Bizarre Hypothetical Outcome of Impeachment

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

He's looking into corruption of the last administration. That is his job. Nobody trustworthy could have done it in the last administration, because everybody was in on it: The FBI, the DOJ, the IRS, the AG, you name it.

He’s pursuing politically motivated investigations.

Ironically enough, that is what the right accused Obama of doing (without evidence).

Prove it's politically motivated. Better yet, who started it?

Giuliani said so. He said it was for Trump’s personal benefit.

So? You are impeaching Trump for something Giuliana said.

Giuliani is a fact witness.

So is Schiff and he is one of the House impeachment managers.

 

[Jitss617]

HUNTER BIDEN IS A CRACK HEAD LOL do you want your taxes going to pay for a politicians son?

Whose tax dollars are going to Hunter?? You said his money came from Ukraine and China.

It's coming out of the money we send to Ukraine.

Except, no, it's not.

Of course it is. Joe finalized that transaction.

Except he didn't. Are you ever not a lying fucking moron?

So how did hunter get paid!!?

 

[Faun]

Some matters of a corrupt country? You know how many times Trump mentioned the word corruption or looking into anyone BUT his political opposition in his 2 calls with Zelensky? ZERO times, which is a few less times than him talking about Ukraine not recieprocating generous Amrican aid and bringing up Biden.

As Soderland testified to saying, Trump didn't give a crap about Ukraine. The matters Trump was after had directly to do with his own little narrow political interests.

Rudy publicly said that he was looking for Biden dirt in Ukraine.
Trump publicly said he wanted Ukraine to investigate Biden.
Mulveney publicly stated that the President ordered hold of the aid to pressure Ukraine for investigations.

To say that there is just no way we could ever figure out what Trump was after in Ukraine is to willingly do this:

Oh the GREAT PRESUME EVIDENCE............LMAO

Mulvaney publicly and explicitly stated that money was held back by Trump for the purpose of pressuring Ukraine for investigations...did I not just say it?

You just praised Sondlands testimony.........and I called your ass on it....

Moron did you read what you quoted?

Mulveney, Trump' chief of Staff and a Director of OMB admited publicly that Trump held up aid to pressure Ukraine.

Sondlands take on what the President was after is not in a vacum, it is a consistent piece of the same story that all the people invoved are testifying to or have publicly admited.


You say Trump didn't hold up aid to force Ukraine into investigating his political opposition?

Well there is a very simple way for Trump to vindicate himself and emberass them impeachin' Democrats - have people directly involved in this matter come testify before Congress, explain what was going on and how Trump was just doing a good job in Ukraine.

Of course Trump is fighting tooth and nail to prevent people from testifying. Why do you think that is?

Please provide a site where Mulveney said that Trump personally told him he was withholding aid from Ukraine for that reason. What Sondland said is he presumed what Trump wanted. But when questioned about what Trump actually told him, it was the exact opposite of what he presumed.

Furthermore, this call took place in July of last year, which is (give or take) a year away from the nomination of Trump's contender. Trump had no idea who he would be facing. He still doesn't today. Nobody does.

In order to support the phony allegation that Trump acted on behalf of discrediting his political opponent, they would have to do one of two things: Show me this crystal ball they used to predict the Biden nomination, or show me how they planned to rig the primary again, so that only Joe could win. Then, show me how Trump knew about either.

Until the Democrats can do that, then this charge that Trump asked Zelensky to "dig up dirt" on Biden because he was a political opponent--and not because of the corruption by the last administration, then the allegation of their claim is completely bogus. Biden is not Trump's rival yet. He is the rival of Sanders, Warren, Buddy-jiz, but not Trump.

Imbecile. They're both running for president. Biden is a rival.

 

[Faun]

Whose tax dollars are going to Hunter?? You said his money came from Ukraine and China.

It's coming out of the money we send to Ukraine.

Except, no, it's not.

Of course it is. Joe finalized that transaction.

Except he didn't. Are you ever not a lying fucking moron?

So how did hunter get paid!!?

Burisma paid him.

 

[Jitss617]

Oh the GREAT PRESUME EVIDENCE............LMAO

Mulvaney publicly and explicitly stated that money was held back by Trump for the purpose of pressuring Ukraine for investigations...did I not just say it?

You just praised Sondlands testimony.........and I called your ass on it....

Moron did you read what you quoted?

Mulveney, Trump' chief of Staff and a Director of OMB admited publicly that Trump held up aid to pressure Ukraine.

Sondlands take on what the President was after is not in a vacum, it is a consistent piece of the same story that all the people invoved are testifying to or have publicly admited.


You say Trump didn't hold up aid to force Ukraine into investigating his political opposition?

Well there is a very simple way for Trump to vindicate himself and emberass them impeachin' Democrats - have people directly involved in this matter come testify before Congress, explain what was going on and how Trump was just doing a good job in Ukraine.

Of course Trump is fighting tooth and nail to prevent people from testifying. Why do you think that is?

Please provide a site where Mulveney said that Trump personally told him he was withholding aid from Ukraine for that reason. What Sondland said is he presumed what Trump wanted. But when questioned about what Trump actually told him, it was the exact opposite of what he presumed.

Furthermore, this call took place in July of last year, which is (give or take) a year away from the nomination of Trump's contender. Trump had no idea who he would be facing. He still doesn't today. Nobody does.

In order to support the phony allegation that Trump acted on behalf of discrediting his political opponent, they would have to do one of two things: Show me this crystal ball they used to predict the Biden nomination, or show me how they planned to rig the primary again, so that only Joe could win. Then, show me how Trump knew about either.

Until the Democrats can do that, then this charge that Trump asked Zelensky to "dig up dirt" on Biden because he was a political opponent--and not because of the corruption by the last administration, then the allegation of their claim is completely bogus. Biden is not Trump's rival yet. He is the rival of Sanders, Warren, Buddy-jiz, but not Trump.

Imbecile. They're both running for president. Biden is a rival.

It's coming out of the money we send to Ukraine.

Except, no, it's not.

Of course it is. Joe finalized that transaction.

Except he didn't. Are you ever not a lying fucking moron?

So how did hunter get paid!!?

Burisma paid him.

And they didn’t receive aMy foreign funds from America? Ahhh your thinking now .. see what I did.

 

[Faun]

Mulvaney publicly and explicitly stated that money was held back by Trump for the purpose of pressuring Ukraine for investigations...did I not just say it?

You just praised Sondlands testimony.........and I called your ass on it....

Moron did you read what you quoted?

Mulveney, Trump' chief of Staff and a Director of OMB admited publicly that Trump held up aid to pressure Ukraine.

Sondlands take on what the President was after is not in a vacum, it is a consistent piece of the same story that all the people invoved are testifying to or have publicly admited.


You say Trump didn't hold up aid to force Ukraine into investigating his political opposition?

Well there is a very simple way for Trump to vindicate himself and emberass them impeachin' Democrats - have people directly involved in this matter come testify before Congress, explain what was going on and how Trump was just doing a good job in Ukraine.

Of course Trump is fighting tooth and nail to prevent people from testifying. Why do you think that is?

Please provide a site where Mulveney said that Trump personally told him he was withholding aid from Ukraine for that reason. What Sondland said is he presumed what Trump wanted. But when questioned about what Trump actually told him, it was the exact opposite of what he presumed.

Furthermore, this call took place in July of last year, which is (give or take) a year away from the nomination of Trump's contender. Trump had no idea who he would be facing. He still doesn't today. Nobody does.

In order to support the phony allegation that Trump acted on behalf of discrediting his political opponent, they would have to do one of two things: Show me this crystal ball they used to predict the Biden nomination, or show me how they planned to rig the primary again, so that only Joe could win. Then, show me how Trump knew about either.

Until the Democrats can do that, then this charge that Trump asked Zelensky to "dig up dirt" on Biden because he was a political opponent--and not because of the corruption by the last administration, then the allegation of their claim is completely bogus. Biden is not Trump's rival yet. He is the rival of Sanders, Warren, Buddy-jiz, but not Trump.

1. Trump started squealing “no quid-pro-quo!!!” to Sondland just as Congress opened the investigations into admin’s withholding whistleblower complaint that used that language.

It’s completely silly to use these after-getting-caught denials as evidence of innocence.

2. Biden presents the foremost challenge to Trump if he wins. Don’t take my word for it, take a look at Trump’s campaign blowing millions on anti-Biden adds in Democratic primary states.

The easiest way for Trump to not lose to Joe is to not run against him at all.

So where are these ads you speak of, and in what part of the country were they ran?

Joe Biden is a gaff machine. He can't go one week without being confused about something. He would be the easiest candidate for Trump to beat, especially with all the discovered scandals by the administration he was part of. Trump would rip him apart. For crying out loud, during a debate, he told the audience he was the only contestant that had the support of the only black Senator. Problem was, he was on the debate stage with Harris when he said it.



Yeah, this is what Trump is deathly afraid of?

"So where are these ads you speak of, and in what part of the country were they ran?"

You're really this stupid, huh?

 

[colfax_m]

He’s pursuing politically motivated investigations.

Ironically enough, that is what the right accused Obama of doing (without evidence).

Prove it's politically motivated. Better yet, who started it?

Giuliani said so. He said it was for Trump’s personal benefit.

So? You are impeaching Trump for something Giuliana said.

Giuliani is a fact witness.

So is Schiff and he is one of the House impeachment managers.

Incorrect. Schiff has no information on Trump’s actions.

 

[Faun]

Mulvaney publicly and explicitly stated that money was held back by Trump for the purpose of pressuring Ukraine for investigations...did I not just say it?

You just praised Sondlands testimony.........and I called your ass on it....

Moron did you read what you quoted?

Mulveney, Trump' chief of Staff and a Director of OMB admited publicly that Trump held up aid to pressure Ukraine.

Sondlands take on what the President was after is not in a vacum, it is a consistent piece of the same story that all the people invoved are testifying to or have publicly admited.


You say Trump didn't hold up aid to force Ukraine into investigating his political opposition?

Well there is a very simple way for Trump to vindicate himself and emberass them impeachin' Democrats - have people directly involved in this matter come testify before Congress, explain what was going on and how Trump was just doing a good job in Ukraine.

Of course Trump is fighting tooth and nail to prevent people from testifying. Why do you think that is?

Please provide a site where Mulveney said that Trump personally told him he was withholding aid from Ukraine for that reason. What Sondland said is he presumed what Trump wanted. But when questioned about what Trump actually told him, it was the exact opposite of what he presumed.

Furthermore, this call took place in July of last year, which is (give or take) a year away from the nomination of Trump's contender. Trump had no idea who he would be facing. He still doesn't today. Nobody does.

In order to support the phony allegation that Trump acted on behalf of discrediting his political opponent, they would have to do one of two things: Show me this crystal ball they used to predict the Biden nomination, or show me how they planned to rig the primary again, so that only Joe could win. Then, show me how Trump knew about either.

Until the Democrats can do that, then this charge that Trump asked Zelensky to "dig up dirt" on Biden because he was a political opponent--and not because of the corruption by the last administration, then the allegation of their claim is completely bogus. Biden is not Trump's rival yet. He is the rival of Sanders, Warren, Buddy-jiz, but not Trump.

Imbecile. They're both running for president. Biden is a rival.

Except, no, it's not.

Of course it is. Joe finalized that transaction.

Except he didn't. Are you ever not a lying fucking moron?

So how did hunter get paid!!?

Burisma paid him.

And they didn’t receive aMy foreign funds from America? Ahhh your thinking now .. see what I did.

Prove it...

 

[Jitss617]

You just praised Sondlands testimony.........and I called your ass on it....

Moron did you read what you quoted?

Mulveney, Trump' chief of Staff and a Director of OMB admited publicly that Trump held up aid to pressure Ukraine.

Sondlands take on what the President was after is not in a vacum, it is a consistent piece of the same story that all the people invoved are testifying to or have publicly admited.


You say Trump didn't hold up aid to force Ukraine into investigating his political opposition?

Well there is a very simple way for Trump to vindicate himself and emberass them impeachin' Democrats - have people directly involved in this matter come testify before Congress, explain what was going on and how Trump was just doing a good job in Ukraine.

Of course Trump is fighting tooth and nail to prevent people from testifying. Why do you think that is?

Please provide a site where Mulveney said that Trump personally told him he was withholding aid from Ukraine for that reason. What Sondland said is he presumed what Trump wanted. But when questioned about what Trump actually told him, it was the exact opposite of what he presumed.

Furthermore, this call took place in July of last year, which is (give or take) a year away from the nomination of Trump's contender. Trump had no idea who he would be facing. He still doesn't today. Nobody does.

In order to support the phony allegation that Trump acted on behalf of discrediting his political opponent, they would have to do one of two things: Show me this crystal ball they used to predict the Biden nomination, or show me how they planned to rig the primary again, so that only Joe could win. Then, show me how Trump knew about either.

Until the Democrats can do that, then this charge that Trump asked Zelensky to "dig up dirt" on Biden because he was a political opponent--and not because of the corruption by the last administration, then the allegation of their claim is completely bogus. Biden is not Trump's rival yet. He is the rival of Sanders, Warren, Buddy-jiz, but not Trump.

Imbecile. They're both running for president. Biden is a rival.

Of course it is. Joe finalized that transaction.

Except he didn't. Are you ever not a lying fucking moron?

So how did hunter get paid!!?

Burisma paid him.

And they didn’t receive aMy foreign funds from America? Ahhh your thinking now .. see what I did.

Prove it...

Lol that’s was the whole point of foreign aid to fund Burisma.. hunter Biden .. now do you want it investigated?

 

[Faun]

1. Trump started squealing “no quid-pro-quo!!!” to Sondland just as Congress opened the investigations into admin’s withholding whistleblower complaint that used that language.

It’s completely silly to use these after-getting-caught denials as evidence of innocence.

2. Biden presents the foremost challenge to Trump if he wins. Don’t take my word for it, take a look at Trump’s campaign blowing millions on anti-Biden adds in Democratic primary states.

The easiest way for Trump to not lose to Joe is to not run against him at all.

So where are these ads you speak of, and in what part of the country were they ran?

Joe Biden is a gaff machine. He can't go one week without being confused about something. He would be the easiest candidate for Trump to beat, especially with all the discovered scandals by the administration he was part of. Trump would rip him apart. For crying out loud, during a debate, he told the audience he was the only contestant that had the support of the only black Senator. Problem was, he was on the debate stage with Harris when he said it.



Yeah, this is what Trump is deathly afraid of?

Blah blah blah. Money does the real talking.

Trump campaign to drop bomb on Biden in early voting states

If Trump campaign really thought Biden would be an easier ooponent than others they would certiainly not be spending to sink him now.

The linked article was written in October. The phone call was in July. Since that time, Biden has attacked Trump repeatedly calling him a white supremacist, racist, and so forth. Remember that Biden too was part of the administration that spied on him, so the animosity against Biden is certainly understandable.

What the hell is the difference? The point is Trump campaign CLEARLY considers Biden a serious threat worth taking a hit on and in July Biden’s numbers were even better than October.

The difference is this took place in July of last year. Nobody knew who would be the candidate, including Trump. So the charge of Trump asking Zelensky to look into the matter because he was a rival is as phony as a black woman with a blond wig.

In July, the polls predicted Biden would be running against him. Impeached Trump didn't take out ads in July be cause he was lining up Zelensky to take Biden out for him. When that failed, Impeached Trump made a campaign ad about Biden getting Shokin fired.

 

[Faun]

Moron did you read what you quoted?

Mulveney, Trump' chief of Staff and a Director of OMB admited publicly that Trump held up aid to pressure Ukraine.

Sondlands take on what the President was after is not in a vacum, it is a consistent piece of the same story that all the people invoved are testifying to or have publicly admited.


You say Trump didn't hold up aid to force Ukraine into investigating his political opposition?

Well there is a very simple way for Trump to vindicate himself and emberass them impeachin' Democrats - have people directly involved in this matter come testify before Congress, explain what was going on and how Trump was just doing a good job in Ukraine.

Of course Trump is fighting tooth and nail to prevent people from testifying. Why do you think that is?

Please provide a site where Mulveney said that Trump personally told him he was withholding aid from Ukraine for that reason. What Sondland said is he presumed what Trump wanted. But when questioned about what Trump actually told him, it was the exact opposite of what he presumed.

Furthermore, this call took place in July of last year, which is (give or take) a year away from the nomination of Trump's contender. Trump had no idea who he would be facing. He still doesn't today. Nobody does.

In order to support the phony allegation that Trump acted on behalf of discrediting his political opponent, they would have to do one of two things: Show me this crystal ball they used to predict the Biden nomination, or show me how they planned to rig the primary again, so that only Joe could win. Then, show me how Trump knew about either.

Until the Democrats can do that, then this charge that Trump asked Zelensky to "dig up dirt" on Biden because he was a political opponent--and not because of the corruption by the last administration, then the allegation of their claim is completely bogus. Biden is not Trump's rival yet. He is the rival of Sanders, Warren, Buddy-jiz, but not Trump.

Imbecile. They're both running for president. Biden is a rival.

Except he didn't. Are you ever not a lying fucking moron?

So how did hunter get paid!!?

Burisma paid him.

And they didn’t receive aMy foreign funds from America? Ahhh your thinking now .. see what I did.

Prove it...

Lol that’s was the whole point of foreign aid to fund Burisma.. hunter Biden .. now do you want it investigated?

Foreign aid went to the Ukrainian government, not Burisma, comrade.

No proof U.S. aid for Ukraine went to Burisma

 

[Jitss617]

Please provide a site where Mulveney said that Trump personally told him he was withholding aid from Ukraine for that reason. What Sondland said is he presumed what Trump wanted. But when questioned about what Trump actually told him, it was the exact opposite of what he presumed.

Furthermore, this call took place in July of last year, which is (give or take) a year away from the nomination of Trump's contender. Trump had no idea who he would be facing. He still doesn't today. Nobody does.

In order to support the phony allegation that Trump acted on behalf of discrediting his political opponent, they would have to do one of two things: Show me this crystal ball they used to predict the Biden nomination, or show me how they planned to rig the primary again, so that only Joe could win. Then, show me how Trump knew about either.

Until the Democrats can do that, then this charge that Trump asked Zelensky to "dig up dirt" on Biden because he was a political opponent--and not because of the corruption by the last administration, then the allegation of their claim is completely bogus. Biden is not Trump's rival yet. He is the rival of Sanders, Warren, Buddy-jiz, but not Trump.

Imbecile. They're both running for president. Biden is a rival.

So how did hunter get paid!!?

Burisma paid him.

And they didn’t receive aMy foreign funds from America? Ahhh your thinking now .. see what I did.

Prove it...

Lol that’s was the whole point of foreign aid to fund Burisma.. hunter Biden .. now do you want it investigated?

Foreign aid went to the Ukrainian government, not Burisma, comrade.

No proof U.S. aid for Ukraine went to Burisma

Lol to find the energy lol smh

 

[Faun]

Would lie about cheating on your wife?

And you're confused about the whole mess. It was Monica lewinsky they accused him of lying about.

If these things upset you I can expect you to be outraged at tRump in your next post, right?

1. I wouldn't cheat on my wife.
2. I certainly would not commit felony perjury, particularly not on internationally broadcast live television.
3. Clinton perjured himself to stop his sexual harassment victim from receiving a fair trail. (That's real obstruction of justice, just in case you want to pretend to care about such things.)

What harassment victim? What trial? Wtf are you talking about? It was a completely consensual relationship.

Wut?? Clinton flew on a plane? Damned cheater.

 

[colfax_m]

Imbecile. They're both running for president. Biden is a rival.

Burisma paid him.

And they didn’t receive aMy foreign funds from America? Ahhh your thinking now .. see what I did.

Prove it...

Lol that’s was the whole point of foreign aid to fund Burisma.. hunter Biden .. now do you want it investigated?

Foreign aid went to the Ukrainian government, not Burisma, comrade.

No proof U.S. aid for Ukraine went to Burisma

Lol to find the energy lol smh

Ukraine has a mature energy sector. There is no need for foreign capital to “find the energy”.

 

[Jitss617]

Please provide a site where Mulveney said that Trump personally told him he was withholding aid from Ukraine for that reason. What Sondland said is he presumed what Trump wanted. But when questioned about what Trump actually told him, it was the exact opposite of what he presumed.

Furthermore, this call took place in July of last year, which is (give or take) a year away from the nomination of Trump's contender. Trump had no idea who he would be facing. He still doesn't today. Nobody does.

In order to support the phony allegation that Trump acted on behalf of discrediting his political opponent, they would have to do one of two things: Show me this crystal ball they used to predict the Biden nomination, or show me how they planned to rig the primary again, so that only Joe could win. Then, show me how Trump knew about either.

Until the Democrats can do that, then this charge that Trump asked Zelensky to "dig up dirt" on Biden because he was a political opponent--and not because of the corruption by the last administration, then the allegation of their claim is completely bogus. Biden is not Trump's rival yet. He is the rival of Sanders, Warren, Buddy-jiz, but not Trump.

Imbecile. They're both running for president. Biden is a rival.

So how did hunter get paid!!?

Burisma paid him.

And they didn’t receive aMy foreign funds from America? Ahhh your thinking now .. see what I did.

Prove it...

Lol that’s was the whole point of foreign aid to fund Burisma.. hunter Biden .. now do you want it investigated?

Foreign aid went to the Ukrainian government, not Burisma, comrade.

No proof U.S. aid for Ukraine went to Burisma

Schweizer: Joe Biden ‘Steered $1.8 Billion’ to Ukraine, Son Got a Deal

 

[Faun]

He's looking into corruption of the last administration. That is his job. Nobody trustworthy could have done it in the last administration, because everybody was in on it: The FBI, the DOJ, the IRS, the AG, you name it.

He’s pursuing politically motivated investigations.

Ironically enough, that is what the right accused Obama of doing (without evidence).

Prove it's politically motivated. Better yet, who started it?

Giuliani said so. He said it was for Trump’s personal benefit.

So? You are impeaching Trump for something Giuliana said.

Giuliani is a fact witness.

Giuliani is under investigation.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Well what do you think the Democrats are so scared for? Why did they forward this phony as hell impeachment charge? They wanted to stop Trump to stop Barr. When they found out that Trump was curious about the Biden/ Burisma situation, they went into panic mode.

Scared? The only thing scary here is the swamp preceedent AG acting like President's personal lawyer sets.

Instead of doing the people's bussiness we have an AG catering to President's personal political interests, chasing dirt on his opponents.

He's looking into corruption of the last administration. That is his job. Nobody trustworthy could have done it in the last administration, because everybody was in on it: The FBI, the DOJ, the IRS, the AG, you name it.

He’s pursuing politically motivated investigations.

Ironically enough, that is what the right accused Obama of doing (without evidence).

Prove it's politically motivated. Better yet, who started it?

Giuliani said so. He said it was for Trump’s personal benefit.

So prove that Trump told him that. I'll wait here for the link.

 

[Faun]

Imbecile. They're both running for president. Biden is a rival.

Burisma paid him.

And they didn’t receive aMy foreign funds from America? Ahhh your thinking now .. see what I did.

Prove it...

Lol that’s was the whole point of foreign aid to fund Burisma.. hunter Biden .. now do you want it investigated?

Foreign aid went to the Ukrainian government, not Burisma, comrade.

No proof U.S. aid for Ukraine went to Burisma

Schweizer: Joe Biden ‘Steered $1.8 Billion’ to Ukraine, Son Got a Deal

So?

 

[Faun]

Imbecile. They're both running for president. Biden is a rival.

Burisma paid him.

And they didn’t receive aMy foreign funds from America? Ahhh your thinking now .. see what I did.

Prove it...

Lol that’s was the whole point of foreign aid to fund Burisma.. hunter Biden .. now do you want it investigated?

Foreign aid went to the Ukrainian government, not Burisma, comrade.

No proof U.S. aid for Ukraine went to Burisma

Lol to find the energy lol smh

So you say. Unfortunately for you, you have no proof of what you're saying.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Well what do you think the Democrats are so scared for? Why did they forward this phony as hell impeachment charge? They wanted to stop Trump to stop Barr. When they found out that Trump was curious about the Biden/ Burisma situation, they went into panic mode.

Scared? The only thing scary here is the swamp preceedent AG acting like President's personal lawyer sets.

Instead of doing the people's bussiness we have an AG catering to President's personal political interests, chasing dirt on his opponents.

He's looking into corruption of the last administration. That is his job. Nobody trustworthy could have done it in the last administration, because everybody was in on it: The FBI, the DOJ, the IRS, the AG, you name it.

what corruption?

The only thing they got is Hunter happened to be working for certain company in Ukraine.

THATS IT, that’s the extent of the basis of so called “investigation”.

Such an investigation would not take that long. Durham already moved it into a criminal investigation. Obviously he found something pretty damning. So I highly doubt it's going to stop at Burisma. With corruption this wide spread, one thing leads to another.

Sounds like you got your investigations confoosled.

There is no official investigation into anything to do with Bidens....publicly known anyway.

I don't think anybody will know what is found until after the investigation is complete, and actions are taken. Barr stated that will be either late spring or early summer.