Lakhota
Diamond Member
While opining on the uselessness of fetal tissue research to Megyn Kelly Dr. Carson neglected to mention his own paper Colloid Cysts of the Third Ventricle: Immunohistochemical evidence for nonneuropithelial differentiation published in Hum Pathol 23:811-816 in 1992. The materials and methods describe using “human choroid plexus ependyma and nasal mucosa from two fetuses aborted in the ninth and 17th week of gestation.”
Yes, Dr. Ben Carson has done research on fetal tissue and published his findings. His name is on the paper so that means he had a substantive role in the research and supports the methods and findings.
How does one explain this given Carson’s stand on fetal tissue research?
Perhaps Dr. Carson feels that only his work delivered the goods and all other researchers have produced inconsequential work, an Ebola vaccine clearly not of merit by Carson’s logic.
Could he think his own research was useless? However, if it was non contributory to the field why was it published?
More: Ben Carson did research on 17 week fetal tissue - Dr. Jen Gunter
Did Carson forget about his research on fetal tissue?
Yes, Dr. Ben Carson has done research on fetal tissue and published his findings. His name is on the paper so that means he had a substantive role in the research and supports the methods and findings.
How does one explain this given Carson’s stand on fetal tissue research?
Perhaps Dr. Carson feels that only his work delivered the goods and all other researchers have produced inconsequential work, an Ebola vaccine clearly not of merit by Carson’s logic.
Could he think his own research was useless? However, if it was non contributory to the field why was it published?
More: Ben Carson did research on 17 week fetal tissue - Dr. Jen Gunter
Did Carson forget about his research on fetal tissue?