TNHarley
Diamond Member
- Sep 27, 2012
- 93,415
- 55,526
- 2,605
- Thread starter
- #21
I know you aren't, but you still label yourself "liberal" and you are far from it. You consider yourself "liberal" because of the raping of the term from the communist hippies.A REAL liberal, and not the Marxist version so many people brand themselves with, yes.so one person having that power is better? Hell, NOT having the TPP sounds good to me.If the TPP was not fast-tracked, it would never pass. Simple as that. It would be hostage to a handful of heavily bribed Congressmen.
The TPP establishes environmental and labor regulations for other countries, The Economic Policy Institute estimates that under the TPP we stand to lose more than 130,000 jobs to Vietnam and Japan alone, with American workers having to compete with their counterparts in Vietnam, where the minimum wage is just 56 cents an hour, it threatens internet freedoms, collective bargaining rights, how many corporations had a seta at the negotiation table?, deregulation and many others.
Perot was right about NAFTA and many people will be right about this abomination.
But hey, the good news is we will have to have higher artificial wages! lol
i'm impressed. you sound like a liberal.
Besides that, you "liberals" like higher artificial wages, remember? Its the band aid you guys put forth from the terrible economic decisions the duopoly has made..
I wouldn't know... i'm not a Marxist. or a socialist for that matter.
ftr, I wouldn't have supported TPP. but no one asked me.