Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He doesn't need to interest you he needs to interest the citizens of his state who have so far have been silent as far as I know in this debacle.He has multiple constitutions?
Nothing that reactionary POS could say would interest me.
Contract law. If one party fails to live up to its responsibility (protect the border, prevent illegal crossings), the contract is null and void.When the federal government refused to secure the border, they likely nullified any agreement the states had to give up their power of border enforcement.
Can’t read can you you racist puke? More than 24 states have already sided with Texas you dumbass. Abbott has every right to defend his state’s southern border. Cry harder.Bullshit. People do not support Abbott putting up barbed wire. That idiot has created an international incident and things are about to be taken out of his hands.
That is a lie.
No, Biden is a traitor aiding and abetting the invasion of this country by foreign agents.![]()
Has Greg Abbott Gone Mad With Power?
Greg Abbott's fact-challenged statement echoes cries of the past as his political theater has overstepped the law and the Supreme Court..www.lonestarleft.com
View attachment 893221
Let’s fact-check this.
- The “broken the compact between the United States and the States” is similar to the words in South Carolina’s 1860 declaration of secession.
- There are no immigration laws in the book that Biden refuses to follow. In fact, he’s following the same laws we’ve had in place for 44 years under the Refugee Act of 1980 and the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.
- If an asylum seeker wants to ask for asylum, they have to do it on American soil. So, crossing the Rio Grande and asking border patrol for asylum is perfectly legal.
- In November, the Cato Institute published a study which found that migrants were more likely to be released by Trump than Biden.
- In immigration law, no blanket mandate requires the detention of all undocumented migrants. Abbott just made that up.
- The assertion that the effect of the federal government’s actions is to “illegally allow their en masse parole into the United States” is incorrect. Parole is a legal mechanism that allows specific individuals temporary entry into the U.S. for humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.
- Abbott invokes Article IV, § 4 of the Constitution, claiming that the failure of the federal government to enforce immigration laws has triggered an invasion. The term “invasion” in the context of the Constitution is typically understood to refer to an armed foreign incursion, not migration, which has historically been used to refer to military action, not civilian migration.
- Abbott’s reference to the state’s right of self-defense to justify his actions is wrong, as the federal government has preeminence in border control and immigration, which are typically not under state jurisdiction.
- The statement about unprecedented harm to the People across the United States is vague and subjective. Harm would need to be quantified and demonstrated through data and evidence.
He has.
The texas government is in a state of rebellion and muxt be brought back into the fold. They are not a separate country. They will not be allowed to act like one.
Time for Joe Biden to nd this in a decisive way, and make an example of them.
Refugees are not "foreign agents", and as I just pointed out the Biden Administration is enforcing all the laws and is less likely to realse asylum seekers into the US than the tRump administration.No, Biden is a traitor aiding and abetting the invasion of this country by foreign agents.
It is studying human interactions 24/7 to learn how to persuade people into thinking.
Soon, humanity may lose all ability to have free will.
Why? President Biden is not obeying his oath of office, and our constitution dictates the duties of our President.Abbott would be wise to stand down.
We are being invaded. How many tens of millions of people need to cross an international border, illegally before its considered an invasion? Just because the criminal elements with in our governments brought them here does not negate the fact that it is an invasion, and our governments are committing open treason against their respective countries.Maybe, maybe not. That’s the argument being made. States gave up their authority to enforce the border to the federal government, and now the fed gov is not holding up to that end of the bargain. What do you think the states are supposed to do? Just let themselves be overrun with illegals?
Refugees are not "foreign agents", and as I just pointed out the Biden Administration is enforcing all the laws and is less likely to realse asylum seekers into the US than the tRump administration.
Not to mention the border bill which the republicans are currently torpedoing just to please tRump.
Why has Biden not been arrested for treason is what I want to know, the man is surrounded by law enforcement and yet how is he not in cuffs? Because the Secret Service is a treasonous organization.Why? President Biden is not obeying his oath of office, and our constitution dictates the duties of our President.
Basically. I’m trying to find the provision where states gave up their rights to defend their borders, I can’t remember where it is….anyone know?Contract law. If one party fails to live up to its responsibility (protect the border, prevent illegal crossings), the contract is null and void.
Crepitus wants Biden to attack Texas with F-16s.Time for Joe Biden to nd this in a decisive way, and make an example of them.
Only on military bases or against military personnel WITH local permission. Posse Comitatus forbids it. I was EOD and we had to get signed requests from local LEOs before we could assist them by disarming and searching for bombs.Air Force Police , Military Police and Shore Patrol could be utilized for Law Enforcement ( Since they already are )
Yeah you never give the fox the keys to the hen house.I would question anything the democrats suggest. Are they planning to declare martial law to 'remove' the illegals, or to remove right wingers from the population?