Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because the test is geared towards white people and their experiences. YOu do realize that being even the poorest white is a different experience than being black in this country, right Hector?
...is a racist piece of crap who got debunked decades ago, and can't show his face in polite society.
Who was it created by and who was it created for?How’s the SAT possibly “geared toward white people”?
The SAT is vocab, reading comp, and writing. Math. Words mean what they mean regardless of what your skin color is. You can either understand what you’re reading or you can’t. Your ethnicity has zero to do with that. 2+2 is 4 no matter where your ancestors are from.
And they always pull out that Straw Man argument. Suddenly, noticing that every ad, every poster, every store application brochure, every notice of special sales events, etc., etc., features 12% of the population almost exclusively jumps to “you don’t like seeing black people!”
It honestly IS so tiresome.
Go back, read the article I posted earlier.How’s the SAT possibly “geared toward white people”?
The SAT is vocab, reading comp, and writing. Math. Words mean what they mean regardless of what your skin color is. You can either understand what you’re reading or you can’t. Your ethnicity has zero to do with that. 2+2 is 4 no matter where your ancestors are from.
Basketball was created by a white guy. Black guys don’t seem to have a problem being good at it. Same with football (both versions) Baseball etc. I have no earthly idea who created the SAT originally. The current version I’m sure is produced ny multiple people of likely multiple ethnicities. That said if it were created by all white people or all black people all the words would mean the same as they do now and 2+2 would still equal 4. You’re good at what you put emphasis on. The reason Asian kids (generally speaking) do well in school is because their parents emphasize it. They demand it. The chances of you making a living playing a sport, performing, or being famous are exceedingly small no matter how hard you work. But if you focus and put the work in at academics your chances of being successful are quite high. Asian parents focus their kids on what gives them the highest chance of being successful in life. And it’s working.Who was it created by and who was it created for?
What page is it on? But let me guess the test was made by white people for white people?Go back, read the article I posted earlier.
So now Basketball and Football are compared to the SAT, ok. Carl Brigham created the SAT. Oh that's what it is, so black people just use school as a babysitter. Thxs for clearing that up for me.Basketball was created by a white guy. Black guys don’t seem to have a problem being good at it. Same with football (both versions) Baseball etc. I have no earthly idea who created the SAT originally. The current version I’m sure is produced ny multiple people of likely multiple ethnicities. That said if it were created by all white people or all black people all the words would mean the same as they do now and 2+2 would still equal 4. You’re good at what you put emphasis on. The reason Asian kids (generally speaking) do well in school is because their parents emphasize it. They demand it. The chances of you making a living playing a sport, performing, or being famous are exceedingly small no matter how hard you work. But if you focus and put the work in at academics your chances of being successful are quite high. Asian parents focus their kids on what gives them the highest chance of being successful in life. And it’s working.
Charles Murray has been condemned by intolerant leftists who pretend to be opposed to book banning in libraries. How has he been debunked? His assertions can easily be documented.Because the test is geared towards white people and their experiences. YOu do realize that being even the poorest white is a different experience than being black in this country, right Hector?
...is a racist piece of crap who got debunked decades ago, and can't show his face in polite society.
You opened the door to that with your own comments about myself and others here…don’t go full Pollyanna now.1) Stop your nasty shit about my “not wanting to encounter black people.” That‘s the lying approach the leftists take when a decent, fair-minded person objects to racist admissions policies. In an attempt to smear them personally, call them racist. How ironic.
No that is not what I meant. With each retelling one guys fish gets bigger and bigger and the other guy’s fish shrinks. In this case your ancestor grew increasingly impoverished and went from being raised in a tenament to living on the 4th floor and sharing a bathroom with a bunch of others. I’m not saying you made it up, I have no idea. It’s just how you presented it in each succeeding response.2) What do you mean by my grandfather “fish story”? That’s another nasty leftist tactic - when someone brings up examples that refute the leftist narrative, call the person a liar and say they made up the story.
3) And I get it - you support diversity over ability and competence. So do many leftists. That’s why we have an idiot ad a Press Secretary and another idiot as a Vice President. Valuing “diversity” over competence is the way to bring about a big decline in America, as we’ve seen.
Or…you just don’t like them. Think about it…who on earth keeps tabs on whether one particular minority is over represented in advertising?4) And the reason I focus on blacks is because that’s where the racism is most pronounced (in their favor).
Oh drop the goody-two-shoes act. If you fling mud, don’t get your knickers in a knot if some of it sticks to you.Now try to set a good example as a moderator and stop calling your enemy a liar and a racist simply because she objects to race-based decisions. I am all for blacks getting into Harvard (or anywhere) as long as they qualify under the regular standards, and not have fake workarounds to get them in over better-qualified whites and Asians.
Miss the point more.So now Basketball and Football are compared to the SAT, ok. Carl Brigham created the SAT. Oh that's what it is, so black people just use school as a babysitter. Thxs for clearing that up for me.
Yet, when it is demonstrated to be untrue (and it has been) by providing examples of a variety of ads from Disney, or Coke, or Target…and you keep at it, it is only natural to wonder if you don’t like seeing Black people? That is a reasonable assumption.And they always pull out that Straw Man argument. Suddenly, noticing that every ad, every poster, every store application brochure, every notice of special sales events, etc., etc., features 12% of the population almost exclusively jumps to “you don’t like seeing black people!”
It honestly IS so tiresome.
Just another disgusting Strawman - making nasty accusations that take what I’ve said and try to twist it into something I’ve never said - all to get me to defend myself against a false claim. It is SUCH a nasty shit way that leftists try to win a debate.Yet, when it is demonstrated to be untrue (and it has been) by providing examples of a variety of ads from Disney, or Coke, or Target…and you keep at it, it is only natural to wonder if you don’t like seeing Black people? That is a reasonable assumption.
So I take it it you don’t notice Asians are overrepresented in ads as well?Just another disgusting Strawman - making nasty accusations that take what I’ve said and try to twist it into something I’ve never said - all to get me to defend myself against a false claim. It is SUCH a nasty shit way that leftists try to win a debate.
For the 10th time, pointing out the racism that is on display when 20 posters in a row are of 12% of the population, and NONE of whites, then advertisers are bending over backwards to hire black models and reject white models. I am opposed to racism.
I dont want to see them more thsn 12% of the timeWhat is overrepresented? Should you see a black person every 15 commercials? Explain.
I dont think Asians are overrepresentedSo I take it it you don’t notice Asians are overrepresented in ads as well?
Trump was speak without a scriptQuicker mind? That doesn't make any sense.
You opened the door to that with your own comments about myself and others here…don’t go full Pollyanna now.
So I’m adding additional details. And living in a tenement on the 4th floor and sharing a bathroom is where impoverished immigrants lived in the early part of the 20th century.No that is not what I meant. With each retelling one guys fish gets bigger and bigger and the other guy’s fish shrinks. In this case your ancestor grew increasingly impoverished and went from being raised in a tenament to living on the 4th floor and sharing a bathroom with a bunch of others. I’m not saying you made it up, I have no idea. It’s just how you presented it in each succeeding response.
No, you can - in about 12% of the cases. But in the remaining 88% of the cases, the most competent will NOT be black - and by prioritizing “diversity” over competence, you don’t get the best in most cases. A big reason why we have so many idiots in the government.Nah…you don’t get it. You assume you cannot have both diversity and competence.
Or…you just don’t like them. Think about it…who on earth keeps tabs on whether one particular minority is over represented in advertising?
Everyone here knows what a nasty person you are.Oh drop the goody-two-shoes act. If you fling mud, don’t get your knickers in a knot if some of it sticks to you.
No, they’re really not.So I take it it you don’t notice Asians are overrepresented in ads as well?
It doesn’t trigger you.I dont think Asians are overrepresented
Well when you are not talking about nothing do you need a script.Trump was speak without a script
Bush, obama snd biden cant
