Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
bernie is a bit of a hypocrite. the death tax is immoral.Bernie Sanders called Trump's budget "grotesquely immoral". Thank God this socialist scum bag didn't get elected or else we'd be talking about increased taxes on the middle class and rich and more big government. Sanders: Trump budget is 'grotesquely immoral'
Yet, the rich should pay their share.bernie is a bit of a hypocrite.Bernie Sanders called Trump's budget "grotesquely immoral". Thank God this socialist scum bag didn't get elected or else we'd be talking about increased taxes on the middle class and rich and more big government. Sanders: Trump budget is 'grotesquely immoral'
Yet, the rich should pay their share.bernie is a bit of a hypocrite.Bernie Sanders called Trump's budget "grotesquely immoral". Thank God this socialist scum bag didn't get elected or else we'd be talking about increased taxes on the middle class and rich and more big government. Sanders: Trump budget is 'grotesquely immoral'
Bernie Sanders called Trump's budget "grotesquely immoral". Thank God this socialist scum bag didn't get elected or else we'd be talking about increased taxes on the middle class and rich and more big government. http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/334949-sanders-trump-budget-is-grotesquely-immoral
fair share of what ?Yet, the rich should pay their share.bernie is a bit of a hypocrite.Bernie Sanders called Trump's budget "grotesquely immoral". Thank God this socialist scum bag didn't get elected or else we'd be talking about increased taxes on the middle class and rich and more big government. Sanders: Trump budget is 'grotesquely immoral'
Probably because the rich have ways to reduce their share to zero.Yet, the rich should pay their share.bernie is a bit of a hypocrite.Bernie Sanders called Trump's budget "grotesquely immoral". Thank God this socialist scum bag didn't get elected or else we'd be talking about increased taxes on the middle class and rich and more big government. Sanders: Trump budget is 'grotesquely immoral'
And the IRS says they do.
Of the income, of course.fair share of what ?Yet, the rich should pay their share.bernie is a bit of a hypocrite.Bernie Sanders called Trump's budget "grotesquely immoral". Thank God this socialist scum bag didn't get elected or else we'd be talking about increased taxes on the middle class and rich and more big government. Sanders: Trump budget is 'grotesquely immoral'
i've known the man for thirty years, sadly he has become crazy and a bit creepy. in all fairness though his political bent has always been like trotsky.Crazy Bernie, a creepy liar who is unqualified for public office, making appearances on fake MSM news is an insult and shows his contempt for the American taxpaying citizen.
inherited wealth belongs to the family, fair is a very subjective term.Of the income, of course.fair share of what ?Yet, the rich should pay their share.bernie is a bit of a hypocrite.Bernie Sanders called Trump's budget "grotesquely immoral". Thank God this socialist scum bag didn't get elected or else we'd be talking about increased taxes on the middle class and rich and more big government. Sanders: Trump budget is 'grotesquely immoral'
bernie is a bit of a hypocrite. the death tax is immoral.Bernie Sanders called Trump's budget "grotesquely immoral". Thank God this socialist scum bag didn't get elected or else we'd be talking about increased taxes on the middle class and rich and more big government. Sanders: Trump budget is 'grotesquely immoral'
i'm not a socialist. i'll bet it is immoral on some other planets.bernie is a bit of a hypocrite. the death tax is immoral.Bernie Sanders called Trump's budget "grotesquely immoral". Thank God this socialist scum bag didn't get elected or else we'd be talking about increased taxes on the middle class and rich and more big government. Sanders: Trump budget is 'grotesquely immoral'
On what damn planet is the death tax immoral?
There are but three modes in which surplus wealth can be disposed of. It call be left to the families of the decedents; or it can be bequeathed for public purposes; or, finally, it can be administered during their lives by its possessors. Under the first and second modes most of the wealth of the world that has reached the few has hitherto been applied. Let us in turn consider each of these modes. The first is the most injudicious. In monarchical countries, the estates and the greatest portion of the wealth are left to the first son, that the vanity of the parent may be gratified by the thought that his name and title are to descend to succeeding generations unimpaired. The condition of this class in Europe to-day teaches the futility of such hopes or ambitions. The successors have become impoverished through their follies or from the fall in the value of land. Even in Great Britain the strict law of entail has been found inadequate to maintain the status of an hereditary class. Its soil is rapidly passing into the hands of the stranger. Under republican institutions the division of property among the children is much fairer, but the question which forces itself upon thoughtful men in all lands is: Why should men leave great fortunes to their children? If this is done from affection, is it not misguided affection? Observation teaches that, generally speaking, it is not well for the children that they should be so burdened. Neither is it well for the state. Beyond providing for the wife and daughters moderate sources of income, and very moderate allowances indeed, if any, for the sons, men may well hesitate, for it is no longer questionable that great suns bequeathed oftener work more for the injury than for the good of the recipients. Wise men will soon conclude that, for the best interests of the members of their families and of the state, such bequests are an improper use of their means.
http://ghiraldelli.pro.br/wp-content/uploads/ccny_essay_1889_gospel.pdf
A hundred years ago even an eighth grader knew "The Gospel of Wealth". Educate yourself.
Probably because the rich have ways to reduce their share to zero.Yet, the rich should pay their share.bernie is a bit of a hypocrite.Bernie Sanders called Trump's budget "grotesquely immoral". Thank God this socialist scum bag didn't get elected or else we'd be talking about increased taxes on the middle class and rich and more big government. Sanders: Trump budget is 'grotesquely immoral'
And the IRS says they do.
Its not only about inheritances. Doesn´t the worker pay his share?inherited wealth belongs to the family, fair is a very subjective term.Of the income, of course.fair share of what ?Yet, the rich should pay their share.bernie is a bit of a hypocrite.Bernie Sanders called Trump's budget "grotesquely immoral". Thank God this socialist scum bag didn't get elected or else we'd be talking about increased taxes on the middle class and rich and more big government. Sanders: Trump budget is 'grotesquely immoral'
bernie is a bit of a hypocrite. the death tax is immoral.Bernie Sanders called Trump's budget "grotesquely immoral". Thank God this socialist scum bag didn't get elected or else we'd be talking about increased taxes on the middle class and rich and more big government. Sanders: Trump budget is 'grotesquely immoral'
On what damn planet is the death tax immoral?
There are but three modes in which surplus wealth can be disposed of. It call be left to the families of the decedents; or it can be bequeathed for public purposes; or, finally, it can be administered during their lives by its possessors. Under the first and second modes most of the wealth of the world that has reached the few has hitherto been applied. Let us in turn consider each of these modes. The first is the most injudicious. In monarchical countries, the estates and the greatest portion of the wealth are left to the first son, that the vanity of the parent may be gratified by the thought that his name and title are to descend to succeeding generations unimpaired. The condition of this class in Europe to-day teaches the futility of such hopes or ambitions. The successors have become impoverished through their follies or from the fall in the value of land. Even in Great Britain the strict law of entail has been found inadequate to maintain the status of an hereditary class. Its soil is rapidly passing into the hands of the stranger. Under republican institutions the division of property among the children is much fairer, but the question which forces itself upon thoughtful men in all lands is: Why should men leave great fortunes to their children? If this is done from affection, is it not misguided affection? Observation teaches that, generally speaking, it is not well for the children that they should be so burdened. Neither is it well for the state. Beyond providing for the wife and daughters moderate sources of income, and very moderate allowances indeed, if any, for the sons, men may well hesitate, for it is no longer questionable that great suns bequeathed oftener work more for the injury than for the good of the recipients. Wise men will soon conclude that, for the best interests of the members of their families and of the state, such bequests are an improper use of their means.
http://ghiraldelli.pro.br/wp-content/uploads/ccny_essay_1889_gospel.pdf
A hundred years ago even an eighth grader knew "The Gospel of Wealth". Educate yourself.
"the worker" does pay his share. shouldn't get hit twice or thrice (cap gains).Its not only about inheritances. Doesn´t the worker pay his share?inherited wealth belongs to the family, fair is a very subjective term.Of the income, of course.fair share of what ?Yet, the rich should pay their share.bernie is a bit of a hypocrite.
Bernie had the budget director twisting in the wind.Bernie Sanders called Trump's budget "grotesquely immoral". Thank God this socialist scum bag didn't get elected or else we'd be talking about increased taxes on the middle class and rich and more big government. http://thehill.com/homenews/c/334949-sanders-trump-budget-is-grotesquely-immoral
i'm not a socialist. i'll bet it is immoral on some other planets.bernie is a bit of a hypocrite. the death tax is immoral.Bernie Sanders called Trump's budget "grotesquely immoral". Thank God this socialist scum bag didn't get elected or else we'd be talking about increased taxes on the middle class and rich and more big government. Sanders: Trump budget is 'grotesquely immoral'
On what damn planet is the death tax immoral?
There are but three modes in which surplus wealth can be disposed of. It call be left to the families of the decedents; or it can be bequeathed for public purposes; or, finally, it can be administered during their lives by its possessors. Under the first and second modes most of the wealth of the world that has reached the few has hitherto been applied. Let us in turn consider each of these modes. The first is the most injudicious. In monarchical countries, the estates and the greatest portion of the wealth are left to the first son, that the vanity of the parent may be gratified by the thought that his name and title are to descend to succeeding generations unimpaired. The condition of this class in Europe to-day teaches the futility of such hopes or ambitions. The successors have become impoverished through their follies or from the fall in the value of land. Even in Great Britain the strict law of entail has been found inadequate to maintain the status of an hereditary class. Its soil is rapidly passing into the hands of the stranger. Under republican institutions the division of property among the children is much fairer, but the question which forces itself upon thoughtful men in all lands is: Why should men leave great fortunes to their children? If this is done from affection, is it not misguided affection? Observation teaches that, generally speaking, it is not well for the children that they should be so burdened. Neither is it well for the state. Beyond providing for the wife and daughters moderate sources of income, and very moderate allowances indeed, if any, for the sons, men may well hesitate, for it is no longer questionable that great suns bequeathed oftener work more for the injury than for the good of the recipients. Wise men will soon conclude that, for the best interests of the members of their families and of the state, such bequests are an improper use of their means.
http://ghiraldelli.pro.br/wp-content/uploads/ccny_essay_1889_gospel.pdf
A hundred years ago even an eighth grader knew "The Gospel of Wealth". Educate yourself.
a lot of offshore dough will come back to our banks.bernie is a bit of a hypocrite. the death tax is immoral.Bernie Sanders called Trump's budget "grotesquely immoral". Thank God this socialist scum bag didn't get elected or else we'd be talking about increased taxes on the middle class and rich and more big government. Sanders: Trump budget is 'grotesquely immoral'
On what damn planet is the death tax immoral?
There are but three modes in which surplus wealth can be disposed of. It call be left to the families of the decedents; or it can be bequeathed for public purposes; or, finally, it can be administered during their lives by its possessors. Under the first and second modes most of the wealth of the world that has reached the few has hitherto been applied. Let us in turn consider each of these modes. The first is the most injudicious. In monarchical countries, the estates and the greatest portion of the wealth are left to the first son, that the vanity of the parent may be gratified by the thought that his name and title are to descend to succeeding generations unimpaired. The condition of this class in Europe to-day teaches the futility of such hopes or ambitions. The successors have become impoverished through their follies or from the fall in the value of land. Even in Great Britain the strict law of entail has been found inadequate to maintain the status of an hereditary class. Its soil is rapidly passing into the hands of the stranger. Under republican institutions the division of property among the children is much fairer, but the question which forces itself upon thoughtful men in all lands is: Why should men leave great fortunes to their children? If this is done from affection, is it not misguided affection? Observation teaches that, generally speaking, it is not well for the children that they should be so burdened. Neither is it well for the state. Beyond providing for the wife and daughters moderate sources of income, and very moderate allowances indeed, if any, for the sons, men may well hesitate, for it is no longer questionable that great suns bequeathed oftener work more for the injury than for the good of the recipients. Wise men will soon conclude that, for the best interests of the members of their families and of the state, such bequests are an improper use of their means.
http://ghiraldelli.pro.br/wp-content/uploads/ccny_essay_1889_gospel.pdf
A hundred years ago even an eighth grader knew "The Gospel of Wealth". Educate yourself.
Thank goodness for stealth wealth.
