Paulie
Diamond Member
- May 19, 2007
- 40,769
- 6,382
- 1,830
The gold bubble will burst soon and many of you will likely STILL not learn the lesson
This discussion is SO far above your pay grade. Please stop ruining a good thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The gold bubble will burst soon and many of you will likely STILL not learn the lesson
The prices for almost all commodities have spiked.I haven't skimmed through all the pages of this thread so if you were already questioned on this I apologize. But what do you mean by awful vs. catastrophic? You say gold standard is awful, but awful is better than catastrophic. Under the context of this exchange, that implies that Fed policy is catastrophic. Is that what you're saying? Gold is better than Fed?
Maybe. I don't know.
Maybe a combination of the two is better.
I just found that exchange and read it. The bull market in gold has little to do with gold supplies though. It's the result of lost confidence in the fiat currency system.
We have posters here claiming that there's no reason to assume the Fed's policies of the last 15 years or so have been inflationary, but yet we see gold up almost 1000% over that time.
Are all of these people running to gold just retarded, or are they on to something?
The gold bubble will burst soon and many of you will likely STILL not learn the lesson
This discussion is SO far above your pay grade. Please stop ruining a good thread.
1932-1964 Washington Quarter
$0.25 (worth in dollar relation)
$6.0150 (worth in silver)
2406.00% (percent increase)
The gold bubble will burst soon and many of you will likely STILL not learn the lesson
This discussion is SO far above your pay grade. Please stop ruining a good thread.
will you tell us how much you lost on gold when it crashes?
The prices for almost all commodities have spiked.Maybe. I don't know.
Maybe a combination of the two is better.
I just found that exchange and read it. The bull market in gold has little to do with gold supplies though. It's the result of lost confidence in the fiat currency system.
We have posters here claiming that there's no reason to assume the Fed's policies of the last 15 years or so have been inflationary, but yet we see gold up almost 1000% over that time.
Are all of these people running to gold just retarded, or are they on to something?
Good thing inflation has been held in check, huh?
She's definitely out of her element.
Although, I agree that owning land is a good idea. Preferably farmland that can produce commodities. A multi-million dollar condo in NYC isn't where you want to have ownership. Anyone who has one of those might consider a sell of real land.
Sellers also have two other options for fulfilling their COMEX silver contracts. They can settle for cash in lieu of the commodity or they can settle for the equivalent number of shares in the SLV silver exchange traded fund. I believe that the buyer has the option to refuse these alternate forms of settlement.
The largest risk to the COMEX silver market is that a large number of maturing long contracts will be demanded for delivery. In March 2011, when a real supply squeeze affected the market, several people told me they were being paid more than $60 per ounce to accept a cash settlement rather than the physical metal.
There is also the risk, as happened in the MF Global Holdings bankruptcy, that customer assets had been re-hypothecated by a broker. That means that customer assets were pledged as collateral for debt of the broker. In the MF Global disaster, multiple COMEX gold and silver contracts suffered default of delivery.
It is also possible that some of the Commercial traders with large net short silver positions could take physical possession of some silver held by exchange traded funds in order to make delivery. This would leave the investors in the ETFs facing a loss of part of their investments.
It is also possible that short sellers might be unable to meet their contractual liabilities to holders of COMEX long accounts, and that even the counterparties to their derivatives contracts might not be in a position to fulfill their commitments. Should this occur, the COMEX would likely declare a force majeure event to relieve itself from any liability for the defaults.
As I think you see, owning paper silver may be convenient, but it does carry risks of loss. A better solution for most people might be purchase of physical silver bullion-priced coins and bars that they can have in their direct possession. Physical silver and gold don’t need credit ratings, because they are the asset rather than a promise of an asset.
I think gold will be less than $500 one day, but it might hit $5000 first.
I think gold will be less than $500 one day, but it might hit $5000 first.
She's definitely out of her element.
Although, I agree that owning land is a good idea. Preferably farmland that can produce commodities. A multi-million dollar condo in NYC isn't where you want to have ownership. Anyone who has one of those might consider a sell of real land.
Yeah but her problem was that she said "Housing prices ALWAYS go up".
Which anyone who hasn't been living deep inside a cave the last 5 years knows all too well isn't true.
Like anything else, there's a time to buy and a time to sell. Her hero Krugman certainly wasn't telling anyone to sell in 2006.