Benghazi: Most people..just dont care! Give it up already.

[Lakhota]

 

[gwennie]

What administration in the past 40 years has not lied to the American public.
Don't you think that the families of the slain from the USS Liberty have a right to know the truth?
Don't you think that the families of the servicemen killed in Iraq have a right to know the truth as to why we were there?
Obama is no better than Bush
Face it, if there is one thing that US Politicians are good at it is lying to the American public.

And who is "supposed" to be doing their very best to expose those lies? Isn't that the main stream media? Aren't they "supposed" to be our watchdogs...the people who make politicians think twice about trying to lie in the first place?

The sad thing about what is happening right now is that the current Administration obviously believes that they can lie with impunity because the main stream media is so slanted in their favor that it will cover for them no matter how obvious the lie is.

Politicians always will be good at lying. The question is...will we have a main stream media that exposes lies no matter who tells them...or will we have a main stream media that only exposes lies for certain people while it covers up the lies of others?

It is not the politicians who are "lying." It is the intelligence community. Obama is standing by the intelligence community. The 9/11/2001 investigation came to the conclusion that is was a "intelligence failure", basically the Bush administration threw the intelligence community under the bus. Obama has done no such thing. He is a leader the way Bush never could be.

The politicians ARE lying.....they always have and they always will. And that includes obama.....he's the biggest liar of them all. 9/11/01 is not what we're talkiing about here.....we're talking about 9/11/12, so please stop blaming Bush AGAIN already. My God, for people who constantly complain about the state of affairs that things were in when Bush was in office, you liberals are completely obsessed with the man to the point of it being pathological. obama has thrown every single person under the bus that he can......in fact, that bus is so stuffed with people that there's no more room and obama has to go looking for another bus to throw people under. The man takes responsibility for NOTHING. The previous CIA director told everyone that it was a terrorist attack within hours and they knew the terrorists were linked to al-quada........that went against what obama had already put out there to the general public, so once Patreaus stepped down obama replaced him with someone who would be more "compliant and cooperative" with the obama administration. In other words, the new CIA director lied his ass off to cover for obama by saying the intel community screwed up.

 

[gwennie]

So you don't care that you were deliberately lied to in order to get Obama re-elected? You don't think you deserve to get the truth about the attack and who did it? You don't think the families of the slain have a right to know the truth? I'm guessing you would be howling in anger if a repub did this, but since it's Obama it's OK? You are one ideological son of a bitch.

What administration in the past 40 years has not lied to the American public.
Don't you think that the families of the slain from the USS Liberty have a right to know the truth?
Don't you think that the families of the servicemen killed in Iraq have a right to know the truth as to why we were there?
Obama is no better than Bush
Face it, if there is one thing that US Politicians are good at it is lying to the American public.

And who is "supposed" to be doing their very best to expose those lies? Isn't that the main stream media? Aren't they "supposed" to be our watchdogs...the people who make politicians think twice about trying to lie in the first place?

The sad thing about what is happening right now is that the current Administration obviously believes that they can lie with impunity because the main stream media is so slanted in their favor that it will cover for them no matter how obvious the lie is.

Politicians always will be good at lying. The question is...will we have a main stream media that exposes lies no matter who tells them...or will we have a main stream media that only exposes lies for certain people while it covers up the lies of others?

As long as obama and the rest of the liberals protect the MSM, we will never have a media that exposes wrongdoing unless they can pin something on the republicans.....the media will savage any republican/conservative they can for stating an opinion, while screaming bloody murder that someone had the audacity to cricitize obama's underwear color. The MSM don't care about what's morally right or wrong......they only care about scoring political points for obama. Morality has gone by the wayside when it comes to journalism these days.

 

[Claudette]

Your oh so right Gwennie.

The LSM is so in the tank for That fuck in the WH that if you or anyone is waiting for the truth then you have a long wait.

They sure won't be investigating him or his administration.

 

[Oldstyle]

What administration in the past 40 years has not lied to the American public.
Don't you think that the families of the slain from the USS Liberty have a right to know the truth?
Don't you think that the families of the servicemen killed in Iraq have a right to know the truth as to why we were there?
Obama is no better than Bush
Face it, if there is one thing that US Politicians are good at it is lying to the American public.

And who is "supposed" to be doing their very best to expose those lies? Isn't that the main stream media? Aren't they "supposed" to be our watchdogs...the people who make politicians think twice about trying to lie in the first place?

The sad thing about what is happening right now is that the current Administration obviously believes that they can lie with impunity because the main stream media is so slanted in their favor that it will cover for them no matter how obvious the lie is.

Politicians always will be good at lying. The question is...will we have a main stream media that exposes lies no matter who tells them...or will we have a main stream media that only exposes lies for certain people while it covers up the lies of others?

As long as obama and the rest of the liberals protect the MSM, we will never have a media that exposes wrongdoing unless they can pin something on the republicans.....the media will savage any republican/conservative they can for stating an opinion, while screaming bloody murder that someone had the audacity to cricitize obama's underwear color. The MSM don't care about what's morally right or wrong......they only care about scoring political points for obama. Morality has gone by the wayside when it comes to journalism these days.

You only have to look at the "approval ratings" of journalists these days to see how discredited their opinions have become. Newspapers like The New York Times once had sterling reputations for journalistic integrity...now it's a forgone conclusion that what they put out will be slanted heavily towards the left. Yet The Times can't understand why they, like publications like Time and Newsweek, who have also become liberal mouthpieces are losing readership and teetering on extinction.

They used to teach that journalists should impartially report the news...now journalists are taught to make the news fit the narrative of their view.

 

[emptystep]

And who is "supposed" to be doing their very best to expose those lies? Isn't that the main stream media? Aren't they "supposed" to be our watchdogs...the people who make politicians think twice about trying to lie in the first place?

The sad thing about what is happening right now is that the current Administration obviously believes that they can lie with impunity because the main stream media is so slanted in their favor that it will cover for them no matter how obvious the lie is.

Politicians always will be good at lying. The question is...will we have a main stream media that exposes lies no matter who tells them...or will we have a main stream media that only exposes lies for certain people while it covers up the lies of others?

It is not the politicians who are "lying." It is the intelligence community. Obama is standing by the intelligence community. The 9/11/2001 investigation came to the conclusion that is was a "intelligence failure", basically the Bush administration threw the intelligence community under the bus. Obama has done no such thing. He is a leader the way Bush never could be.

The intelligence community sent a report to the Obama White House stating that the attack in Benghazi was carried out by a terrorist group with ties to Al Queda. That report was edited to remove the part about Al Queda. That isn't Obama "standing by" the intelligence community. That's Obama fucking around with the intelligence from the intelligence community for political reasons and not owning up to it. That's the Obama Administration telling the American people lies about what they KNEW happened in Benghazi in order to cover their asses.

Obama rushed to take credit for the successful raid on Osama bin Laden...and he tried to pin the blame for the debacle in Benghazi on anyone ELSE he could. That isn't leadership.

OMG, do we have to back up every one of you Benghazi truthers one by one. Is it your turn now? Fine. Hope you didn't have to wait in line long.

Where is this report that the WH edited or at least who has claimed to have seen aforementioned report or at least who has claimed to know someone who claimed that they knew some one who knew the report was edited in the manner you claim?

 

[emptystep]

And who is "supposed" to be doing their very best to expose those lies? Isn't that the main stream media? Aren't they "supposed" to be our watchdogs...the people who make politicians think twice about trying to lie in the first place?

The sad thing about what is happening right now is that the current Administration obviously believes that they can lie with impunity because the main stream media is so slanted in their favor that it will cover for them no matter how obvious the lie is.

Politicians always will be good at lying. The question is...will we have a main stream media that exposes lies no matter who tells them...or will we have a main stream media that only exposes lies for certain people while it covers up the lies of others?

It is not the politicians who are "lying." It is the intelligence community. Obama is standing by the intelligence community. The 9/11/2001 investigation came to the conclusion that is was a "intelligence failure", basically the Bush administration threw the intelligence community under the bus. Obama has done no such thing. He is a leader the way Bush never could be.

The politicians ARE lying.....they always have and they always will. And that includes obama.....he's the biggest liar of them all. 9/11/01 is not what we're talkiing about here.....we're talking about 9/11/12, so please stop blaming Bush AGAIN already. My God, for people who constantly complain about the state of affairs that things were in when Bush was in office, you liberals are completely obsessed with the man to the point of it being pathological. obama has thrown every single person under the bus that he can......in fact, that bus is so stuffed with people that there's no more room and obama has to go looking for another bus to throw people under. The man takes responsibility for NOTHING. The previous CIA director told everyone that it was a terrorist attack within hours and they knew the terrorists were linked to al-quada........that went against what obama had already put out there to the general public, so once Patreaus stepped down obama replaced him with someone who would be more "compliant and cooperative" with the obama administration. In other words, the new CIA director lied his ass off to cover for obama by saying the intel community screwed up.

Name a single person Obama has thrown under the bus. And that previous CIA director you site has been shown to rewrite history. What does he care? He has nothing left to lose.

 

[emptystep]

And who is "supposed" to be doing their very best to expose those lies? Isn't that the main stream media? Aren't they "supposed" to be our watchdogs...the people who make politicians think twice about trying to lie in the first place?

The sad thing about what is happening right now is that the current Administration obviously believes that they can lie with impunity because the main stream media is so slanted in their favor that it will cover for them no matter how obvious the lie is.

Politicians always will be good at lying. The question is...will we have a main stream media that exposes lies no matter who tells them...or will we have a main stream media that only exposes lies for certain people while it covers up the lies of others?

As long as obama and the rest of the liberals protect the MSM, we will never have a media that exposes wrongdoing unless they can pin something on the republicans.....the media will savage any republican/conservative they can for stating an opinion, while screaming bloody murder that someone had the audacity to cricitize obama's underwear color. The MSM don't care about what's morally right or wrong......they only care about scoring political points for obama. Morality has gone by the wayside when it comes to journalism these days.

You only have to look at the "approval ratings" of journalists these days to see how discredited their opinions have become. Newspapers like The New York Times once had sterling reputations for journalistic integrity...now it's a forgone conclusion that what they put out will be slanted heavily towards the left. Yet The Times can't understand why they, like publications like Time and Newsweek, who have also become liberal mouthpieces are losing readership and teetering on extinction.

They used to teach that journalists should impartially report the news...now journalists are taught to make the news fit the narrative of their view.

If everyone else but you is crazy, guess what?

 

[emptystep]

What administration in the past 40 years has not lied to the American public.
Don't you think that the families of the slain from the USS Liberty have a right to know the truth?
Don't you think that the families of the servicemen killed in Iraq have a right to know the truth as to why we were there?
Obama is no better than Bush
Face it, if there is one thing that US Politicians are good at it is lying to the American public.

And who is "supposed" to be doing their very best to expose those lies? Isn't that the main stream media? Aren't they "supposed" to be our watchdogs...the people who make politicians think twice about trying to lie in the first place?

The sad thing about what is happening right now is that the current Administration obviously believes that they can lie with impunity because the main stream media is so slanted in their favor that it will cover for them no matter how obvious the lie is.

Politicians always will be good at lying. The question is...will we have a main stream media that exposes lies no matter who tells them...or will we have a main stream media that only exposes lies for certain people while it covers up the lies of others?

As long as obama and the rest of the liberals protect the MSM, we will never have a media that exposes wrongdoing unless they can pin something on the republicans.....the media will savage any republican/conservative they can for stating an opinion, while screaming bloody murder that someone had the audacity to cricitize obama's underwear color. The MSM don't care about what's morally right or wrong......they only care about scoring political points for obama. Morality has gone by the wayside when it comes to journalism these days.

So now your questioning Obama's underwear color. DO YOU PEOPLE KNOW NO SHAME!

 

[Oldstyle]

It is not the politicians who are "lying." It is the intelligence community. Obama is standing by the intelligence community. The 9/11/2001 investigation came to the conclusion that is was a "intelligence failure", basically the Bush administration threw the intelligence community under the bus. Obama has done no such thing. He is a leader the way Bush never could be.

The intelligence community sent a report to the Obama White House stating that the attack in Benghazi was carried out by a terrorist group with ties to Al Queda. That report was edited to remove the part about Al Queda. That isn't Obama "standing by" the intelligence community. That's Obama fucking around with the intelligence from the intelligence community for political reasons and not owning up to it. That's the Obama Administration telling the American people lies about what they KNEW happened in Benghazi in order to cover their asses.

Obama rushed to take credit for the successful raid on Osama bin Laden...and he tried to pin the blame for the debacle in Benghazi on anyone ELSE he could. That isn't leadership.

OMG, do we have to back up every one of you Benghazi truthers one by one. Is it your turn now? Fine. Hope you didn't have to wait in line long.

Where is this report that the WH edited or at least who has claimed to have seen aforementioned report or at least who has claimed to know someone who claimed that they knew some one who knew the report was edited in the manner you claim?

The ex-head of the CIA testified that they had sent the White House an intelligence report stating that the attack in Benghazi was carried out by an Al Queda affiliated terrorist group and that the reference to Al Queda was subsequently edited out. So who was it that changed that intelligence report, Empty? Why is that information being withheld even now? The Obama Administration "ran out the clock" on this investigation, stone-walling it until after the elections when they promised that we would have answers. We're still waiting for those answers...they are still refusing to level with the American people...and the main stream media is still refusing to cover the story.

 

[emptystep]

Dang, I think I hit my post quota for the day. Can I go or are people still saying stupid shit on the Internet?

 

[emptystep]

The intelligence community sent a report to the Obama White House stating that the attack in Benghazi was carried out by a terrorist group with ties to Al Queda. That report was edited to remove the part about Al Queda. That isn't Obama "standing by" the intelligence community. That's Obama fucking around with the intelligence from the intelligence community for political reasons and not owning up to it. That's the Obama Administration telling the American people lies about what they KNEW happened in Benghazi in order to cover their asses.

Obama rushed to take credit for the successful raid on Osama bin Laden...and he tried to pin the blame for the debacle in Benghazi on anyone ELSE he could. That isn't leadership.

OMG, do we have to back up every one of you Benghazi truthers one by one. Is it your turn now? Fine. Hope you didn't have to wait in line long.

Where is this report that the WH edited or at least who has claimed to have seen aforementioned report or at least who has claimed to know someone who claimed that they knew some one who knew the report was edited in the manner you claim?

The ex-head of the CIA testified that they had sent the White House an intelligence report stating that the attack in Benghazi was carried out by an Al Queda affiliated terrorist group and that the reference to Al Queda was subsequently edited out. So who was it that changed that intelligence report, Empty? Why is that information being withheld even now? The Obama Administration "ran out the clock" on this investigation, stone-walling it until after the elections when they promised that we would have answers. We're still waiting for those answers...they are still refusing to level with the American people...and the main stream media is still refusing to cover the story.

I would tear that up but I will start with: or do you just know this through extra sensory perception?

 

[Oldstyle]

It is not the politicians who are "lying." It is the intelligence community. Obama is standing by the intelligence community. The 9/11/2001 investigation came to the conclusion that is was a "intelligence failure", basically the Bush administration threw the intelligence community under the bus. Obama has done no such thing. He is a leader the way Bush never could be.

The politicians ARE lying.....they always have and they always will. And that includes obama.....he's the biggest liar of them all. 9/11/01 is not what we're talkiing about here.....we're talking about 9/11/12, so please stop blaming Bush AGAIN already. My God, for people who constantly complain about the state of affairs that things were in when Bush was in office, you liberals are completely obsessed with the man to the point of it being pathological. obama has thrown every single person under the bus that he can......in fact, that bus is so stuffed with people that there's no more room and obama has to go looking for another bus to throw people under. The man takes responsibility for NOTHING. The previous CIA director told everyone that it was a terrorist attack within hours and they knew the terrorists were linked to al-quada........that went against what obama had already put out there to the general public, so once Patreaus stepped down obama replaced him with someone who would be more "compliant and cooperative" with the obama administration. In other words, the new CIA director lied his ass off to cover for obama by saying the intel community screwed up.

Name a single person Obama has thrown under the bus. And that previous CIA director you site has been shown to rewrite history. What does he care? He has nothing left to lose.

David Petraeus' story actually rings true. The story that we've been given by the Obama White House hasn't from the start. They knew from live streaming video on the day of the attack that there was no demonstration prior to the attacks...yet they went with the story that the attack was a spontaneous reaction to the YouTube video.

You're right about the ex head of the CIA having nothing to lose. Those are the people that generally tell you the truth. If you think you're getting the truth from Susan Rice and Jay Carney then you're seriously naive.

 

[Claudette]

The intelligence community sent a report to the Obama White House stating that the attack in Benghazi was carried out by a terrorist group with ties to Al Queda. That report was edited to remove the part about Al Queda. That isn't Obama "standing by" the intelligence community. That's Obama fucking around with the intelligence from the intelligence community for political reasons and not owning up to it. That's the Obama Administration telling the American people lies about what they KNEW happened in Benghazi in order to cover their asses.

Obama rushed to take credit for the successful raid on Osama bin Laden...and he tried to pin the blame for the debacle in Benghazi on anyone ELSE he could. That isn't leadership.

OMG, do we have to back up every one of you Benghazi truthers one by one. Is it your turn now? Fine. Hope you didn't have to wait in line long.

Where is this report that the WH edited or at least who has claimed to have seen aforementioned report or at least who has claimed to know someone who claimed that they knew some one who knew the report was edited in the manner you claim?

The ex-head of the CIA testified that they had sent the White House an intelligence report stating that the attack in Benghazi was carried out by an Al Queda affiliated terrorist group and that the reference to Al Queda was subsequently edited out. So who was it that changed that intelligence report, Empty? Why is that information being withheld even now? The Obama Administration "ran out the clock" on this investigation, stone-walling it until after the elections when they promised that we would have answers. We're still waiting for those answers...they are still refusing to level with the American people...and the main stream media is still refusing to cover the story.

He's an Obamabot and doesn't want to hear anything negative about that fuck.

Your wasting your breath OS. He will never admit anything negative about Barry and his pack of boobs. He sees nothing wrong with Rice and the adminstration lying the're asses off for how long?? He also can't seem to comprehend that the CIA threw a wrench in their bs story.

He certainly doesn't give a rats ass about those men who died because Barry's State Department dropped the ball.

In short. He isn't worth your time my friend.

 

[emptystep]

The politicians ARE lying.....they always have and they always will. And that includes obama.....he's the biggest liar of them all. 9/11/01 is not what we're talkiing about here.....we're talking about 9/11/12, so please stop blaming Bush AGAIN already. My God, for people who constantly complain about the state of affairs that things were in when Bush was in office, you liberals are completely obsessed with the man to the point of it being pathological. obama has thrown every single person under the bus that he can......in fact, that bus is so stuffed with people that there's no more room and obama has to go looking for another bus to throw people under. The man takes responsibility for NOTHING. The previous CIA director told everyone that it was a terrorist attack within hours and they knew the terrorists were linked to al-quada........that went against what obama had already put out there to the general public, so once Patreaus stepped down obama replaced him with someone who would be more "compliant and cooperative" with the obama administration. In other words, the new CIA director lied his ass off to cover for obama by saying the intel community screwed up.

Name a single person Obama has thrown under the bus. And that previous CIA director you site has been shown to rewrite history. What does he care? He has nothing left to lose.

David Petraeus' story actually rings true. The story that we've been given by the Obama White House hasn't from the start. They knew from live streaming video on the day of the attack that there was no demonstration prior to the attacks...yet they went with the story that the attack was a spontaneous reaction to the YouTube video.

You're right about the ex head of the CIA having nothing to lose. Those are the people that generally tell you the truth. If you think you're getting the truth from Susan Rice and Jay Carney then you're seriously naive.

Why does Petraeus have nothing left to lose?

 

[Oldstyle]

OMG, do we have to back up every one of you Benghazi truthers one by one. Is it your turn now? Fine. Hope you didn't have to wait in line long.

Where is this report that the WH edited or at least who has claimed to have seen aforementioned report or at least who has claimed to know someone who claimed that they knew some one who knew the report was edited in the manner you claim?

The ex-head of the CIA testified that they had sent the White House an intelligence report stating that the attack in Benghazi was carried out by an Al Queda affiliated terrorist group and that the reference to Al Queda was subsequently edited out. So who was it that changed that intelligence report, Empty? Why is that information being withheld even now? The Obama Administration "ran out the clock" on this investigation, stone-walling it until after the elections when they promised that we would have answers. We're still waiting for those answers...they are still refusing to level with the American people...and the main stream media is still refusing to cover the story.

I would tear that up but I will start with: or do you just know this through extra sensory perception?

Did you not listen to the Senators leaving the meeting with Petraeus? They said he told them that the CIA report called it a terror attack carried out by an Al Queda affiliated group almost from the start and that was in the intelligence given to the White House. What the CIA gave to the White House was not what the White House subsequently gave to us. They edited out the part about Al Queda. So who did that and why did they do so?

 

[Oldstyle]

Name a single person Obama has thrown under the bus. And that previous CIA director you site has been shown to rewrite history. What does he care? He has nothing left to lose.

David Petraeus' story actually rings true. The story that we've been given by the Obama White House hasn't from the start. They knew from live streaming video on the day of the attack that there was no demonstration prior to the attacks...yet they went with the story that the attack was a spontaneous reaction to the YouTube video.

You're right about the ex head of the CIA having nothing to lose. Those are the people that generally tell you the truth. If you think you're getting the truth from Susan Rice and Jay Carney then you're seriously naive.

Why does Petraeus have nothing left to lose?

Because he's left office in disgrace probably never to return? What's his reason for lying?

Susan Rice on the other hand is an ambitious young politician with aspirations to be our next Secretary of State and the man who can do that for her is the man that she went on those five Sunday morning talk shows and protected from criticism over Benghazi by telling the American people information that she SHOULD have know was completely false.

 

[emptystep]

OMG, do we have to back up every one of you Benghazi truthers one by one. Is it your turn now? Fine. Hope you didn't have to wait in line long.

Where is this report that the WH edited or at least who has claimed to have seen aforementioned report or at least who has claimed to know someone who claimed that they knew some one who knew the report was edited in the manner you claim?

The ex-head of the CIA testified that they had sent the White House an intelligence report stating that the attack in Benghazi was carried out by an Al Queda affiliated terrorist group and that the reference to Al Queda was subsequently edited out. So who was it that changed that intelligence report, Empty? Why is that information being withheld even now? The Obama Administration "ran out the clock" on this investigation, stone-walling it until after the elections when they promised that we would have answers. We're still waiting for those answers...they are still refusing to level with the American people...and the main stream media is still refusing to cover the story.

He's an Obamabot and doesn't want to hear anything negative about that fuck.

Your wasting your breath OS. He will never admit anything negative about Barry and his pack of boobs. He sees nothing wrong with Rice and the adminstration lying the're asses off for how long?? He also can't seem to comprehend that the CIA threw a wrench in their bs story.

He certainly doesn't give a rats ass about those men who died because Barry's State Department dropped the ball.

In short. He isn't worth your time my friend.

Patraeus is 'the CIA'. If that is so much the case why the the current CIA director go with Rice to meet McInsane?

 

[emptystep]

The ex-head of the CIA testified that they had sent the White House an intelligence report stating that the attack in Benghazi was carried out by an Al Queda affiliated terrorist group and that the reference to Al Queda was subsequently edited out. So who was it that changed that intelligence report, Empty? Why is that information being withheld even now? The Obama Administration "ran out the clock" on this investigation, stone-walling it until after the elections when they promised that we would have answers. We're still waiting for those answers...they are still refusing to level with the American people...and the main stream media is still refusing to cover the story.

I would tear that up but I will start with: or do you just know this through extra sensory perception?

Did you not listen to the Senators leaving the meeting with Petraeus? They said he told them that the CIA report called it a terror attack carried out by an Al Queda affiliated group almost from the start and that was in the intelligence given to the White House. What the CIA gave to the White House was not what the White House subsequently gave to us. They edited out the part about Al Queda. So who did that and why did they do so?

You seem to be a bit link challenged my friend.

 

[Oldstyle]

Are you claiming that Petraeus didn't testify that the initial CIA report claimed that the attack was carried out by Al Queda affiliated terrorists and that it was not a spontaneous reaction to the YouTube video?