Black Cleveland councilman sees brutal cop body cam; Admits cops doing right thing.

[bucs90]

Then it seems everyone is in agreement with the need for bodycams.

Though if necessary uses of force plummet after their use, cops are gonna have some 'splainin' to do.

No, they're not necessary. They will only reduce the number of abuse charges at taxpayers expense and demonstrate most charges are bogus attempts at avoiding arrest or making a settlement buck. Another level of lottery mentality costing the rest of us.

So a police force that began using bodycams would not see a rate of 'justifiable' uses of force drop sharply from one year to the next?

No, they'll only see a drop in accusations.

Actually.....its has resulted in both:

The use of body cameras by San Diego police has led to fewer complaints by residents and less use of force by officers, according to a city report released Wednesday.

Complaints have fallen 40.5% and use of "personal body" force by officers has been reduced by 46.5% and use of pepper spray by 30.5%, according to the report developed by the Police Department for the City Council's Public Safety and Livable Neighborhoods Committee.

San Diego police body camera report: Fewer complaints, less use of force

And that's with only 60% of the force with body cams. And yet pepper spraying dropped by a third and use of personal force by officers was nearly cut in half.

Complaints fell by about 40%.

Seems to me that when being recorded the cops use violence WAY less often to do their policing.

Which came first? The egg or the chicken?
A couple of years ago in a city in Cal. the police force started using body cameras as an experiment. In the first year the number of complaints against LEO's dropped by 80%.
THIS IS THE CRITICAL PART: The number of arrests remained about the same or a little higher.
Now all you fucking LIB cop-hating genius explain what the results tell us.
YA FUCKING RIGHT!

That's EXACTLY right.

The public had no clue how vast this bullshit false allegation shit is. Countless lawyers make livings off it. Al Sharpton makes a career of it. Hell...Democrats campaign on it.

It's easy lawsuit money half the time. You know the saying.....throw enough shit....something sticks.

The same lowlife scum who do these false claims of abuse are the same ones who go to big box stores like Walmart and fake a slip & fall to get money.

But....Liberals bite the hook like a dumb blind fish.

 

[Skylar]

Then it seems everyone is in agreement with the need for bodycams.

Though if necessary uses of force plummet after their use, cops are gonna have some 'splainin' to do.

No, they're not necessary. They will only reduce the number of abuse charges at taxpayers expense and demonstrate most charges are bogus attempts at avoiding arrest or making a settlement buck. Another level of lottery mentality costing the rest of us.

So a police force that began using bodycams would not see a rate of 'justifiable' uses of force drop sharply from one year to the next?

No, they'll only see a drop in accusations.

Actually.....its has resulted in both:

The use of body cameras by San Diego police has led to fewer complaints by residents and less use of force by officers, according to a city report released Wednesday.

Complaints have fallen 40.5% and use of "personal body" force by officers has been reduced by 46.5% and use of pepper spray by 30.5%, according to the report developed by the Police Department for the City Council's Public Safety and Livable Neighborhoods Committee.

San Diego police body camera report: Fewer complaints, less use of force

And that's with only 60% of the force with body cams. And yet pepper spraying dropped by a third and use of personal force by officers was nearly cut in half.

Complaints fell by about 40%.

Seems to me that when being recorded the cops use violence WAY less often to do their policing.

It does reduce both.

Surprisingly.....when shitheads resist less and act civil...cops use less force. Imagine that.

You say that when cops wear body cams that people behave better. But you've provided nothing to back that claim up. Your OP demonstrates the exact opposite.

When cops are on camera, they commit far fewer acts of violence in their policing.

Go Bodycams.

 

[Conservative65]

Then it seems everyone is in agreement with the need for bodycams.

Though if necessary uses of force plummet after their use, cops are gonna have some 'splainin' to do.

No, they're not necessary. They will only reduce the number of abuse charges at taxpayers expense and demonstrate most charges are bogus attempts at avoiding arrest or making a settlement buck. Another level of lottery mentality costing the rest of us.

So a police force that began using bodycams would not see a rate of 'justifiable' uses of force drop sharply from one year to the next?

No, they'll only see a drop in accusations.

Actually.....its has resulted in both:

The use of body cameras by San Diego police has led to fewer complaints by residents and less use of force by officers, according to a city report released Wednesday.

Complaints have fallen 40.5% and use of "personal body" force by officers has been reduced by 46.5% and use of pepper spray by 30.5%, according to the report developed by the Police Department for the City Council's Public Safety and Livable Neighborhoods Committee.

San Diego police body camera report: Fewer complaints, less use of force

And that's with only 60% of the force with body cams. And yet pepper spraying dropped by a third and use of personal force by officers was nearly cut in half.

Complaints fell by about 40%.

Seems to me that when being recorded the cops use violence WAY less often to do their policing.

It does reduce both.

Surprisingly.....when shitheads resist less and act civil...cops use less force. Imagine that.

If a police officer asks you to do something, it's amazing how doing it keeps things from happening vs. when someone is a smartass.

 

[Skylar]

Then it seems everyone is in agreement with the need for bodycams.

Though if necessary uses of force plummet after their use, cops are gonna have some 'splainin' to do.

No, they're not necessary. They will only reduce the number of abuse charges at taxpayers expense and demonstrate most charges are bogus attempts at avoiding arrest or making a settlement buck. Another level of lottery mentality costing the rest of us.

So a police force that began using bodycams would not see a rate of 'justifiable' uses of force drop sharply from one year to the next?

No, they'll only see a drop in accusations.

Actually.....its has resulted in both:

The use of body cameras by San Diego police has led to fewer complaints by residents and less use of force by officers, according to a city report released Wednesday.

Complaints have fallen 40.5% and use of "personal body" force by officers has been reduced by 46.5% and use of pepper spray by 30.5%, according to the report developed by the Police Department for the City Council's Public Safety and Livable Neighborhoods Committee.

San Diego police body camera report: Fewer complaints, less use of force

And that's with only 60% of the force with body cams. And yet pepper spraying dropped by a third and use of personal force by officers was nearly cut in half.

Complaints fell by about 40%.

Seems to me that when being recorded the cops use violence WAY less often to do their policing.

Which came first? The egg or the chicken?
A couple of years ago in a city in Cal. the police force started using body cameras as an experiment. In the first year the number of complaints against LEO's dropped by 80%.
THIS IS THE CRITICAL PART: The number of arrests remained about the same or a little higher.
Now all you fucking LIB cop-hating genius explain what the results tell us.
YA FUCKING RIGHT!

First off, Danny....you'll need to get specific. As you offering us stats means nothing. YOu couldn't even name the city you're talking about. Show us the evidence.

San Diego started using bodycams. And the number of complaints dropped by 40%. The cops used 'justifiable' force about half as often. THere was no significant drop in arrests.

The explanation? Much of the violence that cops were using to do their policing wasn't justifiable. When they were watched by bodycams, they found ways of doing their job that didn't involving violence. And did their jobs just as well. Uses of violence dropped faster than the complaints about excessive use of force.

Everyone wins.

 

[bucs90]

No, they're not necessary. They will only reduce the number of abuse charges at taxpayers expense and demonstrate most charges are bogus attempts at avoiding arrest or making a settlement buck. Another level of lottery mentality costing the rest of us.

So a police force that began using bodycams would not see a rate of 'justifiable' uses of force drop sharply from one year to the next?

No, they'll only see a drop in accusations.

Actually.....its has resulted in both:

The use of body cameras by San Diego police has led to fewer complaints by residents and less use of force by officers, according to a city report released Wednesday.

Complaints have fallen 40.5% and use of "personal body" force by officers has been reduced by 46.5% and use of pepper spray by 30.5%, according to the report developed by the Police Department for the City Council's Public Safety and Livable Neighborhoods Committee.

San Diego police body camera report: Fewer complaints, less use of force

And that's with only 60% of the force with body cams. And yet pepper spraying dropped by a third and use of personal force by officers was nearly cut in half.

Complaints fell by about 40%.

Seems to me that when being recorded the cops use violence WAY less often to do their policing.

It does reduce both.

Surprisingly.....when shitheads resist less and act civil...cops use less force. Imagine that.

You say that when cops wear body cams that people behave better. But you've provided nothing to back that claim up. Your OP demonstrates the exact opposite.

When cops are on camera, they commit far fewer acts of violence in their policing.

Go Bodycams.

I'm not your college professor you can Google it yourself. PDs report people resist less and behave better when they KNOW they are on body cam.

My OP....was links where the thugs DIDN'T KNOW they were on.

 

[bucs90]

No, they're not necessary. They will only reduce the number of abuse charges at taxpayers expense and demonstrate most charges are bogus attempts at avoiding arrest or making a settlement buck. Another level of lottery mentality costing the rest of us.

So a police force that began using bodycams would not see a rate of 'justifiable' uses of force drop sharply from one year to the next?

No, they'll only see a drop in accusations.

Actually.....its has resulted in both:

The use of body cameras by San Diego police has led to fewer complaints by residents and less use of force by officers, according to a city report released Wednesday.

Complaints have fallen 40.5% and use of "personal body" force by officers has been reduced by 46.5% and use of pepper spray by 30.5%, according to the report developed by the Police Department for the City Council's Public Safety and Livable Neighborhoods Committee.

San Diego police body camera report: Fewer complaints, less use of force

And that's with only 60% of the force with body cams. And yet pepper spraying dropped by a third and use of personal force by officers was nearly cut in half.

Complaints fell by about 40%.

Seems to me that when being recorded the cops use violence WAY less often to do their policing.

Which came first? The egg or the chicken?
A couple of years ago in a city in Cal. the police force started using body cameras as an experiment. In the first year the number of complaints against LEO's dropped by 80%.
THIS IS THE CRITICAL PART: The number of arrests remained about the same or a little higher.
Now all you fucking LIB cop-hating genius explain what the results tell us.
YA FUCKING RIGHT!

First off, Danny....you'll need to get specific. As you offering us stats means nothing. YOu couldn't even name the city you're talking about. Show us the evidence.

San Diego started using bodycams. And the number of complaints dropped by 40%. The cops used 'justifiable' force about half as often. THere was no significant drop in arrests.

The explanation? Much of the violence that cops were using to do their policing wasn't justifiable. When they were watched by bodycams, they found ways of doing their job that didn't involving violence. And did their jobs just as well. Uses of violence dropped faster than the complaints about excessive use of force.

Everyone wins.

Oooor.....people resist less when they are on camera.

 

[Skylar]

So a police force that began using bodycams would not see a rate of 'justifiable' uses of force drop sharply from one year to the next?

No, they'll only see a drop in accusations.

Actually.....its has resulted in both:

The use of body cameras by San Diego police has led to fewer complaints by residents and less use of force by officers, according to a city report released Wednesday.

Complaints have fallen 40.5% and use of "personal body" force by officers has been reduced by 46.5% and use of pepper spray by 30.5%, according to the report developed by the Police Department for the City Council's Public Safety and Livable Neighborhoods Committee.

San Diego police body camera report: Fewer complaints, less use of force

And that's with only 60% of the force with body cams. And yet pepper spraying dropped by a third and use of personal force by officers was nearly cut in half.

Complaints fell by about 40%.

Seems to me that when being recorded the cops use violence WAY less often to do their policing.

It does reduce both.

Surprisingly.....when shitheads resist less and act civil...cops use less force. Imagine that.

You say that when cops wear body cams that people behave better. But you've provided nothing to back that claim up. Your OP demonstrates the exact opposite.

When cops are on camera, they commit far fewer acts of violence in their policing.

Go Bodycams.

I'm not your college professor you can Google it yourself. PDs report people resist less and behave better when they KNOW they are on body cam.

My OP....was links where the thugs DIDN'T KNOW they were on.

And by google it yourself you mean you've got jack shit to back any of the nonsense you just offered. Which I knew when I asked and you knew when you posted.

So we are left with nothing but the facts: when cops are being videotaped they commit far fewer acts of violence in their policing compared to when they aren't.

Go Bodycams!

 

[Skylar]

So a police force that began using bodycams would not see a rate of 'justifiable' uses of force drop sharply from one year to the next?

No, they'll only see a drop in accusations.

Actually.....its has resulted in both:

The use of body cameras by San Diego police has led to fewer complaints by residents and less use of force by officers, according to a city report released Wednesday.

Complaints have fallen 40.5% and use of "personal body" force by officers has been reduced by 46.5% and use of pepper spray by 30.5%, according to the report developed by the Police Department for the City Council's Public Safety and Livable Neighborhoods Committee.

San Diego police body camera report: Fewer complaints, less use of force

And that's with only 60% of the force with body cams. And yet pepper spraying dropped by a third and use of personal force by officers was nearly cut in half.

Complaints fell by about 40%.

Seems to me that when being recorded the cops use violence WAY less often to do their policing.

Which came first? The egg or the chicken?
A couple of years ago in a city in Cal. the police force started using body cameras as an experiment. In the first year the number of complaints against LEO's dropped by 80%.
THIS IS THE CRITICAL PART: The number of arrests remained about the same or a little higher.
Now all you fucking LIB cop-hating genius explain what the results tell us.
YA FUCKING RIGHT!

First off, Danny....you'll need to get specific. As you offering us stats means nothing. YOu couldn't even name the city you're talking about. Show us the evidence.

San Diego started using bodycams. And the number of complaints dropped by 40%. The cops used 'justifiable' force about half as often. THere was no significant drop in arrests.

The explanation? Much of the violence that cops were using to do their policing wasn't justifiable. When they were watched by bodycams, they found ways of doing their job that didn't involving violence. And did their jobs just as well. Uses of violence dropped faster than the complaints about excessive use of force.

Everyone wins.

Oooor.....people resist less when they are on camera.

Prove it. Again, Buc.....you can't back any of that with evidence.

And it doesn't matter what excuses you make up. Bodycams are coming. And cops commit fewer acts of violence when they're being watched. If San Diego is any indication, by about half.

Go Bodycams!

 

[bucs90]

No, they'll only see a drop in accusations.

Actually.....its has resulted in both:

The use of body cameras by San Diego police has led to fewer complaints by residents and less use of force by officers, according to a city report released Wednesday.

Complaints have fallen 40.5% and use of "personal body" force by officers has been reduced by 46.5% and use of pepper spray by 30.5%, according to the report developed by the Police Department for the City Council's Public Safety and Livable Neighborhoods Committee.

San Diego police body camera report: Fewer complaints, less use of force

And that's with only 60% of the force with body cams. And yet pepper spraying dropped by a third and use of personal force by officers was nearly cut in half.

Complaints fell by about 40%.

Seems to me that when being recorded the cops use violence WAY less often to do their policing.

It does reduce both.

Surprisingly.....when shitheads resist less and act civil...cops use less force. Imagine that.

You say that when cops wear body cams that people behave better. But you've provided nothing to back that claim up. Your OP demonstrates the exact opposite.

When cops are on camera, they commit far fewer acts of violence in their policing.

Go Bodycams.

I'm not your college professor you can Google it yourself. PDs report people resist less and behave better when they KNOW they are on body cam.

My OP....was links where the thugs DIDN'T KNOW they were on.

And by google it yourself you mean you've got jack shit to back any of the nonsense you just offered. Which I knew when I asked and you knew when you posted.

So we are left with nothing but the facts: when cops are being videotaped they commit far fewer acts of violence in their policing compared to when they aren't.

Go Bodycams!

No it means I researched myself and got informed and am not gonna provide you a free education.

Cops commit less use of force with body cams? Yes. Because thugs resist less. Dash cams have been around for 20 years so the cops have ALWAYS known they were on camera.

Only now though do thugs see a big round camera on the cop staring him in the face.

Hell....police should bling it out and make the cameras bright gold and fake thug platinum color to get their attention even more.

Thugs resist less.
There's less incentive for a bullshit lawsuit.

Thus....cops aren't put into situations where the need force as much.

Yay bodycams!

 

[bucs90]

No, they'll only see a drop in accusations.

Actually.....its has resulted in both:

The use of body cameras by San Diego police has led to fewer complaints by residents and less use of force by officers, according to a city report released Wednesday.

Complaints have fallen 40.5% and use of "personal body" force by officers has been reduced by 46.5% and use of pepper spray by 30.5%, according to the report developed by the Police Department for the City Council's Public Safety and Livable Neighborhoods Committee.

San Diego police body camera report: Fewer complaints, less use of force

And that's with only 60% of the force with body cams. And yet pepper spraying dropped by a third and use of personal force by officers was nearly cut in half.

Complaints fell by about 40%.

Seems to me that when being recorded the cops use violence WAY less often to do their policing.

Which came first? The egg or the chicken?
A couple of years ago in a city in Cal. the police force started using body cameras as an experiment. In the first year the number of complaints against LEO's dropped by 80%.
THIS IS THE CRITICAL PART: The number of arrests remained about the same or a little higher.
Now all you fucking LIB cop-hating genius explain what the results tell us.
YA FUCKING RIGHT!

First off, Danny....you'll need to get specific. As you offering us stats means nothing. YOu couldn't even name the city you're talking about. Show us the evidence.

San Diego started using bodycams. And the number of complaints dropped by 40%. The cops used 'justifiable' force about half as often. THere was no significant drop in arrests.

The explanation? Much of the violence that cops were using to do their policing wasn't justifiable. When they were watched by bodycams, they found ways of doing their job that didn't involving violence. And did their jobs just as well. Uses of violence dropped faster than the complaints about excessive use of force.

Everyone wins.

Oooor.....people resist less when they are on camera.

Prove it. Again, Buc.....you can't back any of that with evidence.

And it doesn't matter what excuses you make up. Bodycams are coming. And cops commit fewer acts of violence when they're being watched. If San Diego is any indication, by about half.

Go Bodycams!

Yay bodycams!!

Cops have always been on camera moron. Remember dash cams!??

Now....thugs like you get to actually see the big shiny body cam and you behave better.

 

[Skylar]

Actually.....its has resulted in both:

And that's with only 60% of the force with body cams. And yet pepper spraying dropped by a third and use of personal force by officers was nearly cut in half.

Complaints fell by about 40%.

Seems to me that when being recorded the cops use violence WAY less often to do their policing.

It does reduce both.

Surprisingly.....when shitheads resist less and act civil...cops use less force. Imagine that.

You say that when cops wear body cams that people behave better. But you've provided nothing to back that claim up. Your OP demonstrates the exact opposite.

When cops are on camera, they commit far fewer acts of violence in their policing.

Go Bodycams.

I'm not your college professor you can Google it yourself. PDs report people resist less and behave better when they KNOW they are on body cam.

My OP....was links where the thugs DIDN'T KNOW they were on.

And by google it yourself you mean you've got jack shit to back any of the nonsense you just offered. Which I knew when I asked and you knew when you posted.

So we are left with nothing but the facts: when cops are being videotaped they commit far fewer acts of violence in their policing compared to when they aren't.

Go Bodycams!

No it means I researched myself and got informed and am not gonna provide you a free education.

Laughing....oh, obviously. Which is why you're citing yourself and not the research.

YOu've done no research, Buc. You've got nothing to back your claim. That's why you're giving us excuses why you can't back up your claims.

Cops commit less use of force with body cams? Yes. Because thugs resist less.

Prove it. You citing yourself means jack shit. I can demonstrate with evidence that cops commit fewer acts of violence in their policing when they are observed by body cams.

That's irrefutable. You can present nothing to back your narrative.

Dash cams have been around for 20 years so the cops have ALWAYS known they were on camera.

If dash cams show the same thing as bodycams....why are you in favor of body cams?

Easy: because its what the dash cams *don't* show that you want on film. Me too. As when the cops are under constant observation, they use violence far less often.

 

[bucs90]

Survey: Police officers want body-worn cameras
Most national surveys say the vast majority of cops WANT body cameras.

A major factor is how many say false allegations are disproved by the cameras.

America.....I'm so happy about this.

We may FINALLY get to show the majority of America what kind of low life thug scum Obama voters that police have to deal with day to day.

 

[Skylar]

Survey: Police officers want body-worn cameras
Most national surveys say the vast majority of cops WANT body cameras.

A major factor is how many say false allegations are disproved by the cameras.

America.....I'm so happy about this.

We may FINALLY get to show the majority of America what kind of low life thug scum Obama voters that police have to deal with day to day.

Laughing.......but didn't you argue that the body cams will dramatically change the way people behave? And now you're saying the bodycams will merely reveal what cops already have to deal with?

Even you can't keep your story straight. The fact is, cops under observation act better than cops that aren't. With bodycams reducing uses of violence by police by about half.

Oh, and 'low life thug scum Obama voters'? Yeah, how will anyone ever break that 'code'.

 

[bucs90]

It does reduce both.

Surprisingly.....when shitheads resist less and act civil...cops use less force. Imagine that.

You say that when cops wear body cams that people behave better. But you've provided nothing to back that claim up. Your OP demonstrates the exact opposite.

When cops are on camera, they commit far fewer acts of violence in their policing.

Go Bodycams.

I'm not your college professor you can Google it yourself. PDs report people resist less and behave better when they KNOW they are on body cam.

My OP....was links where the thugs DIDN'T KNOW they were on.

And by google it yourself you mean you've got jack shit to back any of the nonsense you just offered. Which I knew when I asked and you knew when you posted.

So we are left with nothing but the facts: when cops are being videotaped they commit far fewer acts of violence in their policing compared to when they aren't.

Go Bodycams!

No it means I researched myself and got informed and am not gonna provide you a free education.

Laughing....oh, obviously. Which is why you're citing yourself and not the research.

YOu've done no research, Buc. You've got nothing to back your claim. That's why you're giving us excuses why you can't back up your claims.

Cops commit less use of force with body cams? Yes. Because thugs resist less.

Prove it. You citing yourself means jack shit. I can demonstrate with evidence that cops commit fewer acts of violence in their policing when they are observed by body cams.

That's irrefutable. You can present nothing to back your narrative.

Dash cams have been around for 20 years so the cops have ALWAYS known they were on camera.

If dash cams show the same thing as bodycams....why are you in favor of body cams?

Easy: because its what the dash cams *don't* show that you want on film. Me too. As when the cops are under constant observation, they use violence far less often.

Hey moron.....think for a second.

Why do cops use force? To subdue someone who is RESISTING.

If they don't resisit....force isn't necessary.

Thus....the end result....less uses of force.

It's an action/reaction situation. Use of force is the REACTION. It goes down when the ACTION goes down. Body cams reduce the number of ACTIONS (resisting) and thus....lowers the incidents of reaction.

In terms you libs can grasp....it's like global warming. Human emissions are the action. Higher temps the reaction. You do a study and see higher temps. There is a CAUSE.

Cops use force....there is a CAUSE. IF use of force is down....it's because the CAUSE went down.

See how simple this shit is?

Taser International did a survey. The vast majority of cops WANT body cams. This is why.

Survey: Police officers want body-worn cameras

 

[Skylar]

If they don't resisit....force isn't necessary.

Then your job is simple, dipshit. Show us the evidence that resisting arrest collars went down by half in San Diego in the year they began using bodycams.

You can't, Buc. There's a reason you're citing yourself rather than your 'vast research'. As you can't back up anything you've claimed.

Show us the evidence. Don't tell us about it. As the only thing we know is that cops use less violence when they're being watched.

 

[bucs90]

If they don't resisit....force isn't necessary.

Then your job is simple, dipshit. Show us the evidence that resisting arrest collars went down by half in San Diego in the year they began using

You can't, Buc. There's a reason you're citing yourself rather than your 'vast research'. As you can't back up anything you've claimed.

Show us the evidence. Don't tell us about it. As the only thing we know is that cops use less violence when they're being watched.

God damn I didn't think you were this dumb.

It's cause and effect.

If the effect is going down....it's because the cause is.

Just like you libs say global warming works.

If carbon emissions go down (resisiting arrest) then temperatures go down (use of force). That's probably the only way I'll be able to get a liberal to understand this.

You want me to link you to the stats on how many people got CHARGED with resisiting arrest per agency in America? Sure let me just do a FOIA request to 1000 police agencies real quick for all 2011-2015 arrest stats. ....

 

[Skylar]

If they don't resisit....force isn't necessary.

Then your job is simple, dipshit. Show us the evidence that resisting arrest collars went down by half in San Diego in the year they began using

You can't, Buc. There's a reason you're citing yourself rather than your 'vast research'. As you can't back up anything you've claimed.

Show us the evidence. Don't tell us about it. As the only thing we know is that cops use less violence when they're being watched.

God damn I didn't think you were this dumb.

It's cause and effect.

If the effect is going down....it's because the cause is.

Just like you libs say global warming works.

If carbon emissions go down (resisiting arrest) then temperatures go down (use of force). That's probably the only way I'll be able to get a liberal to understand this.

You want me to link you to the stats on how many people got CHARGED with resisiting arrest per agency in America? Sure let me just do a FOIA request to 1000 police agencies real quick for all 2011-2015 arrest stats. ....

Again, show us the evidence that resisting arrest charges dropped by about half in San Diego the year they started using bodycams. Because we know that uses of forces by police dropped by about half.

You're still just quoting yourself, Buc. And you're still nobody.

And you're quoting yourself....because you've got jack shit to back your claims.

 

[Skylar]

Since you're clearly never going to be able to back any of the horseshit you've offered us, dipshit....I'll do the research for you:

The documents obtained by Team 10 show 893 resisting arrest or obstructing justice arrests in 2014 by county sheriff's Deputies, 889 obstructing justice arrests in 2013 and 810 in 2012.

San Diego police body camera report: Fewer complaints, less use of force

So in San Diego......use of force complaints dropped 40%. Use of force by police dropped 46%.

But resisting arrest or obstruction of justice arrests INCREASED from 2013 to 2014.

Exactly opposite of what you insisted happened.

What's your excuse this time, dipshit.

 

[Skylar]

If they don't resisit....force isn't necessary.

Then your job is simple, dipshit. Show us the evidence that resisting arrest collars went down by half in San Diego in the year they began using

You can't, Buc. There's a reason you're citing yourself rather than your 'vast research'. As you can't back up anything you've claimed.

Show us the evidence. Don't tell us about it. As the only thing we know is that cops use less violence when they're being watched.

God damn I didn't think you were this dumb.

It's cause and effect.

If the effect is going down....it's because the cause is.

Just like you libs say global warming works.

If carbon emissions go down (resisiting arrest) then temperatures go down (use of force). That's probably the only way I'll be able to get a liberal to understand this.

You want me to link you to the stats on how many people got CHARGED with resisiting arrest per agency in America? Sure let me just do a FOIA request to 1000 police agencies real quick for all 2011-2015 arrest stats. ....

Again, show us the evidence that resisting arrest charges dropped by about half in San Diego the year they started using bodycams. Because we know that uses of forces by police dropped by about half.

You're still just quoting yourself, Buc. And you're still nobody.

And you're quoting yourself....because you've got jack shit to back your claims.

"RESISTING ARREST" is not an FBI UCR code Group A offense required to be publicly reported by police agencies.

Here are the stats for San Diego and surrounding areas. They dont.....and aren't required...to report how many arrests are made for the offense of "resisting arrest".

ARJIS Crime Statistics

But only a moron could fail to see the simple cause and effect.

Uses of force are done on those who RESIST. And they're likely charged with resisting.

If uses of force are down.....then the CAUSE OF the use of that force is down.

Use of force is a REACTION/EFFECT.
Resisting is an ACTION/CAUSE.

I knew you were below average IQ. But didn't know you were this dumb.

ANd yet in San Diego.....resisting arrest and obstruction of justice charges INCREASED under the use of bodycams. If barely.

What's your next excuse, shit-stain?

Laughing.....why the deleted post, Buc? Reality getting in the way of your narrative?

 

[bucs90]

If they don't resisit....force isn't necessary.

Then your job is simple, dipshit. Show us the evidence that resisting arrest collars went down by half in San Diego in the year they began using

You can't, Buc. There's a reason you're citing yourself rather than your 'vast research'. As you can't back up anything you've claimed.

Show us the evidence. Don't tell us about it. As the only thing we know is that cops use less violence when they're being watched.

God damn I didn't think you were this dumb.

It's cause and effect.

If the effect is going down....it's because the cause is.

Just like you libs say global warming works.

If carbon emissions go down (resisiting arrest) then temperatures go down (use of force). That's probably the only way I'll be able to get a liberal to understand this.

You want me to link you to the stats on how many people got CHARGED with resisiting arrest per agency in America? Sure let me just do a FOIA request to 1000 police agencies real quick for all 2011-2015 arrest stats. ....

Again, show us the evidence that resisting arrest charges dropped by about half in San Diego the year they started using bodycams. Because we know that uses of forces by police dropped by about half.

You're still just quoting yourself, Buc. And you're still nobody.

And you're quoting yourself....because you've got jack shit to back your claims.

"RESISTING ARREST" is not an FBI UCR code Group A offense required to be publicly reported by police agencies.

Here are the stats for San Diego and surrounding areas. They dont.....and aren't required...to report how many arrests are made for the offense of "resisting arrest".

ARJIS Crime Statistics

But only a moron could fail to see the simple cause and effect.

Uses of force are done on those who RESIST. And they're likely charged with resisting.

If uses of force are down.....then the CAUSE OF the use of that force is down.

Use of force is a REACTION/EFFECT.
Resisting is an ACTION/CAUSE.

I knew you were below average IQ. But didn't know you were this dumb.

ANd yet in San Diego.....resisting arrest and obstruction of justice charges INCREASED under the use of bodycams. If barely.

What's your next excuse, shit-stain?

Laughing.....why the deleted post, Buc? Reality getting in the way of your narrative?

Not at all. Your link you provided is about to bite you in the ass.....

You are gonna get a lesson in statistics 101. You provided raw numbers if an increase (tiny % increase) in the offense of "resisting arrest" in San Deigo....reported by one patrol team in your link.

You didn't consider two statistical anomalies...m.
1. San Diegos booming population growth from 2011-2014 which would increase all raw numbers
2. PROTESTS that we saw in recent years which cause the annual "resisting arrest" stat to surge from a single days event.

You confuse raw numbers with %. But stand by.....your education will get better.....