Attorney General Jeff Sessions may be facing perjury charges.

[bripat9643]

As you remember there were accusations that Jeff Sessions lied under oath during his senate confirmation hearing. Everyone went along well he must have misunderstood the question. We know now that he did in fact lie, and he told one lie after another ever since.



After this we found out that Jeff Sessions did meet twice with the Russian ambassador, and he was asked (after he got caught) if he had spoke about the Trump campaign. He said NO that wasn't what the meeting was about, and the Trump campaign was not discussed.
Jeff Sessions spoke twice with Russian envoy during presidential campaign: Department of Justice

Then this comes out:

"Russia’s ambassador to Washington told his superiors in Moscow that he discussed campaign-related matters, including policy issues important to Moscow, with Jeff Sessions during the 2016 presidential race, contrary to public assertions by the embattled attorney general, according to current and former U.S. officials.Ambassador Sergey Kislyak’s accounts of two conversations with Sessions — then a top foreign policy adviser to Republican candidate Donald Trump — were intercepted by U.S. spy agencies, which monitor the communications of senior Russian officials in the United States and in Russia. Sessions initially failed to disclose his contacts with Kislyak and then said that the meetings were not about the Trump campaign."

Sessions discussed Trump campaign-related matters with Russian ambassador, U.S. intelligence intercepts show

Now the SLAM DUNK.

"Sessions’s participation in the gathering was detailed in court documents released Monday by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. The adviser who offered to set up the meeting was George Papadopoulos, who has pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI, according to the documents. Sessions had not previously disclosed the meeting, despite being asked over multiple appearances on Capitol Hill whether he or anyone on the campaign ever discussed meeting with Russians. A Sessions spokeswoman declined to comment this week on the March 31 meeting with Trump and campaign advisers, including Papadopoulos. But on Thursday, a person familiar with Sessions’s recollections said that “people who remember the conversation” believed that Papadopoulos was proposing an idea of using his Russian contacts to try to set up a meeting between Trump and Putin, “which was immediately rejected by then-Senator Sessions.”

Democrats demand that Sessions explain his meeting with Papadopoulos

March 31, 2016 meeting where George Papadopoulos, was discussing his Russian plan to meet with the Russian Professor who claimed to have 1000's of Hillary Clinton's emails--and as you can see Donald Trump is at the table also. Apparently Jeff Sessions was adamantely opposed to it, and stated that if this leaked out--all hell would break loose.

But Jeff Sessions has continually lied (under oath about this,) and I imagine he will be removed as Attorney General on perjury charges.

Sessions' ONLY possible "defense":.............The onset of dementia......

Really, once again what Russian officials did the campaign have direct contact with?


.

The Russian Ambassador had 2 meetings with Jeff Sessions. That’s in addition to Mike Flynn’s phone calls. Wire taps of the Ambassador’s phone calls to the Kremlin say that Sessions was prepared to provide them with a report of the campaign’s progress.

Manaforte, Kuchner and Jr. all met with the Russian lawyer. Kuchner tried to have the Russians set up a back channel to the Kremlin. Flynn was a paid agent for the Russians and failed to disclose it. That’s in addition to his phone calls to the Russian Ambassador.

All of these people lied about meeting with or even knowing any Russians.

Roger Stone was quoting emails from the WikiLeaks dump hours BEFORE they were posted online.

If you were to substitute the names in this post with names of members of the Clinton campaign staff, the whole pack of you would be screaming “Lock her up” like a pack of rabid dogs.

Oh wait, you’re already doing that over the Uranium One deal, based on lies and innuendo.

 

[bripat9643]

Even if that was an accurate description of his email, which it isn't, "collusion" isn't a crime. However, political campaigns paying foreign governments for information is a crime.

Collusion is just the common name given to the conspiracy charge, which is a crime.

No, "collusion" is a name snowflakes use when there is no evidence of any real crime. In order to be guilty of conspiracy, you have to be conspiring to do something that's actually against the law. So far you snowflakes have been unable to name anything Trump has done that's illegal.

 

[Dragonlady]

Even if that was an accurate description of his email, which it isn't, "collusion" isn't a crime. However, political campaigns paying foreign governments for information is a crime.

Collusion is just the common name given to the conspiracy charge, which is a crime.

No, "collusion" is a name snowflakes use when there is no evidence of any real crime. In order to be guilty of conspiracy, you have to be conspiring to do something that's actually against the law. So far you snowflakes have been unable to name anything Trump has done that's illegal.

Try to wrap your tiny little mind around what was illegal:

Collusion is not a crime by itself. Here are the charges Mueller could be exploring.

There’s also the question of why Jeff Sessions let Junior’s Russian lawyer’s client off with the wrist slap of a fine for money laundering. 2 cents on the dollar. That’s less than the Mafia charged.

 

[radical right]

Collusion is just the common name given to the conspiracy charge, which is a crime.

No, "collusion" is a name snowflakes use when there is no evidence of any real crime. In order to be guilty of conspiracy, you have to be conspiring to do something that's actually against the law. So far you snowflakes have been unable to name anything Trump has done that's illegal.

Jeff Sessions faces perjury, contempt of congress and DOJ internal sanctions. It's a matter of time before Mueller tells us what he found in Trumps taxes.

 

[OKTexas]

Even if that was an accurate description of his email, which it isn't, "collusion" isn't a crime. However, political campaigns paying foreign governments for information is a crime.

Collusion is just the common name given to the conspiracy charge, which is a crime.

No, "collusion" is a name snowflakes use when there is no evidence of any real crime. In order to be guilty of conspiracy, you have to be conspiring to do something that's actually against the law. So far you snowflakes have been unable to name anything Trump has done that's illegal.

Try to wrap your tiny little mind around what was illegal:

Collusion is not a crime by itself. Here are the charges Mueller could be exploring.

There’s also the question of why Jeff Sessions let Junior’s Russian lawyer’s client off with the wrist slap of a fine for money laundering. 2 cents on the dollar. That’s less than the Mafia charged.

Your link is really laughable, how could the Trump campaign conspire to get emails the professor claimed the Russians already had. Seems to me these so called legal scholars are grasping at just as many straws as all you regressives are. LMAO


.

 

[radical right]

Your link is really laughable, how could the Trump campaign conspire to get emails the professor claimed the Russians already had. Seems to me these so called legal scholars are grasping at just as many straws as all you regressives are. LMAO
.

Someone fencing stolen property is a co conspirator in the theft.

It is a crime to purchase or accept property that you know or believe was obtained through theft. ... Receiving stolen property is a crime in order to deter people from aiding or rewarding thieves by buying stolen property, concealing stolen property, and to deter theft in general.

 

[nat4900]

Maybe....just maybe......Trump is telling Sessions that even if perjury is hanging over his dementia-ridden head, a PARDON is not far behind, IF.....IF, Sessions decides to appoint a special prosecutor to go after Clinton; .......after all, how else can Trump keep his CULT members' base in line???

 

[OKTexas]

Your link is really laughable, how could the Trump campaign conspire to get emails the professor claimed the Russians already had. Seems to me these so called legal scholars are grasping at just as many straws as all you regressives are. LMAO
.

Someone fencing stolen property is a co conspirator in the theft.

It is a crime to purchase or accept property that you know or believe was obtained through theft. ... Receiving stolen property is a crime in order to deter people from aiding or rewarding thieves by buying stolen property, concealing stolen property, and to deter theft in general.

So tell me, when did the campaign take possession of this "stolen property"?


.

 

[nat4900]

So tell me, when did the campaign take possession of this "stolen property"?

An interesting question that can best be answered by Julian Assange and his close buddy, Roger Stone......

Roger Stone faces subpoena threat over Assange contact - CNNPolitics

 

[radical right]

It is a crime to purchase or accept property that you know or believe was obtained through theft. ... Receiving stolen property is a crime in order to deter people from aiding or rewarding thieves by buying stolen property, concealing stolen property, and to deter theft in general.

So tell me, when did the campaign take possession of this "stolen property"?


.

You are guilty of "attempted" receiving stolen property.

Just like in an attempted murder case, the police don't have to wait for the victim to be killed, but can prevent the crime, and still charge the criminal for attempted murder.

 

[radical right]

One group of theories in criminal law is that attempt to commit an act occurs when a person comes dangerously close to carrying out a criminal act, and intends to commit the act, but does not in fact commit it. ... There are many specific crimes ofattempt, such as attempted murder, which may vary by jurisdiction.

 

[OKTexas]

So tell me, when did the campaign take possession of this "stolen property"?

An interesting question that can best be answered by Julian Assange and his close buddy, Roger Stone......

Roger Stone faces subpoena threat over Assange contact - CNNPolitics

So tell me, when did the campaign take possession of this "stolen property"?

An interesting question that can best be answered by Julian Assange and his close buddy, Roger Stone......

Roger Stone faces subpoena threat over Assange contact - CNNPolitics

OK, for the sake of argument, let's assume which is what everyone is doing anyway, that Stone was given a heads up that the Podesta emails were going to be released. What law would have been violated? Please quote the statute.


.

 

[Cellblock2429]

As you remember there were accusations that Jeff Sessions lied under oath during his senate confirmation hearing. Everyone went along well he must have misunderstood the question. We know now that he did in fact lie, and he told one lie after another ever since.



After this we found out that Jeff Sessions did meet twice with the Russian ambassador, and he was asked (after he got caught) if he had spoke about the Trump campaign. He said NO that wasn't what the meeting was about, and the Trump campaign was not discussed.
Jeff Sessions spoke twice with Russian envoy during presidential campaign: Department of Justice

Then this comes out:

"Russia’s ambassador to Washington told his superiors in Moscow that he discussed campaign-related matters, including policy issues important to Moscow, with Jeff Sessions during the 2016 presidential race, contrary to public assertions by the embattled attorney general, according to current and former U.S. officials.Ambassador Sergey Kislyak’s accounts of two conversations with Sessions — then a top foreign policy adviser to Republican candidate Donald Trump — were intercepted by U.S. spy agencies, which monitor the communications of senior Russian officials in the United States and in Russia. Sessions initially failed to disclose his contacts with Kislyak and then said that the meetings were not about the Trump campaign."

Sessions discussed Trump campaign-related matters with Russian ambassador, U.S. intelligence intercepts show

Now the SLAM DUNK.

"Sessions’s participation in the gathering was detailed in court documents released Monday by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. The adviser who offered to set up the meeting was George Papadopoulos, who has pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI, according to the documents. Sessions had not previously disclosed the meeting, despite being asked over multiple appearances on Capitol Hill whether he or anyone on the campaign ever discussed meeting with Russians. A Sessions spokeswoman declined to comment this week on the March 31 meeting with Trump and campaign advisers, including Papadopoulos. But on Thursday, a person familiar with Sessions’s recollections said that “people who remember the conversation” believed that Papadopoulos was proposing an idea of using his Russian contacts to try to set up a meeting between Trump and Putin, “which was immediately rejected by then-Senator Sessions.”

Democrats demand that Sessions explain his meeting with Papadopoulos

March 31, 2016 meeting where George Papadopoulos, was discussing his Russian plan to meet with the Russian Professor who claimed to have 1000's of Hillary Clinton's emails--and as you can see Donald Trump is at the table also. Apparently Jeff Sessions was adamantely opposed to it, and stated that if this leaked out--all hell would break loose.

But Jeff Sessions has continually lied (under oath about this,) and I imagine he will be removed as Attorney General on perjury charges.

/—-/ your select outrage is comical.

 

[OKTexas]

One group of theories in criminal law is that attempt to commit an act occurs when a person comes dangerously close to carrying out a criminal act, and intends to commit the act, but does not in fact commit it. ... There are many specific crimes ofattempt, such as attempted murder, which may vary by jurisdiction.

What criminal act are you referring to?


.

 

[radical right]

What criminal act are you referring to?
.

The emails were gotten by illegally breaching a computer system by a foreign government. That covers almost half a dozen federal crimes.

 

[OKTexas]

What criminal act are you referring to?
.

The emails were gotten by illegally breaching a computer system by a foreign government. That covers almost half a dozen federal crimes.

And the Trump campaign had what to do with that?


.

 

[radical right]

The emails were gotten by illegally breaching a computer system by a foreign government. That covers almost half a dozen federal crimes.

And the Trump campaign had what to do with that?
.

It is a crime to purchase or accept property that you know or believe was obtained through theft. ... Receiving stolen property is a crime in order to deter people from aiding or rewarding thieves by buying stolen property, concealing stolen property, and to deter theft in general

One group of theories in criminal law is that attempt to commit an act occurs when a person comes dangerously close to carrying out a criminal act, and intends to commit the act, but does not in fact commit it. ... There are many specific crimes of attempt, such as attempted murder

.

 

[OKTexas]

The emails were gotten by illegally breaching a computer system by a foreign government. That covers almost half a dozen federal crimes.

And the Trump campaign had what to do with that?
.

It is a crime to purchase or accept property that you know or believe was obtained through theft. ... Receiving stolen property is a crime in order to deter people from aiding or rewarding thieves by buying stolen property, concealing stolen property, and to deter theft in general

One group of theories in criminal law is that attempt to commit an act occurs when a person comes dangerously close to carrying out a criminal act, and intends to commit the act, but does not in fact commit it. ... There are many specific crimes of attempt, such as attempted murder

.

 

[bripat9643]

Even if that was an accurate description of his email, which it isn't, "collusion" isn't a crime. However, political campaigns paying foreign governments for information is a crime.

Collusion is just the common name given to the conspiracy charge, which is a crime.

No, "collusion" is a name snowflakes use when there is no evidence of any real crime. In order to be guilty of conspiracy, you have to be conspiring to do something that's actually against the law. So far you snowflakes have been unable to name anything Trump has done that's illegal.

Try to wrap your tiny little mind around what was illegal:

Collusion is not a crime by itself. Here are the charges Mueller could be exploring.

There’s also the question of why Jeff Sessions let Junior’s Russian lawyer’s client off with the wrist slap of a fine for money laundering. 2 cents on the dollar. That’s less than the Mafia charged.

There was nothing illegal by the Trump campaign, you fucking brain damaged cockroach. Mewler shouldn't be "exploring" anything. If he doesn't already have specific charges that he's investigating, then he is conducting a witchhunt. Legitimate investigations done "explore" something to charge you with. That's what they did in the former Soviet Union.

 

[bripat9643]

It is a crime to purchase or accept property that you know or believe was obtained through theft. ... Receiving stolen property is a crime in order to deter people from aiding or rewarding thieves by buying stolen property, concealing stolen property, and to deter theft in general.

So tell me, when did the campaign take possession of this "stolen property"?


.

You are guilty of "attempted" receiving stolen property.

Just like in an attempted murder case, the police don't have to wait for the victim to be killed, but can prevent the crime, and still charge the criminal for attempted murder.

What's the "stolen property," moron?