- Moderator
- #1,021
Expectations are in matriculation, not admissions.The soft bigotry of low expectations.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Expectations are in matriculation, not admissions.The soft bigotry of low expectations.
We should be able to call out the obvious in this zone.But you didn’t problem with the lowered standards for Whites. You didn’t even object to Native Americans and Hispanics until it was pointed out.
Do I object? As long as they do not lower their minimum requirement for admissions for a group, I don’t care.
I don’t mind it if they trying to attract different demographics to their school whether it is racial, ethnic, gender, economic, first generation, or White people states that don’t typically send student’s to Harvard.
If they flat refused to admit anyone in a specific group (or did so so rarely it was a token) I would have a problem.
Whatever. I’m also ok with lower standards for first Gen students too (and that is done).
Ha!I doubt that. The human mind is creative with or without capitalism.
And the leftists supporting this have quietly changed the goal posts. For months, they have insisted that standards are not being lowered for blacks, and here we have the proof in Harvard’s recruitment effort. They are sending out letters to blacks with combined SAT scores of 1100! That’s quite mid-range, and whites with that score would never even be considered.
We already know how low Harvard has fallen: They gave a teaching post to Lori Lightfoot.
Says who? You keep moving the goal posts.Expectations are in matriculation, not admissions.
OK, since you’re playing semantics, would you agree that we have lower standards for blacks compared to whites? Blacks get a recruitment letter with a very average 1100 SAT, and whites need a 1300.Lowering the standards means lowering below the stated minimum for what is accepted. I’ve consistently said that. No changing goalposts.
Why the lower standards for admissions? That’s an example of the soft bigotry of low expectations.Expectations are in matriculation, not admissions.
Why the lower standards for admissions? That’s an example of the soft bigotry of low expectations.
No, low expectations is having lower standards for blacks than whites. Why shouldn’t blacks and whites have to meet the same minimum standards?How?
Low expectations would be graduating someone who didn’t meet the requirements.
And Whites get a lower standard than Asians.OK, since you’re playing semantics, would you agree that we have lower standards for blacks compared to whites? Blacks get a recruitment letter with a very average 1100 SAT, and whites need a 1300.
They do at graduation.No, low expectations is having lower standards for blacks than whites. Why shouldn’t blacks and whites have to meet the same minimum standards?
So you agree that standards are lower for whites than Asians, but do not agree that standards are lower for blacks compared to BOTH whites and Asians?And Whites get a lower standard than Asians.
I would agree the standard is lowered in that part of the admission process.
Why shouldn’t they at admissions? By having lower admissions standards for blacks, a better-qualified Asian or white student is robbed of the opportunity.They do at graduation.
I just said the standards are lower for all but the Asians.So you agree that standards are lower for whites than Asians, but do not agree that standards are lower for blacks compared to BOTH whites and Asians?
what about Natalie Wood....she is def worth rememberingHa!
The Soviet Union could not keep up with America
Other than the Rubic Cube and the AK47 they left nothing behind worth remembering
the poor asian woman probably had no street cred, never robbed anybody or killed anyoneExpectations are in matriculation, not admissions.
Now numbers mean nothing, when they don't fit your madness. My numbers came from the DOJ/FBI.Again - you are dense - absolute numbers mean nothing given the difference in population. Jews are almost three times as likely as blacks to be victims of hate crimes.
To,degrees…..the lowest for blacks, then higher for whites, and slightly higher beyond that for Asians.I just said the standards are lower for all but the Asians.
Graduation rates are the proof that the admissions criteria used accepted qualified students. Why should they be robbed of the opportunity? And why should everyone be robbed of the opportunity to benefit from a diverse campus? Again, going to these elite universities is not a RIGHT and test scores are not the only metric. Universities have their own stated missions and their criteria is usually in line with fulfilling it.Why shouldn’t they at admissions? By having lower admissions standards for blacks, a better-qualified Asian or white student is robbed of the opportunity.
Per capita. Look it up.Now numbers mean nothing, when they don't fit your madness. My numbers came from the DOJ/FBI.