Bizarre Hypothetical Outcome of Impeachment

So where are these ads you speak of, and in what part of the country were they ran?

Joe Biden is a gaff machine. He can't go one week without being confused about something. He would be the easiest candidate for Trump to beat, especially with all the discovered scandals by the administration he was part of. Trump would rip him apart. For crying out loud, during a debate, he told the audience he was the only contestant that had the support of the only black Senator. Problem was, he was on the debate stage with Harris when he said it.



Yeah, this is what Trump is deathly afraid of?


Blah blah blah. Money does the real talking.

Trump campaign to drop bomb on Biden in early voting states

If Trump campaign really thought Biden would be an easier ooponent than others they would certiainly not be spending to sink him now.


The linked article was written in October. The phone call was in July. Since that time, Biden has attacked Trump repeatedly calling him a white supremacist, racist, and so forth. Remember that Biden too was part of the administration that spied on him, so the animosity against Biden is certainly understandable.


What the hell is the difference? The point is Trump campaign CLEARLY considers Biden a serious threat worth taking a hit on and in July Biden’s numbers were even better than October.


The difference is this took place in July of last year. Nobody knew who would be the candidate, including Trump. So the charge of Trump asking Zelensky to look into the matter because he was a rival is as phony as a black woman with a blond wig.


Quit strawgrasping, it was always known that Biden would be a serious challenge to Trump should he run and all polling showed that from the start.

He was the most high profile democrat with the most extensive record and Trump certainly is not going to be able to pull the “crazy socialist!!” routine on him.


Biden has a long history of gaffs, his VP terms, suspicious activity particularly with his son, and now I understand sons. And don't tell me back in July, Trump knew Biden would be his rival. Nobody knew back then. Remember, when Trump joined the primary, nobody thought he'd have a chance at winning. Same with his presidency.

Let's also keep in mind the ongoing Barr investigation. Barr said it would probably be complete in late spring or early summer this year. What he finds might shed some light on why Hunter really got that job, and what Burisma got in return.
 
Blah blah blah. Money does the real talking.

Trump campaign to drop bomb on Biden in early voting states

If Trump campaign really thought Biden would be an easier ooponent than others they would certiainly not be spending to sink him now.

The linked article was written in October. The phone call was in July. Since that time, Biden has attacked Trump repeatedly calling him a white supremacist, racist, and so forth. Remember that Biden too was part of the administration that spied on him, so the animosity against Biden is certainly understandable.

What the hell is the difference? The point is Trump campaign CLEARLY considers Biden a serious threat worth taking a hit on and in July Biden’s numbers were even better than October.

The difference is this took place in July of last year. Nobody knew who would be the candidate, including Trump. So the charge of Trump asking Zelensky to look into the matter because he was a rival is as phony as a black woman with a blond wig.

Quit strawgrasping, it was always known that Biden would be a serious challenge to Trump should he run and all polling showed that from the start.

He was the most high profile democrat with the most extensive record and Trump certainly is not going to be able to pull the “crazy socialist!!” routine on him.

Biden has a long history of gaffs, his VP terms, suspicious activity particularly with his son, and now I understand sons. And don't tell me back in July, Trump knew Biden would be his rival. Nobody knew back then. Remember, when Trump joined the primary, nobody thought he'd have a chance at winning. Same with his presidency.

Let's also keep in mind the ongoing Barr investigation. Barr said it would probably be complete in late spring or early summer this year. What he finds might shed some light on why Hunter really got that job, and what Burisma got in return.
I believe the late timing of those reports are being done on purpose..................for a political strategy to do more damage closer to the elections............

To me that is very TYPICAL of what is done these days...................and after we know who will be the Dem Candidate for Pres.............
 
The linked article was written in October. The phone call was in July. Since that time, Biden has attacked Trump repeatedly calling him a white supremacist, racist, and so forth. Remember that Biden too was part of the administration that spied on him, so the animosity against Biden is certainly understandable.

What the hell is the difference? The point is Trump campaign CLEARLY considers Biden a serious threat worth taking a hit on and in July Biden’s numbers were even better than October.

The difference is this took place in July of last year. Nobody knew who would be the candidate, including Trump. So the charge of Trump asking Zelensky to look into the matter because he was a rival is as phony as a black woman with a blond wig.

Quit strawgrasping, it was always known that Biden would be a serious challenge to Trump should he run and all polling showed that from the start.

He was the most high profile democrat with the most extensive record and Trump certainly is not going to be able to pull the “crazy socialist!!” routine on him.

Biden has a long history of gaffs, his VP terms, suspicious activity particularly with his son, and now I understand sons. And don't tell me back in July, Trump knew Biden would be his rival. Nobody knew back then. Remember, when Trump joined the primary, nobody thought he'd have a chance at winning. Same with his presidency.

Let's also keep in mind the ongoing Barr investigation. Barr said it would probably be complete in late spring or early summer this year. What he finds might shed some light on why Hunter really got that job, and what Burisma got in return.
I believe the late timing of those reports are being done on purpose..................for a political strategy to do more damage closer to the elections............

To me that is very TYPICAL of what is done these days...................and after we know who will be the Dem Candidate for Pres.............

I don't think so. Investigations do take a very long time. Look at Clinton, at Trump, at Hilary......

In this particular case, Durham early on stated it is now a criminal investigation. I don't think he would have announced that unless he had something good. When somebody in the coup looks at prison time, they start talking, and the investigation continues. If that's what takes place in this case, I say it might even be late summer before we get the entire story, especially if it leads back to Obama himself.
 
Let's get really weird and assume:

Trump has new evidence submitted and he resigns before impeachment. Pence is now President

Biden wins the Democratic nomination and defeats Pence in the popular vote and Electoral College by barely squeaking by.

The House of Representative flips to Republican control and McCarthy is named Speaker of the House.

The Senate remains in Republican hands with McConnell in charge.

Now, wouldn't Biden be subject to impeachment in the House on day one of his administration for his actions in Ukraine, claiming that if the prosecutor was not removed, they would not get the billion dollar loan guarantee?

The evidence is on tape and the Senate would be forced to remove him in a trial that could last one day. The Democrat VP would then become President.

Sound plausible?

Not one of your dumber threads. It is your dumbest thread

That's rich. considering this is about the third thread I have made in twice that many years. I said it was hypothetical. I guess you have no clue as to what that means. You could have skipped over it, bu you decided to chime in with a useless comment as you normally do.
 
Blah blah blah. Money does the real talking.

Trump campaign to drop bomb on Biden in early voting states

If Trump campaign really thought Biden would be an easier ooponent than others they would certiainly not be spending to sink him now.

The linked article was written in October. The phone call was in July. Since that time, Biden has attacked Trump repeatedly calling him a white supremacist, racist, and so forth. Remember that Biden too was part of the administration that spied on him, so the animosity against Biden is certainly understandable.

What the hell is the difference? The point is Trump campaign CLEARLY considers Biden a serious threat worth taking a hit on and in July Biden’s numbers were even better than October.

The difference is this took place in July of last year. Nobody knew who would be the candidate, including Trump. So the charge of Trump asking Zelensky to look into the matter because he was a rival is as phony as a black woman with a blond wig.

Quit strawgrasping, it was always known that Biden would be a serious challenge to Trump should he run and all polling showed that from the start.

He was the most high profile democrat with the most extensive record and Trump certainly is not going to be able to pull the “crazy socialist!!” routine on him.

Biden has a long history of gaffs, his VP terms, suspicious activity particularly with his son, and now I understand sons. And don't tell me back in July, Trump knew Biden would be his rival. Nobody knew back then. Remember, when Trump joined the primary, nobody thought he'd have a chance at winning. Same with his presidency.

Let's also keep in mind the ongoing Barr investigation. Barr said it would probably be complete in late spring or early summer this year. What he finds might shed some light on why Hunter really got that job, and what Burisma got in return.

Oh yes, the very many fruitful Barr investigations who can forget :rolleyes:
 
The linked article was written in October. The phone call was in July. Since that time, Biden has attacked Trump repeatedly calling him a white supremacist, racist, and so forth. Remember that Biden too was part of the administration that spied on him, so the animosity against Biden is certainly understandable.

What the hell is the difference? The point is Trump campaign CLEARLY considers Biden a serious threat worth taking a hit on and in July Biden’s numbers were even better than October.

The difference is this took place in July of last year. Nobody knew who would be the candidate, including Trump. So the charge of Trump asking Zelensky to look into the matter because he was a rival is as phony as a black woman with a blond wig.

Quit strawgrasping, it was always known that Biden would be a serious challenge to Trump should he run and all polling showed that from the start.

He was the most high profile democrat with the most extensive record and Trump certainly is not going to be able to pull the “crazy socialist!!” routine on him.

Biden has a long history of gaffs, his VP terms, suspicious activity particularly with his son, and now I understand sons. And don't tell me back in July, Trump knew Biden would be his rival. Nobody knew back then. Remember, when Trump joined the primary, nobody thought he'd have a chance at winning. Same with his presidency.

Let's also keep in mind the ongoing Barr investigation. Barr said it would probably be complete in late spring or early summer this year. What he finds might shed some light on why Hunter really got that job, and what Burisma got in return.

Oh yes, the very many fruitful Barr investigations who can forget :rolleyes:

Well what do you think the Democrats are so scared for? Why did they forward this phony as hell impeachment charge? They wanted to stop Trump to stop Barr. When they found out that Trump was curious about the Biden/ Burisma situation, they went into panic mode.
 
What the hell is the difference? The point is Trump campaign CLEARLY considers Biden a serious threat worth taking a hit on and in July Biden’s numbers were even better than October.

The difference is this took place in July of last year. Nobody knew who would be the candidate, including Trump. So the charge of Trump asking Zelensky to look into the matter because he was a rival is as phony as a black woman with a blond wig.

Quit strawgrasping, it was always known that Biden would be a serious challenge to Trump should he run and all polling showed that from the start.

He was the most high profile democrat with the most extensive record and Trump certainly is not going to be able to pull the “crazy socialist!!” routine on him.

Biden has a long history of gaffs, his VP terms, suspicious activity particularly with his son, and now I understand sons. And don't tell me back in July, Trump knew Biden would be his rival. Nobody knew back then. Remember, when Trump joined the primary, nobody thought he'd have a chance at winning. Same with his presidency.

Let's also keep in mind the ongoing Barr investigation. Barr said it would probably be complete in late spring or early summer this year. What he finds might shed some light on why Hunter really got that job, and what Burisma got in return.

Oh yes, the very many fruitful Barr investigations who can forget :rolleyes:

Well what do you think the Democrats are so scared for? Why did they forward this phony as hell impeachment charge? They wanted to stop Trump to stop Barr. When they found out that Trump was curious about the Biden/ Burisma situation, they went into panic mode.

Scared? The only thing scary here is the swamp preceedent AG acting like President's personal lawyer sets.

Instead of doing the people's bussiness we have an AG catering to President's personal political interests, chasing dirt on his opponents.
 
HUNTER BIDEN IS A CRACK HEAD LOL do you want your taxes going to pay for a politicians son?
Whose tax dollars are going to Hunter?? You said his money came from Ukraine and China.
It's coming out of the money we send to Ukraine.
Except, no, it's not. :cuckoo:
Of course it is. Joe finalized that transaction.
Except he didn't. Are you ever not a lying fucking moron?
 
The difference is this took place in July of last year. Nobody knew who would be the candidate, including Trump. So the charge of Trump asking Zelensky to look into the matter because he was a rival is as phony as a black woman with a blond wig.

Quit strawgrasping, it was always known that Biden would be a serious challenge to Trump should he run and all polling showed that from the start.

He was the most high profile democrat with the most extensive record and Trump certainly is not going to be able to pull the “crazy socialist!!” routine on him.

Biden has a long history of gaffs, his VP terms, suspicious activity particularly with his son, and now I understand sons. And don't tell me back in July, Trump knew Biden would be his rival. Nobody knew back then. Remember, when Trump joined the primary, nobody thought he'd have a chance at winning. Same with his presidency.

Let's also keep in mind the ongoing Barr investigation. Barr said it would probably be complete in late spring or early summer this year. What he finds might shed some light on why Hunter really got that job, and what Burisma got in return.

Oh yes, the very many fruitful Barr investigations who can forget :rolleyes:

Well what do you think the Democrats are so scared for? Why did they forward this phony as hell impeachment charge? They wanted to stop Trump to stop Barr. When they found out that Trump was curious about the Biden/ Burisma situation, they went into panic mode.

Scared? The only thing scary here is the swamp preceedent AG acting like President's personal lawyer sets.

Instead of doing the people's bussiness we have an AG catering to President's personal political interests, chasing dirt on his opponents.

He's looking into corruption of the last administration. That is his job. Nobody trustworthy could have done it in the last administration, because everybody was in on it: The FBI, the DOJ, the IRS, the AG, you name it.
 
Quit strawgrasping, it was always known that Biden would be a serious challenge to Trump should he run and all polling showed that from the start.

He was the most high profile democrat with the most extensive record and Trump certainly is not going to be able to pull the “crazy socialist!!” routine on him.

Biden has a long history of gaffs, his VP terms, suspicious activity particularly with his son, and now I understand sons. And don't tell me back in July, Trump knew Biden would be his rival. Nobody knew back then. Remember, when Trump joined the primary, nobody thought he'd have a chance at winning. Same with his presidency.

Let's also keep in mind the ongoing Barr investigation. Barr said it would probably be complete in late spring or early summer this year. What he finds might shed some light on why Hunter really got that job, and what Burisma got in return.

Oh yes, the very many fruitful Barr investigations who can forget :rolleyes:

Well what do you think the Democrats are so scared for? Why did they forward this phony as hell impeachment charge? They wanted to stop Trump to stop Barr. When they found out that Trump was curious about the Biden/ Burisma situation, they went into panic mode.

Scared? The only thing scary here is the swamp preceedent AG acting like President's personal lawyer sets.

Instead of doing the people's bussiness we have an AG catering to President's personal political interests, chasing dirt on his opponents.

He's looking into corruption of the last administration. That is his job. Nobody trustworthy could have done it in the last administration, because everybody was in on it: The FBI, the DOJ, the IRS, the AG, you name it.

He’s pursuing politically motivated investigations.

Ironically enough, that is what the right accused Obama of doing (without evidence).
 
Biden has a long history of gaffs, his VP terms, suspicious activity particularly with his son, and now I understand sons. And don't tell me back in July, Trump knew Biden would be his rival. Nobody knew back then. Remember, when Trump joined the primary, nobody thought he'd have a chance at winning. Same with his presidency.

Let's also keep in mind the ongoing Barr investigation. Barr said it would probably be complete in late spring or early summer this year. What he finds might shed some light on why Hunter really got that job, and what Burisma got in return.

Oh yes, the very many fruitful Barr investigations who can forget :rolleyes:

Well what do you think the Democrats are so scared for? Why did they forward this phony as hell impeachment charge? They wanted to stop Trump to stop Barr. When they found out that Trump was curious about the Biden/ Burisma situation, they went into panic mode.

Scared? The only thing scary here is the swamp preceedent AG acting like President's personal lawyer sets.

Instead of doing the people's bussiness we have an AG catering to President's personal political interests, chasing dirt on his opponents.

He's looking into corruption of the last administration. That is his job. Nobody trustworthy could have done it in the last administration, because everybody was in on it: The FBI, the DOJ, the IRS, the AG, you name it.

He’s pursuing politically motivated investigations.

Ironically enough, that is what the right accused Obama of doing (without evidence).

Prove it's politically motivated. Better yet, who started it?
 
I think every president going forward will be impeached because of the bar democrats set.

Exactly, whenever the House is controlled by one party, and the president is from the other party, there will be spite impeachments just for political advantage.
It is practically impossible to impeach the president as long as they do everything through the proper established channels. Trump tried to conduct foreign policy at cross purposes to established policy and in spite of the state department.


Trump establishes foreign policy and sets the policy. What you are really saying is that Trump did not follow Obama's policies however, that is why we elected Trump in the first place, because we did not like Obama's policies. Impeaching Trump for not following a previous POTUS' policies is taking power away from We The People which is what the deep-state, bureaucrat-Democrats are trying to do.
 
Quit strawgrasping, it was always known that Biden would be a serious challenge to Trump should he run and all polling showed that from the start.

He was the most high profile democrat with the most extensive record and Trump certainly is not going to be able to pull the “crazy socialist!!” routine on him.

Biden has a long history of gaffs, his VP terms, suspicious activity particularly with his son, and now I understand sons. And don't tell me back in July, Trump knew Biden would be his rival. Nobody knew back then. Remember, when Trump joined the primary, nobody thought he'd have a chance at winning. Same with his presidency.

Let's also keep in mind the ongoing Barr investigation. Barr said it would probably be complete in late spring or early summer this year. What he finds might shed some light on why Hunter really got that job, and what Burisma got in return.

Oh yes, the very many fruitful Barr investigations who can forget :rolleyes:

Well what do you think the Democrats are so scared for? Why did they forward this phony as hell impeachment charge? They wanted to stop Trump to stop Barr. When they found out that Trump was curious about the Biden/ Burisma situation, they went into panic mode.

Scared? The only thing scary here is the swamp preceedent AG acting like President's personal lawyer sets.

Instead of doing the people's bussiness we have an AG catering to President's personal political interests, chasing dirt on his opponents.

He's looking into corruption of the last administration. That is his job. Nobody trustworthy could have done it in the last administration, because everybody was in on it: The FBI, the DOJ, the IRS, the AG, you name it.

what corruption?

The only thing they got is Hunter happened to be working for certain company in Ukraine.

THATS IT, that’s the extent of the basis of so called “investigation”.
 
I think every president going forward will be impeached because of the bar democrats set.

Exactly, whenever the House is controlled by one party, and the president is from the other party, there will be spite impeachments just for political advantage.
It is practically impossible to impeach the president as long as they do everything through the proper established channels. Trump tried to conduct foreign policy at cross purposes to established policy and in spite of the state department.


Trump establishes foreign policy and sets the policy. What you are really saying is that Trump did not follow Obama's policies however, that is why we elected Trump in the first place, because we did not like Obama's policies. Impeaching Trump for not following a previous POTUS' policies is taking power away from We The People which is what the deep-state, bureaucrat-Democrats are trying to do.
I think every president going forward will be impeached because of the bar democrats set.

Exactly, whenever the House is controlled by one party, and the president is from the other party, there will be spite impeachments just for political advantage.
It is practically impossible to impeach the president as long as they do everything through the proper established channels. Trump tried to conduct foreign policy at cross purposes to established policy and in spite of the state department.


Trump establishes foreign policy and sets the policy. What you are really saying is that Trump did not follow Obama's policies however, that is why we elected Trump in the first place, because we did not like Obama's policies. Impeaching Trump for not following a previous POTUS' policies is taking power away from We The People which is what the deep-state, bureaucrat-Democrats are trying to do.

Trump didn’t change official policy when he did shit directly contrary to it.
 
Biden has a long history of gaffs, his VP terms, suspicious activity particularly with his son, and now I understand sons. And don't tell me back in July, Trump knew Biden would be his rival. Nobody knew back then. Remember, when Trump joined the primary, nobody thought he'd have a chance at winning. Same with his presidency.

Let's also keep in mind the ongoing Barr investigation. Barr said it would probably be complete in late spring or early summer this year. What he finds might shed some light on why Hunter really got that job, and what Burisma got in return.

Oh yes, the very many fruitful Barr investigations who can forget :rolleyes:

Well what do you think the Democrats are so scared for? Why did they forward this phony as hell impeachment charge? They wanted to stop Trump to stop Barr. When they found out that Trump was curious about the Biden/ Burisma situation, they went into panic mode.

Scared? The only thing scary here is the swamp preceedent AG acting like President's personal lawyer sets.

Instead of doing the people's bussiness we have an AG catering to President's personal political interests, chasing dirt on his opponents.

He's looking into corruption of the last administration. That is his job. Nobody trustworthy could have done it in the last administration, because everybody was in on it: The FBI, the DOJ, the IRS, the AG, you name it.

what corruption?

The only thing they got is Hunter happened to be working for certain company in Ukraine.

THATS IT, that’s the extent of the basis of so called “investigation”.

Such an investigation would not take that long. Durham already moved it into a criminal investigation. Obviously he found something pretty damning. So I highly doubt it's going to stop at Burisma. With corruption this wide spread, one thing leads to another.
 
Oh yes, the very many fruitful Barr investigations who can forget :rolleyes:

Well what do you think the Democrats are so scared for? Why did they forward this phony as hell impeachment charge? They wanted to stop Trump to stop Barr. When they found out that Trump was curious about the Biden/ Burisma situation, they went into panic mode.

Scared? The only thing scary here is the swamp preceedent AG acting like President's personal lawyer sets.

Instead of doing the people's bussiness we have an AG catering to President's personal political interests, chasing dirt on his opponents.

He's looking into corruption of the last administration. That is his job. Nobody trustworthy could have done it in the last administration, because everybody was in on it: The FBI, the DOJ, the IRS, the AG, you name it.

what corruption?

The only thing they got is Hunter happened to be working for certain company in Ukraine.

THATS IT, that’s the extent of the basis of so called “investigation”.

Such an investigation would not take that long. Durham already moved it into a criminal investigation. Obviously he found something pretty damning. So I highly doubt it's going to stop at Burisma. With corruption this wide spread, one thing leads to another.

Sounds like you got your investigations confoosled.

There is no official investigation into anything to do with Bidens....publicly known anyway.
 
Oh yes, the very many fruitful Barr investigations who can forget :rolleyes:

Well what do you think the Democrats are so scared for? Why did they forward this phony as hell impeachment charge? They wanted to stop Trump to stop Barr. When they found out that Trump was curious about the Biden/ Burisma situation, they went into panic mode.

Scared? The only thing scary here is the swamp preceedent AG acting like President's personal lawyer sets.

Instead of doing the people's bussiness we have an AG catering to President's personal political interests, chasing dirt on his opponents.

He's looking into corruption of the last administration. That is his job. Nobody trustworthy could have done it in the last administration, because everybody was in on it: The FBI, the DOJ, the IRS, the AG, you name it.

He’s pursuing politically motivated investigations.

Ironically enough, that is what the right accused Obama of doing (without evidence).

Prove it's politically motivated. Better yet, who started it?

Giuliani said so. He said it was for Trump’s personal benefit.
 
Well what do you think the Democrats are so scared for? Why did they forward this phony as hell impeachment charge? They wanted to stop Trump to stop Barr. When they found out that Trump was curious about the Biden/ Burisma situation, they went into panic mode.

Scared? The only thing scary here is the swamp preceedent AG acting like President's personal lawyer sets.

Instead of doing the people's bussiness we have an AG catering to President's personal political interests, chasing dirt on his opponents.

He's looking into corruption of the last administration. That is his job. Nobody trustworthy could have done it in the last administration, because everybody was in on it: The FBI, the DOJ, the IRS, the AG, you name it.

what corruption?

The only thing they got is Hunter happened to be working for certain company in Ukraine.

THATS IT, that’s the extent of the basis of so called “investigation”.

Such an investigation would not take that long. Durham already moved it into a criminal investigation. Obviously he found something pretty damning. So I highly doubt it's going to stop at Burisma. With corruption this wide spread, one thing leads to another.

Sounds like you got your investigations confoosled.

There is no official investigation into anything to do with Bidens....publicly known anyway.

They think Durham is investigating Biden and Burisma. Why? Because they have to. Otherwise their fairy tale doesn’t work.
 
Well what do you think the Democrats are so scared for? Why did they forward this phony as hell impeachment charge? They wanted to stop Trump to stop Barr. When they found out that Trump was curious about the Biden/ Burisma situation, they went into panic mode.

Scared? The only thing scary here is the swamp preceedent AG acting like President's personal lawyer sets.

Instead of doing the people's bussiness we have an AG catering to President's personal political interests, chasing dirt on his opponents.

He's looking into corruption of the last administration. That is his job. Nobody trustworthy could have done it in the last administration, because everybody was in on it: The FBI, the DOJ, the IRS, the AG, you name it.

He’s pursuing politically motivated investigations.

Ironically enough, that is what the right accused Obama of doing (without evidence).

Prove it's politically motivated. Better yet, who started it?

Giuliani said so. He said it was for Trump’s personal benefit.

So? You are impeaching Trump for something Giuliana said.
 
Scared? The only thing scary here is the swamp preceedent AG acting like President's personal lawyer sets.

Instead of doing the people's bussiness we have an AG catering to President's personal political interests, chasing dirt on his opponents.

He's looking into corruption of the last administration. That is his job. Nobody trustworthy could have done it in the last administration, because everybody was in on it: The FBI, the DOJ, the IRS, the AG, you name it.

He’s pursuing politically motivated investigations.

Ironically enough, that is what the right accused Obama of doing (without evidence).

Prove it's politically motivated. Better yet, who started it?

Giuliani said so. He said it was for Trump’s personal benefit.

So? You are impeaching Trump for something Giuliana said.
Giuliani is a fact witness.
 

Forum List

Back
Top