Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why should the BEST students be robbed of the best opportunities? You think the bright Asian kid who was rejected is thankful that kicking him out makes for a more “diverse” campus?Graduation rates are the proof that the admissions criteria used accepted qualified students. Why should they be robbed of the opportunity? And why should everyone be robbed of the opportunity to benefit from a diverse campus? Again, going to these elite universities is not a RIGHT and test scores are not the only metric. Universities have their own stated missions and their criteria is usually in line with fulfilling it.
Why if that is only part of the criteria and part of the mission is to bring in a diverse group of students?To,degrees…..the lowest for blacks, then higher for whites, and slightly higher beyond that for Asians.
There should be just ONE standard.
Liberals just refuse to acknowledge that they hold lesser standards for people of a particular race.How?
Low expectations would be graduating someone who didn’t meet the requirements.
it happens in matriculation too.Expectations are in matriculation, not admissions.
You’re getting worse.Why if that is only part of the criteria and part of the mission is to bring in a diverse group of students?
I notice you keep trying to omit or minimize the fact that Whites also get a lowered standard
Why should racial diversity be the mission of academia.Why if that is only part of the criteria and part of the mission is to bring in a diverse group of students?
I notice you keep trying to omit or minimize the fact that Whites also get a lowered standard
That happens too.How?
Low expectations would be graduating someone who didn’t meet the requirements.
Because I showed the real numbers.Per capita. Look it up.
Why are you ignoring the earlier chart that shows how much more likely Jews are to be victimized by hate crimes than blacks? Doesn’t fit your madness?
Best according to who? They aren’t robbed of anything because they aren’t ENTITLED to anything.Why should the BEST students be robbed of the best opportunities? You think the bright Asian kid who was rejected is thankful that kicking him out makes for a more “diverse” campus?
This pursuit of “diversity” instead of excellence will be the downfall of this country.
Blacks admitted under the black standards, as opposed to the blacks who were good enough to get in under the white standards, need a lot of tutoring to keep up with their classmates.Liberals just refuse to acknowledge that they hold lesser standards for people of a particular race.
it happens in matriculation too.
And that is where it shouldn’t. That is lowering the standards.That happens too.
that is nothing compared to black on black crime which is rampantBecause I showed the real numbers.
Anti-Black or African American hate crimes continue to be the largest bias incident victim category, with 2,871 incidents in 2020, a 49% increase since 2019.
Meaningless without considering the difference in population sizes.Because I showed the real numbers.
Anti-Black or African American hate crimes continue to be the largest bias incident victim category, with 2,871 incidents in 2020, a 49% increase since 2019.
and every democrat should get a free education...duhGraduation rates are the proof that the admissions criteria used accepted qualified students. Why should they be robbed of the opportunity? And why should everyone be robbed of the opportunity to benefit from a diverse campus? Again, going to these elite universities is not a RIGHT and test scores are not the only metric. Universities have their own stated missions and their criteria is usually in line with fulfilling it.
If you prioritize diversity over excellence, you aren’t getting the most excellent possible. Look at our Press Secretary. Look at our Vice President. Those are two examples of what happens when diversity trumps competence.Best according to who? They aren’t robbed of anything because they aren’t ENTITLED to anything.
EXCELLENCE is proven through graduation, and, as I pointed out earlier, but you ignored, you can have both excellence and diversity and diversity has been proven to offer benefits both in school and the workplace. Colleges recognize this and make it part of their mission.
Typically they are also first gen, and while they often need extra help at the first year, they catch up. How is this bad?Blacks admitted under the black standards, as opposed to the blacks who were good enough to get in under the white standards, need a lot of tutoring to keep up with their classmates.
Ah…now who is moving the goal posts?The last thing liberals want is a high drop-out rate for the students they let in with lower standards, so they push them through.
What's the Jewish population in America?Meaningless without considering the difference in population sizes.
How is that moving the goalposts? I am pointing out the challenges were you admit groups of people under lower standards.Typically they are also first gen, and while they often need extra help at the first year, they catch up. How is this bad?
Ah…now who is moving the goal posts?
AGAIN you can have BOTH. And we have plenty of incompetence without diversity, such as our last president.If you prioritize diversity over excellence, you aren’t getting the most excellent possible. Look at our Press Secretary. Look at our Vice President. Those are two examples of what happens when diversity trumps competence.
The Gateway Pundit...
He was a great president. And you’re one to talk - the idiot you voted for can’t complete a sentence or find his way off the stage.AGAIN you can have BOTH. And we have plenty of incompetence without diversity, such as our last president.
