Biden Gives Abbot Until Tomorrow Or Face the Consequences

[Yarddog]

Sure sure, its not an invasion you say ... but no one wants 3 million people showing up uninvited. There isnt even time to even fully vet who they are as many have fake ID's.... it takes a Washington lawyer to simply ignore the damage done, by the influx of drugs and how much this is causing human suffering.
Anyone can claim being a refugee, and of course they do because they know we are a bunch of idiots wo will believe them.

OP... half of the country of India should be considered refugees under your standards. Why do we not want to take all of them? give a reason why we shouldnt.

 

[BS Filter]

They will be made to.

Funny. It's Biden's move.

 

[candycorn]

There was no court order.

Sure there was. Garland messed with Texas. And won.

The feds have the right to cut the wire.

Via the court order you just said didn't exist.

Many legal experts agree that Texas can keep putting wire up. Read the article on Fox.

Texas governor doing 'exactly right thing' amid constitutional battle over border enforcement: legal experts

The latest Supreme Court decision in Texas’ battle with the Biden White House has sparked a legal debate over the Lone Star State’s constitutional authority to defend itself.

www.foxnews.com

I guess they can roll the dice and take your chances with the feds. Plenty of room in the lock up for those violating court orders.

 

[MarathonMike]

YOU wanna quote that for us or will you admit you just another lying sack of republican shit?

A pro-China Democrat like you would love to see Texas strafed by F-16s.

 

[Failzero]

Only on military bases or against military personnel WITH local permission. Posse Comitatus forbids it. I was EOD and we had to get signed requests from local LEOs before we could assist them by disarming and searching for bombs.

Military Members are entering illegally at Southern Border ( Jordanian Military ) ( Iranian Military ) ( Chinese Military ) ( Various Enemy Combatants )

 

[BS Filter]

Sure there was. Garland messed with Texas. And won.

Via the court order you just said didn't exist.

I guess they can roll the dice and take your chances with the feds. Plenty of room in the lock up for those violating court orders.

Show me the court order. You're full of shit, as always.

 

[otto105]

Texas has every right to defend it's borders. Since obviously the feds refuse to

Is there not border patrol at the border? Are Asylum cases not being processed?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Yep it's a last minute power grab.... And you're right it's all about votes.

Well, that article was from 2017…so it is old but, I had, at one time, heard that the U.S. was running ads in Mexico encouraging mexican citizens to come to the U.S. Now again, it WAS for tourism, but, the message appeared to be somewhat politically motivated, at least according to Bloomberg.

 

[WEATHER53]

Is there not border patrol at the border? Are Asylum cases not being processed?

They are processed and maybe then declared actual asylum recipients

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Has Greg Abbott Gone Mad With Power?

Greg Abbott's fact-challenged statement echoes cries of the past as his political theater has overstepped the law and the Supreme Court..

www.lonestarleft.com

View attachment 893221


Let’s fact-check this.

1. The “broken the compact between the United States and the States” is similar to the words in South Carolina’s 1860 declaration of secession.
2. There are no immigration laws in the book that Biden refuses to follow. In fact, he’s following the same laws we’ve had in place for 44 years under the Refugee Act of 1980 and the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.
3. If an asylum seeker wants to ask for asylum, they have to do it on American soil. So, crossing the Rio Grande and asking border patrol for asylum is perfectly legal.
4. In November, the Cato Institute published a study which found that migrants were more likely to be released by Trump than Biden.
5. In immigration law, no blanket mandate requires the detention of all undocumented migrants. Abbott just made that up.
6. The assertion that the effect of the federal government’s actions is to “illegally allow their en masse parole into the United States” is incorrect. Parole is a legal mechanism that allows specific individuals temporary entry into the U.S. for humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.
7. Abbott invokes Article IV, § 4 of the Constitution, claiming that the failure of the federal government to enforce immigration laws has triggered an invasion. The term “invasion” in the context of the Constitution is typically understood to refer to an armed foreign incursion, not migration, which has historically been used to refer to military action, not civilian migration.
8. Abbott’s reference to the state’s right of self-defense to justify his actions is wrong, as the federal government has preeminence in border control and immigration, which are typically not under state jurisdiction.
9. The statement about unprecedented harm to the People across the United States is vague and subjective. Harm would need to be quantified and demonstrated through data and evidence.

He has.

The texas government is in a state of rebellion and muxt be brought back into the fold. They are not a separate country. They will not be allowed to act like one.

Time for Joe Biden to nd this in a decisive way, and make an example of them.

He's right. Biden is a failure.

 

[candycorn]

Show me the court order. You're full of shit, as always.

U.S. Supreme Court says Texas can’t block federal agents from the border​

The high court’s order effectively maintains long-running precedent that the federal government — not individual states — has authority to enforce border security.

U.S. Supreme Court says Texas can’t block federal agents from the border

The high court’s order effectively maintains long-running precedent that the federal government — not individual states — has authority to enforce border security.

www.texastribune.org

Your move.

 

[Arlette]

Maybe some our erudite leftists in here can tell us -- What might the 'consequences' be?

1) A sternly worded letter?

2) Sponge Brains Shits Pants takes Texas out like he did Corn Pop?

3) He gives Governor Abbot a mean look

4) He disinvites Abbot to the SOTU Address

Enquiring minds.......

Biden will take Abbott's wheelchair

 

[Failzero]

Xiden will say “Stand Up Greg”

 

[Yarddog]

Has Greg Abbott Gone Mad With Power?

Greg Abbott's fact-challenged statement echoes cries of the past as his political theater has overstepped the law and the Supreme Court..

www.lonestarleft.com

View attachment 893221


Let’s fact-check this.

1. The “broken the compact between the United States and the States” is similar to the words in South Carolina’s 1860 declaration of secession.
2. There are no immigration laws in the book that Biden refuses to follow. In fact, he’s following the same laws we’ve had in place for 44 years under the Refugee Act of 1980 and the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.
3. If an asylum seeker wants to ask for asylum, they have to do it on American soil. So, crossing the Rio Grande and asking border patrol for asylum is perfectly legal.
4. In November, the Cato Institute published a study which found that migrants were more likely to be released by Trump than Biden.
5. In immigration law, no blanket mandate requires the detention of all undocumented migrants. Abbott just made that up.
6. The assertion that the effect of the federal government’s actions is to “illegally allow their en masse parole into the United States” is incorrect. Parole is a legal mechanism that allows specific individuals temporary entry into the U.S. for humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.
7. Abbott invokes Article IV, § 4 of the Constitution, claiming that the failure of the federal government to enforce immigration laws has triggered an invasion. The term “invasion” in the context of the Constitution is typically understood to refer to an armed foreign incursion, not migration, which has historically been used to refer to military action, not civilian migration.
8. Abbott’s reference to the state’s right of self-defense to justify his actions is wrong, as the federal government has preeminence in border control and immigration, which are typically not under state jurisdiction.
9. The statement about unprecedented harm to the People across the United States is vague and subjective. Harm would need to be quantified and demonstrated through data and evidence.

He has.

The texas government is in a state of rebellion and muxt be brought back into the fold. They are not a separate country. They will not be allowed to act like one.

Time for Joe Biden to nd this in a decisive way, and make an example of them.

All complete garbage. His motivation is simply to protect the citizens of Texas and the U.S., something the Feds cannot find the will to do.

 

[Mac-7]

He's right. Biden is a failure.

Abbott may be president someday

 

[Markle]

Biden will probably send in the drug cartels to slap Abott around

Not that far-fetched. China supplies most of the supplies for the production of many illegal narcotics flowing across our border.

 

[Vrenn]

Maybe some our erudite leftists in here can tell us -- What might the 'consequences' be?

1) A sternly worded letter?

2) Sponge Brains Shits Pants takes Texas out like he did Corn Pop?

3) He gives Governor Abbot a mean look

4) He disinvites Abbot to the SOTU Address

Enquiring minds.......

Texas is one of the Red State Welfare States. That means that Texas can be bankrupted by the Federal Government. Congress is not a factor here. It's strictly the Executive Branch and the Courts. And the Supreme Court has already spoken. Texas is going to get spanked and sent to their room just like a spoiled little brat that is throwing a temper tantrum.

 

[sparky]

One would imagine the pen mightier than the wall here.....~S~

 

[WEATHER53]

Midnight
Tomorrow is now today.

 

[Vrenn]

Texas national guard will follow Abbot and not Joke Briben

Then the 82nd will be used and the Texas NG is no match for that type of skills.