Assassination Politics and the Abrupt Advent of Kamala Harris, a Query

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2016
16,687
29,665

Assassination Politics and the Abrupt Advent of Kamala Harris, a Query

3 Aug 2024 ~~ By Victoria White Berger

Despite an ongoing range of congressional and independent efforts to get the truth out of the Secret Service and their “intelligence” confreres, we still don’t know what happened in Butler, PA, lacking conclusive, factual information behind the assassination attempt of former President Trump; nor do we know the extent of actors. Will we ever? Doubtful.
There are longstanding instances of reluctance to reveal true intelligence when it comes to assassinations or attempted assassinations. To this day, there remain many arguments surrounding Jack Kennedy’s killing. Records have still not been released to the public.
At present, the entire intelligence apparatus is mum on July 13, 2024—both Kimberly Cheatle (disgraced and forced to resign) and the present acting director were ambiguous with congressional investigators. FBI director Christopher Wray went so far as to desperately imply—which the bureau hastily retracted—that Trump wasn’t really even hit by a bullet
~Snip~
The progressive Democrats have been far and away the most vocal and hateful in their attitudes—despite what the MSM wants us to believe. They are already at it again, having (sort of) restrained themselves for a few days post-shooting (shamefully for our country, the same couldn’t be said of internet users).
None of this explains the specifics—the timing, the sheer oddity of the Secret Service’s engagement, and Joe Biden’s initial terrible, ridiculous and still ongoing reluctance to call a spade and spade and utter the word “assassination.” Kamala, tellingly, has tried to stay away from this discussion.
It seems unlikely that the 20-year-old suspect—as “they” tell us—was acting alone. Was he groomed, recruited, and encouraged by others? These “others” may be part of the “they.”
~Snip~
Is any of this legal? We’re not clear on that, either. Why Kamala, why now?
“They” have tried everything—lawsuits, ballot removals, FBI raids—to rid themselves of Trump and none of it has been adequate, and was in fact reaching critical failure at the same time that Biden’s dementia was exposed to the masses during the debate; that exposure led to many in Biden’s electoral donor base threatening, or even stepping up, to withdraw funds. It was a house of cards from the start—Biden’s senility from the Oval Office —and that house was coming down rapidly.
~snip~
July 13 may have been, as characteristic of the work of the Biden/Harris regime, a bungled, inexpert attempt at a political change-a-roo, but here’s the bottom line: a failed assassination attempt is not a good political look during a presidential race for the presidency of America. This is a huge national security risk for all of us, from start to (wherever we) finish.



Commentary:
If according to Cheatle and her successor Rowe claim that there were no discrepancies in the way they protected Donald Trump? Why was Crooks able to get so close to Trump.
If the assassination had succeeded, would we be repeating the cover-ups like the JFK, RFK and MLK?
we are starting to put 2 + 2 together and getting the right answer. I've been mulling all of this over for a while now and the only answer that makes any sense is that this was a planned assassination by the opposition party using their own government departments to make it happen. Crooks being the hapless assassin who was instantly taken out. No testimony from him just like Oswald. The FBI/SS can insist all they want that they had no idea there was a man with a gun on a nearby roof but they had witnesses at that rally screaming about it all over the place.
So, we now know that communication between law enforcement and SS, the offer of drone refused, nearby roof in line of fire unprotected, no coordination between LE and SS, DJT allowed out on the stage with a suspicious person somewhere on the grounds, reduced protection for DJT, and on and on it goes. Adds up to only one thing. That was Plan A. When that failed, Plan B was implemented which was to take out Biden but not in the same way. Too obvious. And that's how we have ended up with Kamala. She has been enabled to take over the nomination, the money, the delegates all in the span of 7-10 days. Does that not sound like a plan to you? It sure does to me.
 

Assassination Politics and the Abrupt Advent of Kamala Harris, a Query

3 Aug 2024 ~~ By Victoria White Berger

Despite an ongoing range of congressional and independent efforts to get the truth out of the Secret Service and their “intelligence” confreres, we still don’t know what happened in Butler, PA, lacking conclusive, factual information behind the assassination attempt of former President Trump; nor do we know the extent of actors. Will we ever? Doubtful.
There are longstanding instances of reluctance to reveal true intelligence when it comes to assassinations or attempted assassinations. To this day, there remain many arguments surrounding Jack Kennedy’s killing. Records have still not been released to the public.
At present, the entire intelligence apparatus is mum on July 13, 2024—both Kimberly Cheatle (disgraced and forced to resign) and the present acting director were ambiguous with congressional investigators. FBI director Christopher Wray went so far as to desperately imply—which the bureau hastily retracted—that Trump wasn’t really even hit by a bullet
~Snip~
The progressive Democrats have been far and away the most vocal and hateful in their attitudes—despite what the MSM wants us to believe. They are already at it again, having (sort of) restrained themselves for a few days post-shooting (shamefully for our country, the same couldn’t be said of internet users).
None of this explains the specifics—the timing, the sheer oddity of the Secret Service’s engagement, and Joe Biden’s initial terrible, ridiculous and still ongoing reluctance to call a spade and spade and utter the word “assassination.” Kamala, tellingly, has tried to stay away from this discussion.
It seems unlikely that the 20-year-old suspect—as “they” tell us—was acting alone. Was he groomed, recruited, and encouraged by others? These “others” may be part of the “they.”
~Snip~
Is any of this legal? We’re not clear on that, either. Why Kamala, why now?
“They” have tried everything—lawsuits, ballot removals, FBI raids—to rid themselves of Trump and none of it has been adequate, and was in fact reaching critical failure at the same time that Biden’s dementia was exposed to the masses during the debate; that exposure led to many in Biden’s electoral donor base threatening, or even stepping up, to withdraw funds. It was a house of cards from the start—Biden’s senility from the Oval Office —and that house was coming down rapidly.
~snip~
July 13 may have been, as characteristic of the work of the Biden/Harris regime, a bungled, inexpert attempt at a political change-a-roo, but here’s the bottom line: a failed assassination attempt is not a good political look during a presidential race for the presidency of America. This is a huge national security risk for all of us, from start to (wherever we) finish.



Commentary:
If according to Cheatle and her successor Rowe claim that there were no discrepancies in the way they protected Donald Trump? Why was Crooks able to get so close to Trump.
If the assassination had succeeded, would we be repeating the cover-ups like the JFK, RFK and MLK?
we are starting to put 2 + 2 together and getting the right answer. I've been mulling all of this over for a while now and the only answer that makes any sense is that this was a planned assassination by the opposition party using their own government departments to make it happen. Crooks being the hapless assassin who was instantly taken out. No testimony from him just like Oswald. The FBI/SS can insist all they want that they had no idea there was a man with a gun on a nearby roof but they had witnesses at that rally screaming about it all over the place.
So, we now know that communication between law enforcement and SS, the offer of drone refused, nearby roof in line of fire unprotected, no coordination between LE and SS, DJT allowed out on the stage with a suspicious person somewhere on the grounds, reduced protection for DJT, and on and on it goes. Adds up to only one thing. That was Plan A. When that failed, Plan B was implemented which was to take out Biden but not in the same way. Too obvious. And that's how we have ended up with Kamala. She has been enabled to take over the nomination, the money, the delegates all in the span of 7-10 days. Does that not sound like a plan to you? It sure does to me.
Please. Pull your head out of your ass for the love of God. :auiqs.jpg:

Trump's shooting was fostered by an environment he helped create. He has really no one to blame but himself.
If you're going take your chief rival out, you don't send a 20 year old incel that can't shoot straight to do the job. :)
So please, stop with the grand conspiracies. They make you sound like a loon.

This looks like a massive f-up in security mainly with the Secret Service but with a huge call out of local law enforcement..cause it looks like they screwed up too.
That's the problem when you think the other guy has checked everywhere...it's an assumption. And you know what those are.
 
That was Plan A. When that failed, Plan B was implemented which was to take out Biden but not in the same way. Too obvious. And that's how we have ended up with Kamala. She has been enabled to take over the nomination, the money, the delegates all in the span of 7-10 days. Does that not sound like a plan to you? It sure does to me.
America's sitzkrieg civil war against itself began with the coup attempt of Jan. 6th. It's not surprising if government agencies are attempting to assassinate Trump, if that's indeed what has happened. And it wouldn't be surprising if one of Trump pseudo-military gangs attempt an assassination on Trump's behalf.

And now, the biggest fear for both sides is the suspicions that the SS agents and police can't be trusted by either side.

Is this a new twist on history that demonstrates how a democracy can self destruct?

Lives of the other side's politicians are cheap in America now. It may take one of them being gunned down on camera, to stop the rush to insane blood lust.
 
Last edited:
Please. Pull your head out of your ass for the love of God. :auiqs.jpg:

Trump's shooting was fostered by an environment he helped create. He has really no one to blame but himself.
If you're going take your chief rival out, you don't send a 20 year old incel that can't shoot straight to do the job. :)
So please, stop with the grand conspiracies. They make you sound like a loon.

This looks like a massive f-up in security mainly with the Secret Service but with a huge call out of local law enforcement..cause it looks like they screwed up too.
That's the problem when you think the other guy has checked everywhere...it's an assumption. And you know what those are.
Aren't the moonbats adorable when they actually gaslight themselves? :lmao:
 

Assassination Politics and the Abrupt Advent of Kamala Harris, a Query

3 Aug 2024 ~~ By Victoria White Berger

Despite an ongoing range of congressional and independent efforts to get the truth out of the Secret Service and their “intelligence” confreres, we still don’t know what happened in Butler, PA, lacking conclusive, factual information behind the assassination attempt of former President Trump; nor do we know the extent of actors. Will we ever? Doubtful.
There are longstanding instances of reluctance to reveal true intelligence when it comes to assassinations or attempted assassinations. To this day, there remain many arguments surrounding Jack Kennedy’s killing. Records have still not been released to the public.
At present, the entire intelligence apparatus is mum on July 13, 2024—both Kimberly Cheatle (disgraced and forced to resign) and the present acting director were ambiguous with congressional investigators. FBI director Christopher Wray went so far as to desperately imply—which the bureau hastily retracted—that Trump wasn’t really even hit by a bullet
~Snip~
The progressive Democrats have been far and away the most vocal and hateful in their attitudes—despite what the MSM wants us to believe. They are already at it again, having (sort of) restrained themselves for a few days post-shooting (shamefully for our country, the same couldn’t be said of internet users).
None of this explains the specifics—the timing, the sheer oddity of the Secret Service’s engagement, and Joe Biden’s initial terrible, ridiculous and still ongoing reluctance to call a spade and spade and utter the word “assassination.” Kamala, tellingly, has tried to stay away from this discussion.
It seems unlikely that the 20-year-old suspect—as “they” tell us—was acting alone. Was he groomed, recruited, and encouraged by others? These “others” may be part of the “they.”
~Snip~
Is any of this legal? We’re not clear on that, either. Why Kamala, why now?
“They” have tried everything—lawsuits, ballot removals, FBI raids—to rid themselves of Trump and none of it has been adequate, and was in fact reaching critical failure at the same time that Biden’s dementia was exposed to the masses during the debate; that exposure led to many in Biden’s electoral donor base threatening, or even stepping up, to withdraw funds. It was a house of cards from the start—Biden’s senility from the Oval Office —and that house was coming down rapidly.
~snip~
July 13 may have been, as characteristic of the work of the Biden/Harris regime, a bungled, inexpert attempt at a political change-a-roo, but here’s the bottom line: a failed assassination attempt is not a good political look during a presidential race for the presidency of America. This is a huge national security risk for all of us, from start to (wherever we) finish.



Commentary:
If according to Cheatle and her successor Rowe claim that there were no discrepancies in the way they protected Donald Trump? Why was Crooks able to get so close to Trump.
If the assassination had succeeded, would we be repeating the cover-ups like the JFK, RFK and MLK?
we are starting to put 2 + 2 together and getting the right answer. I've been mulling all of this over for a while now and the only answer that makes any sense is that this was a planned assassination by the opposition party using their own government departments to make it happen. Crooks being the hapless assassin who was instantly taken out. No testimony from him just like Oswald. The FBI/SS can insist all they want that they had no idea there was a man with a gun on a nearby roof but they had witnesses at that rally screaming about it all over the place.
So, we now know that communication between law enforcement and SS, the offer of drone refused, nearby roof in line of fire unprotected, no coordination between LE and SS, DJT allowed out on the stage with a suspicious person somewhere on the grounds, reduced protection for DJT, and on and on it goes. Adds up to only one thing. That was Plan A. When that failed, Plan B was implemented which was to take out Biden but not in the same way. Too obvious. And that's how we have ended up with Kamala. She has been enabled to take over the nomination, the money, the delegates all in the span of 7-10 days. Does that not sound like a plan to you? It sure does to me.
The tRump campaign set it up. They wanted the publicity.
 
Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, the third time is enemy action. As the list is increased with the little information we are getting it is impossible for a rational person to dismiss malfeasance. 1) obvious rooftop left wide open 2) no recordings (or coordination) of communications, 3) Drones were refused 4) Shooter was able to shoot eight times while being aimed at by counter snipers) 5) The manned window overlooking the roof was left vacant after a known threat. 6) The shooter was found with a range finder and let go. 7) Info regarding shooters foreign bank accounts still not known 8) Cell phone data shows that a cell phone that was at shooters home and workplace was also three blocks from the FBI building in DC. 9) encrypted messages from the 20 year kids phone have not been deciphered by the FBI. 10) The kid used a shooting range that also was used by the FBI. etc. etc. etc. In short ..to dismiss "enemy action" in this shooting is simply retarded.
 
Once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, the third time is enemy action. As the list is increased with the little information we are getting it is impossible for a rational person to dismiss malfeasance. 1) obvious rooftop left wide open 2) no recordings (or coordination) of communications, 3) Drones were refused 4) Shooter was able to shoot eight times while being aimed at by counter snipers) 5) The manned window overlooking the roof was left vacant after a known threat. 6) The shooter was found with a range finder and let go. 7) Info regarding shooters foreign bank accounts still not known 8) Cell phone data shows that a cell phone that was at shooters home and workplace was also three blocks from the FBI building in DC. 9) encrypted messages from the 20 year kids phone have not been deciphered by the FBI. 10) The kid used a shooting range that also was used by the FBI. etc. etc. etc. In short ..to dismiss "enemy action" in this shooting is simply retarded.
America's SS aren't even trying to deny with any energy their involvement in the attempt to eliminate Trump.
There's no reason for them to fear any blowback against them, at least until Trump is crowned the Duck King.
 
I ponder the thought of Trump having his brains blown out. With all of this cover up, slanty roof, locals at fault kind of narrative, just imagine the message that would be sent out if the sniper had hit Trumps skull. " YOU wanna go against the deep state NOW?" Who would have the courage to step up and carry the MAGA torch??? Nobody in their right mind.
 
I ponder the thought of Trump having his brains blown out. With all of this cover up, slanty roof, locals at fault kind of narrative, just imagine the message that would be sent out if the sniper had hit Trumps skull. " YOU wanna go against the deep state NOW? Who would have the courage to step up and carry the MAGA torch??? Nobody in their right mind.

Jesus dude.

Yeah.

But, fuck.
 
So a question that has been running through my mind....
If Trump had been assassinated that day, would Biden have still dropped out of the race?
 
So a question that has been running through my mind....
If Trump had been assassinated that day, would Biden have still dropped out of the race?

Not...a....chance.

Trump's survival was the condition that ensured Biden's abdication.
 
Much like a "color revolution", where an election is stolen (been done for 500 years) it is imperative to make it obvious that the election was indeed stolen. If this assassination attempt was successful, and all the obvious "mistakes" were revealed, it would have vastly more power than simply a dumb kid with a rifle. Perhaps "they" wanted to kill Trump..and let everyone know that "they" did it....far more power with that being the narrative.
 
Much like a "color revolution", where an election is stolen (been done for 500 years) it is imperative to make it obvious that the election was indeed stolen. If this assassination attempt was successful, and all the obvious "mistakes" were revealed, it would have vastly more power than simply a dumb kid with a rifle. Perhaps "they" wanted to kill Trump..and let everyone know that "they" did it....far more power with that being the narrative.

Based.
 

Forum List

Back
Top