Attorney General Jeff Sessions may be facing perjury charges.

[bripat9643]

So tell me, when did the campaign take possession of this "stolen property"?

An interesting question that can best be answered by Julian Assange and his close buddy, Roger Stone......

Roger Stone faces subpoena threat over Assange contact - CNNPolitics

Assange didn't steal anything, you brain dead cockroach.

 

[bripat9643]

Your link is really laughable, how could the Trump campaign conspire to get emails the professor claimed the Russians already had. Seems to me these so called legal scholars are grasping at just as many straws as all you regressives are. LMAO
.

Someone fencing stolen property is a co conspirator in the theft.

It is a crime to purchase or accept property that you know or believe was obtained through theft. ... Receiving stolen property is a crime in order to deter people from aiding or rewarding thieves by buying stolen property, concealing stolen property, and to deter theft in general.

Emails do not constitute tolen property, moron.

 

[bripat9643]

Collusion is just the common name given to the conspiracy charge, which is a crime.

No, "collusion" is a name snowflakes use when there is no evidence of any real crime. In order to be guilty of conspiracy, you have to be conspiring to do something that's actually against the law. So far you snowflakes have been unable to name anything Trump has done that's illegal.

Jeff Sessions faces perjury, contempt of congress and DOJ internal sanctions. It's a matter of time before Mueller tells us what he found in Trumps taxes.

No he doesn't, moron. Who's going to prosecute him?

 

[bripat9643]

One group of theories in criminal law is that attempt to commit an act occurs when a person comes dangerously close to carrying out a criminal act, and intends to commit the act, but does not in fact commit it. ... There are many specific crimes ofattempt, such as attempted murder, which may vary by jurisdiction.

It's a theory that is never applied in actual law courts, dumbass.

You are so desperate it gives me a warm glow inside.

 

[Slyhunter]

Washington is corrupt. We need more people like Donald Trump.

 

[radical right]

One group of theories in criminal law is that attempt to commit an act occurs when a person comes dangerously close to carrying out a criminal act, and intends to commit the act, but does not in fact commit it. ... There are many specific crimes ofattempt, such as attempted murder, which may vary by jurisdiction.

It's a theory that is never applied in actual law courts, dumbass.

You are so desperate it gives me a warm glow inside.

You have shown what a moron you are. Attempted murder is a crime in almost every criminal code throughout america, and most foreign nations. Attempted crimes often have the same exact punishment as if the crime was completed.

Idiot.....

 

[ClosedCaption]

I'm all for replacing Sessions. He's an incompetent AG.

We need someone willing to investigate Hillary Obama. Now I understand what Obama meant when he said, "tell Vlad I'll have more flexibility after the election."

You want everyone invedtigated EXCEPT the one person who is seeking fuck you and America in the ass. But you want to protect Putin so bad that you're willing to go after other Americans all for the Kremlin.

 

[radical right]

New York Consolidated Laws, Penal Law - PEN § 110.05 | FindLaw

New York Consolidated Laws, Penal Law - PEN § 110.05 Attempt to commit a crime;  punishment

An attempt to commit a crime is a:

1. Class A-I felony when the crime attempted is the A-I felony of murder in the first degree, aggravated murder as defined in subdivision one of section 125.26 of this chapter, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal possession of a chemical or biological weapon in the first degree or criminal use of a chemical or biological weapon in the first degree;

2. Class A-II felony when the crime attempted is a class A-II felony

3. Class B felony when the crime attempted is a class A-I felony except as provided in subdivision one hereof;

4. Class C felony when the crime attempted is a class B felony;

5. Class D felony when the crime attempted is a class C felony;

6. Class E felony when the crime attempted is a class D felony;

 

[radical right]

One group of theories in criminal law is that attempt to commit an act occurs when a person comes dangerously close to carrying out a criminal act, and intends to commit the act, but does not in fact commit it. ...

It's a theory that is never applied in actual law courts, dumbass..

New York Consolidated Laws, Penal Law - PEN § 110.05 | FindLaw

An attempt to commit a crime is a:

1. Class A-I felony when the crime attempted is the A-I felony
2. Class A-II felony when the crime attempted is a class A-II felony;

 

[Dragonlady]

Even if that was an accurate description of his email, which it isn't, "collusion" isn't a crime. However, political campaigns paying foreign governments for information is a crime.

Collusion is just the common name given to the conspiracy charge, which is a crime.

No, "collusion" is a name snowflakes use when there is no evidence of any real crime. In order to be guilty of conspiracy, you have to be conspiring to do something that's actually against the law. So far you snowflakes have been unable to name anything Trump has done that's illegal.

Try to wrap your tiny little mind around what was illegal:

Collusion is not a crime by itself. Here are the charges Mueller could be exploring.

There’s also the question of why Jeff Sessions let Junior’s Russian lawyer’s client off with the wrist slap of a fine for money laundering.

Your link is really laughable, how could the Trump campaign conspire to get emails the professor claimed the Russians already had. Seems to me these so called legal scholars are grasping at just as many straws as all you regressives are. LMAO
.

Someone fencing stolen property is a co conspirator in the theft.

It is a crime to purchase or accept property that you know or believe was obtained through theft. ... Receiving stolen property is a crime in order to deter people from aiding or rewarding thieves by buying stolen property, concealing stolen property, and to deter theft in general.

So tell me, when did the campaign take possession of this "stolen property"?


.

When Roger Stone started tweeting about the the stolen emails before WikiLeaks posted them.

 

[whitehall]

Barry Hussein's former A.G. was clearly guilty of negligent homicide when he authorized the insane "Operation Fast/Furious" where one of the 3,000 illegal weapons shipped by the ATF to Mexican drug cartels was used to murder a U.S. Border Patrol Officer. Even alleged gun control advocates called in sick rather than confront the mess. Now they want to indict Trump's A.G. for perjury? Give me a break.

 

[bripat9643]

Even if that was an accurate description of his email, which it isn't, "collusion" isn't a crime. However, political campaigns paying foreign governments for information is a crime.

Collusion is just the common name given to the conspiracy charge, which is a crime.

No, "collusion" is a name snowflakes use when there is no evidence of any real crime. In order to be guilty of conspiracy, you have to be conspiring to do something that's actually against the law. So far you snowflakes have been unable to name anything Trump has done that's illegal.

Try to wrap your tiny little mind around what was illegal:

Collusion is not a crime by itself. Here are the charges Mueller could be exploring.

There’s also the question of why Jeff Sessions let Junior’s Russian lawyer’s client off with the wrist slap of a fine for money laundering.

Your link is really laughable, how could the Trump campaign conspire to get emails the professor claimed the Russians already had. Seems to me these so called legal scholars are grasping at just as many straws as all you regressives are. LMAO
.

Someone fencing stolen property is a co conspirator in the theft.

It is a crime to purchase or accept property that you know or believe was obtained through theft. ... Receiving stolen property is a crime in order to deter people from aiding or rewarding thieves by buying stolen property, concealing stolen property, and to deter theft in general.

So tell me, when did the campaign take possession of this "stolen property"?


.

When Roger Stone started tweeting about the the stolen emails before WikiLeaks posted them.

Translation: Mueller is conducting a witch hunt. There is no evidence Trump did anything illegal.

Roger Stone did tweet about the emails prior to their release.

 

[radical right]

Barry Hussein's former A.G. was clearly guilty of negligent homicide when he authorized the insane "Operation Fast/Furious" where one of the 3,000 illegal weapons shipped by the ATF to Mexican drug cartels was used to murder a U.S. Border Patrol Officer. Even alleged gun control advocates called in sick rather than confront the mess. Now they want to indict Trump's A.G. for perjury? Give me a break.

Sessions lied repeatedly to the US congress under oath.

 

[radical right]

Translation: Mueller is conducting a witch hunt. There is no evidence Trump did anything illegal.

Roger Stone did tweet about the emails prior to their release.

The closer Mueller looks, the more crimes he uncovers done by the Trump associates, from money laundering, to tax evasion, to conspiring to release illegally obtained emails.

When Mueller finishes with Trumps taxes, who knows what will be found.

 

[OKTexas]

Translation: Mueller is conducting a witch hunt. There is no evidence Trump did anything illegal.

Roger Stone did tweet about the emails prior to their release.

The closer Mueller looks, the more crimes he uncovers done by the Trump associates, from money laundering, to tax evasion, to conspiring to release illegally obtained emails.

When Mueller finishes with Trumps taxes, who knows what will be found.

Who's been charged with tax evasion?


.

 

[radical right]

Who's been charged with tax evasion?


.

Five Key Points From the Indictment of Paul Manafort and Rick Gates ...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/30/.../five-takeaways-manafort-gates-indictment.html
4 days ago - The men were charged with 12 counts related to money laundering, tax evasion and foreign lobbying. We read through the 31-page indictment.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

As you remember there were accusations that Jeff Sessions lied under oath during his senate confirmation hearing. Everyone went along well he must have misunderstood the question. We know now that he did in fact lie, and he told one lie after another ever since.



After this we found out that Jeff Sessions did meet twice with the Russian ambassador, and he was asked (after he got caught) if he had spoke about the Trump campaign. He said NO that wasn't what the meeting was about, and the Trump campaign was not discussed.
Jeff Sessions spoke twice with Russian envoy during presidential campaign: Department of Justice

Then this comes out:

"Russia’s ambassador to Washington told his superiors in Moscow that he discussed campaign-related matters, including policy issues important to Moscow, with Jeff Sessions during the 2016 presidential race, contrary to public assertions by the embattled attorney general, according to current and former U.S. officials.Ambassador Sergey Kislyak’s accounts of two conversations with Sessions — then a top foreign policy adviser to Republican candidate Donald Trump — were intercepted by U.S. spy agencies, which monitor the communications of senior Russian officials in the United States and in Russia. Sessions initially failed to disclose his contacts with Kislyak and then said that the meetings were not about the Trump campaign."

Sessions discussed Trump campaign-related matters with Russian ambassador, U.S. intelligence intercepts show

Now the SLAM DUNK.

"Sessions’s participation in the gathering was detailed in court documents released Monday by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. The adviser who offered to set up the meeting was George Papadopoulos, who has pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI, according to the documents. Sessions had not previously disclosed the meeting, despite being asked over multiple appearances on Capitol Hill whether he or anyone on the campaign ever discussed meeting with Russians. A Sessions spokeswoman declined to comment this week on the March 31 meeting with Trump and campaign advisers, including Papadopoulos. But on Thursday, a person familiar with Sessions’s recollections said that “people who remember the conversation” believed that Papadopoulos was proposing an idea of using his Russian contacts to try to set up a meeting between Trump and Putin, “which was immediately rejected by then-Senator Sessions.”

Democrats demand that Sessions explain his meeting with Papadopoulos

March 31, 2016 meeting where George Papadopoulos, was discussing his Russian plan to meet with the Russian Professor who claimed to have 1000's of Hillary Clinton's emails--and as you can see Donald Trump is at the table also. Apparently Jeff Sessions was adamantely opposed to it, and stated that if this leaked out--all hell would break loose.

But Jeff Sessions has continually lied (under oath about this,) and I imagine he will be removed as Attorney General on perjury charges.

This is silly, it will blow over in a week other than on whine fest fake news reports....

Trump's non-stick ... y'all blew it with your 24/7 nincompoopery.

.

"This is silly, it will blow over in a week "

Sessions lying to congress? ha, no...

 

[ScienceRocks]

As you remember there were accusations that Jeff Sessions lied under oath during his senate confirmation hearing. Everyone went along well he must have misunderstood the question. We know now that he did in fact lie, and he told one lie after another ever since.



After this we found out that Jeff Sessions did meet twice with the Russian ambassador, and he was asked (after he got caught) if he had spoke about the Trump campaign. He said NO that wasn't what the meeting was about, and the Trump campaign was not discussed.
Jeff Sessions spoke twice with Russian envoy during presidential campaign: Department of Justice

Then this comes out:

"Russia’s ambassador to Washington told his superiors in Moscow that he discussed campaign-related matters, including policy issues important to Moscow, with Jeff Sessions during the 2016 presidential race, contrary to public assertions by the embattled attorney general, according to current and former U.S. officials.Ambassador Sergey Kislyak’s accounts of two conversations with Sessions — then a top foreign policy adviser to Republican candidate Donald Trump — were intercepted by U.S. spy agencies, which monitor the communications of senior Russian officials in the United States and in Russia. Sessions initially failed to disclose his contacts with Kislyak and then said that the meetings were not about the Trump campaign."

Sessions discussed Trump campaign-related matters with Russian ambassador, U.S. intelligence intercepts show

Now the SLAM DUNK.

"Sessions’s participation in the gathering was detailed in court documents released Monday by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. The adviser who offered to set up the meeting was George Papadopoulos, who has pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI, according to the documents. Sessions had not previously disclosed the meeting, despite being asked over multiple appearances on Capitol Hill whether he or anyone on the campaign ever discussed meeting with Russians. A Sessions spokeswoman declined to comment this week on the March 31 meeting with Trump and campaign advisers, including Papadopoulos. But on Thursday, a person familiar with Sessions’s recollections said that “people who remember the conversation” believed that Papadopoulos was proposing an idea of using his Russian contacts to try to set up a meeting between Trump and Putin, “which was immediately rejected by then-Senator Sessions.”

Democrats demand that Sessions explain his meeting with Papadopoulos

March 31, 2016 meeting where George Papadopoulos, was discussing his Russian plan to meet with the Russian Professor who claimed to have 1000's of Hillary Clinton's emails--and as you can see Donald Trump is at the table also. Apparently Jeff Sessions was adamantely opposed to it, and stated that if this leaked out--all hell would break loose.

But Jeff Sessions has continually lied (under oath about this,) and I imagine he will be removed as Attorney General on perjury charges.

This is silly, it will blow over in a week other than on whine fest fake news reports....

Trump's non-stick ... y'all blew it with your 24/7 nincompoopery.

.

"This is silly, it will blow over in a week "

Sessions lying to congress? ha, no...

Loserterians are really dumb! Clinton was IMPEACHED FOR PERJURY, idiots.

 

[OKTexas]

Who's been charged with tax evasion?


.

Five Key Points From the Indictment of Paul Manafort and Rick Gates ...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/30/.../five-takeaways-manafort-gates-indictment.html
4 days ago - The men were charged with 12 counts related to money laundering, tax evasion and foreign lobbying. We read through the 31-page indictment.

Well child the NYT lied to ya, if you read the actual counts in the indictment tax evasion is NOT one of them, they are right there in you link.


.

 

[oreo]

Of course, Papadopoulos himself is the only source of evidence for this, right?

There's Donald Jr.s email.

That's evidence of nothing.

Don Jr.’s email is evidence that Don Jr. was willing to meet with Russian government reps to get comprising information from the Russian government on Hillary Clinton. In other words, “collusion”.

And then he lied about it.

Even if that was an accurate description of his email, which it isn't, "collusion" isn't a crime. However, political campaigns paying foreign governments for information is a crime.

Collusion with a foreign adversary to interfere into an American election is TREASON. Collusion with a foreign adversary to commit a felony in this country by hacking into DNC databases or any private computer to sway the outcome of an American election is TREASON. We consider cyber attacks to be the 21st century Act of War.
Russian hack almost brought the U.S. military to its knees