BERNIE TAKES THE LEAD IN CALIFORNIA

[gipper]

In the last few months she has EKED out ONLY a win (that's still being contested) and is now 'losing' the massively important state of California. If she loses California, along with all the increased heat from her scandal(s), the Liberal Regime, to include many of her Super Delegate supporters, will panic and abandon her faster that she abandoned the 4 Americans in Benghazi!

Why would they abandon her when she's ahead in the delegate count?

California is one of the major key states in the election. With the rise of Bernie and inability of Hillary to actually outright win and of the states in the last fe months' primaries, if she loses California, her Super delegate and the party are going to start panicking and might just switch over to the 'winning horse'.

Sticking with the analogy of a Horse race, going down the stretch in this primary, Bernie is out in front, and die-hard Hillary supporters are arguing that more important people in the stands - a vast minority of people in the stands - who have the power to award her with the win no matter how she finishes like her.

That might get you a win in the primaries but not in the general. Throw in the fact that Trump now leads Hillary in the polls while those same polls show Bernie leading Trump. Use common sense and do the math....if Hillary loses California, the sensible thing for Democrats would be to rally behind Bernie.

I hope you are right. Keeping Mrs. BJ from the WH would be the best thing the Ds have done since...well forever.

 

[nat4900]

Since I'm a Sanders' supporter, I welcome the very tight race next Tuesday. I well know that Clinton will be the nominee, and that once democrats settle down to incorporate some of Sanders policies, its on to send Trump back to start up yet another university scam.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

In the last few months she has EKED out ONLY a win (that's still being contested) and is now 'losing' the massively important state of California. If she loses California, along with all the increased heat from her scandal(s), the Liberal Regime, to include many of her Super Delegate supporters, will panic and abandon her faster that she abandoned the 4 Americans in Benghazi!

Why would they abandon her when she's ahead in the delegate count?

California is one of the major key states in the election. With the rise of Bernie and inability of Hillary to actually outright win and of the states in the last fe months' primaries, if she loses California, her Super delegate and the party are going to start panicking and might just switch over to the 'winning horse'.

Sticking with the analogy of a Horse race, going down the stretch in this primary, Bernie is out in front, and die-hard Hillary supporters are arguing that more important people in the stands - a vast minority of people in the stands - who have the power to award her with the win no matter how she finishes like her.

That might get you a win in the primaries but not in the general. Throw in the fact that Trump now leads Hillary in the polls while those same polls show Bernie leading Trump. Use common sense and do the math....if Hillary loses California, the sensible thing for Democrats would be to rally behind Bernie.

More nonsense from easilyfooled65.

 

[Vigilante]

Isn't it funny that even "FRUIT and NUTS" Kalipornians are realizing that soon, the Hildebeast is going to have this land on her!They know a CORRUPT, LYING, CRIMINAL, MURDEROUS BITCH when even the LOW IQ, sees one!

 

[Hutch Starskey]

He still splits the pledged delegate with Clinton which makes it impossible for him to gain ground in the delegate count. He's done and this changes nothing.

She's fucked!

Holy crap!

She's not getting the nomination

Tell us how Sanders pulls ahead in delegates. How many are left and how many would he need to win to pull ahead? Is that likely to happen?

There's no way she goes into Philly losing to Bernie in pledged (earned in voting) delegates. But she also cannot win on a first ballot without convincing the superdelegates, and the DLC which Obama still has sway with, that she not only can, but will, beat Donald.

Why would the supers go with anyone else if she's won the most delegates?

 

[easyt65]

He still splits the pledged delegate with Clinton which makes it impossible for him to gain ground in the delegate count. He's done and this changes nothing.

She's fucked!

Holy crap!

She's not getting the nomination

Tell us how Sanders pulls ahead in delegates. How many are left and how many would he need to win to pull ahead? Is that likely to happen?

There's no way she goes into Philly losing to Bernie in pledged (earned in voting) delegates. But she also cannot win on a first ballot without convincing the superdelegates, and the DLC which Obama still has sway with, that she not only can, but will, beat Donald.

Why would the supers go with anyone else if she's won the most delegates?

1. The only reason she has the most delegates is because of the 'rigged' Super delegate BS

2. Sanders has won every state in the last few months with the exception of 1, and that one is highly contested.

3. California is a HUGE 'win' the Liberals have to have...and Bernie just took the lead. If she loses California she has successfully proved she can't beat Bernie without the rigged Super Delegate system and that Ca is in jeopardy of going to Trump because....

4. Trump leads Hillary in the polls now....and finally because

5. Sanders, not Hillary, leads Trump in the polls.

 

[bendog]

He still splits the pledged delegate with Clinton which makes it impossible for him to gain ground in the delegate count. He's done and this changes nothing.

She's fucked!

Holy crap!

She's not getting the nomination

Tell us how Sanders pulls ahead in delegates. How many are left and how many would he need to win to pull ahead? Is that likely to happen?

There's no way she goes into Philly losing to Bernie in pledged (earned in voting) delegates. But she also cannot win on a first ballot without convincing the superdelegates, and the DLC which Obama still has sway with, that she not only can, but will, beat Donald.

Why would the supers go with anyone else if she's won the most delegates?

1. The only reason she has the most delegates is because of the 'rigged' Super delegate BS

2. Sanders has won every state in the last few months with the exception of 1, and that one is highly contested.

3. California is a HUGE 'win' the Liberals have to have...and Bernie just took the lead. If she loses California she has successfully proved she can't beat Bernie without the rigged Super Delegate system and that Ca is in jeopardy of going to Trump because....

4. Trump leads Hillary in the polls now....and finally because

5. Sanders, not Hillary, leads Trump in the polls.

The Superdelegates won't flip to Bernie. He's not a democrat. He will not be the nominee. His only path was to win enough delegates in voting to win with them on the first ballot. The latinos and especially the blacks don't care much for him and his white quasi-socialist agenda.

But, if Hillary can't make her case that she'll beat Trump, the superdelegates can still throw this nomination wide open.

 

[easyt65]

The Superdelegates won't flip to Bernie. He's not a democrat. He will not be the nominee. His only path was to win enough delegates in voting to win with them on the first ballot. The latinos and especially the blacks don't care much for him and his white quasi-socialist agenda.

But, if Hillary can't make her case that she'll beat Trump, the superdelegates can still throw this nomination wide open.

So you think Libs would rather 'ride a sure loser' than back the Socialist using their brand? I think you under-estimate liberals' / politicians' desire to maintain power. Hail, you might be right.....

 

[bendog]

The Superdelegates won't flip to Bernie. He's not a democrat. He will not be the nominee. His only path was to win enough delegates in voting to win with them on the first ballot. The latinos and especially the blacks don't care much for him and his white quasi-socialist agenda.

But, if Hillary can't make her case that she'll beat Trump, the superdelegates can still throw this nomination wide open.

So you think Libs would rather 'ride a sure loser' than back the Socialist using their brand? I think you under-estimate liberals' / politicians' desire to maintain power. Hail, you might be right.....

Unless Hillary can make a convincing argument she has a path to beating Donald, the dems may draft someone not currently in the race. It's not likely, but I thing the fear of Trump makes anything possible.

And I don't think anyone who seriously watches this stuff thinks Bernie can beat Donald.

 

[Vigilante]

PLEASE LET IT GO TO BIDEN!

Watch Joe Biden Rub, Touch And Kiss His Way To Beck-Like Creepiness

 

[nat4900]

Isn't it funny that even "FRUIT and NUTS" Kalipornians are realizing that soon, the Hildebeast is going to have this land on her!They know a CORRUPT, LYING, CRIMINAL, MURDEROUS BITCH when even the LOW IQ, sees one!

Yes, Vigilante....dreaming, wishing and hoping is a great escape for some mindless right wingers...like you.

May I suggest to also find a right wing virgin to sacrifice on the altar to help realize your little dreams??

 

[Hutch Starskey]

He still splits the pledged delegate with Clinton which makes it impossible for him to gain ground in the delegate count. He's done and this changes nothing.

She's fucked!

Holy crap!

She's not getting the nomination

Tell us how Sanders pulls ahead in delegates. How many are left and how many would he need to win to pull ahead? Is that likely to happen?

There's no way she goes into Philly losing to Bernie in pledged (earned in voting) delegates. But she also cannot win on a first ballot without convincing the superdelegates, and the DLC which Obama still has sway with, that she not only can, but will, beat Donald.

Why would the supers go with anyone else if she's won the most delegates?

1. The only reason she has the most delegates is because of the 'rigged' Super delegate BS

2. Sanders has won every state in the last few months with the exception of 1, and that one is highly contested.

3. California is a HUGE 'win' the Liberals have to have...and Bernie just took the lead. If she loses California she has successfully proved she can't beat Bernie without the rigged Super Delegate system and that Ca is in jeopardy of going to Trump because....

4. Trump leads Hillary in the polls now....and finally because

5. Sanders, not Hillary, leads Trump in the polls.

1. The only reason she has the most delegates is because of the 'rigged' Super delegate BS

No. She's won the most votes and the most pledged delegates without even counting the supers.

2. Sanders has won every state in the last few months with the exception of 1, and that one is highly contested.

But not the most delegates. Which is really all that matters in a primary.

3. California is a HUGE 'win' the Liberals have to have...and Bernie just took the lead. If she loses California she has successfully proved she can't beat Bernie without the rigged Super Delegate system and that Ca is in jeopardy of going to Trump because....

Nothing is rigged.
Wrong. Delegates are apportioned based on percentage and districts won. Sanders can win 51% and both get equal delegates. That in no way advances Sanders delegate count.

4. Trump leads Hillary in the polls now....and finally because

5. Sanders, not Hillary, leads Trump in the polls.

None of that matters



You really have no clue how this works other than what RW media feeds you.

 

[g5000]

Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton in a tight race in California as the campaign batters her popularity

I'm taking points off the LA Times for ending their poll question with a preposition.

Among eligible voters, Clinton and Sanders are tied.

Among likely voters, Clinton has a 10 point lead.

The young and the poor don't vote.

 

[bendog]

She's fucked!

Holy crap!

She's not getting the nomination

Tell us how Sanders pulls ahead in delegates. How many are left and how many would he need to win to pull ahead? Is that likely to happen?

There's no way she goes into Philly losing to Bernie in pledged (earned in voting) delegates. But she also cannot win on a first ballot without convincing the superdelegates, and the DLC which Obama still has sway with, that she not only can, but will, beat Donald.

Why would the supers go with anyone else if she's won the most delegates?

1. The only reason she has the most delegates is because of the 'rigged' Super delegate BS

2. Sanders has won every state in the last few months with the exception of 1, and that one is highly contested.

3. California is a HUGE 'win' the Liberals have to have...and Bernie just took the lead. If she loses California she has successfully proved she can't beat Bernie without the rigged Super Delegate system and that Ca is in jeopardy of going to Trump because....

4. Trump leads Hillary in the polls now....and finally because

5. Sanders, not Hillary, leads Trump in the polls.

1. The only reason she has the most delegates is because of the 'rigged' Super delegate BS

No. She's won the most votes and the most pledged delegates without even counting the supers.

2. Sanders has won every state in the last few months with the exception of 1, and that one is highly contested.

But not the most delegates. Which is really all that matters in a primary.

3. California is a HUGE 'win' the Liberals have to have...and Bernie just took the lead. If she loses California she has successfully proved she can't beat Bernie without the rigged Super Delegate system and that Ca is in jeopardy of going to Trump because....

Nothing is rigged.
Wrong. Delegates are apportioned based on percentage and districts won. Sanders can win 51% and both get equal delegates. That in no way advances Sanders delegate count.

4. Trump leads Hillary in the polls now....and finally because

5. Sanders, not Hillary, leads Trump in the polls.

None of that matters



You really have no clue how this works other than what RW media feeds you.

It's only rigged if you think democratic primaries should always be open to anyone, including independents and possibly even republicans.

 

[blastoff]

Who cares if Bernie wins the peoples' republic of CA? As they say in Chicago, the fix is in with the super d's so poor Bern can go pound sand.

 

[bendog]

Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton in a tight race in California as the campaign batters her popularity

Among eligible voters, Clinton and Sanders are tied.

Among likely voters, Clinton has a 10 point lead.

The young and the poor don't vote.

Right. Sanders has no legs. And he absolutely has to have historic latino turnouts in places like VA and Fla to beat Donald, and he hasn't shown that he can do that. He probably can't win in Ohio because the blacks might not turn out.

 

[g5000]

Bernie Sanders will probably croak before 2020. In a couple years, he won't be able to remember where he left his shoes.

"It's Monday, sir. 2017. You're the President. Of America. Remember? And your Amazon order of Depends just arrived."

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Sanders would have to win all remaining primaries by something like 30% or better each to pull ahead in the delegate count.
Impossible.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

He still splits the pledged delegate with Clinton which makes it impossible for him to gain ground in the delegate count. He's done and this changes nothing.

She's fucked!

Holy crap!

She's not getting the nomination

Tell us how Sanders pulls ahead in delegates. How many are left and how many would he need to win to pull ahead? Is that likely to happen?

It's all up to Soros. If he directs the Super Delegates to go for Biden or Lizzy Cheekbones, it's adios Hilly

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Tell us how Sanders pulls ahead in delegates. How many are left and how many would he need to win to pull ahead? Is that likely to happen?

There's no way she goes into Philly losing to Bernie in pledged (earned in voting) delegates. But she also cannot win on a first ballot without convincing the superdelegates, and the DLC which Obama still has sway with, that she not only can, but will, beat Donald.

Why would the supers go with anyone else if she's won the most delegates?

1. The only reason she has the most delegates is because of the 'rigged' Super delegate BS

2. Sanders has won every state in the last few months with the exception of 1, and that one is highly contested.

3. California is a HUGE 'win' the Liberals have to have...and Bernie just took the lead. If she loses California she has successfully proved she can't beat Bernie without the rigged Super Delegate system and that Ca is in jeopardy of going to Trump because....

4. Trump leads Hillary in the polls now....and finally because

5. Sanders, not Hillary, leads Trump in the polls.

1. The only reason she has the most delegates is because of the 'rigged' Super delegate BS

No. She's won the most votes and the most pledged delegates without even counting the supers.

2. Sanders has won every state in the last few months with the exception of 1, and that one is highly contested.

But not the most delegates. Which is really all that matters in a primary.

3. California is a HUGE 'win' the Liberals have to have...and Bernie just took the lead. If she loses California she has successfully proved she can't beat Bernie without the rigged Super Delegate system and that Ca is in jeopardy of going to Trump because....

Nothing is rigged.
Wrong. Delegates are apportioned based on percentage and districts won. Sanders can win 51% and both get equal delegates. That in no way advances Sanders delegate count.

4. Trump leads Hillary in the polls now....and finally because

5. Sanders, not Hillary, leads Trump in the polls.

None of that matters



You really have no clue how this works other than what RW media feeds you.

It's only rigged if you think democratic primaries should always be open to anyone, including independents and possibly even republicans.

It's a Democratic primary. Why any of them are open I will never understand.