colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
When your argument falls back to “yeah well you can’t prove it” it’s time to reconsider the strength of your argument.Trump released the funds right after the Administration was forced to tell the House about the whistleblower complaint. Trump had already withheld the funds- he only released them after Americans were going to find out why he was withholding them for his own political benefit.
You don't know that nor can prove it. That's why this whole impeachment thing is a scam. If they thought that's why Trump was holding back funds, why didn't they give him enough rope to hang himself? Why not actually let him do what they thought he was doing? Then they might have had a real case.
You can't get much of a stronger argument than that. So far, this entire impeachment is about mind reading. The Democrats were able to read Trump's mind on why he withheld aid. The Democrats were able to read minds to know that Biden would be their nominee a year ahead of time. The Democrats read minds to tell us what Shokin did, instead of him telling us what he did. The Democrats were able to read Zelensky's mind when he said he felt no pressure from President Trump.
It's all about mind reading, and the Democrats impeached on it. So don't tell me I have a weak case.
Dude, Giuliani said why he wanted Biden investigated. To help Trump. They admitted it.
Don’t be a sucker.
Isn't that what a lawyer is supposed to do? Would you hire a lawyer that didn't want to help you?
It’s what he was helping him with. He was helping him dig up dirt on Joe Biden. No mind reading needed.