Benghazi Victim’s Mother SCREAMS: “Hillary Is a Liar!” After Watching ’13 Hours’ (VIDEO)

[Camp]

Nope. It matters very little either way. If you think that it does, you're fucked in the head.

You are one of the most irrational partisan hacks on the board, the party is the ONLY thing that matters to you.

Whoever the GOP candidate is, will be the next POTUS. It's looking more and more like that will be Trump.

If the democratic - socialists run Mao Tse Sanders, you may not even capture California in the general.

Partisans don't remind you that Clinton should have kept his pants on, and Obama should only drone Americans after trying them first.

If your nonsense was followed, terrorist like ISIS and al Qaeda could get Americans to hang out with, treat them like princes and sheiks and enjoy the comfort of having human shields to protect them from a drone and air attacks. Some people prefer that hanging out with terrorists or aiding them in any way is enough of a reason to terminate their assistance or possible assistance to terrorist when in a terrorist region and enclave of the world.

 

[Lilah]

I guess it is no big deal Mrs. Clinton lies to a grieving mother.

Benghazi Victim's Mother SCREAMS: "Hillary Is a Liar!" After Watching '13 Hours' (VIDEO) - The Gateway Pundit

Pat Smith joined Megyn Kelly tonight after attending the opening of ’13 Hours’ last night in Dallas, Texas.
She sobbed as she told Megyn about the movie.

I left as soon as Sean came on screen, or the person who portrayed him. I couldn’t handle it. HILLARY IS A LIAR! I know what she told me!​

I always rely on Hollywood movies to get my facts too. For example, Superman really can fly and space ships can go up to Warp 9.

Read the book.

Oh yes....books are so reliable too. Like Harry Potter. So accurate and true.

Given the choice between believing the guys who were there or believing Obama and his appointees, it's an easy pick.

Believing what you want to believe is what makes it easy.

Easy peasy for you.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I always rely on Hollywood movies to get my facts too. For example, Superman really can fly and space ships can go up to Warp 9.

Read the book.

Oh yes....books are so reliable too. Like Harry Potter. So accurate and true.

Given the choice between believing the guys who were there or believing Obama and his appointees, it's an easy pick.

Believing what you want to believe is what makes it easy.

Easy peasy for you.

Nope, I deal in reality, like the reality that Stevens had a hand in his own death, and that of three others, poor bastard.

 

[Lilah]

Read the book.

Oh yes....books are so reliable too. Like Harry Potter. So accurate and true.

Given the choice between believing the guys who were there or believing Obama and his appointees, it's an easy pick.

Believing what you want to believe is what makes it easy.

Easy peasy for you.

Nope, I deal in reality, like the reality that Stevens had a hand in his own death, and that of three others, poor bastard.

That would be your version of reality.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Why do you respond with such stupidity?

Facts are not stupid.

That case was about anonymous people making secretive unlimited contributions to political campaigns.

Well now that's a flat out lie, isn't it? If you have a valid point, you wouldn't need to lie.

{
Facts of the case

Citizens United sought an injunction against the Federal Election Commission in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to prevent the application of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) to its film Hillary: The Movie. The Movie expressed opinions about whether Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton would make a good president.}

{{meta.pageTitle}}

The democratic party sought to silence criticism of Hillary Clinton.

The movie was considered the distribution outright unregulated political campaigning financed by those anonymous sources right before the election. The law that enabled it to be distributed after the election is still a controversial law objected to by both Republicans and Democrats.
No one is wailing about the film. That is your always delusional imagination at work.

Again, you are simply lying. The democratic party attempted to crush free speech using the McCain / Feingold travesty. Because the PAC behind Citizens United formed a 503 Corporation, the party claimed that they could be denied political speech.


{Citizens United argued that: 1) Section 203 violates the First Amendment on its face and when applied to The Movie and its related advertisements, and that 2) Sections 201 and 203 are also unconstitutional as applied to the circumstances.}

{{meta.pageTitle}}

This case was PURELY about the party trying to crush political speech contrary to party goals.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Oh yes....books are so reliable too. Like Harry Potter. So accurate and true.

Given the choice between believing the guys who were there or believing Obama and his appointees, it's an easy pick.

Believing what you want to believe is what makes it easy.

Easy peasy for you.

Nope, I deal in reality, like the reality that Stevens had a hand in his own death, and that of three others, poor bastard.

That would be your version of reality.

No, it's the version of reality. Just like: Ambassador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security, U.S. officials say

 

[Camp]

Why do you respond with such stupidity?

Facts are not stupid.

That case was about anonymous people making secretive unlimited contributions to political campaigns.

Well now that's a flat out lie, isn't it? If you have a valid point, you wouldn't need to lie.

{
Facts of the case

Citizens United sought an injunction against the Federal Election Commission in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to prevent the application of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) to its film Hillary: The Movie. The Movie expressed opinions about whether Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton would make a good president.}

{{meta.pageTitle}}

The democratic party sought to silence criticism of Hillary Clinton.

The movie was considered the distribution outright unregulated political campaigning financed by those anonymous sources right before the election. The law that enabled it to be distributed after the election is still a controversial law objected to by both Republicans and Democrats.
No one is wailing about the film. That is your always delusional imagination at work.

Again, you are simply lying. The democratic party attempted to crush free speech using the McCain / Feingold travesty. Because the PAC behind Citizens United formed a 503 Corporation, the party claimed that they could be denied political speech.


{Citizens United argued that: 1) Section 203 violates the First Amendment on its face and when applied to The Movie and its related advertisements, and that 2) Sections 201 and 203 are also unconstitutional as applied to the circumstances.}

{{meta.pageTitle}}

This case was PURELY about the party trying to crush political speech contrary to party goals.

My explanation is correct and yours mumbo jumbo bullshit.

 

[Uncensored2008]

My explanation is correct and yours mumbo jumbo bullshit.

My "mumbo jumbo" being the actual case....

You lied, whether you have the intellect to grasp it or not. The case regarded "Hillary: The Movie" which your party attempted to block.

Look, democrats are at war to end civil rights. This was just one of many battles you fought in your quest to end the freedom of speech. It is just that in this case you lost. You demand that the DNC controlled media is the only source that should be allowed, but the Constitution says otherwise. There were not enough Ginsburg and Kagans on the court to completely subvert the Constitution in this case.

 

[Camp]

My explanation is correct and yours mumbo jumbo bullshit.

My "mumbo jumbo" being the actual case....

You lied, whether you have the intellect to grasp it or not. The case regarded "Hillary: The Movie" which your party attempted to block.

Look, democrats are at war to end civil rights. This was just one of many battles you fought in your quest to end the freedom of speech. It is just that in this case you lost. You demand that the DNC controlled media is the only source that should be allowed, but the Constitution says otherwise. There were not enough Ginsburg and Kagans on the court to completely subvert the Constitution in this case.

I am not a Democrat and didn't fight the battle you accuse me of fighting back in 2008 so STFU you lying little turd, or don't STFU, not sure anyone really cares about the blather and crap you post. Are there some other turds that cheer for your racist bullshit? On second thought, keep it up. Show everyone who reads these threads what a racist is really like.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

i wonder if there is a scene in the movie where muslim terrorists are watching u-tube in their spare time.