LogikAndReazon
Gold Member
- Feb 21, 2012
- 5,351
- 668
- 190
Sanders.... Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua and Greece are looking for the next savior of the common good...
Amerikkkanistas unite !
Amerikkkanistas unite !
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
he'll be on all the ballots, for sure. groundswell, real grassroots (one word). Vermont politicians are powerful. we only have six hundred and thirty thousand people, yet we control eighty-five percent of the world's global warming.Reality check:
An "independent" candidate has zero chance of becoming president.
If Sanders wants to win - and if he's not just playing at it - he'll need to get one of the parties to anoint him their nominee.
Socialist that he (admittedly) is, the closest fit is The Democrat Party though I must concede the Jake Starkey wing of what calls itself "The Republican Party" might be well enough aligned that it would consider him over any conservative.
Will he even be on the ballot in more than a very few states? Not without party backing. Do I give him much of a chance at all? No, but I'm sad that it is that way. We need something or somebody to shake up the status quo even if it's an out-and-out Communist who's honest about it. Don't read that as anything to do with Mr. Sanders - he draws the line at socialist. But nothing precludes the possibility of another out-of-the-blue, articulate, cleans-up-nice figure riding a sparkling white horse down the center aisle of either convention.
And....
And as those parties stand today, an honest Communist would have an equal shot at the nomination at either convention.
Yep. The old proverb springs to mind. "The road to hell is paved with good intentions."Bernie Sanders is a socialist and there is no potential good In evil.
The question is who is left and who is right?
Indeed, the media tells us who to vote for and we do.The question is who is left and who is right?
no, those are more like, "Who is a member of a grown up party and who is a complete nut?"
There's a reason why those third parties get 1% of the vote.
ross perotThe question is who is left and who is right?
no, those are more like, "Who is a member of a grown up party and who is a complete nut?"
There's a reason why those third parties get 1% of the vote.
What do you imagine that proves?He raised $1.5 million dollars one day after entering the race.
What do you imagine that proves?He raised $1.5 million dollars one day after entering the race.
"The political network overseen by the conservative billionaires Charles G. and David H. Koch plans to spend close to $900 million on the 2016 campaign, an unparalleled effort by coordinated outside groups to shape a presidential election that is already on track to be the most expensive in history."
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/u...-spend-900-million-on-2016-campaign.html?_r=0
Not really, Moron. How does Bernie campaign against Hillary without raising money? Unlike the Clintons and the Bushes Bernie would neither expect nor accept campaign funds from corporate parasites like the Kochs; however, that doesn't mean he can run without raising ANY money. Get it?hat it proves, you nit wit, is that Sanders is a hypocrite of the first order. The money that the Koch brothers contributes is irrelevant. Because you seem to not be too bright let me try to clear it up a bit for you. It would be like Jeb Bush campaigning on getting the big money out of politics and then accepting big money from the Koch Brothers. Is that simple enough for you?
Not really, Moron. How does Bernie campaign against Hillary without raising money? Unlike the Clintons and the Bushes Bernie would neither expect nor accept campaign funds from corporate parasites like the Kochs; however, that doesn't mean he can run without raising ANY money. Get it?hat it proves, you nit wit, is that Sanders is a hypocrite of the first order. The money that the Koch brothers contributes is irrelevant. Because you seem to not be too bright let me try to clear it up a bit for you. It would be like Jeb Bush campaigning on getting the big money out of politics and then accepting big money from the Koch Brothers. Is that simple enough for you?
The bidding starts in our presidential auction.What do you imagine that proves?He raised $1.5 million dollars one day after entering the race.
"The political network overseen by the conservative billionaires Charles G. and David H. Koch plans to spend close to $900 million on the 2016 campaign, an unparalleled effort by coordinated outside groups to shape a presidential election that is already on track to be the most expensive in history."
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/u...-spend-900-million-on-2016-campaign.html?_r=0
The bidding starts in our presidential auction.What do you imagine that proves?He raised $1.5 million dollars one day after entering the race.
"The political network overseen by the conservative billionaires Charles G. and David H. Koch plans to spend close to $900 million on the 2016 campaign, an unparalleled effort by coordinated outside groups to shape a presidential election that is already on track to be the most expensive in history."
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/u...-spend-900-million-on-2016-campaign.html?_r=0
You are one brain-dead bitch of a troll, aren't you, Troll?Jesus how stupid are you exactly? It is completely hypocritical of him to say that and then accept money, especially that much money. Whether or not he needs it is in fact irrelevant.
Show us where either Warren or Sanders has ever said they want the private money out of politics for others and not for all candidates, or admit you're just another hypocritical ideologue.But unlike Sanders and Warren, I want the money out of politics for everyone, not just my political opponents.
Here's my first of many reason why I believe Bernie Sanders is a good man, Troll.Perhaps that's why you are ignorant enough to believe that Bernie Sanders is a good man.
You are one brain-dead bitch of a troll, aren't you, Troll?Jesus how stupid are you exactly? It is completely hypocritical of him to say that and then accept money, especially that much money. Whether or not he needs it is in fact irrelevant.
"Bernie Sanders' nascent presidential campaign announced Friday that it raised more than $1.5 million in its first 24 hours, a number that far outpaces what Republican presidential hopefuls posted in their first day.
"Sanders, the independent senator from Vermont who caucuses with Democrats, kicked off his dark horse campaign for the Democratic nomination on Thursday with an email to supporters and a press conference outside the U.S. Capitol. Since then, more than 100,000 people signed up for the campaign and 35,000 people donated money, according to a campaign press release.
"The average donation was $43.54.
Fuck you, yours, and the corporate hypocrites you troll for, Stupid Bitch.
Bernie Sanders raises 1.5 million in 24 hours - CNNPolitics.com
Show us where either Warren or Sanders has ever said they want the private money out of politics for others and not for all candidates, or admit you're just another hypocritical ideologue.But unlike Sanders and Warren, I want the money out of politics for everyone, not just my political opponents.