rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 285,194
- 157,905
Nobody is being ruined....she is being stubborn over something as inconsequential as a cakeThe difference is that when these laws were put in place, refusing to serve black PEOPLE had a significant economic impact on black people. Plus, it was the GOVERNMENT mandating such service differences/refusals.
So discrimination has to be significant before you'll say it shouldn't happen? Okay, please give us a number....how many cases of discrimination does it take before ol' Marty will admit that these Americans should be treated equally?
When it as a substantial economic impact.
Again, define "substantial"....
According to you at some point, discrimination becomes "not okay". That, in and of itself, is an indefensible stance but while you're dishing out the crazy, why not just go a bit further and tell us how many gays must be discriminated against before it becomes "significant" in your book?
Baking a cake for a gay wedding is not substantial
Requiring a baker to do so....is
In only one case (your side's) is government action required, and THAT is what the issue becomes. Government should not be involved in things as trivial as this, and it 100% shouldn't decide it can ruin someone over it.