Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
That's a classic No True Scotsman fallacy. There are plenty of sane people that recognize that its entirely possible to have an incongruity between one's biological gender and one's gender identity. And that aligning with one's gender identify has dramatic mental health benefits.
For a grown-up to not know the difference between boys and girls is prima facie proof of insanity, mental retardation, or other mental defect. Nothing to do with No True Scottsman. By definition, one who is so f•••ed up in the head as to be confused about this distinction is not sane.
You may not be able to comprehend gender dysphoria as you don't experience it. But it most definitely happens. And aligning with one's gender with one's gender identify dramatically reduces suicide and self harm.
Which is why the AMA has focused on treatment and the WHO is about to do the same. That *you* disagree is meaningless.
You may not be able to comprehend gender dysphoria as you don't experience it. But it most definitely happens. And aligning with one's gender with one's gender identify dramatically reduces suicide and self harm.
Which is why the AMA has focused on treatment and the WHO is about to do the same. That *you* disagree is meaningless.
It is scientifically, biologically, impossible to change a person'sgendersex. Gender dysphoria is purely a mental disease. It is never appropriate or helpful to treat a mental illness by mutilating the patient's body in a vain attempt to make that patient's body conform to the patient's delusions.
We have Syriusly & Skylar here Tag teaming people who are against depressing normal development in boys & girls so that later doctors can amputate their healthy vital organs.
Bearing in mind that all this is being done by what the parents/kids say they want. All while children cannot legally consent, nor are qualified to make such fantastical diagnoses of themselves. Yet it is upon the child's word that Drs proceed,even while admitting such a change is only a gross approximation done to placate a mental state in the patient; and that true sex change doesnt actually exist
That is just the complete way of saying children are being permanently harmed by doctors. The penal code in the OP applies.
`
Being a parent myself, I am against any mandatory state intervention on the rights of parents. However, in 2008, Wisconsin (my state) we have the Kara Neumann case, in which her religious parents withheld treatment for her diabetes on the belief that praying for her would cure her, not medical science. She died. In some respects, the state should have a vested interest in the child's well being that would preclude parental rights.
However, this works both ways. There are those people who put their belief in science, in extremis. The behavioral science allowing parents to change a child's gender based on what I consider to be pseudo-science, on gender identification, is also not in the child's best interest, hence, should not be allowed.
`
Being a parent myself, I am against any mandatory state intervention on the rights of parents. However, in 2008, Wisconsin (my state) we have the Kara Neumann case, in which her religious parents withheld treatment for her diabetes on the belief that praying for her would cure her, not medical science. She died. In some respects, the state should have a vested interest in the child's well being that would preclude parental rights.
However, this works both ways. There are those people who put their belief in science, in extremis. The behavioral science allowing parents to change a child's gender based on what I consider to be pseudo-science, on gender identification, is also not in the child's best interest, hence, should not be allowed.
Well, that's just a fancy way of saying that you believe that child-protective laws in place in CA are warranted and valid in this case. And, I agree.
`
Being a parent myself, I am against any mandatory state intervention on the rights of parents. However, in 2008, Wisconsin (my state) we have the Kara Neumann case, in which her religious parents withheld treatment for her diabetes on the belief that praying for her would cure her, not medical science. She died. In some respects, the state should have a vested interest in the child's well being that would preclude parental rights.
`
`
However, this works both ways. There are those people who put their belief in science, in extremis. The behavioral science allowing parents to change a child's gender based on what I consider to be pseudo-science, on gender identification, is also not in the child's best interest, hence, should not be allowed.
`
`
Sounds like you're daring folks here to do what my signature says to do. Beware of your hubris causing issues in your strategy....So what did the Berkeley police tell you when you called them 3 years ago about what you consider to be abuse?
We have Syriusly & Skylar here Tag teaming people who are against depressing normal development in boys & girls so that later doctors can amputate their healthy vital organs..
Sounds like you're daring folks here to do what my signature says to do. Beware of your hubris causing issues in your strategy....So what did the Berkeley police tell you when you called them 3 years ago about what you consider to be abuse?
https://www.justice.gov/contact-us
Again is a sign of her delusion. The Department of Justice has absolutely no jurisdiction over any child abuse unless the abuse crosses state lines-
Again is a sign of her delusion. The Department of Justice has absolutely no jurisdiction over any child abuse unless the abuse crosses state lines-
Have any such "transgender children" gone across state lines for the drugging? ..
Sounds like you're daring folks here to do what my signature says to do. Beware of your hubris causing issues in your strategy....So what did the Berkeley police tell you when you called them 3 years ago about what you consider to be abuse?
I absolutely advise anyone who is aware of any child abuse to notify the local authorities immediately.
That is what I would do if I was aware of any child abuse.
Silhouette? If Silhouette heard about the parents holding their kids captive:
California family: Parents charged after children found shackled - CNN
Silhouette would go through the same two step process she always goes through:
a) Are the parents straight? If so- go no further- no need to mention it to anyone- are the parents gay? Go to step B
b) Post condemnation of the gay parents on USMB. Do not notify police or CPS. Attacking the parents as 'bad gays' on USMB is enough.
The difference between us is I would notify the police and CPS of any child abuse I suspect. And I have done so.
Sil never would....because she knows she's completely full of shit. And a pair of loving parents taking in a special needs child is neither 'child abuse' nor 'molestation'.
Sil never would....because she knows she's completely full of shit. And a pair of loving parents taking in a special needs child is neither 'child abuse' nor 'molestation'.
You left out the part about the "loving parents" subjecting said special needs child to physical deformity, abuse and mutilation. Do be more comprehensive in your statements.
Yes, it's "compulsive" to object to the cult of LGBT and its value system; which includes using contracts to legally banish children for life from either a mother or father, and, drugging them to permanently retard normal puberty all so they can be lead to a surgical suite to have their healthy vital organs chopped off in a macabre experiment rendering them sterile, numb, incontinent, mutilated eunuchs.
