I noticed that some in the media are still trying to make Watergate the biggest scandal in Americas history when it was nothing more than a combination of office politics and dirty tricks affecting very few Americans. Or maybe the media is simply reminding everybody they brought down a president. It must be tough seeing something they are so proud of being knocked off the throne by Benghazi and the IRS.
Compared to office politics Benghazi and the IRS are the bigger scandals by far. Benghazi is ultimately about the UNIC (United Nations/International Community), while IRS tyranny highlights the governments ever-tightening grip on private sector Americans.
Evidence is another thing the MSM pushes to protect liberals. Media mouths set themselves up as judges ruling on whether or not evidence is admissible. The IRS discriminated against conservative organizations to be sure, while the MSM supports the politics of personal destruction. Personal destruction is admissible when the defendant is a conservative, but inadmissible when a liberal is in the dock. Heres how it works:
The media destroyed George Allen personally because of the word macaca, while liberals get away with the most horrendous statements. Compare the silliness of macaca to these gems:
Hussein fails to mention that the government must abuse one group in order to give his positives rights to another group. Is it any wonder the parasite class loves him?
This next one is Hussein speaking to Russian President Medvedev when the mic was on:
Its hard to believe he was reelected anyway?
The next one is about the Internet:
An editing or gatekeeping function is doublespeak for covering up shoddy reputations, larceny, treason, perversion, and serious falls from grace.
Incidentally, Clinton must have been tickled pink when a whole bunch of people edited the Benghazi talking points. Unfortunately for Hussein & Company a few in the press would not go along.
This next one is a stunner that got some coverage:
Somebody should have asked Clinton where the hell were the military gatekeepers in Benghazi?
This next one is mind-boggling because of who said it:
Ginsburgs comment explains why her decisions are often based on a Constitution she envisions rather than the one she was dealt.
This final gem takes democracy-loving stupidity to new heights:
In one sentence Madame Short Legs managed to contradict John Adams, John Quincy Adams, and Alexander Hamilton not to mention all of the other great minds throughout history who had no use for democracy:
Let me close with my take on democracy and socialism since they are intertwined.
Democracy is a government of, by, and for parasites. Socialism is the religion of mean women and pussy-whipped men one is not possible without the other. When put in practice socialism becomes a variant of divide and rule; hence, Socialists divide people while empowering theocracy. Thats the fairest way to describe the fundamental difference between Socialists and those men and women who want freedom for all in a limited form of government.
Compared to office politics Benghazi and the IRS are the bigger scandals by far. Benghazi is ultimately about the UNIC (United Nations/International Community), while IRS tyranny highlights the governments ever-tightening grip on private sector Americans.
Evidence is another thing the MSM pushes to protect liberals. Media mouths set themselves up as judges ruling on whether or not evidence is admissible. The IRS discriminated against conservative organizations to be sure, while the MSM supports the politics of personal destruction. Personal destruction is admissible when the defendant is a conservative, but inadmissible when a liberal is in the dock. Heres how it works:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=r90z0PMnKwI]George Allen introduces Macaca - YouTube[/ame]
The media destroyed George Allen personally because of the word macaca, while liberals get away with the most horrendous statements. Compare the silliness of macaca to these gems:
The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent, as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, as least as it's been interpreted, and Warren Court interpreted in the same way that, generally, and (sic) Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, says what the states can't do to you, says what the federal government can't do to you, but it doesn't say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf. Barack Hussein Obama
Hussein fails to mention that the government must abuse one group in order to give his positives rights to another group. Is it any wonder the parasite class loves him?
This next one is Hussein speaking to Russian President Medvedev when the mic was on:
On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved but its important for him to give me space This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility. Barack Hussein Obama
Its hard to believe he was reelected anyway?
The next one is about the Internet:
We are all going to have to rethink how we deal with this, because there are all these competing values ... Without any kind of editing function or gatekeeping function, what does it mean to have the right to defend your reputation? Hillary Clinton
An editing or gatekeeping function is doublespeak for covering up shoddy reputations, larceny, treason, perversion, and serious falls from grace.
Incidentally, Clinton must have been tickled pink when a whole bunch of people edited the Benghazi talking points. Unfortunately for Hussein & Company a few in the press would not go along.
This next one is a stunner that got some coverage:
The fact is we had four dead Americans! Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided theyd go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? Hillary Clinton
Somebody should have asked Clinton where the hell were the military gatekeepers in Benghazi?
This next one is mind-boggling because of who said it:
I would not look to the US Constitution if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012. Ruth Ginsburg
Ginsburgs comment explains why her decisions are often based on a Constitution she envisions rather than the one she was dealt.
This final gem takes democracy-loving stupidity to new heights:
While democracy in the long run is the most stable form of government, in the short run, it is among the most fragile. Madeleine Albright
In one sentence Madame Short Legs managed to contradict John Adams, John Quincy Adams, and Alexander Hamilton not to mention all of the other great minds throughout history who had no use for democracy:
Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide. John Adams
Democracy will soon degenerate into an anarchy, such an anarchy that every man will do what is right in his own eyes and no man's life or property or reputation or liberty will be secure, and every one of these will soon mould itself into a system of subordination of all the moral virtues and intellectual abilities, all the powers of wealth, beauty, wit and science, to the wanton pleasures, the capricious will, and the execrable cruelty of one or a very few. John Adams, An Essay on Man's Lust for Power, August 29, 1763
The experience of all former ages had shown that of all human governments, democracy was the most unstable, fluctuating and short-lived. John Quincy Adams
We are a Republican Government, Real liberty is never found in despotism or in the extremes of democracy...it has been observed that a pure democracy if it were practicable would be the most perfect government. Experience has proved that no position is more false than this. The ancient democracies in which the people themselves deliberated never possessed one good feature of government. Their very character was tyranny; their figure deformity. Alexander Hamilton
Let me close with my take on democracy and socialism since they are intertwined.
Democracy is a government of, by, and for parasites. Socialism is the religion of mean women and pussy-whipped men one is not possible without the other. When put in practice socialism becomes a variant of divide and rule; hence, Socialists divide people while empowering theocracy. Thats the fairest way to describe the fundamental difference between Socialists and those men and women who want freedom for all in a limited form of government.