rhodescholar
Gold Member
- Banned
- #41
Ugh, another bottom-feeding piece of shit lands in the forum, quoting electronicintifada, no less...
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
BBC Hands Airwaves Over To Israel’s Minister For War
- Thread starter DIRECTOR
- Start date
Ugh, another bottom-feeding piece of shit lands in the forum, quoting electronicintifada, no less...
BBC Hands Airwaves Over To Israel’s Minister For War
SOURCE: electronicintifada.net
Submitted by Amena Saleem
Thu, 04/09/2015 16:32 pm
Ugh, another bottom-feeding piece of shit lands in the forum, quoting electronicintifada, no less...
Where else would a bottom feeder go for "news?"
Stormfront perhaps? PressTV?
It can easily be argued that IE speaks to the frustrations many Palestinians have with the erosion of a two-state solution, and the possibility of their ever achieving rights. That too is free speech...
Yanno, I've been thinking lately that there is no deal that reps from both sides of the fence could take back to their constituents for approval. It may well be that one side or the other or some international body will have to impose a two-state solution which, IMHO, is the only viable solution.
rhodescholar
Gold Member
- Banned
- #44
You seem to have a problem with exposing hate groups when you agree with their sentiments.
You are happy to label Electronic Infatada as hateful and dishonest. But you stop short of EVER criticizing Anti-Islamic rhetoric.
Here's a sample of what you don't seem to consider "hateful" and "dishonest" - just "angry" at "current events". How are these sorts of things any less hateful than the anti-semitic rhetoric you are quick to condemn?
Pamela Geller: Pamela Geller advocates banning Islam demolishing mosques deporting and killing Muslims Islamophobia Today eNewspaper
If a government wants to learn how to manage growing Islamic problems, take some advice from Ottoman army officer Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. Atatürk abolished Islam by putting a complete ban on Islamic materials, demolishing mosques, and removing any traces of Islam in his country to get rid of the evil. Those who tried to revolt were put in their place, or basically killed….
It is time for the UK to stop wasting their military abroad, but bring them to patrol their own streets and begin to remove Muslims. And it is vital time to plan and arrange deportation programs – and even arrange new deportation programs for practicing Muslims born in England to be deported to their parent’s country of origin.
Before you start whining childishly, why don't you address a very simple question: what do you think is going to happen in British and other Western societies when the proportion of muslims reaches 30% or more? Do you believe they will not try to islamicize the society, and forcibly introduce sharia and anti-semitic practices and policies as they have done - EVERYWHERE ELSE? Your integrity is at issue here, so answer it honestly.
It's no more hateful and dishonest than Pam Gellars site which is also a hate mongering site.
Pam Geller is not working under the auspices of a known terrorist organization nor does she share any genocidal agenda, so once again, all you are proving is your own dishonesty, underhandedness and lack of human decency.
Electronic Infantada is an on-line media source that is biased towards the Palestinians. People like you choose to excuse the hate that comes from those like Geller. It's quite clear from your unwillingness, and those of others here - to ever condemn it. Dishonesty? Lack of human decency? Look into your mirror. She's associated with neo-Nazi's and white supremacists.
And she shares a genocidal agenda.
Pamela Geller: Pamela Geller advocates banning Islam demolishing mosques deporting and killing Muslims Islamophobia Today eNewspaper
If a government wants to learn how to manage growing Islamic problems, take some advice from Ottoman army officer Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. Atatürk abolished Islam by putting a complete ban on Islamic materials, demolishing mosques, and removing any traces of Islam in his country to get rid of the evil. Those who tried to revolt were put in their place, or basically killed….
It is time for the UK to stop wasting their military abroad, but bring them to patrol their own streets and begin to remove Muslims. And it is vital time to plan and arrange deportation programs – and even arrange new deportation programs for practicing Muslims born in England to be deported to their parent’s country of origin.
65% of all Brits advocate banning islam, demolishing mosques and deporting muslims. Some think that muslims found guilty of child abuse and assisting terrorism should be executed and their remains dumped in a pit. Is this wrong for the majority of Brits to feel this way after suffering Islamic violence, aggression and flouting of the law for 14 years under a neo Marxist regime. Until you have lived with islamonazi aggressives and violence you are in no position to say that it is wrong to want them out of your country. And the biggest culprits for the terrorism
...There are news sites with their own leanings and hate sites with little or no truth. If you care to, you can find the facts somewhere in the middle...
You have to want to search and evaluate on your own. It helps if you have a good understanding of the players.
I too use a wide variety of sources, I believe I have a pretty good grasp of the players, and how's this for somewhere in the middle:
No.
Even though it sums up the arab muslim position perfectly ?
It's as accurate as claiming that the Israeli's want to kill all the Palestinians.
And when has every Israeli leader stood up and stated publicly that they want to kill all the Palestinians ? LINKS ?
It's no more hateful and dishonest than Pam Gellars site which is also a hate mongering site.
Pam Geller is not working under the auspices of a known terrorist organization nor does she share any genocidal agenda, so once again, all you are proving is your own dishonesty, underhandedness and lack of human decency.
She editorializes on stories and issues. She does fabricate stories or incite violence. She is like a thousand talking heads out there from Fox to al-Jezeera.
She shows the horror and hypocrisy of radical islam and terrorism. She is not a sponsor of terrorist groups.
Angry at current events, yes. Hateful of all muslims, no.
You have a problem with exposing what certain groups are doing in the name of Islam against others? It is the same stories you can find in a few dozen or more publication around the same time.
She does not recruit for terrorist groups to go and chop off heads of civilians.
You seem to have a problem with exposing hate groups when you agree with their sentiments.
You are happy to label Electronic Infatada as hateful and dishonest. But you stop short of EVER criticizing Anti-Islamic rhetoric.
Here's a sample of what you don't seem to consider "hateful" and "dishonest" - just "angry" at "current events". How are these sorts of things any less hateful than the anti-semitic rhetoric you are quick to condemn?
Pamela Geller: Pamela Geller advocates banning Islam demolishing mosques deporting and killing Muslims Islamophobia Today eNewspaper
If a government wants to learn how to manage growing Islamic problems, take some advice from Ottoman army officer Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. Atatürk abolished Islam by putting a complete ban on Islamic materials, demolishing mosques, and removing any traces of Islam in his country to get rid of the evil. Those who tried to revolt were put in their place, or basically killed….
It is time for the UK to stop wasting their military abroad, but bring them to patrol their own streets and begin to remove Muslims. And it is vital time to plan and arrange deportation programs – and even arrange new deportation programs for practicing Muslims born in England to be deported to their parent’s country of origin.
Have you ever lived in a town or city that has a 5% or greater Islamic population concentrated into a few areas. Having to live with the fear of violent attacks every day, unable to protect your children from rape, beatings, abuse and forced conversion. Because this is what has happened in the UK. So is it any wonder that 65% to 75% of Brits want to see islam made illegal, muslims banned from migrating here and any guilty of a crime deported. Those who groom and rape 11 ands 12 year old girls or to be engaged in terrorist activity to be executed and thrown into lime pits. They want the troops brought home and used to round up the Islamic extremists that are known and to take DNA samples before sending them packing. The majority of the known extremists are either converts or 3rd and 4th generation immigrants with dual or triple nationality. Every day there is a new Islamic atrocity and they are very rarely reported on because the police don't have the numbers to stop any protests against the muslims. Imagine living in these circumstances and watching the looney left snub your attempts at stopping the rapes, beatings and violence.
I am sure that being a Jewish right-wing fascist makes her a non-partisan teller of the truth. She is an embarrassment to thoughtful Jews, even strong supporters of Israel.
Because she tells the truth about islam, just like Geert Wilders does. And that is why you don't like them do you. We have all recently seen how muslims deal with those who speak the truth with Charlie Hebdo , and the world is waking up to them.
She's about as truthful as Electronic Infatada.
As I said you know nothing until you have lived under the threat of islam
BBC Hands Airwaves Over To Israel’s Minister For War
_________________________________________________________________________
SOURCE: electronicintifada.net
Submitted by Amena Saleem
Thu, 04/09/2015 16:32 pm
Moshe Yaalon poses for a photo with notorious racist blogger Pamela Geller. (Wikipedia) The writer and journalist Karl Sabbagh posed an interesting question this month. Writing on the current affairs website Al Araby, Sabbagh asked: “British journalists are among the best and most skeptical in the world. Why then, with a few honorable exceptions, do they fail to be skeptical when comes to Israel?”
The question was especially pertinent in light of an egregious interview conducted by senior BBC presenter Sarah Montague just two weeks earlier with Israel’s “defense” minister Moshe Yaalon.
Montague was interviewing Yaalon on the BBC’s flagship radio news program Today in the week of Benjamin Netanyahu’s election victory, a victory which followed his very public declaration that there would be no Palestinian state if he was returned to power.
But Montague didn’t probe and challenge Yaalon on whether his prime minister’s declaration has highlighted Israel’s contempt for international law, for the so-called peace process, and revealed a desire to remain indefinitely as an illegal occupier of Palestinian land. She didn’t ask him if Netanyahu’s admission means that Israel can no longer be viewed as a “partner for peace” by its Western allies. […]
READ MORE: BBC hands airwaves over to Israel s minister for war The Electronic Intifada
______________________________________________________________________________
electronic intifada? one of the worse sites to use or quote from. Try a more factual site instead of one that deals in hate mongering
It's no more hateful and dishonest than Pam Gellars site which is also a hate mongering site.
Is that because it tells the truth which is very painful to you.
No. It's because I don't like bigotry or it's supporters.
Yet you defend Islamic violence and atrocities, why is that.
.
It's no more hateful and dishonest than Pam Gellars site which is also a hate mongering site.
Pam Geller is not working under the auspices of a known terrorist organization nor does she share any genocidal agenda, so once again, all you are proving is your own dishonesty, underhandedness and lack of human decency.
She editorializes on stories and issues. She does fabricate stories or incite violence. .
Here is some elaboration:
She does fabricate stories to inflame and incite: Have you seen what she has to say on the Bosnian genocide, and defends the Serbian war criminals? This event has been well documented.
How about this one on "Puppy Bombs" (designed to generate hatred and anger) - Robert Spencer Pamela Geller discover puppy bomb jihad loonwatch.com
False or misleading Fatwah's?
Geller's claim that Muslims burned alive hundreds of Christians, complete with photographs: Hoaxes And Fabrications On Islam And Muslims - Islam for Muslims - Nigeria The actual story? A fuel tanker explosion in the Congo: Fuel tanker explosion kills over 230 in Congo Reuters
Yet people excuse her or even support her.
You mean the rapes of children to bed ridden elderly males and females by muslim terrorists, the murders of Christians by nailing shut the doors of a church and setting fire to the church.
Did you read your link where it says the original came from an Egyptian telling the story.
Then you have not read any of the British MSM recently that details all the 14 to 24 year old girls going to Syria to be "wives" of the soldiers fighting for IS. They are the prize for succeeding against the enemy. And islam has always had a way of legalising prostitution it is called Muta, why don't you look it up.
See above and do you want a video of it happening in Africa, no make believe in these stories as they are too well reported.
It shows that you are anti semitic and a Jew hater because you believe islamonazi lies over the truth.
.
Pam Geller is not working under the auspices of a known terrorist organization nor does she share any genocidal agenda, so once again, all you are proving is your own dishonesty, underhandedness and lack of human decency.
She editorializes on stories and issues. She does fabricate stories or incite violence. .
Here is some elaboration:
She does fabricate stories to inflame and incite: Have you seen what she has to say on the Bosnian genocide, and defends the Serbian war criminals? This event has been well documented.
How about this one on "Puppy Bombs" (designed to generate hatred and anger) - Robert Spencer Pamela Geller discover puppy bomb jihad loonwatch.com
False or misleading Fatwah's?
Geller's claim that Muslims burned alive hundreds of Christians, complete with photographs: Hoaxes And Fabrications On Islam And Muslims - Islam for Muslims - Nigeria The actual story? A fuel tanker explosion in the Congo: Fuel tanker explosion kills over 230 in Congo Reuters
Yet people excuse her or even support her.
Puppy Bombs Rescued from Egyptian Violence - Middle East - News - Arutz Sheva
Puppy bombs The latest weapon in the Muslim Brotherhood arsenal - National counterterrorism Examiner.com
just reporting stories from other sources.
The fatwa source was
Tunisians Raise Alarm on Possible Fatwa Encouraging Sexual Jihad - Al-Monitor the Pulse of the Middle East
Geller does not create these stories, they come from mainstream news sources.
Yes she creates them - in the same way conspiracy theorists 's take unrelated "facts" and turn them into a false story. For example story that Muslims were burning hundreds of Christians but in reality, the story was fiction and the pictures taken from a horrific fire in the Congo.
Or claiming that the Serbian genocide was "manufactured" - how is that different than holocaust deniers?
On the puppy bomb story - the original source retracted it, it was shown to be a wrong and she still promotes on her sitees, it knowing it is false: Nuts and Fruits Department Pamela Geller s Puppy Bombs Hatewatch
What difference is there between making up a story and knowingly promoting a false story? There is none.
The puppy bomb story is a good example
Here are some examples of Christians being burnt alive from non partisan sources
Christians Burned Alive Muslim Persecution of Christians November 2014
Muslims Take 100 Christians Burn Them Alive Slit Their Throats Shoot Them And Hack Them To Death - Walid Shoebat
Last edited:
EDITORIAL The FBI dumps a hate group - Washington Times
The poverty law center, known by its initials SPLC, is actually a money-making scheme — some have called it a “scam” — of an Alabama lawyer who set out years ago to get rich on the backs of the poor and the duped.
Civil Freedoms are the exact opposite and defend muslims right to be violent by demonising anyone who speaks out against muslim extremism and violence
.
Pam Geller is not working under the auspices of a known terrorist organization nor does she share any genocidal agenda, so once again, all you are proving is your own dishonesty, underhandedness and lack of human decency.
She editorializes on stories and issues. She does fabricate stories or incite violence. .
Here is some elaboration:
She does fabricate stories to inflame and incite: Have you seen what she has to say on the Bosnian genocide, and defends the Serbian war criminals? This event has been well documented.
How about this one on "Puppy Bombs" (designed to generate hatred and anger) - Robert Spencer Pamela Geller discover puppy bomb jihad loonwatch.com
False or misleading Fatwah's?
Geller's claim that Muslims burned alive hundreds of Christians, complete with photographs: Hoaxes And Fabrications On Islam And Muslims - Islam for Muslims - Nigeria The actual story? A fuel tanker explosion in the Congo: Fuel tanker explosion kills over 230 in Congo Reuters
Yet people excuse her or even support her.
Puppy Bombs Rescued from Egyptian Violence - Middle East - News - Arutz Sheva
Puppy bombs The latest weapon in the Muslim Brotherhood arsenal - National counterterrorism Examiner.com
just reporting stories from other sources.
The fatwa source was
Tunisians Raise Alarm on Possible Fatwa Encouraging Sexual Jihad - Al-Monitor the Pulse of the Middle East
Geller does not create these stories, they come from mainstream news sources.
Yes she creates them - in the same way conspiracy theorists 's take unrelated "facts" and turn them into a false story. For example story that Muslims were burning hundreds of Christians but in reality, the story was fiction and the pictures taken from a horrific fire in the Congo.
Or claiming that the Serbian genocide was "manufactured" - how is that different than holocaust deniers?
On the puppy bomb story - the original source retracted it, it was shown to be a wrong and she still promotes on her sitees, it knowing it is false: Nuts and Fruits Department Pamela Geller s Puppy Bombs Hatewatch
What difference is there between making up a story and knowingly promoting a false story? There is none.
The puppy bomb story is a good example
Yes it is of your anti Semitism and defence of Islamic violence and terrorism
Muslim Brotherhood caught using puppies as fire bombs - Washington Times
Robyn Urman, a rescuer with the New Jersey group, Pet ResQ Inc, said this isn’t the first time Muslim Brotherhood members had been busted trying to use animals as gasoline-fired bombs, Breitbart reported.
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/1/muslim-brotherhood-caught-using-puppies-fire-bombs/#ixzz3XZ19ktEa
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
You seem to have a problem with exposing hate groups when you agree with their sentiments.
You are happy to label Electronic Infatada as hateful and dishonest. But you stop short of EVER criticizing Anti-Islamic rhetoric.
Here's a sample of what you don't seem to consider "hateful" and "dishonest" - just "angry" at "current events". How are these sorts of things any less hateful than the anti-semitic rhetoric you are quick to condemn?
Pamela Geller: Pamela Geller advocates banning Islam demolishing mosques deporting and killing Muslims Islamophobia Today eNewspaper
If a government wants to learn how to manage growing Islamic problems, take some advice from Ottoman army officer Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. Atatürk abolished Islam by putting a complete ban on Islamic materials, demolishing mosques, and removing any traces of Islam in his country to get rid of the evil. Those who tried to revolt were put in their place, or basically killed….
It is time for the UK to stop wasting their military abroad, but bring them to patrol their own streets and begin to remove Muslims. And it is vital time to plan and arrange deportation programs – and even arrange new deportation programs for practicing Muslims born in England to be deported to their parent’s country of origin.
Before you start whining childishly, why don't you address a very simple question: what do you think is going to happen in British and other Western societies when the proportion of muslims reaches 30% or more? Do you believe they will not try to islamicize the society, and forcibly introduce sharia and anti-semitic practices and policies as they have done - EVERYWHERE ELSE? Your integrity is at issue here, so answer it honestly.
They are trying it now, with the help of the neo Marxists and other looney left morons. Ask about the thousands of 11 and 12 year old girls raped by adult muslim men that the police and politicians ignored. Then ask why are the Brits so angry and hateful towards the muslims and left wing politicians
I am sure that being a Jewish right-wing fascist makes her a non-partisan teller of the truth. She is an embarrassment to thoughtful Jews, even strong supporters of Israel.
Because she tells the truth about islam, just like Geert Wilders does. And that is why you don't like them do you. We have all recently seen how muslims deal with those who speak the truth with Charlie Hebdo , and the world is waking up to them.
She's about as truthful as Electronic Infatada.
EI intentionall incites hate and violence.
You might not like the phrasing of geller, the way she writes, but the stories come from generally accepted sources. She is not creating stories or fabricating lies with the intent of inciting violence.
I don't usually care of Geller but I find stories there from time to time.
Her phrasing incites hate. THAT is what I don't like. The same things you don't like about IE. How is what she says different than EI? Hate is hate. I don't care for EI and consider it a hateful and untrustworthy source - in the same category as Geller and her associates.
EI is a poison site. Anything I find there I have to seek at least three or more legitimate sources, and I still take it with a large does of salt. It is propaganda, half truths and out right lies. Exceedingly anti-Semitic and supports the use of violence against jews.
Good lord. So is Atlas Shrugs - it's a cess of anti-Islamic propaganda, half truths and outright lies as I pointed out in the links. It feeds anti-Islamic bigotry and fears and she was certainly calling for mass deportations of Muslims and killing those who resisted. Sounds like violence to me. Fortunately, this is the US and people are unlikely to act that extremely.
Have you seen what SPLC says about Geller?
More false claims and fabrications aimed at generating hatred:
Fact-Checking Pamela Geller 270 Million Victims of Islam - Little Green Footballs
Geller falsely claims Imam Rauf made comment blaming the Jews for 9-11 Blog Media Matters for America
What is the difference between deliberately distorting stories to incite hatred and making up stories? The motivation is the same - hate and a desire to shape public opinion to act on that hate.
Any one with a sliver of intelligence can look back just over 100 years and count the numbers of innocents mass murdered by Islamic terrorism, and see that it runs into the upper tens of millions in Asia alone. Then there are the figures for the M.E that are also in the tens of millions. Look at the horn of Africa and count the dead there at the hands of muslims. We don't need to fabricate numbers as the death tolls are freely available on the Internet
Strange then how he made the comment on camera in an interview, and now the pro islam cabal is truing to have all copies removed.
The "and" here is that your heroes have named their website after programs unleashed to mass murder as many Jews as possible, including the point blank murder of Jewish children.
They aren't "my heros". I have not defended them nor advocated for them. Try honesty for a change.
Geller has never been part of a terrorist organization, and just because you feel compelled to defend terrorism because you see it as fashionable, that does not mean Geller and your murderous terrorist friends are the same.
Geller advocates hate and the killing of Muslims. She does not have to be a part of a "terrorist organization" to be contemptable. yet you seem compelled to defend her.
Now...let's have some honesty Dogma (are you capable of that?) -- Where have I defended terrorism?
I see aris2chat agrees. Perhaps she can answer as well. Or maybe she can explain why she defends the hatred spewed from the likes of Geller as if it were any different than the hatred spewed by EI. You both will defend anti-Muslim hatred to the death while condemning anti-semitism.
Note - EI itself is not a terrorist organization either.
Just as hamas isn't as well I bet. It is funded by terrorist groups and is staffed by terrorists.
When you tell the truth about islam and the muslims using their own words it is not hatred but being truthful. The liars are those that claim the truth is hatred
The "and" here is that your heroes have named their website after programs unleashed to mass murder as many Jews as possible, including the point blank murder of Jewish children.
They aren't "my heros". I have not defended them nor advocated for them. Try honesty for a change.
Geller has never been part of a terrorist organization, and just because you feel compelled to defend terrorism because you see it as fashionable, that does not mean Geller and your murderous terrorist friends are the same.
Geller advocates hate and the killing of Muslims. She does not have to be a part of a "terrorist organization" to be contemptable. yet you seem compelled to defend her.
Now...let's have some honesty Dogma (are you capable of that?) -- Where have I defended terrorism?
I see aris2chat agrees. Perhaps she can answer as well. Or maybe she can explain why she defends the hatred spewed from the likes of Geller as if it were any different than the hatred spewed by EI. You both will defend anti-Muslim hatred to the death while condemning anti-semitism.
Note - EI itself is not a terrorist organization either.
it is not about hate but the right to speak out against such actions like refugees throwing christians off a boat to Italy. About abuse of girls. About support of terrorism. About imposing Islamic "will" in US schools. About "they an riot and kill" but the rest of the world has to be silent.
Stories she posts about are those in main stream media. She is expressing the frustration so many people have with the islamization of america and the world. It is about free speech and being able to ask questions and even saying "no" to muslim that make americans feel like they are being forced to submit.
There are so many others that speak about that are about inciting hate against muslims. Geller is rather sedate by comparison. She is not saying anything that cannot be heard from many other main stream talking heads on the TV or radio.
She is not going to kiss Islamists arse, but she might smack them across the cheek from time to time.
Speaking from first hand experience of full Islamic communities resorting to violence and making their self imposed ghetto's into no-go areas. The foul smell coming from the muslim ghetto's turn peoples stomachs and forces them to sell cheaply. The gangs of muslim youths gathering in residential areas to intimidate and terrorise the inhabitants. The attacks on lone men and women walking past muslim ghettos by gangs screaming get out of our area. This was even caught on camera when a politician was told to get out of the muslim area when he was holding a meeting with muslim leaders.
Many Americans don't know what it is like to be intimidated and to have no recourse at all to fight back.
The "and" here is that your heroes have named their website after programs unleashed to mass murder as many Jews as possible, including the point blank murder of Jewish children.
They aren't "my heros". I have not defended them nor advocated for them. Try honesty for a change.
Geller has never been part of a terrorist organization, and just because you feel compelled to defend terrorism because you see it as fashionable, that does not mean Geller and your murderous terrorist friends are the same.
Geller advocates hate and the killing of Muslims. She does not have to be a part of a "terrorist organization" to be contemptable. yet you seem compelled to defend her.
Now...let's have some honesty Dogma (are you capable of that?) -- Where have I defended terrorism?
I see aris2chat agrees. Perhaps she can answer as well. Or maybe she can explain why she defends the hatred spewed from the likes of Geller as if it were any different than the hatred spewed by EI. You both will defend anti-Muslim hatred to the death while condemning anti-semitism.
Note - EI itself is not a terrorist organization either.
it is not about hate but the right to speak out against such actions like refugees throwing christians off a boat to Italy. About abuse of girls. About support of terrorism. About imposing Islamic "will" in US schools. About "they an riot and kill" but the rest of the world has to be silent.
Stories she posts about are those in main stream media. She is expressing the frustration so many people have with the islamization of america and the world. It is about free speech and being able to ask questions and even saying "no" to muslim that make americans feel like they are being forced to submit.
There are so many others that speak about that are about inciting hate against muslims. Geller is rather sedate by comparison. She is not saying anything that cannot be heard from many other main stream talking heads on the TV or radio.
She is not going to kiss Islamists arse, but she might smack them across the cheek from time to time.
It can easily be argued that IE speaks to the frustrations many Palestinians have with the erosion of a two-state solution, and the possibility of their ever achieving rights. That too is free speech. Yet you condemn one as hate and applaud the other as justifiable frustration.
Hate is hate. But apparently not when it's the likes of Pamela Geller directing it against innocent Muslims.
And what "Islamanization of America" are you referring to?
The one that is coming ever so slowly, like a cancer spreading through an organ.
rhodescholar
Gold Member
- Banned
- #60
Any one with a sliver of intelligence can look back just over 100 years and count the numbers of innocents mass murdered by Islamic terrorism, and see that it runs into the upper tens of millions in Asia alone. Then there are the figures for the M.E that are also in the tens of millions. Look at the horn of Africa and count the dead there at the hands of muslims. We don't need to fabricate numbers as the death tolls are freely available on the Internet Strange then how he made the comment on camera in an interview, and now the pro islam cabal is truing to have all copies removed.
Forget the last 100 years, my focus lately has been from the year 700 throughout 1800, where there was little or no Western engagement with the mideast. The research I've been doing has been just horrifying, as the amounts of people slaughtered by muslims in africa, the mideast and asia made WW2 look like a party. It is tragic that this history is not more widely known, because if it were, and people generally understood the goal of most muslims to conquer the planet, islam would have justifiably been destroyed long ago.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 79
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 202
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 165
- Replies
- 15
- Views
- 417
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 21
- Views
- 212
- Replies
- 27
- Views
- 131
- Replies
- 320
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 43
- Views
- 262
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8404
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 478
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-