Remodeling Maidiac
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #61
They had every intention of killing him but failed. They couldn't keep pouring rounds into that boat after the initial volley, but make no mistake about it they tried to kill him at first. That much is obvious.When police are shooting an unarmed person too far away to be any kind of threat to them, they are firing with the intent of killing. They were told to capture him alive. Orders are orders when you hold any kind of position that gives you a licence to kill for a government. They disobeyed theirs. As a police officer, you cannot allow your emotions to get in the way of your job. Plain and simple. Police are supposed to make clear-minded decisions and follow the orders given to them by whoever has authority. Same goes for the army, navy, air force, and seals.
Nobody had the right to tell the police to take him alive. You take him alive if possible. If they had wanted to kill him they would have killed him. You can not believe that the police knew he was unarmed "if" in fact he was unarmed which I doubt. With the silence put on the bomber after his capture I wish they had killed him. I really think liberals think the police should line up and slowly walk toward this guy knowing he would eventually run out of ammo and he could be taken alive. You do realize that the police for the most part have families at home that depend on them for support. There is nothing in the job description that says you have to commit suicide in a situation like this.
Nobody said the officers had to close on foot but they had a ton of resources to avoid that and actually used those resources. Just the FLIR itself was a HUGE tactical advantage for them. That kid didn't move. They could have walked right up to that boat and taken him out by his hair if they wanted to.
Naive fool.
He could have had any number of deadly devices on him.
He got shot. Boo fucking hoo