I agree.Um, [ King Leopold] should have been put on trial for crimes against humanity like the Nazis were.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree.Um, [ King Leopold] should have been put on trial for crimes against humanity like the Nazis were.
Whites who are denied university admissions because of what happened in the past are not responsible for what happened in the past. Their denial does not seem reasonable to me.Sounds reasonable to me. Makes up for the generations of black kids who weren't accepted.
True. This isn’t about revenge. It should be about eliminating racist admissions policies - not instituting them in reverse.Whites who are denied university admissions because of what happened in the past are not responsible for what happened in the past. Their denial does not seem reasonable to me.
In fact, I’d suggest that ALL high-achieving white and Asian kids with a perfect or near-perfect GPA and SAT score who were rejected from Ivy League universities reapplyl
No, I am talking about the students who just graduated THIS month and will begin their college career in a few months. They should consider reapplying to the top schools from which they were rejected, where blacks with lower metrics got in, for the 2024-2025 academic year, and spend a gap year doing other pursuits.Chances are they have moved on and are doing just fine in other schools. Let's face it, once you are out of college nobody really gives a fuck where you went or what your GPA was.
That would be correct if that were the only metric they used.Absolutely. When you hire people, you make a best guess at their competence based on their CV. But with diversity, you are likely to get more incompetence since you are now hiring people not on their qualifications, recommendations and accomplishments, but instead based on ethnic, gender, and racial standards that have NOTHING to do with competence.
It sounds like revenge. You hate the thought that a Black person (not Latinos, Native Americans or White women) get a spot you feel certain people are entitled to based only ONE metric.True. This isn’t about revenge. It should be about eliminating racist admissions policies - not instituting them in reverse.
There is no guarentee they will get accepted over someone with lower scores who excels in other areas unless are proposing a law forcing higher Ed to make to accept applicants only on ranked test scores/gpa. That would be a mess.I say that once the SCOTUS issues its ruling that universities cannot take race into account when deciding whom to admit, the Asian kid should reapply.
In fact, I’d suggest that ALL high-achieving white and Asian kids with a perfect or near-perfect GPA and SAT score who were rejected from Ivy League universities reapplyl
That is part of the issue. People, like Lisa, think Harvard is accepting C students who struggled to graduate highschool. These are all going to be high achievers.As are the academic achievements of most everyone applying at Harvard
I’ve never heard of that.They do because the FED MAKES THEM. If they don't meet the Fed's quotas for DEI, they would lose federal funding.
"Too bad, we all filled up of Asians for now! Check back with us in a few years! Right now we need mo Black folks."
Its the only metric that we can see for ourselvesIt sounds like revenge. You hate the thought that a Black person (not Latinos, Native Americans or White women) get a spot you feel certain people are entitled to based only ONE metric.
Its the system used in oriental countries where there are very few black peopleThere is no guarentee they will get accepted over someone with lower scores who excels in other areas unless are proposing a law forcing higher Ed to make to accept applicants only on ranked test scores/gpa. That would be a mess.
I don’t agree. As long as the standards for graduation are not lowered (which would devalue the degree) they be able to have flexibility in who and how they admit if diversity is their goal.It shouldn’t happen anywhere. Lowering standards for admissions is no different. Affirmative action is simply Jim Crow camouflaged in modern liberalism.
Actually there is bias in those tests in terms of access to resources to help a student pass them, bright students from poor districts are going to be disadvantaged. Test scores alone are no guarantee that tbe student is “the best” or a good fit and GPA is a better indicator of success than test scores. Schools are doing away with requiring test scores at all.Its the only metric that we can see for ourselves
admitting students with the highest scores on a test that every student takes are free of racial bias toward any group
And, interestingly, students from those countries struggle with problems requiring innovation and creativity to solve.Its the system used in oriental countries where there are very few black people
Students with low test scores can still go to college but not to an Ivy League schoolActually there is bias in those tests in terms of access to resources to help a student pass them, bright students from poor districts are going to be disadvantaged.
The chinese struggle because they are products of communismAnd, interestingly, students from those countries struggle with problems requiring innovation and creativity to solve.
No, I hate the fact that there are different standards for different races, and that it’s deemed that blacks with lower GPAs and SAT scores - the best indicators of successful completion of freshman year - are entitled to spots that better-qualified students are denied simply because of their race.It sounds like revenge. You hate the thought that a Black person (not Latinos, Native Americans or White women) get a spot you feel certain people are entitled to based only ONE metric.
Students with low test scores can still go to college but not to and Ivy League school
Or MIT which should be reserved for only the best
Or, why not trade school?
Does everyone deserve a white collar job if they are not qualified for collage?
SAT scores are shown to have economic bias and are less of an indicator of success than GPA. If one of the school’s missions is diversity then they able to accept the student’s needed to fulfill that.No, I hate the fact that there are different standards for different races, and that it’s deemed that blacks with lower GPAs and SAT scores - the best indicators of successful completion of freshman year - are entitled to spots that better-qualified students are denied simply because of their race.