Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whas up wid dat boyos?
Anyone want to take a guess as to what it was or maybe one of our more connected posters knows?
I wonder if Prime Minister Johnson got a shot of hydroxychloroquine, aka Trumpicillin?
The people have a right to know.
If I came down with a case of the Chinese Kung Flu, that's what I would ask for, to try and keep me out of the hospital.
No, the people do not have a right to know. There is no right to the details of another person's medical treatment in the US. Where do you think such a right derives from?
Why wouldn't a doctor make available the results of a successful therapy, particularly with a disease that so little is known about? If Johnson was given the Trump Cure, I can't think of a single legitimate reason why the people shouldn't be informed.
Many reasons.
First of all, any medical procedure anyone goes through is entirely confidential under the HIPAA laws.
No doctor can reveal anything about the medical treatment of anyone, by law.
Second is that what works for one could kill another,so it would be irresponsible,
Third is it could be complex, and not only hard to describe, but hard to know what actually helped from a series of things all tried at once.
Forth is that it could lead to criminal activity. For example, what if antibodies were taken from those who recovered? Do you want wealthy people to kidnap recovered individuals, in order to steal their antibodies?
He might have had a liberal doctor who refused to give him Trump's drug out of spite and gave him some other drug.There have been cases of it working on patients afflicted with the virus and it was reported and their name was reported....now the patient may have agreed to release the info....anyhow....I do not think Boris would mind releasing the info.
Whas up wid dat boyos?
Anyone want to take a guess as to what it was or maybe one of our more connected posters knows?
I wonder if Prime Minister Johnson got a shot of hydroxychloroquine, aka Trumpicillin?
The people have a right to know.
If I came down with a case of the Chinese Kung Flu, that's what I would ask for, to try and keep me out of the hospital.
No, the people do not have a right to know. There is no right to the details of another person's medical treatment in the US. Where do you think such a right derives from?
Why wouldn't a doctor make available the results of a successful therapy, particularly with a disease that so little is known about? If Johnson was given the Trump Cure, I can't think of a single legitimate reason why the people shouldn't be informed.
Many reasons.
First of all, any medical procedure anyone goes through is entirely confidential under the HIPAA laws.
No doctor can reveal anything about the medical treatment of anyone, by law.
Second is that what works for one could kill another,so it would be irresponsible,
Third is it could be complex, and not only hard to describe, but hard to know what actually helped from a series of things all tried at once.
Forth is that it could lead to criminal activity. For example, what if antibodies were taken from those who recovered? Do you want wealthy people to kidnap recovered individuals, in order to steal their antibodies?
There have been cases of it working on patients afflicted with the virus and it was reported and their name was reported....now the patient may have agreed to release the info....anyhow....I do not think Boris would mind releasing the info.
The HIPPA laws apply in America....not the U.K.
That was not an entirely serious remarkIf it was anything other than the malaria drug the lib media would have reported it by nowWhas up wid dat boyos?
Anyone want to take a guess as to what it was or maybe one of our more connected posters knows?
BINGO!
I would say it was that old malaria drug hydroxychloroquine that made the trick and cured him!!
It appears that way....why else would they be so hush hush about it.?
The English just hate to admit America is more advanced than they are.
Hopefully when Boris is more steady on his feet he will clear up this matter if by then somone has not told what treatment was used.....and I am sure if The Donald saved his life Boris will not be hesitant to say it.
Not saying anything about hydroxychloroquine means it was used? Really? That is some mental gymnastics, right there.
just an observation about how politically biased the liberal news media is
if johnson recovered from the chinese disease by taking hydroxychloroquine that would be a plus for trump and a minus for the anti trump, aka fauci
He might have had a liberal doctor who refused to give him Trump's drug out of spite and gave him some other drug.There have been cases of it working on patients afflicted with the virus and it was reported and their name was reported....now the patient may have agreed to release the info....anyhow....I do not think Boris would mind releasing the info.
If anybody uncovers the truth here it'll be somebody from the Gateway Pundit.Very possible.....what is hard to figure is why the media has not pursued this story. One would think they would be all over it.....perhaps the msm have conjured together and agreed not to report anything on the malaria drug.
Maybe the National Enquirer will come out with a scoop?
That was not an entirely serious remarkIf it was anything other than the malaria drug the lib media would have reported it by nowWhas up wid dat boyos?
Anyone want to take a guess as to what it was or maybe one of our more connected posters knows?
BINGO!
I would say it was that old malaria drug hydroxychloroquine that made the trick and cured him!!
It appears that way....why else would they be so hush hush about it.?
The English just hate to admit America is more advanced than they are.
Hopefully when Boris is more steady on his feet he will clear up this matter if by then somone has not told what treatment was used.....and I am sure if The Donald saved his life Boris will not be hesitant to say it.
Not saying anything about hydroxychloroquine means it was used? Really? That is some mental gymnastics, right there.
just an observation about how politically biased the liberal news media is
if johnson recovered from the chinese disease by taking hydroxychloroquine that would be a plus for trump and a minus for the anti trump, aka fauci
Wrong.
So far it appears hydroxychloroquine is only useful in extreme stages where the immune system is attacking the lungs, along with antibiotics for the pneumonia.
What Trump did wrong was to imply hydroxychloroquine was useful to prevent early infection, which is totally untrue. And all that would do is deplete the world of hydroxychloroquine that is needed for other things.
Whas up wid dat boyos?
Anyone want to take a guess as to what it was or maybe one of our more connected posters knows?
I wonder if Prime Minister Johnson got a shot of hydroxychloroquine, aka Trumpicillin?
The people have a right to know.
If I came down with a case of the Chinese Kung Flu, that's what I would ask for, to try and keep me out of the hospital.
No, the people do not have a right to know. There is no right to the details of another person's medical treatment in the US. Where do you think such a right derives from?
Why wouldn't a doctor make available the results of a successful therapy, particularly with a disease that so little is known about? If Johnson was given the Trump Cure, I can't think of a single legitimate reason why the people shouldn't be informed.
Many reasons.
First of all, any medical procedure anyone goes through is entirely confidential under the HIPAA laws.
No doctor can reveal anything about the medical treatment of anyone, by law.
Second is that what works for one could kill another,so it would be irresponsible,
Third is it could be complex, and not only hard to describe, but hard to know what actually helped from a series of things all tried at once.
Forth is that it could lead to criminal activity. For example, what if antibodies were taken from those who recovered? Do you want wealthy people to kidnap recovered individuals, in order to steal their antibodies?
There have been cases of it working on patients afflicted with the virus and it was reported and their name was reported....now the patient may have agreed to release the info....anyhow....I do not think Boris would mind releasing the info.
The HIPPA laws apply in America....not the U.K.
Whas up wid dat boyos?
Anyone want to take a guess as to what it was or maybe one of our more connected posters knows?
I wonder if Prime Minister Johnson got a shot of hydroxychloroquine, aka Trumpicillin?
The people have a right to know.
If I came down with a case of the Chinese Kung Flu, that's what I would ask for, to try and keep me out of the hospital.
No, the people do not have a right to know. There is no right to the details of another person's medical treatment in the US. Where do you think such a right derives from?
Why wouldn't a doctor make available the results of a successful therapy, particularly with a disease that so little is known about? If Johnson was given the Trump Cure, I can't think of a single legitimate reason why the people shouldn't be informed.
Many reasons.
First of all, any medical procedure anyone goes through is entirely confidential under the HIPAA laws.
No doctor can reveal anything about the medical treatment of anyone, by law.
Second is that what works for one could kill another,so it would be irresponsible,
Third is it could be complex, and not only hard to describe, but hard to know what actually helped from a series of things all tried at once.
Forth is that it could lead to criminal activity. For example, what if antibodies were taken from those who recovered? Do you want wealthy people to kidnap recovered individuals, in order to steal their antibodies?
There have been cases of it working on patients afflicted with the virus and it was reported and their name was reported....now the patient may have agreed to release the info....anyhow....I do not think Boris would mind releasing the info.
The HIPPA laws apply in America....not the U.K.
No doctor has reported hydroxychloroquine has been successful in any case.
They know they can't, even if they think it was successful.
They could get sued if someone then overdoes on it by themselves.
The cases where hydroxychloroquine was credited as working were released by the patients themselves, like the Michigan congresswoman. And she really could not possibly know what worked or not, since she was getting many medications.
And HIPAA laws DO apply to the US press in the US, regardless of where the patient or doctors are.
Whas up wid dat boyos?
Anyone want to take a guess as to what it was or maybe one of our more connected posters knows?
I wonder if Prime Minister Johnson got a shot of hydroxychloroquine, aka Trumpicillin?
The people have a right to know.
If I came down with a case of the Chinese Kung Flu, that's what I would ask for, to try and keep me out of the hospital.
No, the people do not have a right to know. There is no right to the details of another person's medical treatment in the US. Where do you think such a right derives from?
Why wouldn't a doctor make available the results of a successful therapy, particularly with a disease that so little is known about? If Johnson was given the Trump Cure, I can't think of a single legitimate reason why the people shouldn't be informed.
Many reasons.
First of all, any medical procedure anyone goes through is entirely confidential under the HIPAA laws.
No doctor can reveal anything about the medical treatment of anyone, by law.
Second is that what works for one could kill another,so it would be irresponsible,
Third is it could be complex, and not only hard to describe, but hard to know what actually helped from a series of things all tried at once.
Forth is that it could lead to criminal activity. For example, what if antibodies were taken from those who recovered? Do you want wealthy people to kidnap recovered individuals, in order to steal their antibodies?
There have been cases of it working on patients afflicted with the virus and it was reported and their name was reported....now the patient may have agreed to release the info....anyhow....I do not think Boris would mind releasing the info.
The HIPPA laws apply in America....not the U.K.
No doctor has reported hydroxychloroquine has been successful in any case.
They know they can't, even if they think it was successful.
They could get sued if someone then overdoes on it by themselves.
The cases where hydroxychloroquine was credited as working wBorere released by the patients themselves, like the Michigan congresswoman. And she really could not possibly know what worked or not, since she was getting many medications.
And HIPAA laws DO apply to the US press in the US, regardless of where the patient or doctors are.
www.reuters.com
Professor Didier Raoult Releases the Results of a New Hydroxychloroquine Treatment Study on 1061 Patients – COVEXIT.comWhas up wid dat boyos?
Anyone want to take a guess as to what it was or maybe one of our more connected posters knows?
I wonder if Prime Minister Johnson got a shot of hydroxychloroquine, aka Trumpicillin?
The people have a right to know.
If I came down with a case of the Chinese Kung Flu, that's what I would ask for, to try and keep me out of the hospital.
No, the people do not have a right to know. There is no right to the details of another person's medical treatment in the US. Where do you think such a right derives from?
Why wouldn't a doctor make available the results of a successful therapy, particularly with a disease that so little is known about? If Johnson was given the Trump Cure, I can't think of a single legitimate reason why the people shouldn't be informed.
Many reasons.
First of all, any medical procedure anyone goes through is entirely confidential under the HIPAA laws.
No doctor can reveal anything about the medical treatment of anyone, by law.
Second is that what works for one could kill another,so it would be irresponsible,
Third is it could be complex, and not only hard to describe, but hard to know what actually helped from a series of things all tried at once.
Forth is that it could lead to criminal activity. For example, what if antibodies were taken from those who recovered? Do you want wealthy people to kidnap recovered individuals, in order to steal their antibodies?
There have been cases of it working on patients afflicted with the virus and it was reported and their name was reported....now the patient may have agreed to release the info....anyhow....I do not think Boris would mind releasing the info.
The HIPPA laws apply in America....not the U.K.
No doctor has reported hydroxychloroquine has been successful in any case.
They know they can't, even if they think it was successful.
They could get sued if someone then overdoes on it by themselves.
The cases where hydroxychloroquine was credited as working were released by the patients themselves, like the Michigan congresswoman. And she really could not possibly know what worked or not, since she was getting many medications.
And HIPAA laws DO apply to the US press in the US, regardless of where the patient or doctors are.
That was not an entirely serious remarkIf it was anything other than the malaria drug the lib media would have reported it by nowWhas up wid dat boyos?
Anyone want to take a guess as to what it was or maybe one of our more connected posters knows?
BINGO!
I would say it was that old malaria drug hydroxychloroquine that made the trick and cured him!!
It appears that way....why else would they be so hush hush about it.?
The English just hate to admit America is more advanced than they are.
Hopefully when Boris is more steady on his feet he will clear up this matter if by then somone has not told what treatment was used.....and I am sure if The Donald saved his life Boris will not be hesitant to say it.
Not saying anything about hydroxychloroquine means it was used? Really? That is some mental gymnastics, right there.
just an observation about how politically biased the liberal news media is
if johnson recovered from the chinese disease by taking hydroxychloroquine that would be a plus for trump and a minus for the anti trump, aka fauci
Wrong.
So far it appears hydroxychloroquine is only useful in extreme stages where the immune system is attacking the lungs, along with antibiotics for the pneumonia.
What Trump did wrong was to imply hydroxychloroquine was useful to prevent early infection, which is totally untrue. And all that would do is deplete the world of hydroxychloroquine that is needed for other things.
You have no sources and thus what you say is questionable.
On the other hand here is a good report of what is happening with the malaria drug.................Hospitals Stockpile Drug Trump Says Could Treat Covid-19
“Many U.S. hospitals are currently using hydroxychloroquine as first-line therapy for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 despite extremely limited clinical data supporting its effectiveness,” said Wesley Self, M.D., M.P.H., emergency medicine physician at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and PETAL Clinical Trials Network investigator leading the ORCHID trial. “Thus, data on hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19 are urgently needed to inform clinical practice.” NIH clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine, a potential therapy for COVID-19, begins
That was not an entirely serious remarkIf it was anything other than the malaria drug the lib media would have reported it by nowWhas up wid dat boyos?
Anyone want to take a guess as to what it was or maybe one of our more connected posters knows?
BINGO!
I would say it was that old malaria drug hydroxychloroquine that made the trick and cured him!!
It appears that way....why else would they be so hush hush about it.?
The English just hate to admit America is more advanced than they are.
Hopefully when Boris is more steady on his feet he will clear up this matter if by then somone has not told what treatment was used.....and I am sure if The Donald saved his life Boris will not be hesitant to say it.
Not saying anything about hydroxychloroquine means it was used? Really? That is some mental gymnastics, right there.
just an observation about how politically biased the liberal news media is
if johnson recovered from the chinese disease by taking hydroxychloroquine that would be a plus for trump and a minus for the anti trump, aka fauci
Wrong.
So far it appears hydroxychloroquine is only useful in extreme stages where the immune system is attacking the lungs, along with antibiotics for the pneumonia.
What Trump did wrong was to imply hydroxychloroquine was useful to prevent early infection, which is totally untrue. And all that would do is deplete the world of hydroxychloroquine that is needed for other things.
You have no sources and thus what you say is questionable.
On the other hand here is a good report of what is happening with the malaria drug.................Hospitals Stockpile Drug Trump Says Could Treat Covid-19
“Many U.S. hospitals are currently using hydroxychloroquine as first-line therapy for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 despite extremely limited clinical data supporting its effectiveness,” said Wesley Self, M.D., M.P.H., emergency medicine physician at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and PETAL Clinical Trials Network investigator leading the ORCHID trial. “Thus, data on hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19 are urgently needed to inform clinical practice.” NIH clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine, a potential therapy for COVID-19, begins
Sure I did not prove anything without links, but your link proved I am right.
{...
“I’m probably more of a fan than maybe anybody,” Trump said of chloroquine during the news briefing. “It may work, it may not work. But I feel good about it. That’s all it is, it’s just a feeling. I’m a smart guy. I feel good about it. You’re going to see soon enough.”
...}
Trump admitted he has absolutely nothing to go on when he expressed enthusiasm, for hydroxychloroquine.
As for hospital hoarding, that does no mean an anticipated future need but a future scarcity for current needs. It is not just for malaria, but any time you need to reduce an immune system response, like lupus or arthritis. Look it up. Hydroxychloroquine is mostly for suppressing an immune system response. And with extreme cases of COVID-19, the immune system can start attacking the lungs. So then hydroxychloroquine would likely help. But with an early case, if you used hydroxychloroquine, it would inhibit the immune system response, making it easier for COVID-19 to start a severe infection.
That was not an entirely serious remarkIf it was anything other than the malaria drug the lib media would have reported it by nowWhas up wid dat boyos?
Anyone want to take a guess as to what it was or maybe one of our more connected posters knows?
BINGO!
I would say it was that old malaria drug hydroxychloroquine that made the trick and cured him!!
It appears that way....why else would they be so hush hush about it.?
The English just hate to admit America is more advanced than they are.
Hopefully when Boris is more steady on his feet he will clear up this matter if by then somone has not told what treatment was used.....and I am sure if The Donald saved his life Boris will not be hesitant to say it.
Not saying anything about hydroxychloroquine means it was used? Really? That is some mental gymnastics, right there.
just an observation about how politically biased the liberal news media is
if johnson recovered from the chinese disease by taking hydroxychloroquine that would be a plus for trump and a minus for the anti trump, aka fauci
Wrong.
So far it appears hydroxychloroquine is only useful in extreme stages where the immune system is attacking the lungs, along with antibiotics for the pneumonia.
What Trump did wrong was to imply hydroxychloroquine was useful to prevent early infection, which is totally untrue. And all that would do is deplete the world of hydroxychloroquine that is needed for other things.
You have no sources and thus what you say is questionable.
On the other hand here is a good report of what is happening with the malaria drug.................Hospitals Stockpile Drug Trump Says Could Treat Covid-19
“Many U.S. hospitals are currently using hydroxychloroquine as first-line therapy for hospitalized patients with COVID-19 despite extremely limited clinical data supporting its effectiveness,” said Wesley Self, M.D., M.P.H., emergency medicine physician at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and PETAL Clinical Trials Network investigator leading the ORCHID trial. “Thus, data on hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of COVID-19 are urgently needed to inform clinical practice.” NIH clinical trial of hydroxychloroquine, a potential therapy for COVID-19, begins
Sure I did not prove anything without links, but your link proved I am right.
{...
“I’m probably more of a fan than maybe anybody,” Trump said of chloroquine during the news briefing. “It may work, it may not work. But I feel good about it. That’s all it is, it’s just a feeling. I’m a smart guy. I feel good about it. You’re going to see soon enough.”
...}
Trump admitted he has absolutely nothing to go on when he expressed enthusiasm, for hydroxychloroquine.
As for hospital hoarding, that does no mean an anticipated future need but a future scarcity for current needs. It is not just for malaria, but any time you need to reduce an immune system response, like lupus or arthritis. Look it up. Hydroxychloroquine is mostly for suppressing an immune system response. And with extreme cases of COVID-19, the immune system can start attacking the lungs. So then hydroxychloroquine would likely help. But with an early case, if you used hydroxychloroquine, it would inhibit the immune system response, making it easier for COVID-19 to start a severe infection.
www.foxnews.com
Professor Didier Raoult Releases the Results of a New Hydroxychloroquine Treatment Study on 1061 Patients – COVEXIT.comWhas up wid dat boyos?
Anyone want to take a guess as to what it was or maybe one of our more connected posters knows?
I wonder if Prime Minister Johnson got a shot of hydroxychloroquine, aka Trumpicillin?
The people have a right to know.
If I came down with a case of the Chinese Kung Flu, that's what I would ask for, to try and keep me out of the hospital.
No, the people do not have a right to know. There is no right to the details of another person's medical treatment in the US. Where do you think such a right derives from?
Why wouldn't a doctor make available the results of a successful therapy, particularly with a disease that so little is known about? If Johnson was given the Trump Cure, I can't think of a single legitimate reason why the people shouldn't be informed.
Many reasons.
First of all, any medical procedure anyone goes through is entirely confidential under the HIPAA laws.
No doctor can reveal anything about the medical treatment of anyone, by law.
Second is that what works for one could kill another,so it would be irresponsible,
Third is it could be complex, and not only hard to describe, but hard to know what actually helped from a series of things all tried at once.
Forth is that it could lead to criminal activity. For example, what if antibodies were taken from those who recovered? Do you want wealthy people to kidnap recovered individuals, in order to steal their antibodies?
There have been cases of it working on patients afflicted with the virus and it was reported and their name was reported....now the patient may have agreed to release the info....anyhow....I do not think Boris would mind releasing the info.
The HIPPA laws apply in America....not the U.K.
No doctor has reported hydroxychloroquine has been successful in any case.
They know they can't, even if they think it was successful.
They could get sued if someone then overdoes on it by themselves.
The cases where hydroxychloroquine was credited as working were released by the patients themselves, like the Michigan congresswoman. And she really could not possibly know what worked or not, since she was getting many medications.
And HIPAA laws DO apply to the US press in the US, regardless of where the patient or doctors are.
Korean and Japanese doctors treating early onset Covid-19 infected patients all agree. Most survivors drank a miracle concoction that washed the virus from their throats down into their stomachs, where acids destroyed it completely. Can you guess what they drank?
Korean and Japanese doctors treating early onset Covid-19 infected patients all agree. Most survivors drank a miracle concoction that washed the virus from their throats down into their stomachs, where acids destroyed it completely. Can you guess what they drank?
That is silly because water will wash viruses down from the throat to the stomach as well.
But you don't get COVID-19 through the throat.
It comes in from the nasal passages or the lungs.
It is airborn, not from what you eat.
This confirms that he was treated with the Trump combo. See how they evaded the elephant in the room in that article? Of course the world wants to know what the fuck he was treated with!Link alleging 'miracle cure'? Last i read he was released from hospital and recuperating..but far from well. He credited hospital with "saving his life". No allegation of miracles...Whas up wid dat boyos?
Anyone want to take a guess as to what it was or maybe one of our more connected posters knows?
Johnson Discharged From Hospital After Coronavirus Treatment
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has been discharged after a tumultuous hospital stay for coronavirus.www.ibtimes.com
