Nope. Just a judge that doesn't have a personal conflict of interest.ROFL! Of course it's a legitimate question since his family are exactly the kind of people Trump is promising to deport.Then again --- Judge Curiel's family has become a question only for jelly-smeared tots like the OP; it has never however become a legitimate question.
Only a totally shameless douche bag would claim the judge's family isn't relevant.
What the flying fuck does a judge's ethincity have to do with sitting before a FRAUD case?
Is "FRAUD" somehow different if your ancestry is from Mexico than it is if it came from Germany?
He's from FUCKING INDIANA, Fingerboy. Is Rump proposing to build a wall around fucking Indiana??
Fuckin' partisan hacks....
It's already been explained about 1000 times, douche bag. The anchor baby judge's parents were Mexican illegal aliens. Trump is promising to deport 11 million illegal aliens, almost all from Mexico. What could be more relevant than that?
Do you really think pretending to be the world's biggest dumbass makes your case more credible?
So the only judge that can hear this case should be one who agrees with Trump's policies? Is that right? Or only the non white judges?
Funny then that STILL nobody can explain what some judge's personal heritage has to do with the merits of a fraud case.
I take it "fraud" must take on a different meaning if your parents were from Mexico. If only these things were written down, codified in something like ----- , I dunno, we could call it "law" just to make up a name --- instead of being based on genetics. I can dream, can't I?
Btw do you guys have a resource somewhere that explains what nationality judge to go for on other crimes? Like, if I get a speeding ticket, is it better to get an Inuit judge or a Greek?
![eusa_think :eusa_think: :eusa_think:](/styles/smilies/eusa_think.gif)