Boom!!!! Judge in Manafort case says Mueller only wants to hurt Trump

[Billy_Bob]

To suggest the FBI operates like the Stasi is hysterically wrong.

To suggest the FBI operates like the Stasi is hysterically wrong.

To suggest the FBI operates like the Stasi is spot on .


.

Yet that is precisely what they did.. and called the media. Another intimidation tactic.

 

[WEATHER53]

Mueller has a history of choosing a target first and looking for evidence second
Having found no evidence on Trump aa to how he and the Russians worked together to turn the election so Trump won, Mueeler embarked on the witch hunt to pursue other people and other Trump matters
99% of all Republicans and probably 30% of all Democrats have been declaring this for over a year. Now a judge has

 

[Contumacious]

Mueller has a history of choosing a target first and looking for evidence second
Having found no evidence on Trump aa to how he and the Russians worked together to turn the election so Trump won, Mueeler embarked on the witch hunt to pursue other people and other Trump matters
99% of all Republicans and probably 30% of all Democrats have been declaring this for over a year. Now a judge has

Did you mean to say

"Mueller has a history of choosing a target first and MANUFACTURING evidence second"

 

[westwall]

Mueller has a history of choosing a target first and looking for evidence second
Having found no evidence on Trump aa to how he and the Russians worked together to turn the election so Trump won, Mueeler embarked on the witch hunt to pursue other people and other Trump matters
99% of all Republicans and probably 30% of all Democrats have been declaring this for over a year. Now a judge has

Did you mean to say

"Mueller has a history of choosing a target first and MANUFACTURING evidence second"

I don't know if there is evidence he has actually manufactured evidence, but, he certainly will keep exculpatory evidence away from a defense team. Which is highly unethical, and illegal in some cases.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Can someone show how Mueller and the anthrax investigation impacts the Trump investigation?

Some one is going to have to prove that the suspect was absolutely innocent to the (1) "detriment of the American taxpayer" and (2) "who has had to fork over 4.5 million dollars to settle the lawsuit brought against mueller and Co."

That Mueller supposedly would keep exculpatory evidence from Trump's lawyers is inflammatory and without evidence.

Trump's character is at question far more than that of Mueller.

Time will tell and need not be further discussed here.

 

[Contumacious]

Mueller has a history of choosing a target first and looking for evidence second
Having found no evidence on Trump aa to how he and the Russians worked together to turn the election so Trump won, Mueeler embarked on the witch hunt to pursue other people and other Trump matters
99% of all Republicans and probably 30% of all Democrats have been declaring this for over a year. Now a judge has

Did you mean to say

"Mueller has a history of choosing a target first and MANUFACTURING evidence second"

I don't know if there is evidence he has actually manufactured evidence, but, he certainly will keep exculpatory evidence away from a defense team. Which is highly unethical, and illegal in some cases.

Rosenstein and Mueller Running for Cover Leaving Brennan Exposed


"But now that the FISA court has on record Rosenstein and Comey’s confessions that the spy warrants requested by the FBI to spy on Trump are based on deception of the court, "


If Comey is capable so is his bosom buddy Mueller


.

 

[eagle1462010]

Can someone show how Mueller and the anthrax investigation impacts the Trump investigation?

Some one is going to have to prove that the suspect was absolutely innocent to the (1) "detriment of the American taxpayer" and (2) "who has had to fork over 4.5 million dollars to settle the lawsuit brought against mueller and Co."

That Mueller supposedly would keep exculpatory evidence from Trump's lawyers is inflammatory and without evidence.

Trump's character is at question far more than that of Mueller.

Time will tell and need not be further discussed here.

Sure............just as soon as you show why a tax evasion charge from a decade before this issue was at hand relates to Russian Collusion.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Beholden? The court has no authority to tell the Deputy AG how to conduct investigations.

He made the statement of why these cases aren't in the lower courts and not his............He also questioned the authority under the special council. Just as he questioned cases over a decade old that have no bearing on their scope of the special council........

He made the statement of why these cases aren't in the lower courts and not his............He also questioned the authority under the special council. Just as he questioned cases over a decade old that have no bearing on their scope of the special council........

Damn, dude. I've posted a link on this like three freaking times now.
Read it!

Rosenstein decides the scope. Not the judge.
Rosenstein gave Mueller the aurhority to investigate and indict Manafort on his Ukraine dealings. That is what was in question in the motion filed by the defense.

This blows that up.

Prosecutors: Rosenstein gave Mueller OK to probe, indict Manafort

"However, Mueller's team submitted a previously undisclosed memo to a federal court in Washington showing that a few months after Mueller was appointed last May, Rosenstein gave him explicit authority to target Manafort over the financial aspects of his lobbying work for the Ukrainian government — in addition to allegations he was linked to Russian interference in the 2016 election.

"The May 17, 2017 [appointment] order was worded categorically in order to permit its release without confirming specific investigations involving specific individuals," Rosenstein wrote in the Aug. 2, 2017 memo. "The following allegations were within the scope of the Investigation at the time of your appointment and are within the scope of the Order: ... Allegations that Paul Manafort: Committed a crime or crimes by colluding with Russian government officials with respect to the Russian government's efforts to interfere with the 2016 election for President of the United States, in violation of United States law. Committed a crime or crimes arising out of payments he received from the Ukrainian government before and during the tenure of President Viktor Yanukovych."

"Every key step in this case — including the investigative path and the Indictment itself — has been authorized by the Acting Attorney General through ongoing consultation," Mueller's team wrote in a brief opposing Manafort's bid to throw out the D.C. case.

The new disclosures about the Justice Department's internal handling of the Manafort investigation came in response to a motion Manafort's lawyers filed last month in U.S. District Court in Washington asking to have the criminal charges pending against him there thrown out on the grounds that Mueller's appointment was defective and that he exceeded his authority in going after Manafort."

And again..........there are 3 Branches of Gov't...........The DOJ is in the Executive Dept............Not the Judiciary...........

The Judiciary decides the legality of Court matters including whether or not the Scope by Rosenstein gives unfettered power to the Special Council. A special council that went back over 10 years to dig up a charge against Manafort. Nothing to do with Russia Investigation.

The Judge Challenged that...........because he could see the abuse of power with the Special Council and chastised them for it.

In regards to the Russia Collusion.......YOU HAVE NOTHING. But it is clear that Mueller is trying to crucify Manafort to find anything on Trump. Which is what the Judge said.

In regards to this case........drag Manafort out into the street and have the MSM and FBI beat him to death. because this is a political LINCHING AND NOT A CRIMINAL CASE FOR JUSTICE.

The Judge SAW THAT...........We see it.............and SO DO THE PEOPLE.

The Judiciary decides the legality of Court matters including whether or not the Scope by Rosenstein gives unfettered power to the Special Council. A special council that went back over 10 years to dig up a charge against Manafort. Nothing to do with Russia Investigation.

Bullshit.

The scope is the scope the AG decides it will be. Period.
The judge has no authority in that regard at all.

By definition, if the scope is set by the AG, then it is not "unfettered power" but clearly limited to the scope set by the AG.

You can spin all you like, but Rosenstein has said clearly that Manafort's dealings with Ukraine were within the scope since the day Mueller was appointed.

Well it looks like the judge will say differently. Eh? Need a hug?

The judge can say what he likes but that changes nothing.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The memo remit allows Mueller to go where the evidence goes.

You need to read the whole transcript of the exchange between the Judge and SC lawyer. Ellis was smoking the shit out of them. That memo was produced only after the raid. You know like "OMG I need a memo for the raid Ron!!!!!!!".

By the way that raid was truly Stasi. That's police state shit right there Jake.

Bullshit. It says clearly that Mueller had this authority since his appointment.

 

[eagle1462010]

He made the statement of why these cases aren't in the lower courts and not his............He also questioned the authority under the special council. Just as he questioned cases over a decade old that have no bearing on their scope of the special council........

He made the statement of why these cases aren't in the lower courts and not his............He also questioned the authority under the special council. Just as he questioned cases over a decade old that have no bearing on their scope of the special council........

Damn, dude. I've posted a link on this like three freaking times now.
Read it!

Rosenstein decides the scope. Not the judge.
Rosenstein gave Mueller the aurhority to investigate and indict Manafort on his Ukraine dealings. That is what was in question in the motion filed by the defense.

This blows that up.

Prosecutors: Rosenstein gave Mueller OK to probe, indict Manafort

"However, Mueller's team submitted a previously undisclosed memo to a federal court in Washington showing that a few months after Mueller was appointed last May, Rosenstein gave him explicit authority to target Manafort over the financial aspects of his lobbying work for the Ukrainian government — in addition to allegations he was linked to Russian interference in the 2016 election.

"The May 17, 2017 [appointment] order was worded categorically in order to permit its release without confirming specific investigations involving specific individuals," Rosenstein wrote in the Aug. 2, 2017 memo. "The following allegations were within the scope of the Investigation at the time of your appointment and are within the scope of the Order: ... Allegations that Paul Manafort: Committed a crime or crimes by colluding with Russian government officials with respect to the Russian government's efforts to interfere with the 2016 election for President of the United States, in violation of United States law. Committed a crime or crimes arising out of payments he received from the Ukrainian government before and during the tenure of President Viktor Yanukovych."

"Every key step in this case — including the investigative path and the Indictment itself — has been authorized by the Acting Attorney General through ongoing consultation," Mueller's team wrote in a brief opposing Manafort's bid to throw out the D.C. case.

The new disclosures about the Justice Department's internal handling of the Manafort investigation came in response to a motion Manafort's lawyers filed last month in U.S. District Court in Washington asking to have the criminal charges pending against him there thrown out on the grounds that Mueller's appointment was defective and that he exceeded his authority in going after Manafort."

And again..........there are 3 Branches of Gov't...........The DOJ is in the Executive Dept............Not the Judiciary...........

The Judiciary decides the legality of Court matters including whether or not the Scope by Rosenstein gives unfettered power to the Special Council. A special council that went back over 10 years to dig up a charge against Manafort. Nothing to do with Russia Investigation.

The Judge Challenged that...........because he could see the abuse of power with the Special Council and chastised them for it.

In regards to the Russia Collusion.......YOU HAVE NOTHING. But it is clear that Mueller is trying to crucify Manafort to find anything on Trump. Which is what the Judge said.

In regards to this case........drag Manafort out into the street and have the MSM and FBI beat him to death. because this is a political LINCHING AND NOT A CRIMINAL CASE FOR JUSTICE.

The Judge SAW THAT...........We see it.............and SO DO THE PEOPLE.

The Judiciary decides the legality of Court matters including whether or not the Scope by Rosenstein gives unfettered power to the Special Council. A special council that went back over 10 years to dig up a charge against Manafort. Nothing to do with Russia Investigation.

Bullshit.

The scope is the scope the AG decides it will be. Period.
The judge has no authority in that regard at all.

By definition, if the scope is set by the AG, then it is not "unfettered power" but clearly limited to the scope set by the AG.

You can spin all you like, but Rosenstein has said clearly that Manafort's dealings with Ukraine were within the scope since the day Mueller was appointed.

Well it looks like the judge will say differently. Eh? Need a hug?

The judge can say what he likes but that changes nothing.

You still have a problem with who's courtroom it belongs to..............It's not Rosenstein..........

You still have a problem with the 3 branches of Gov't........

Hint..........DOJ is the executive branch.............Not the Judicial Branch..........shhhhh

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Beholden? The court has no authority to tell the Deputy AG how to conduct investigations.

He made the statement of why these cases aren't in the lower courts and not his............He also questioned the authority under the special council. Just as he questioned cases over a decade old that have no bearing on their scope of the special council........

He made the statement of why these cases aren't in the lower courts and not his............He also questioned the authority under the special council. Just as he questioned cases over a decade old that have no bearing on their scope of the special council........

Damn, dude. I've posted a link on this like three freaking times now.
Read it!

Rosenstein decides the scope. Not the judge.
Rosenstein gave Mueller the aurhority to investigate and indict Manafort on his Ukraine dealings. That is what was in question in the motion filed by the defense.

This blows that up.

Prosecutors: Rosenstein gave Mueller OK to probe, indict Manafort

"However, Mueller's team submitted a previously undisclosed memo to a federal court in Washington showing that a few months after Mueller was appointed last May, Rosenstein gave him explicit authority to target Manafort over the financial aspects of his lobbying work for the Ukrainian government — in addition to allegations he was linked to Russian interference in the 2016 election.

"The May 17, 2017 [appointment] order was worded categorically in order to permit its release without confirming specific investigations involving specific individuals," Rosenstein wrote in the Aug. 2, 2017 memo. "The following allegations were within the scope of the Investigation at the time of your appointment and are within the scope of the Order: ... Allegations that Paul Manafort: Committed a crime or crimes by colluding with Russian government officials with respect to the Russian government's efforts to interfere with the 2016 election for President of the United States, in violation of United States law. Committed a crime or crimes arising out of payments he received from the Ukrainian government before and during the tenure of President Viktor Yanukovych."

"Every key step in this case — including the investigative path and the Indictment itself — has been authorized by the Acting Attorney General through ongoing consultation," Mueller's team wrote in a brief opposing Manafort's bid to throw out the D.C. case.

The new disclosures about the Justice Department's internal handling of the Manafort investigation came in response to a motion Manafort's lawyers filed last month in U.S. District Court in Washington asking to have the criminal charges pending against him there thrown out on the grounds that Mueller's appointment was defective and that he exceeded his authority in going after Manafort."

And again..........there are 3 Branches of Gov't...........The DOJ is in the Executive Dept............Not the Judiciary...........

The Judiciary decides the legality of Court matters including whether or not the Scope by Rosenstein gives unfettered power to the Special Council. A special council that went back over 10 years to dig up a charge against Manafort. Nothing to do with Russia Investigation.

The Judge Challenged that...........because he could see the abuse of power with the Special Council and chastised them for it.

In regards to the Russia Collusion.......YOU HAVE NOTHING. But it is clear that Mueller is trying to crucify Manafort to find anything on Trump. Which is what the Judge said.

In regards to this case........drag Manafort out into the street and have the MSM and FBI beat him to death. because this is a political LINCHING AND NOT A CRIMINAL CASE FOR JUSTICE.

The Judge SAW THAT...........We see it.............and SO DO THE PEOPLE.

The Judiciary decides the legality of Court matters including whether or not the Scope by Rosenstein gives unfettered power to the Special Council. A special council that went back over 10 years to dig up a charge against Manafort. Nothing to do with Russia Investigation.

Bullshit.

The scope is the scope the AG decides it will be. Period.
The judge has no authority in that regard at all.

By definition, if the scope is set by the AG, then it is not "unfettered power" but clearly limited to the scope set by the AG.

You can spin all you like, but Rosenstein has said clearly that Manafort's dealings with Ukraine were within the scope since the day Mueller was appointed.

Tax evasion charges from 10 years ago are dealings with Ukraine.............

Where did the money come from, dope?

 

[eagle1462010]

The memo remit allows Mueller to go where the evidence goes.

You need to read the whole transcript of the exchange between the Judge and SC lawyer. Ellis was smoking the shit out of them. That memo was produced only after the raid. You know like "OMG I need a memo for the raid Ron!!!!!!!".

By the way that raid was truly Stasi. That's police state shit right there Jake.

Bullshit. It says clearly that Mueller had this authority since his appointment.

His authority allows him to go anywhere he pleases.................which is what he's doing.......

Hey pal................the Judge called their asses out on it............which part of decade old accusations apply to Russia ..............hmmmmm

NONE.

 

[eagle1462010]

He made the statement of why these cases aren't in the lower courts and not his............He also questioned the authority under the special council. Just as he questioned cases over a decade old that have no bearing on their scope of the special council........

He made the statement of why these cases aren't in the lower courts and not his............He also questioned the authority under the special council. Just as he questioned cases over a decade old that have no bearing on their scope of the special council........

Damn, dude. I've posted a link on this like three freaking times now.
Read it!

Rosenstein decides the scope. Not the judge.
Rosenstein gave Mueller the aurhority to investigate and indict Manafort on his Ukraine dealings. That is what was in question in the motion filed by the defense.

This blows that up.

Prosecutors: Rosenstein gave Mueller OK to probe, indict Manafort

"However, Mueller's team submitted a previously undisclosed memo to a federal court in Washington showing that a few months after Mueller was appointed last May, Rosenstein gave him explicit authority to target Manafort over the financial aspects of his lobbying work for the Ukrainian government — in addition to allegations he was linked to Russian interference in the 2016 election.

"The May 17, 2017 [appointment] order was worded categorically in order to permit its release without confirming specific investigations involving specific individuals," Rosenstein wrote in the Aug. 2, 2017 memo. "The following allegations were within the scope of the Investigation at the time of your appointment and are within the scope of the Order: ... Allegations that Paul Manafort: Committed a crime or crimes by colluding with Russian government officials with respect to the Russian government's efforts to interfere with the 2016 election for President of the United States, in violation of United States law. Committed a crime or crimes arising out of payments he received from the Ukrainian government before and during the tenure of President Viktor Yanukovych."

"Every key step in this case — including the investigative path and the Indictment itself — has been authorized by the Acting Attorney General through ongoing consultation," Mueller's team wrote in a brief opposing Manafort's bid to throw out the D.C. case.

The new disclosures about the Justice Department's internal handling of the Manafort investigation came in response to a motion Manafort's lawyers filed last month in U.S. District Court in Washington asking to have the criminal charges pending against him there thrown out on the grounds that Mueller's appointment was defective and that he exceeded his authority in going after Manafort."

And again..........there are 3 Branches of Gov't...........The DOJ is in the Executive Dept............Not the Judiciary...........

The Judiciary decides the legality of Court matters including whether or not the Scope by Rosenstein gives unfettered power to the Special Council. A special council that went back over 10 years to dig up a charge against Manafort. Nothing to do with Russia Investigation.

The Judge Challenged that...........because he could see the abuse of power with the Special Council and chastised them for it.

In regards to the Russia Collusion.......YOU HAVE NOTHING. But it is clear that Mueller is trying to crucify Manafort to find anything on Trump. Which is what the Judge said.

In regards to this case........drag Manafort out into the street and have the MSM and FBI beat him to death. because this is a political LINCHING AND NOT A CRIMINAL CASE FOR JUSTICE.

The Judge SAW THAT...........We see it.............and SO DO THE PEOPLE.

The Judiciary decides the legality of Court matters including whether or not the Scope by Rosenstein gives unfettered power to the Special Council. A special council that went back over 10 years to dig up a charge against Manafort. Nothing to do with Russia Investigation.

Bullshit.

The scope is the scope the AG decides it will be. Period.
The judge has no authority in that regard at all.

By definition, if the scope is set by the AG, then it is not "unfettered power" but clearly limited to the scope set by the AG.

You can spin all you like, but Rosenstein has said clearly that Manafort's dealings with Ukraine were within the scope since the day Mueller was appointed.

Tax evasion charges from 10 years ago are dealings with Ukraine.............

Where did the money come from, dope?

Yeah. they knew 10 years early to safe money for a rainy day when they supposedly colluded with Russia.....

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Haha...wow. pure, delusional, Trumpkin fantasy. If anything, this judge is going to get himself removed from this case with his comments.

This judge exposed gross prosecutorial misconduct. If you think that will get him removed your smoking to much dope... The judge has every right to determine if they were acting within their scope or if they were over stepping their authority.

Gawd you idiots are like sheep with blinders on following the bell..

judge has every right to determine if they were acting within their scope or if they were over stepping their authority.

Except Rosenstein determines the scope and approves any actions taken by Mueller before they are taken. You're circle jerking with this one.

Tell that to Judge Ellis. And keep in mind whatever is in or not in that memo Ellis can bounce Manafort's case out of court.

Bullshit. If what's in the memo blows up the defense's argument, which it does, then he has to rule against them.

Seriously did you not read my post? What's in or not in the memo CAN bounce the case out of court. Can as in could as in possibly.

In what way?
What is in the memo blows the defense allegation out of the water.

You're hoping for some mystery evidence to prove a case no one has made? Fool.

 

[Contumacious]

TIME TO SAY BUH BYE TO NIKKIE HALEY


Nikki Haley says she won’t defend Trump’s ‘communication style’

 

[westwall]

Can someone show how Mueller and the anthrax investigation impacts the Trump investigation?

Some one is going to have to prove that the suspect was absolutely innocent to the (1) "detriment of the American taxpayer" and (2) "who has had to fork over 4.5 million dollars to settle the lawsuit brought against mueller and Co."

That Mueller supposedly would keep exculpatory evidence from Trump's lawyers is inflammatory and without evidence.

Trump's character is at question far more than that of Mueller.

Time will tell and need not be further discussed here.

it shows beyond doubt that he is unethical, and will resort to criminal behavior to get the result he wants. That's how it affects the trump investigation.

 

[westwall]

He made the statement of why these cases aren't in the lower courts and not his............He also questioned the authority under the special council. Just as he questioned cases over a decade old that have no bearing on their scope of the special council........

He made the statement of why these cases aren't in the lower courts and not his............He also questioned the authority under the special council. Just as he questioned cases over a decade old that have no bearing on their scope of the special council........

Damn, dude. I've posted a link on this like three freaking times now.
Read it!

Rosenstein decides the scope. Not the judge.
Rosenstein gave Mueller the aurhority to investigate and indict Manafort on his Ukraine dealings. That is what was in question in the motion filed by the defense.

This blows that up.

Prosecutors: Rosenstein gave Mueller OK to probe, indict Manafort

"However, Mueller's team submitted a previously undisclosed memo to a federal court in Washington showing that a few months after Mueller was appointed last May, Rosenstein gave him explicit authority to target Manafort over the financial aspects of his lobbying work for the Ukrainian government — in addition to allegations he was linked to Russian interference in the 2016 election.

"The May 17, 2017 [appointment] order was worded categorically in order to permit its release without confirming specific investigations involving specific individuals," Rosenstein wrote in the Aug. 2, 2017 memo. "The following allegations were within the scope of the Investigation at the time of your appointment and are within the scope of the Order: ... Allegations that Paul Manafort: Committed a crime or crimes by colluding with Russian government officials with respect to the Russian government's efforts to interfere with the 2016 election for President of the United States, in violation of United States law. Committed a crime or crimes arising out of payments he received from the Ukrainian government before and during the tenure of President Viktor Yanukovych."

"Every key step in this case — including the investigative path and the Indictment itself — has been authorized by the Acting Attorney General through ongoing consultation," Mueller's team wrote in a brief opposing Manafort's bid to throw out the D.C. case.

The new disclosures about the Justice Department's internal handling of the Manafort investigation came in response to a motion Manafort's lawyers filed last month in U.S. District Court in Washington asking to have the criminal charges pending against him there thrown out on the grounds that Mueller's appointment was defective and that he exceeded his authority in going after Manafort."

And again..........there are 3 Branches of Gov't...........The DOJ is in the Executive Dept............Not the Judiciary...........

The Judiciary decides the legality of Court matters including whether or not the Scope by Rosenstein gives unfettered power to the Special Council. A special council that went back over 10 years to dig up a charge against Manafort. Nothing to do with Russia Investigation.

The Judge Challenged that...........because he could see the abuse of power with the Special Council and chastised them for it.

In regards to the Russia Collusion.......YOU HAVE NOTHING. But it is clear that Mueller is trying to crucify Manafort to find anything on Trump. Which is what the Judge said.

In regards to this case........drag Manafort out into the street and have the MSM and FBI beat him to death. because this is a political LINCHING AND NOT A CRIMINAL CASE FOR JUSTICE.

The Judge SAW THAT...........We see it.............and SO DO THE PEOPLE.

The Judiciary decides the legality of Court matters including whether or not the Scope by Rosenstein gives unfettered power to the Special Council. A special council that went back over 10 years to dig up a charge against Manafort. Nothing to do with Russia Investigation.

Bullshit.

The scope is the scope the AG decides it will be. Period.
The judge has no authority in that regard at all.

By definition, if the scope is set by the AG, then it is not "unfettered power" but clearly limited to the scope set by the AG.

You can spin all you like, but Rosenstein has said clearly that Manafort's dealings with Ukraine were within the scope since the day Mueller was appointed.

Well it looks like the judge will say differently. Eh? Need a hug?

The judge can say what he likes but that changes nothing.

Let me ask you to do that next time you happen to be in Court. Please make sure your telling the judge he doesn't matter is televised as well.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Can someone show how Mueller and the anthrax investigation impacts the Trump investigation?

Some one is going to have to prove that the suspect was absolutely innocent to the (1) "detriment of the American taxpayer" and (2) "who has had to fork over 4.5 million dollars to settle the lawsuit brought against mueller and Co."

That Mueller supposedly would keep exculpatory evidence from Trump's lawyers is inflammatory and without evidence.

Trump's character is at question far more than that of Mueller.

Time will tell and need not be further discussed here.

Sure............just as soon as you show why a tax evasion charge from a decade before this issue was at hand relates to Russian Collusion.

Mueller has done so for the court's satisfaction. I have no need to show that to you; you won't accept it.

 

[eagle1462010]

Can someone show how Mueller and the anthrax investigation impacts the Trump investigation?

Some one is going to have to prove that the suspect was absolutely innocent to the (1) "detriment of the American taxpayer" and (2) "who has had to fork over 4.5 million dollars to settle the lawsuit brought against mueller and Co."

That Mueller supposedly would keep exculpatory evidence from Trump's lawyers is inflammatory and without evidence.

Trump's character is at question far more than that of Mueller.

Time will tell and need not be further discussed here.

Sure............just as soon as you show why a tax evasion charge from a decade before this issue was at hand relates to Russian Collusion.

Mueller has done so for the court's satisfaction. I have no need to show that to you; you won't accept it.

I wan't the one asking for the information. The Judge was.............

 

[westwall]

Can someone show how Mueller and the anthrax investigation impacts the Trump investigation?

Some one is going to have to prove that the suspect was absolutely innocent to the (1) "detriment of the American taxpayer" and (2) "who has had to fork over 4.5 million dollars to settle the lawsuit brought against mueller and Co."

That Mueller supposedly would keep exculpatory evidence from Trump's lawyers is inflammatory and without evidence.

Trump's character is at question far more than that of Mueller.

Time will tell and need not be further discussed here.

Sure............just as soon as you show why a tax evasion charge from a decade before this issue was at hand relates to Russian Collusion.

Mueller has done so for the court's satisfaction. I have no need to show that to you; you won't accept it.

So you're reason is "because it's trump....." But lo and behold it isn't. So you're a hypocrite. Thanks, we already KNEW that.