*Biden Sent The Goons To Mar-Largo*

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Libtards will simply ignore it.

Exactly.

 

[Marener]

The ex president had executive privilege.

The ex-president can’t use executive privilege against the sitting president.

It would be insane to think otherwise.

 

[Marener]

Libtards will simply ignore it.

It’s not ignored. We’ve explained in great detail how this story is bullshit and hype.

You won’t listen to facts.

 

[Rigby5]

And mischaracterized.

This was nothing more than a request for document retrieval

Wrong.
A "document retrieval" goes to the source, like Pentagon, CIA, FBI, etc.
It does not go to the DOJ in order to get a warrant to conduct a raid to steal private annotated copies.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

LMFAO!!!

Definition of "libtard" = fiscally conservative patriot of America who disproves theory that Co2 is cause of Earth Climate Change

"conservative" = IQ under 5, supporter of W, big spending, massive deficits, putting opium in legal pills, socializing senior drugs by lying to Congress about the estimated cost, porking out to public education while flipping off vouchers, cheering for Joe Biden in 2020, and supporter/believer that if all Middle East Muslims are exterminated by US troops and that land is given to Israel, Jesus will float down from the clouds....


Any more for us, "counselor??"

Wow. You must of clicked on every far left kook site to come up with that much bullshit. You get a five star rating from Barry Nancy and Joey.

 

[Rigby5]

The ex-president can’t use executive privilege against the sitting president.

It would be insane to think otherwise.

Wrong.
Private communications by a president remain private even after office.
Executive privilege can NEVER go away, because if those the president seeks counsel from know it will someday become public, then they will not be able to speak freely.

Since presidents often have conflict, ex-presidents always have to have protections against current presidents.

 

[Marener]

Wrong.
A "document retrieval" goes to the source, like Pentagon, CIA, FBI, etc.
It does not go to the DOJ in order to get a warrant to conduct a raid to steal private annotated copies.

The document request was for NARA to give documents to the DoJ to proceed with an investigation of the mishandling of classified information.

 

[Rigby5]

It’s not ignored. We’ve explained in great detail how this story is bullshit and hype.

You won’t listen to facts.

No one could possibly believe the FBI would not have run this by the oval office first.
But in reality, it likely was the Biden team that came up with the whole idea.
It is absurd to think otherwise.

 

[Rigby5]

The document request was for NARA to give documents to the DoJ to proceed with an investigation of the mishandling of classified information.

Which then proves the oval office was involved in the raid.

And again, it is impossible for any ex-president to have "mishandled" any classified docs, because when president, they had full authority to do whatever they wanted with them.

 

[Marener]

No one could possibly believe the FBI would not have run this by the oval office first.

Why not?

 

[BlindBoo]

Copies of classified docs given to presidents for weekly updates, are private property of the president, and are NOT supposed to be returned or even looked at by anyone else without the permission of the president they were given to.

The raid would not have been conducted without approval by Biden, since the legal and political fallout is obvious.
But the main point is that the raid was criminal, so Biden is still legally liable because he has done nothing to return the papers to their legal owner.

Funny how all those lawyers and lawmakers missed that "Copies" clause.

Okay. Everybody pack up and go on home!

Go-on now.......

 

[Marener]

Which then proves the oval office was involved in the raid.

And again, it is impossible for any ex-president to have "mishandled" any classified docs, because when president, they had full authority to do whatever they wanted with them.

No, it proves that the administration wanted the DoJ to investigate, which is proper given the nature of the problem.

 

[Rigby5]

Why not?

The FBI would have run it by the oval office first because it is so unconventional.
Never before has anyone raided the residence of an ex-president, in order to steal private documents.
No person in the FBI would have taken that criminal authority upon themselves, for the reason that it would diminish the prestige of all future presidents as well.
It also totally destroyed the impartiality of the FBI, with such a criminal act.
The vast implications will be reverberating for decades to come.
It was totally criminal, and only someone with a very hostile agenda could have even considered something like that.

 

[Rigby5]

No, it proves that the administration wanted the DoJ to investigate, which is proper given the nature of the problem.

Wrong.
It is NOT at all "proper" to investigate the private copies that an ex-president has of classified docs.
All presidents have them, and they get to decide what to do with them.
NARA only has to get copies as well, in order to satisfy FOIA, but they are NOT supposed to be the private presidential copies.

 

[Marener]

The FBI would have run it by the oval office first because it is so unconventional.
Never before has anyone raided the residence of an ex-president, in order to steal private documents.
No person in the FBI would have taken that criminal authority upon themselves, for the reason that it would diminish the prestige of all future presidents as well.
It also totally destroyed the impartiality of the FBI, with such a criminal act.
The vast implications will be reverberating for decades to come.
It was totally criminal, and only someone with a very hostile agenda could have even considered something like that.

No, they wouldn’t. They would want to keep the politicians as far away from it as possible. That’s why they would exercise independent judgement and treat the situation as objectively as possible.

Former presidents are just citizens. They live under the law like the rest of us.

 

[Marener]

Wrong.
It is NOT at all "proper" to investigate the private copies that an ex-president has of classified docs.
All presidents have them, and they get to decide what to do with them.
NARA only has to get copies as well, in order to satisfy FOIA, but they are NOT supposed to be the private presidential copies.

Of course it is proper. Those classified documents contain state secrets and the contents are supposed to be kept secret.

If those documents are improperly handled, there’s serious national security ramifications that need to be mitigated.

 

[Billiejeens]

The document request was for NARA to give documents to the DoJ to proceed with an investigation of the mishandling of classified information.

You literally don't even know what is being discussed.

 

[Marener]

You literally don't even know what is being discussed.

I do. You don’t. The stories are vague overhyped rehashing of facts that I knew months ago.

 

[Rigby5]

No, they wouldn’t. They would want to keep the politicians as far away from it as possible. That’s why they would exercise independent judgement and treat the situation as objectively as possible.

Former presidents are just citizens. They live under the law like the rest of us.

Wrong.
If you can abuse former presidents, that allows sitting presidents to be extorted.

And clearly former presidents are NOT "just citizens" because they were given personal, private copies of classified docs at one time.
That can never happen with "just citizens".
Only ex-presidents can have copies of classified docs in their possession, with even having a security clearance.

The FBI is not capable of making "independent judgement" as to what the intent of the law was, and the potential future political ramifications.
It really should have been the judiciary who was consulted.
But I would bet 100% it was the oval office instead.

 

[Rigby5]

Of course it is proper. Those classified documents contain state secrets and the contents are supposed to be kept secret.

If those documents are improperly handled, there’s serious national security ramifications that need to be mitigated.

Whether or not classified docs are to be kept secret, is totally up to the president, and ex-president after their term is up.
Presidents can and often do reveal classified information when it is to the benefit of the country.
For example, you could intimidate a threatening country with your knowledge of their capabilities.
No one else gets any say.
Only presidents, VPs, and ex-presidents.