Biden Gives Abbot Until Tomorrow Or Face the Consequences

I'd hate to be the commander of the Texas Army National Guard about now.

220px-36th_Infantry_Division_SSI.png
Abbot should sack him and name a new one if he bows to DC. 14 other states are on the record supporting Abbots moves. If the order comes down it will be the first test of whether this country is going to begin falling into chaos.
Texans, and all other state populations need to begin to prepare to resist DC. They've gone full fockin tyrannical and the more they are allowed to take, the farther they'll push. DC has become openly EVIL.
 
Abbot should sack him and name a new one if he bows to DC. 14 other states are on the record supporting Abbots moves. If the order comes down it will be the first test of whether this country is going to begin falling into chaos.
Texans, and all other state populations need to begin to prepare to resist DC. They've gone full fockin tyrannical and the more they are allowed to take, the farther they'll push. DC has become openly EVIL.
We run this country. Politicians work for us. We need to remind them of that.
 

View attachment 893221


Let’s fact-check this.

  1. The “broken the compact between the United States and the States” is similar to the words in South Carolina’s 1860 declaration of secession.
  2. There are no immigration laws in the book that Biden refuses to follow. In fact, he’s following the same laws we’ve had in place for 44 years under the Refugee Act of 1980 and the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.
  3. If an asylum seeker wants to ask for asylum, they have to do it on American soil. So, crossing the Rio Grande and asking border patrol for asylum is perfectly legal.
  4. In November, the Cato Institute published a study which found that migrants were more likely to be released by Trump than Biden.
  5. In immigration law, no blanket mandate requires the detention of all undocumented migrants. Abbott just made that up.
  6. The assertion that the effect of the federal government’s actions is to “illegally allow their en masse parole into the United States” is incorrect. Parole is a legal mechanism that allows specific individuals temporary entry into the U.S. for humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.
  7. Abbott invokes Article IV, § 4 of the Constitution, claiming that the failure of the federal government to enforce immigration laws has triggered an invasion. The term “invasion” in the context of the Constitution is typically understood to refer to an armed foreign incursion, not migration, which has historically been used to refer to military action, not civilian migration.
  8. Abbott’s reference to the state’s right of self-defense to justify his actions is wrong, as the federal government has preeminence in border control and immigration, which are typically not under state jurisdiction.
  9. The statement about unprecedented harm to the People across the United States is vague and subjective. Harm would need to be quantified and demonstrated through data and evidence.

He has.

The texas government is in a state of rebellion and muxt be brought back into the fold. They are not a separate country. They will not be allowed to act like one.

Time for Joe Biden to nd this in a decisive way, and make an example of them.


Abbott is doing exactly what he is authorized to do by Article 1, Section 10, Clause 3, USSC. He's doing as his oath requires, too bad the same can't be said about xiden. And millions upon millions of military aged males, from virtually every nation on earth, forcing their was into our country, is an invasion by any metric you want to use.

.
 
Refugees are not "foreign agents", and as I just pointed out the Biden Administration is enforcing all the laws and is less likely to realse asylum seekers into the US than the tRump administration.

Not to mention the border bill which the republicans are currently torpedoing just to please tRump.


Really, show us exactly how the 24,000+ Chinese, 22,000+ Russians, Iraqis, Syrians, Iranians, Senegalese, and many other countries are being vetted. They've already caught nearly 200 that are on the terrorist watch list, how many more were included in the millions of got aways?

.
 

View attachment 893221


Let’s fact-check this.

  1. The “broken the compact between the United States and the States” is similar to the words in South Carolina’s 1860 declaration of secession.
  2. There are no immigration laws in the book that Biden refuses to follow. In fact, he’s following the same laws we’ve had in place for 44 years under the Refugee Act of 1980 and the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.
  3. If an asylum seeker wants to ask for asylum, they have to do it on American soil. So, crossing the Rio Grande and asking border patrol for asylum is perfectly legal.
  4. In November, the Cato Institute published a study which found that migrants were more likely to be released by Trump than Biden.
  5. In immigration law, no blanket mandate requires the detention of all undocumented migrants. Abbott just made that up.
  6. The assertion that the effect of the federal government’s actions is to “illegally allow their en masse parole into the United States” is incorrect. Parole is a legal mechanism that allows specific individuals temporary entry into the U.S. for humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.
  7. Abbott invokes Article IV, § 4 of the Constitution, claiming that the failure of the federal government to enforce immigration laws has triggered an invasion. The term “invasion” in the context of the Constitution is typically understood to refer to an armed foreign incursion, not migration, which has historically been used to refer to military action, not civilian migration.
  8. Abbott’s reference to the state’s right of self-defense to justify his actions is wrong, as the federal government has preeminence in border control and immigration, which are typically not under state jurisdiction.
  9. The statement about unprecedented harm to the People across the United States is vague and subjective. Harm would need to be quantified and demonstrated through data and evidence.

He has.

The texas government is in a state of rebellion and muxt be brought back into the fold. They are not a separate country. They will not be allowed to act like one.

Time for Joe Biden to nd this in a decisive way, and make an example of them.

About half the states are with him.

Here we go
 
That is a straight up lie.

I'm just about sick of you people lying your asses off and nobody calling you on it.

💚 A Circular Revolution in Fashion 👚 | Impactful Ninja. there is no "invasion".

B. nobody is "engineering" it.

So C. You're a fucking liar.


You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Drs without borders are providing maps where illegals can get aid all through south America and Mexico, the intl red cross is also providing maps with weigh stations in Mexico and the US.





I could get more, but even your ignorant ass should get it.

.
 
Last edited:
Sure there was. Garland messed with Texas. And won.

Via the court order you just said didn't exist.

I guess they can roll the dice and take your chances with the feds. Plenty of room in the lock up for those violating court orders.

Candy never met a pair of jackboots she didn't want to lick to gleaning shiny perfection.

Lick harder, candy. Harder.
 
No you don't. You say things like this to get responses.
Joe Biden has certain responsibilities to accomplish in his job. One is to ensure the laws of the land are enforced.

The President as Law Enforcer​


Obviously our immigration laws are not being enforced. Joe Biden is failing to carry out his responsibilities In a big way.

If Biden won't enforce U.S. immigration law, states and local governments should​

Link… . If Biden won't enforce U.S. immigration law, states and local governments should

Biden is trying to get Texas to allow open borders again, In my opinion he is acting like a dictator and if he takes further actions against Texas, I am sure many people will agree with me.
 
Texas is one of the Red State Welfare States. That means that Texas can be bankrupted by the Federal Government. Congress is not a factor here. It's strictly the Executive Branch and the Courts. And the Supreme Court has already spoken. Texas is going to get spanked and sent to their room just like a spoiled little brat that is throwing a temper tantrum.

Or they will just start the secessions.

Let's go
 
I dont foresee the Texas National Guard throwing down on our active duty military

We are all Americans

That is except for the 25 million or so foreign interlopers who are causing all the trouble

Not anymore.

Can't share a nation with about half the people on this board, maybe more. They do not have core American principles, so what's the point?

It's already over. Might as well get it started, then over with.
 
He was enforcing a Supreme Court decision that required school integration.
Biden is not making sure our immigration laws are enforced. He just decided he liked open borders because Trump didn’t and the hell with the law. .

A President that.makes his own laws and overrules the existing ones is in my opinion a dictator.
 
Rave on lunatic

136th Airlift Wing................C-130H but are ungrading to the C-130J. These are Cargo planes.

147th Attack Wing............ MQ-9 Reapers (drones)

149th Fighter Wing............F-16C/D which are older
F-16s that were gotten from the Active Duty when they upgraded

The rest are support units.

Texas Air Guards have ZERO F-22s, FA-18s and A-10s. Stop lying, asshole.

You ASSume that those in the US military will turn any of that on the people in Texas just trying to protect against a foreign invasion.

That's a big ASSumption, pal.
 

Forum List

Back
Top