Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It only means that the literary agent made a mistake.
BIG!!! Supreme Court agrees to hear birther case
There's lots of other evidence such as the fraudulent BC but it's complicated and requires experts to evaluate. The pamphlet is simple and deadly.
Will the court actually look at the evidence for once or will they make a fool of themselves like all the other federal courts who threw birther cases out for no legal reason.?
Breaking news! Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts schedules a case by Attorney Taitz regarding Obama’s forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court | Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire
Posted on | January 9, 2013 |
Law offices of Orly Taitz
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts scheduled a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court. The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.
Will the court actually look at the evidence for once or will they make a fool of themselves like all the other federal courts who threw birther cases out for no legal reason.?
Breaking news! Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts schedules a case by Attorney Taitz regarding Obamas forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court | Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire
Posted on | January 9, 2013 |
Law offices of Orly Taitz
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts scheduled a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obamas use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court. The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.
So we suffered a coup d'etat by a foreign national and didn't even know it!
[
I'll go with what Hawaii says, especially since they have private sources to back them up. There's nothing to back up your evidence, only an apology for an error.
Hawaii claims obozo as their native son. Of course they will back him up. THINK
[
I'll go with what Hawaii says, especially since they have private sources to back them up. There's nothing to back up your evidence, only an apology for an error.
Hawaii claims obozo as their native son. Of course they will back him up. THINK
They've got newspaper items to prove it. How'd they get there? Does Obama have a time machine?
Will the court actually look at the evidence for once or will they make a fool of themselves like all the other federal courts who threw birther cases out for no legal reason.?
So we suffered a coup d'etat by a foreign national and didn't even know it!
That's the problem, most of the dems know he's a fraud and just don't care.
Will the court actually look at the evidence for once or will they make a fool of themselves like all the other federal courts who threw birther cases out for no legal reason.?
So we suffered a coup d'etat by a foreign national and didn't even know it!
That's the problem, most of the dems know he's a fraud and just don't care.
What amazes me is the lack of any legal knowledge the birthers have.
Even if there was a valid claim the defendant has to PROVE NOTHING. Obama does not have to prove his birth certificate is real and authentic. NEVER in a civil case.
The entire burden is on the birthers to PROVE that he is not a citizen and not constitutionally qualified to be President.
And since they have NO evidence they have NO case.
[
They've got newspaper items to prove it. How'd they get there? Does Obama have a time machine?
What amazes me is the lack of any legal knowledge the birthers have.
Even if there was a valid claim the defendant has to PROVE NOTHING. Obama does not have to prove his birth certificate is real and authentic. NEVER in a civil case.
The entire burden is on the birthers to PROVE that he is not a citizen and not constitutionally qualified to be President.
And since they have NO evidence they have NO case.
To be frank, what amazes me is how many posts you have n this thread. If this birther thing is so rediculous to you, why do you keep on posting about it? Let it go. It is the right of an American to question anything he or she pleases. And if a Supreme Court Justice lends any credence to it by allowing it to appear in front of him, so be it.
What amazes me is the lack of any legal knowledge the birthers have.
Even if there was a valid claim the defendant has to PROVE NOTHING. Obama does not have to prove his birth certificate is real and authentic. NEVER in a civil case.
The entire burden is on the birthers to PROVE that he is not a citizen and not constitutionally qualified to be President.
And since they have NO evidence they have NO case.
This is theater for the rubes who don't know the first thing about how the justice system works. Taitz will milk this for many dollars on the speaker circuit. The suckers will cream their jeans over this ploy.
This is theater for the rubes who don't know the first thing about how the justice system works. Taitz will milk this for many dollars on the speaker circuit. The suckers will cream their jeans over this ploy.
what ploy? her lying and saying the court is taking her case when all they did was put her petition for certiorari on the conference calendar?
i guess the 'lawyer' chiropractor yoga instructor needs money to pay off the sanctions she got for bringing frivolous cases.
lol.
I have NO problem with the SC taking it up.
But they will not. It will be shit canned.
