Paulie
Diamond Member
- May 19, 2007
- 40,769
- 6,382
- 1,830
A revolution? It would not be a revolution it would be civil war. You all haven't noticed that this nation is divided philosophically?
A civil war, yeah, that's just what we need.
The nation already isn't working, let's burn it down kill everyone we don't like and then start over.
Yeah, that'll fix it.
This is what happens when you feed people a line of bullshit about watering the tree of liberty with blood.
They haven't a clue what revolution really means.
Try THINKING revolutionary for a change, that might help.
We won't find your liberty at the end of a gun barrel, we'll find it when we stop thinking like slaves.
You want to know the BIG LIE that keeps them going?
The myth of shortage.
This world is so damned wealthy, but we've allowed our masters to convince us it isn't so we work like slaves and some of us kiss the hands of the masters who allow us the previlage of working for them.
Fucking tools.
Perhaps your idea of revolution differs from mine. My version of a successful revolution would not even involve a single shot being fired from a weapon.
Remember the four boxes: Soap, Ballot, Jury, Ammo. In that order.
We haven't even BEGUN to use even the FIRST one properly, let alone the next two. Jury box? PLEASE. 90% of people don't even want to be hassled with jury duty, and will do whatever they can to get out of it. Although it happens to be such a HUGE significant factor in the people's control of their own country. An unbiased, informed jury is a powerful body. I imagine we'll probably never live to see it used to its full intended potential.