Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.Practically speaking, the universe had a beginning. Unless of course you don't see anymore usable energy in the closed system.
How come skull pilot won't comment on this?Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man.Like godThis is all in your head.No because no one threatened him with hell or promised eternal life if he believes those things.You didn't answer my question.Do you believe in ghosts, vampires, werewolves, and magick? Yes, or no.Why should I? I believe in angels and demons and that demons were angels. I believe I don't want to meet either of them in this world. I believe in guardian angels. I believe that the Holy Spirit whispers in a very soft voice and can soften the hearts of others and carries one bad ass monster of a stick. I believe in intercessory prayers. I believe that the power of confession, forgiveness, thankfulness and dying to self is more powerful than anything you will ever possess and leads to happiness and success.
The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics says otherwise. It's that whole usable energy thingee..Practically speaking, the universe had a beginning. Unless of course you don't see anymore usable energy in the closed system.
You really do need to quit basing your understanding of the universe on outdated models. This is why your conclusions keep falling short. With the Quantum Gravity Loop, there is no beginning, or end to the universe, and this is accomplished without loss of available energy. With no beginning, there is no "Primary Source" - no God necessary.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
Probably because he isn't in this particular thread. Of course, you could always ask him.How come skull pilot won't comment on this?Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man.Like godThis is all in your head.No because no one threatened him with hell or promised eternal life if he believes those things.You didn't answer my question.Do you believe in ghosts, vampires, werewolves, and magick? Yes, or no.
Because he already proved Ding's prejudiced presumptions about atheists to be a lie with one name - Ayn Rand.How come skull pilot won't comment on this?Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man.Like godThis is all in your head.No because no one threatened him with hell or promised eternal life if he believes those things.You didn't answer my question.Do you believe in ghosts, vampires, werewolves, and magick? Yes, or no.
Nope. Quantum mechanics proves this to be inaccurate.The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics says otherwise. It's that whole usable energy thingee..Practically speaking, the universe had a beginning. Unless of course you don't see anymore usable energy in the closed system.
You really do need to quit basing your understanding of the universe on outdated models. This is why your conclusions keep falling short. With the Quantum Gravity Loop, there is no beginning, or end to the universe, and this is accomplished without loss of available energy. With no beginning, there is no "Primary Source" - no God necessary.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
I kind of see it the other way around. But if it please you to see it this way. Go for it, brother.Because he already proved Ding's prejudiced presumptions about atheists to be a lie with one name - Ayn Rand.How come skull pilot won't comment on this?Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man.Like godThis is all in your head.No because no one threatened him with hell or promised eternal life if he believes those things.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
So, Ayn Rand was a socialist?I kind of see it the other way around. But if it please you to see it this way. Go for it, brother.Because he already proved Ding's prejudiced presumptions about atheists to be a lie with one name - Ayn Rand.How come skull pilot won't comment on this?Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man.Like godThis is all in your head.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
I was just having a conversation on this very subject today. No, quantum mechanics does not disprove the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. Would you like to have that discussion with me?Nope. Quantum mechanics proves this to be inaccurate.The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics says otherwise. It's that whole usable energy thingee..Practically speaking, the universe had a beginning. Unless of course you don't see anymore usable energy in the closed system.
You really do need to quit basing your understanding of the universe on outdated models. This is why your conclusions keep falling short. With the Quantum Gravity Loop, there is no beginning, or end to the universe, and this is accomplished without loss of available energy. With no beginning, there is no "Primary Source" - no God necessary.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
No. She was a conservative. You are a socialist. She also wasn't a big fan of Libertarians either. She thought they were discards from the left, anarchists who were amoral. Kind of like you.So, Ayn Rand was a socialist?I kind of see it the other way around. But if it please you to see it this way. Go for it, brother.Because he already proved Ding's prejudiced presumptions about atheists to be a lie with one name - Ayn Rand.How come skull pilot won't comment on this?Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man.Like god
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
You think ayn Rand proves atheism isn't for capitalists too?I kind of see it the other way around. But if it please you to see it this way. Go for it, brother.Because he already proved Ding's prejudiced presumptions about atheists to be a lie with one name - Ayn Rand.How come skull pilot won't comment on this?Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man.Like godThis is all in your head.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
I didn't say that it disproves it. It allows for creation of energy without loss of mass. It functions outside of Einsteinian physics.I was just having a conversation on this very subject today. No, quantum mechanics does not disprove the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. Would you like to have that discussion with me?Nope. Quantum mechanics proves this to be inaccurate.The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics says otherwise. It's that whole usable energy thingee..Practically speaking, the universe had a beginning. Unless of course you don't see anymore usable energy in the closed system.
You really do need to quit basing your understanding of the universe on outdated models. This is why your conclusions keep falling short. With the Quantum Gravity Loop, there is no beginning, or end to the universe, and this is accomplished without loss of available energy. With no beginning, there is no "Primary Source" - no God necessary.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
No. She was a conservative. You are a socialist. She also wasn't a big fan of Libertarians either. She thought they were discards from the left, anarchists who were amoral. Kind of like you.So, Ayn Rand was a socialist?I kind of see it the other way around. But if it please you to see it this way. Go for it, brother.Because he already proved Ding's prejudiced presumptions about atheists to be a lie with one name - Ayn Rand.How come skull pilot won't comment on this?Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
So from what we know our current universe started 14 billion years ago but what was before that? My guess is the universe before ours was contracting after it first expanded for about 25 billion years.Nope. Quantum mechanics proves this to be inaccurate.The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics says otherwise. It's that whole usable energy thingee..Practically speaking, the universe had a beginning. Unless of course you don't see anymore usable energy in the closed system.
You really do need to quit basing your understanding of the universe on outdated models. This is why your conclusions keep falling short. With the Quantum Gravity Loop, there is no beginning, or end to the universe, and this is accomplished without loss of available energy. With no beginning, there is no "Primary Source" - no God necessary.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
No. I don't believe I did say that. I believe you are confused by what I said. Ayn Rand did believe that socialism worships big government and social policy. I said I believe that militant atheists worship big government and social policy and that it is based on atheism and the deification of man. Any Rand believed in objectionsim or some such bullshit, that man's self interest was noble and good or something along those lines. You guys are so desperate to win an argument you will distort anything I write to serve your purpose. I write fucking paragraphs and the best you can do is snip out little pieces to misquote and use as silly fringe arguments while you concede the rest and pretend that you addressed it to comfort your wounded and fragile egos. I have no preference for an outcome. You guys do.You think ayn Rand proves atheism isn't for capitalists too?I kind of see it the other way around. But if it please you to see it this way. Go for it, brother.Because he already proved Ding's prejudiced presumptions about atheists to be a lie with one name - Ayn Rand.How come skull pilot won't comment on this?Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man.Like god
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
You sound like someone who has been brainwashed into thinking atheism is evil.
Ayn Rand and skull will tell you that's ridiculous but you choose to see it the other way around? You choose is the key part of the sentence.
Quantum mechanics indicates you're on the right track.So from what we know our current universe started 14 billion years ago but what was before that? My guess is the universe before ours was contracting after it first expanded for about 25 billion years.Nope. Quantum mechanics proves this to be inaccurate.The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics says otherwise. It's that whole usable energy thingee..Practically speaking, the universe had a beginning. Unless of course you don't see anymore usable energy in the closed system.
You really do need to quit basing your understanding of the universe on outdated models. This is why your conclusions keep falling short. With the Quantum Gravity Loop, there is no beginning, or end to the universe, and this is accomplished without loss of available energy. With no beginning, there is no "Primary Source" - no God necessary.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
The point is we don't know for sure and I'm open to all scientific theories.
The good thing about not believing a scientific theory is you won't burn in hell for eternity if you are wrong.
That's what I said and as a person who claims to absolutely know right from wrong he won't admit lying or that he was wrong.No. She was a conservative. You are a socialist. She also wasn't a big fan of Libertarians either. She thought they were discards from the left, anarchists who were amoral. Kind of like you.So, Ayn Rand was a socialist?I kind of see it the other way around. But if it please you to see it this way. Go for it, brother.Because he already proved Ding's prejudiced presumptions about atheists to be a lie with one name - Ayn Rand.How come skull pilot won't comment on this?
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
Your comment wasn't directed at liberals, it was directed at atheists. However, since Ayn Rand was, herself, an atheist, your observation is inaccurate, at best, a lie, at worst.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
No. I don't believe I did say that. I believe you are confused by what I said. Ayn Rand did believe that socialism worships big government and social policy. I said I believe that militant atheists worship big government and social policy and that it is based on atheism and the deification of man. Any Rand believed in objectionsim or some such bullshit, that man's self interest was noble and good or something along those lines. You guys are so desperate to win an argument you will distort anything I write to serve your purpose. I write fucking paragraphs and the best you can do is snip out little pieces to misquote and use as silly fringe arguments while you concede the rest and pretend that you addressed it to comfort your wounded and fragile egos. I have no preference for an outcome. You guys do.You think ayn Rand proves atheism isn't for capitalists too?I kind of see it the other way around. But if it please you to see it this way. Go for it, brother.Because he already proved Ding's prejudiced presumptions about atheists to be a lie with one name - Ayn Rand.How come skull pilot won't comment on this?Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
You sound like someone who has been brainwashed into thinking atheism is evil.
Ayn Rand and skull will tell you that's ridiculous but you choose to see it the other way around? You choose is the key part of the sentence.
Sometimes less is more.No. I don't believe I did say that. I believe you are confused by what I said. Ayn Rand did believe that socialism worships big government and social policy. I said I believe that militant atheists worship big government and social policy and that it is based on atheism and the deification of man. Any Rand believed in objectionsim or some such bullshit, that man's self interest was noble and good or something along those lines. You guys are so desperate to win an argument you will distort anything I write to serve your purpose. I write fucking paragraphs and the best you can do is snip out little pieces to misquote and use as silly fringe arguments while you concede the rest and pretend that you addressed it to comfort your wounded and fragile egos. I have no preference for an outcome. You guys do.You think ayn Rand proves atheism isn't for capitalists too?I kind of see it the other way around. But if it please you to see it this way. Go for it, brother.Because he already proved Ding's prejudiced presumptions about atheists to be a lie with one name - Ayn Rand.How come skull pilot won't comment on this?Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
You sound like someone who has been brainwashed into thinking atheism is evil.
Ayn Rand and skull will tell you that's ridiculous but you choose to see it the other way around? You choose is the key part of the sentence.
Let's be honest too that atheism is probably much more compatable with unregulated free market capitalism. Greed is good, every man for himself survival of the fittestNo. I don't believe I did say that. I believe you are confused by what I said. Ayn Rand did believe that socialism worships big government and social policy. I said I believe that militant atheists worship big government and social policy and that it is based on atheism and the deification of man. Any Rand believed in objectionsim or some such bullshit, that man's self interest was noble and good or something along those lines. You guys are so desperate to win an argument you will distort anything I write to serve your purpose. I write fucking paragraphs and the best you can do is snip out little pieces to misquote and use as silly fringe arguments while you concede the rest and pretend that you addressed it to comfort your wounded and fragile egos. I have no preference for an outcome. You guys do.You think ayn Rand proves atheism isn't for capitalists too?I kind of see it the other way around. But if it please you to see it this way. Go for it, brother.Because he already proved Ding's prejudiced presumptions about atheists to be a lie with one name - Ayn Rand.How come skull pilot won't comment on this?
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
You sound like someone who has been brainwashed into thinking atheism is evil.
Ayn Rand and skull will tell you that's ridiculous but you choose to see it the other way around? You choose is the key part of the sentence.
Except you didn't say anything about militant atheism. You said it is , "based on atheism". There was no qualifier. You were levelling that "socialism is their religion" bullshit against atheists in general. Now that your accusation has been exposed as bullshit, you want to try to pretend you were saying something you weren't.
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
