At 2:45 p.m., or within one minute after shooting Ashli, Lt. Byrd made the following radio call:

[Faun]

It was obvious she was unarmed and yet he shot and killed her.
You leftist cry about unarmed blacks getting killed by the police when in actuality more unarmed white people are killed by the police.

WTF?? How was it obvious she was unarmed??

 

[Lesh]

WTF?? How was it obvious she was unarmed??

She had on a backpack that could very well have held a bomb

Keep in mind they all knew that bombs had been found that day

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Cultist would be you. Biden is fucking the country inside out but leftists said he is doing a wonderful job.

I really am not interested in hearing a grown man whine.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So when a terrorist part of an irate mob assaults a store owner and loots his store, you should have no problem with a police officer shooting the terrorist.

What kind of a fool thinks this is the same thing? Damn we are a country of stupid people.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

They didn't want their city burned down by BLM.

Liar.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I am not doubting that. I am POINTING out that if it you support Ashli Babbit being shot then you should have no problem with looters being shot.

Which might be the dumbest post, not just of this thread, but of this entire topic, ever

 

[LeroyDumonde]

Liar.

How do you think BLM would have reacted if the jury had returned a not guilty verdict?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

How do you think BLM would have reacted if the jury had returned a not guilty verdict?

Irrelevant to your lie.

 

[LeroyDumonde]

Irrelevant to your lie.

You won't answer because we both know that they'd riot and cause billions of dollars of damage and numerous deaths. The jury knew it too.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You won't answer because we both know that they'd riot and cause billions of dollars of damage and numerous deaths. The jury knew it too.

Does not support your lie.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Cultist would be you. Biden is fucking the country inside out but leftists said he is doing a wonderful job.

Give us some examples of how he is doing that.

 

[LeroyDumonde]

Does not support your lie.

BLM's history supports my theory. I know their history, you know their history, and the jury knew their history. They absolutely knew how BLM would react to a not guilty verdict. So rather than siding with the autopsy report and all the video shown during trial, they sided with their rational fear. Chauvin was a sacrifice to pacify BLM.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

BLM's history supports my theory. I know their history, you know their history, and the jury knew their history. They absolutely knew how BLM would react to a not guilty verdict. So rather than siding with the autopsy report and all the video shown during trial, they sided with their rational fear. Chauvin was a sacrifice to pacify BLM.

Give us a link that proves Floyd wasn't murdered by Chauvin, not an opinion piece. Factual evidence.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Which might be the dumbest post, not just of this thread, but of this entire topic, ever

A typical Leftist who thinks their opinion is entitled to be converted to fact. Why don’t you provide some empirical or validated data to back up what lies between your ears??

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

BLM's history supports my theory. I know their history, you know their history, and the jury knew their history. They absolutely knew how BLM would react to a not guilty verdict. So rather than siding with the autopsy report and all the video shown during trial, they sided with their rational fear. Chauvin was a sacrifice to pacify BLM.

It does not support your embarrassing lie that a jury unanimously decided to be corrupt criminals and send an innocent man to prison for the rest of his life.

In any way.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

A typical Leftist who thinks their opinion is entitled to be converted to fact.

You whiny baby, am I supposed to type "IMO" after every post to soothe your little baby feefees? Shut up stupid.

 

[LeftofLeft]

You whiny baby, am I supposed to type "IMO" after every post to soothe your little baby feefees? Shut up stupid.

What is your problem? Can’t think critically?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What is your problem? Can’t think critically?

Wait, aren't you the embarrassing moron that equated the insurrection to looting a Walmart? Holy fuck dude, maybe try Dry January. Or something.

 

[LeftofLeft]

You whiny baby, am I supposed to type "IMO" after every post to soothe your little baby feefees? Shut up stupid.

Let’s challenge your indoctrinated-approved education and see if you have the ability to refute in an articulate manner.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Let’s challenge your indoctrinated-approved education and see if you have the ability to refute in an articulate manner.

Well, since you don't know what the word "refute" means, I would say you are beneath me and not in a position to test my education.

When you make unevidece and unargued claims, "nuh uh" is a perfectly satisfactory and complete refutation.

And when you make idiotic, false eqivalences, general mockery is appropriate.

I am not sure where you get the idea that your embarrassing horseshit deserves something more.