Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i'm afraid that boat has sailed for starkey, sorry jake, but you are in the top five faithful libs on this board. hillary justifies the means, damn the costs. some feel that way about the republicans. we can't lose that, it's healthy.Your mischaracterization does not stand up in the committee, Frank.Trolling and spamming does not make it true, Frank. You cannot accept the truth that it was not what you want it to be.
The American electorate knows your interp is false.
Trot along. That is not going to change.
Jake, Hillary knew it was a terrorist attack and said so.
Why did she lie about a terror attack on the anniversary of 9/11?
“We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack—not a protest"- Hillary Clinton helping Obama cover up a terrorist attack at Benghazi
Keep spamming and trolling, which will catch up to you.
Jake, I keep reposting in the hopes you're not totally retarded and can understand Hillary's admission that she helped Obama cover up a terror attack
the pattern i see with respect to benghazi, no one mentioned hillary after it happened, now no one mentions obama. pretty slick.Your mischaracterization does not stand up in the committee, Frank.Trolling and spamming does not make it true, Frank. You cannot accept the truth that it was not what you want it to be.
The American electorate knows your interp is false.
Trot along. That is not going to change.
Jake, Hillary knew it was a terrorist attack and said so.
Why did she lie about a terror attack on the anniversary of 9/11?
“We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack—not a protest"- Hillary Clinton helping Obama cover up a terrorist attack at Benghazi
Keep spamming and trolling, which will catch up to you.
Jake, I keep reposting in the hopes you're not totally retarded and can understand Hillary's admission that she helped Obama cover up a terror attack
i'm not sure which is more scary, misleading intentionally the country just before a national election,Trolling and spamming does not make it true, Frank. You cannot accept the truth that it was not what you want it to be.
The American electorate knows your interp is false.
Trot along. That is not going to change.
Jake, Hillary knew it was a terrorist attack and said so.
Why did she lie about a terror attack on the anniversary of 9/11?
“We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack—not a protest"- Hillary Clinton helping Obama cover up a terrorist attack at Benghazi
Then the only question I have as a follow up is did it hurt when you were dropped on your head as a child?But doesn't logical reasoning point to a cover up? The majority of personnel that were in Benghazi were CIA. The compound was not officially recognized by the State Dept. The guards hired to keep watch of the outside of the compound were locals. They were trying to keep a low profile which is not consistent with a diplomatic mission.How about the fact you have no evidence of 'wrongdoing.'How about the fact that Hillary sent an email to Chelsea stating it was a terrorist attack, then told the American people it was caused by a video???Name one factual lie, as opposed to everything Pubs say, fool.They're only smiling because sheep like you buy into their lies...
Face it, your defense of Hillary exposed you as a fool and a tool.
How about the fact you have no evidence of a 'crime.'
How about the fact you have no evidence of a 'cover up.'
How about the fact that House republicans have admitted that 'Benghazi' is about politics, not finding 'facts' or 'the truth.'
And how about the fact that the 'Benghazi' committee has found no evidence of 'wrongdoing,' of a 'crime,' of a 'cover up,' and whose chairman admitted Thursday’s 'hearing' revealed nothing new or relevant.
Those are the only facts which matter – not the right's baseless, unfounded speculation, spin, and lies.
Face it: you have nothing, you never did; all you have is an unwarranted hatred of Clinton, and the well-deserved contempt of the American people.
It's unfortunate that the republicans are a bunch of dupes going after Hillary in an ill-fated attempt at keeping her out of the White House. They are missing an opportunity to expose an even larger conspiracy.
Yes, that Obama was arming Al Qaeda, ISIS and Islamic Jihad through the Consulate.
Right. We already know that
You are talking out of your butt. I am a mainstream Republican, and you with Frank are far right loons. The committee has not made the conclusions you and Frank jump to. Tis what its.i'm afraid that boat has sailed for starkey, sorry jake, but you are in the top five faithful libs on this board. hillary justifies the means, damn the costs. some feel that way about the republicans. we can't lose that, it's healthy.
however, "i misspoke" is the new whatever.
That is a good question. Why is the committee misleading the country, wash?i'm not sure which is more scary, misleading intentionally the country just before a national election, or the Americans so easily misled.
Then the only question I have as a follow up is did it hurt when you were dropped on your head as a child?But doesn't logical reasoning point to a cover up? The majority of personnel that were in Benghazi were CIA. The compound was not officially recognized by the State Dept. The guards hired to keep watch of the outside of the compound were locals. They were trying to keep a low profile which is not consistent with a diplomatic mission.How about the fact you have no evidence of 'wrongdoing.'How about the fact that Hillary sent an email to Chelsea stating it was a terrorist attack, then told the American people it was caused by a video???Name one factual lie, as opposed to everything Pubs say, fool.
Face it, your defense of Hillary exposed you as a fool and a tool.
How about the fact you have no evidence of a 'crime.'
How about the fact you have no evidence of a 'cover up.'
How about the fact that House republicans have admitted that 'Benghazi' is about politics, not finding 'facts' or 'the truth.'
And how about the fact that the 'Benghazi' committee has found no evidence of 'wrongdoing,' of a 'crime,' of a 'cover up,' and whose chairman admitted Thursday’s 'hearing' revealed nothing new or relevant.
Those are the only facts which matter – not the right's baseless, unfounded speculation, spin, and lies.
Face it: you have nothing, you never did; all you have is an unwarranted hatred of Clinton, and the well-deserved contempt of the American people.
It's unfortunate that the republicans are a bunch of dupes going after Hillary in an ill-fated attempt at keeping her out of the White House. They are missing an opportunity to expose an even larger conspiracy.
Yes, that Obama was arming Al Qaeda, ISIS and Islamic Jihad through the Consulate.
Right. We already know that
After 3 years and how many investigations later you haven't figured out yet that you are only hurting your cause. Stupid republican dupes.
That is a good question. Why is the committee misleading the country, wash?i'm not sure which is more scary, misleading intentionally the country just before a national election, or the Americans so easily misled.
You are talking out of your butt. I am a mainstream Republican, and you with Frank are far right loons. The committee has not made the conclusions you and Frank jump to. Tis what its.i'm afraid that boat has sailed for starkey, sorry jake, but you are in the top five faithful libs on this board. hillary justifies the means, damn the costs. some feel that way about the republicans. we can't lose that, it's healthy.
however, "i misspoke" is the new whatever.
Where does the committee concluded she did wrong, Frank. Your conclusion does not matter.That is a good question. Why is the committee misleading the country, wash?i'm not sure which is more scary, misleading intentionally the country just before a national election, or the Americans so easily misled.
Jake snorts the Obama Kool-Aid straight from the can.
Hillary admitted it was a terror attack, Jake
You are mischaracterizing what I wrote, deliberately. I said nothing of the sort about being "cleared". Where has the committee concluded she did wrong.You are talking out of your butt. I am a mainstream Republican, and you with Frank are far right loons. The committee has not made the conclusions you and Frank jump to. Tis what its.i'm afraid that boat has sailed for starkey, sorry jake, but you are in the top five faithful libs on this board. hillary justifies the means, damn the costs. some feel that way about the republicans. we can't lose that, it's healthy.
however, "i misspoke" is the new whatever.
The Committee hasn't cleared your girl either as you keep saying
You are mischaracterizing what I wrote, deliberately. I said nothing of the sort about being "cleared". Where has the committee concluded she did wrong.You are talking out of your butt. I am a mainstream Republican, and you with Frank are far right loons. The committee has not made the conclusions you and Frank jump to. Tis what its.i'm afraid that boat has sailed for starkey, sorry jake, but you are in the top five faithful libs on this board. hillary justifies the means, damn the costs. some feel that way about the republicans. we can't lose that, it's healthy.
however, "i misspoke" is the new whatever.
The Committee hasn't cleared your girl either as you keep saying
And the FBI is still investigating her.You are talking out of your butt. I am a mainstream Republican, and you with Frank are far right loons. The committee has not made the conclusions you and Frank jump to. Tis what its.i'm afraid that boat has sailed for starkey, sorry jake, but you are in the top five faithful libs on this board. hillary justifies the means, damn the costs. some feel that way about the republicans. we can't lose that, it's healthy.
however, "i misspoke" is the new whatever.
The Committee hasn't cleared your girl either as you keep saying
Frank, I have not said anything of the sort; that is a mischaractrization of yours. I have said that they have made no conclusions she did wrong doing. After three years, and the statements of two Congressmen and a former staffer that they are trying to hurt her campaign, I doubt they will. 50% of GOP think like I do.The Committee hasn't concluded ANYTHING right now, so please stop saying they cleared her or found she did no wrongYou are mischaracterizing what I wrote, deliberately. I said nothing of the sort about being "cleared". Where has the committee concluded she did wrong.You are talking out of your butt. I am a mainstream Republican, and you with Frank are far right loons. The committee has not made the conclusions you and Frank jump to. Tis what its.i'm afraid that boat has sailed for starkey, sorry jake, but you are in the top five faithful libs on this board. hillary justifies the means, damn the costs. some feel that way about the republicans. we can't lose that, it's healthy.
however, "i misspoke" is the new whatever.
The Committee hasn't cleared your girl either as you keep saying
How can you people keep claiming that the hearing "didn't prove anything" when it most certainly did prove a number of key things? How? Did you watch the hearing? Can you read? Have you read the transcript? Some very important facts were brought to light during the hearing, and when faced with them Hillary told a number of obvious lies and distortions.
the chair of the committee said it didn't prove anything.
but keep going.... it's amusing. stupid and ignorant... but amusing.
Actually, the chairman said the opposite. He said the committee's investigation has brought out a number of important new facts and evidence. Go read his opening statement. Go read his comments later during the hearing, when he pointed out some of the disclosures that had come to light and that Hillary had been forced to face during the hearing.
Part of the problem is that you guys just don't care that Hillary's incompetence got four Americans killed and that she participated in a cover-up that tried to get us to believe that the attack was a spontaneous incident and not a planned assault. You don't care how much Hillary lied because you reject traditional notions of right and wrong and honesty and integrity.
I always find it amusing watching the right chastise the left for voting for Hilllary despite their preceived notion her incompetence failed to protect 4 Americans on the other side of the planet; even though they voted for Bush after his incompetence allowed 3000 people to die on 9.11 right here inside our own border.How can you people keep claiming that the hearing "didn't prove anything" when it most certainly did prove a number of key things? How? Did you watch the hearing? Can you read? Have you read the transcript? Some very important facts were brought to light during the hearing, and when faced with them Hillary told a number of obvious lies and distortions.
the chair of the committee said it didn't prove anything.
but keep going.... it's amusing. stupid and ignorant... but amusing.
Actually, the chairman said the opposite. He said the committee's investigation has brought out a number of important new facts and evidence. Go read his opening statement. Go read his comments later during the hearing, when he pointed out some of the disclosures that had come to light and that Hillary had been forced to face during the hearing.
Part of the problem is that you guys just don't care that Hillary's incompetence got four Americans killed and that she participated in a cover-up that tried to get us to believe that the attack was a spontaneous incident and not a planned assault. You don't care how much Hillary lied because you reject traditional notions of right and wrong and honesty and integrity.
