Benghazi Hero’s Dad Reveals Bombshell Document That Could PROVE Hillary Lied [VIDEO]

What we learned since the hearings:

Obama lied about the video

Hillary helped Obama cover up a terrorist attack

Progressives are defending their leadership for lying about and covering up a terrorist attack

But Frank, All of those things were cleared by the Select House Committee on Intelligence who found no wrongdoing on those specific elements.
 
They're only smiling because sheep like you buy into their lies...
Name one factual lie, as opposed to everything Pubs say, fool.
How about the fact that Hillary sent an email to Chelsea stating it was a terrorist attack, then told the American people it was caused by a video???

Face it, your defense of Hillary exposed you as a fool and a tool.
the night she told Chelsea it was a terrorist attack, a terrorist group came in and took credit for the event, the following morning this terrorist group retracted that they were responsible..... it was a very confusing time....
Yes we already heard that story. She was confused. Got it.
they all were...which is the norm in most surprise attacks....
It wasn't a surprise, as you know.
 
What we learned since the hearings:

Obama lied about the video

Hillary helped Obama cover up a terrorist attack

Progressives are defending their leadership for lying about and covering up a terrorist attack
That they knew was going to happen, but refused to take steps to prevent.
 
What we learned since the hearings:

Obama lied about the video

Hillary helped Obama cover up a terrorist attack

Progressives are defending their leadership for lying about and covering up a terrorist attack
That they knew was going to happen, but refused to take steps to prevent.

Abu Sufian bin Qumu, one of the leaders of the Benghazi protest was released from Gitmo by Condoleezza Rice. I don't think that much has ever been said about that before. In fact, George bush released 520 Gitmo prisoners between 2007 and 2009. Pretty good about cover ups themselves don't you think?
 
isn't it funny how they never said a word about the 50 dead in benghazi like attacks when baby bush was president? of course not... because it's not about the dead. it's because hillary terrifies them.

they're pathetic.
You can't see or hear what you disagree with so you couldn't know what was said when. The fact is the left is terrified about Hillary, you know she's damaged good with a LOT of baggage and it WILL come out when the gloves are off. Proclaiming a pre-victory celebration won't work.
 
Iceweasel, the gloves are off now, and the far right has not even scored a punch on HRC.
 
What we learned since the hearings:

Obama lied about the video

Hillary helped Obama cover up a terrorist attack

Progressives are defending their leadership for lying about and covering up a terrorist attack

But Frank, All of those things were cleared by the Select House Committee on Intelligence who found no wrongdoing on those specific elements.

Really? I just checked the Select Committee website and didn't find any of that. Can you please post where you found that?
 
What we learned since the hearings:

Obama lied about the video

Hillary helped Obama cover up a terrorist attack

Progressives are defending their leadership for lying about and covering up a terrorist attack
That they knew was going to happen, but refused to take steps to prevent.

And there the conspiracy nuts move it up a notch.
 
Obama and Hillary already said Republicans are "the enemy"
But they're smiling, as opposed to Pubs and hater dupes.
They're only smiling because sheep like you buy into their lies...
Name one factual lie, as opposed to everything Pubs say, fool.
How about the fact that Hillary sent an email to Chelsea stating it was a terrorist attack, then told the American people it was caused by a video???

Face it, your defense of Hillary exposed you as a fool and a tool.
How about the fact you have no evidence of 'wrongdoing.'

How about the fact you have no evidence of a 'crime.'

How about the fact you have no evidence of a 'cover up.'

How about the fact that House republicans have admitted that 'Benghazi' is about politics, not finding 'facts' or 'the truth.'

And how about the fact that the 'Benghazi' committee has found no evidence of 'wrongdoing,' of a 'crime,' of a 'cover up,' and whose chairman admitted Thursday’s 'hearing' revealed nothing new or relevant.

Those are the only facts which matter – not the right's baseless, unfounded speculation, spin, and lies.

Face it: you have nothing, you never did; all you have is an unwarranted hatred of Clinton, and the well-deserved contempt of the American people.
But doesn't logical reasoning point to a cover up? The majority of personnel that were in Benghazi were CIA. The compound was not officially recognized by the State Dept. The guards hired to keep watch of the outside of the compound were locals. They were trying to keep a low profile which is not consistent with a diplomatic mission.
It's unfortunate that the republicans are a bunch of dupes going after Hillary in an ill-fated attempt at keeping her out of the White House. They are missing an opportunity to expose an even larger conspiracy.
 
But they're smiling, as opposed to Pubs and hater dupes.
They're only smiling because sheep like you buy into their lies...
Name one factual lie, as opposed to everything Pubs say, fool.
How about the fact that Hillary sent an email to Chelsea stating it was a terrorist attack, then told the American people it was caused by a video???

Face it, your defense of Hillary exposed you as a fool and a tool.
How about the fact you have no evidence of 'wrongdoing.'

How about the fact you have no evidence of a 'crime.'

How about the fact you have no evidence of a 'cover up.'

How about the fact that House republicans have admitted that 'Benghazi' is about politics, not finding 'facts' or 'the truth.'

And how about the fact that the 'Benghazi' committee has found no evidence of 'wrongdoing,' of a 'crime,' of a 'cover up,' and whose chairman admitted Thursday’s 'hearing' revealed nothing new or relevant.

Those are the only facts which matter – not the right's baseless, unfounded speculation, spin, and lies.

Face it: you have nothing, you never did; all you have is an unwarranted hatred of Clinton, and the well-deserved contempt of the American people.
But doesn't logical reasoning point to a cover up? The majority of personnel that were in Benghazi were CIA. The compound was not officially recognized by the State Dept. The guards hired to keep watch of the outside of the compound were locals. They were trying to keep a low profile which is not consistent with a diplomatic mission.
It's unfortunate that the republicans are a bunch of dupes going after Hillary in an ill-fated attempt at keeping her out of the White House. They are missing an opportunity to expose an even larger conspiracy.

Yes, that Obama was arming Al Qaeda, ISIS and Islamic Jihad through the Consulate.

Right. We already know that
 
They're only smiling because sheep like you buy into their lies...
Name one factual lie, as opposed to everything Pubs say, fool.
How about the fact that Hillary sent an email to Chelsea stating it was a terrorist attack, then told the American people it was caused by a video???

Face it, your defense of Hillary exposed you as a fool and a tool.
How about the fact you have no evidence of 'wrongdoing.'

How about the fact you have no evidence of a 'crime.'

How about the fact you have no evidence of a 'cover up.'

How about the fact that House republicans have admitted that 'Benghazi' is about politics, not finding 'facts' or 'the truth.'

And how about the fact that the 'Benghazi' committee has found no evidence of 'wrongdoing,' of a 'crime,' of a 'cover up,' and whose chairman admitted Thursday’s 'hearing' revealed nothing new or relevant.

Those are the only facts which matter – not the right's baseless, unfounded speculation, spin, and lies.

Face it: you have nothing, you never did; all you have is an unwarranted hatred of Clinton, and the well-deserved contempt of the American people.
But doesn't logical reasoning point to a cover up? The majority of personnel that were in Benghazi were CIA. The compound was not officially recognized by the State Dept. The guards hired to keep watch of the outside of the compound were locals. They were trying to keep a low profile which is not consistent with a diplomatic mission.
It's unfortunate that the republicans are a bunch of dupes going after Hillary in an ill-fated attempt at keeping her out of the White House. They are missing an opportunity to expose an even larger conspiracy.

Yes, that Obama was arming Al Qaeda, ISIS and Islamic Jihad through the Consulate.

Right. We already know that

They were arming Syrian rebels at the constant urging and support of the neocon wing of the GOP.

Nothing good ever comes of acting like a Republican.
 
Iceweasel, the gloves are off now, and the far right has not even scored a punch on HRC.

Jake defending the lady who covered up a terrorist attack. That's very Progressive of you Jake
Telling the truth is not defensive but truthful.

You far right sillies have not hurt Hillary.

You need to start telling the truth.

Yeah Jake, you and the truth are parallel tracks that never meet in Newtonian space. Hillary admitted it was a terror attack and then she went on to lie about a video. Why are you supporting someone who lied about a terror attack?

“We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack—not a protest"- Hillary Clinton helping Obama cover up a terrorist attack at Benghazi.
 
Last edited:
Iceweasel, the gloves are off now, and the far right has not even scored a punch on HRC.

Jake defending the lady who covered up a terrorist attack. That's very Progressive of you Jake
Telling the truth is not defensive but truthful.

You far right sillies have not hurt Hillary.

You need to start telling the truth.

Yeah Jake, you and the truth are parallel track that never meet in Newtonian space. Hillary admitted it was a terror attack and then she went on to lie about a video. Why are you supporting someone who lied about a terror attack?

“We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack—not a protest"- Hillary Clinton helping Obama cover up a terrorist attack at Benghazi.
That is you in the mirror to whom you are talking.

Show me where the committee found her guilty of lying.

You are pathetic, Frank. Your types in our GOP is the reason we are facing electoral disaster next year.
 
Iceweasel, the gloves are off now, and the far right has not even scored a punch on HRC.

Jake defending the lady who covered up a terrorist attack. That's very Progressive of you Jake
Telling the truth is not defensive but truthful.

You far right sillies have not hurt Hillary.

You need to start telling the truth.

Yeah Jake, you and the truth are parallel track that never meet in Newtonian space. Hillary admitted it was a terror attack and then she went on to lie about a video. Why are you supporting someone who lied about a terror attack?

“We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack—not a protest"- Hillary Clinton helping Obama cover up a terrorist attack at Benghazi.
That is you in the mirror to whom you are talking.

Show me where the committee found her guilty of lying.

You are pathetic, Frank. Your types in our GOP is the reason we are facing electoral disaster next year.

Show me where the committee found her guilty of lying.

thst isnt up to the committee

that was not the trial

--LOL
 
Name one factual lie, as opposed to everything Pubs say, fool.
How about the fact that Hillary sent an email to Chelsea stating it was a terrorist attack, then told the American people it was caused by a video???

Face it, your defense of Hillary exposed you as a fool and a tool.
How about the fact you have no evidence of 'wrongdoing.'

How about the fact you have no evidence of a 'crime.'

How about the fact you have no evidence of a 'cover up.'

How about the fact that House republicans have admitted that 'Benghazi' is about politics, not finding 'facts' or 'the truth.'

And how about the fact that the 'Benghazi' committee has found no evidence of 'wrongdoing,' of a 'crime,' of a 'cover up,' and whose chairman admitted Thursday’s 'hearing' revealed nothing new or relevant.

Those are the only facts which matter – not the right's baseless, unfounded speculation, spin, and lies.

Face it: you have nothing, you never did; all you have is an unwarranted hatred of Clinton, and the well-deserved contempt of the American people.
But doesn't logical reasoning point to a cover up? The majority of personnel that were in Benghazi were CIA. The compound was not officially recognized by the State Dept. The guards hired to keep watch of the outside of the compound were locals. They were trying to keep a low profile which is not consistent with a diplomatic mission.
It's unfortunate that the republicans are a bunch of dupes going after Hillary in an ill-fated attempt at keeping her out of the White House. They are missing an opportunity to expose an even larger conspiracy.

Yes, that Obama was arming Al Qaeda, ISIS and Islamic Jihad through the Consulate.

Right. We already know that

They were arming Syrian rebels at the constant urging and support of the neocon wing of the GOP.

Nothing good ever comes of acting like a Republican.

Obama: the most powerless, greatest President EVAH!!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top