- Sep 13, 2012
- 65,744
- 20,749
Texas needs to read the Constitution
They will lose this one
Perhaps you should read it. The State have every right to repel invasions when the feds prove unwilling or unable to do it. The que ball myorkis has testified they have operational control of the border. But operational control is defined in the law and he's lying his ass off.
What is Operational Control?
Congress statutorily defined operational control in the Secure Fence Act of 2006, which ordered DHS to achieve operational control of all the land and maritime borders of the United States within 18 months of enactment. The act defined operational control as: “the prevention of all unlawful entries into the United States, including entries by terrorists, other unlawful aliens, instruments of terrorism, narcotics, and other contraband.”[1]“Operational Control” at the Border: More than Words
“Operational control” is a term that has attained growing significance as a metric of what the United States has achieved in border security. However, the term is ambiguous, shifting, and poorly-defined. Whether operational control is a specific state of existence, or a concept that describes a...
immigrationforum.org
10+ million illegal entries in 3 short years proves the feds are unable to repel this invasion. And I think the courts will agree with TX.
.