#BoycottStarbucks Trending on Twitter After Getting 2 Blacks Arrested for Using Bathroom

[The Sage of Main Street]

They were not dressed like Starbucks expects. They failed to look like queers

-Geaux

Starbutts

In a nutshell, this situation shows that those who are Latte in the Loafers belong to the A Punk Is a Hunk cult.

 

[toobfreak]

View attachment 188524

Wrong. A private business has the right to ask anyone to leave at any time for any reason. You have a right to comply. The woman saying this never would have happened had the people looked like her overlooked another thing that never would have happened had they looked like her!

 

[featherlite]

Some businesses put up signs clearly stating their restrooms are not for public use and only for paying customers.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Only in your fantasies of racism existing in everything.

Honey, it would be the same reaction had it been 2 whites. You don’t buy, are asked to leave if you won’t, you leave.

"turd-colored freaks"...Oh good....more reason for black voters to swing to the GOP.

And social cons have to ask why blacks don’t vote for the GOP....

Nope.

Sure, because calling someone “turd colored” is not racist.

Sometimes I’m amazed at how fucking stupid people are, or at what lengths they will go to defend racists.

A Jungle Bunny Is Not the Easter Bunny

By "racism," you mean Realism or Adultism, as opposed to your warm and fuzzy Kumbaya cartoon fantasies. By using vulgar terms, we get even for your insulting pejorative use of "racism."

 

[Flopper]

"This property is for paying customers only"
God forbid you have colored people coming in and do just that and you get branded racist.. This country is so fucking sad.

If you're making minimum wage, as many black people are, paying $5 a cup for coffee drinks so you can sit around a roaring fireplace socializing with friends is simply unaffordable. It's just too expensive. Businesses today discriminate not based on the color of your skin but the color of your money.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

The company was founded on the premise that Starbucks would be a comfortable third place for people to work and socialize; the first two places being home and office. Come in anytime and stay as long as you want with no pressure to buy anything. This was part of the Starbucks culture which created millions of devoted customers. However as Starbucks expanded into very high traffic locations, the big overstuffed chairs, and fireplaces became small tables and stand up bars. Every inch of space was used. I have no doubt that customers that sit for expended periods without ordering would be asked to leave.

Maybe they might want to make an announcement then? Change their corporate motto? I'm fine with Caribou, they are our 'home grown' go to for coffee. But Starbucks still needs to be honest with where they are now if they don't want this snowball to avalanche.

You know how ill-mannered we snowflakes are.

Most Starbuck stores are located in shopping centers and near major shopping and restaurant areas. In these stores, the atmosphere is usually very casual and laid back. My experience has been you can sit in one of these stores for hours and no one is going to suggest you leave. I was in a Starbucks in New York last year and believe me, no one would want to sit in one these places for long. It was crowded and noisy, the kind of place you grab a cup of coffee on the way to work.

Starbucks policies are all about social responsibility, business code of conduct, human rights, equal opportunity, healthcare, and all the things that drives conservatives nuts. This of course is the primary reason why this story is relished so by conservatives; the most liberal and pc oriented major business ejects two black men presenting an opportunity to build a case of discrimination.

Policies | Starbucks Coffee Company

Starbucks can be considered a model, as you describe it,for what liberals want of our society.


Yet we can see that, even when liberals get what they want, it does not lead to racial harmony.

At least one lib was talking ominously of how Starbucks needs to do this or that, before this "avalanches".


This bodes ill for the future, if demographic shift gives liberals the power to remake society as they see fit.

An organization can provide leadership but not all members will follow. In the case of Starbucks, there're over 250,000 employees. Being a liberal is not a requirement to work at Starbucks.

BUT, regardless, Stabucks did nothing wrong and is responding as a liberal would want, throwing the hard working manager to the wolves, and "taking responsibility" and taking steps so nothing as horrible as a manager asking black non customers to leave will ever happen again.


And still they are being mobbed with protesters.

THis bodes ill for the future.

Reconstruction II—How Did Whites End the First One?

That "future" has been here since the 60s. It should have been stopped dead in its tracks.

 

[MikeK]

[...]

unless the same manager allowed whites to use the restroom, race has nothing to do with this .....
..yet another time blacks refuse to obey lawful, common sense orders and they are made out to be victims of racism ...

...hey blacks--if you keep doing stupid crap, and not listening --you will keep putting your hand in the fire over and over and over

Yesterday I posted a video commentary by a Black man named Brandon Tatum, a decent citizen and a good American whom I said should be a criminal court judge and I meant it. I feel that it's not only unfortunate but shameful that decent Black citizens like this man must suffer the negative social effects brought about by the persistently disgraceful, hateful and often criminal conduct of contemptible low-life ******* like the pair who caused this hard-working girl to lose her job.

These two examples of human garbage, and so many like them, are the reason why the word ****** and all it implies remains an active component of the American lexicon. ******* like them are the reason why race relations in the U.S. have not and will not progress beyond the current level. The problem is these people, not so-called White "racism."

I believe it is important for those who resent Starbuck's cowardly pandering on behalf of the lowest level of American society to tell them how you feel.

Starbucks Corporate Headquarters
564 W Randolph St, Chicago, IL 60661

Starbucks Phone Number:
(800) 782-7282

A letter is best. A phone call is better than nothing. An eMail is worthless.

 

[MikeK]

Gotta love it.... I hope they shut every Starbucks down from Texas to California... LOL.

I hope the homeless are made aware of a cozy place to relax (loiter) in with nice bathrooms and welcoming proprietors.

 

[ABikerSailor]

You know, I saw this story again on the news this morning, and guess what? That shop is located in a mainly white section of town that also happens to be one of the more affluent in the city.

The other customers said that the men were being quiet and not disturbing anyone, and that there were still a few empty tables around.

Additionally, no charges were filed against the 2 men. They were arrested, held for around 8 hours, and then released.

Starbucks screwed the pooch on this one.

 

[harmonica]

You know, I saw this story again on the news this morning, and guess what? That shop is located in a mainly white section of town that also happens to be one of the more affluent in the city.

The other customers said that the men were being quiet and not disturbing anyone, and that there were still a few empty tables around.

Additionally, no charges were filed against the 2 men. They were arrested, held for around 8 hours, and then released.

Starbucks screwed the pooch on this one.

..no charges doesn't mean they didn't break the law
..they were legally, lawfully told to leave and they didn't --that's trespassing right there--just for starters

 

[ABikerSailor]

You know, I saw this story again on the news this morning, and guess what? That shop is located in a mainly white section of town that also happens to be one of the more affluent in the city.

The other customers said that the men were being quiet and not disturbing anyone, and that there were still a few empty tables around.

Additionally, no charges were filed against the 2 men. They were arrested, held for around 8 hours, and then released.

Starbucks screwed the pooch on this one.

..no charges doesn't mean they didn't break the law
..they were legally, lawfully told to leave and they didn't --that's trespassing right there--just for starters

Were there signs posted in that store that said the tables were for paying customers only? If not, they weren't trespassing.

And, if Starbucks the corporation thought the manager did right, why did they fire them?

 

[harmonica]

You know, I saw this story again on the news this morning, and guess what? That shop is located in a mainly white section of town that also happens to be one of the more affluent in the city.

The other customers said that the men were being quiet and not disturbing anyone, and that there were still a few empty tables around.

Additionally, no charges were filed against the 2 men. They were arrested, held for around 8 hours, and then released.

Starbucks screwed the pooch on this one.

..no charges doesn't mean they didn't break the law
..they were legally, lawfully told to leave and they didn't --that's trespassing right there--just for starters

Were there signs posted in that store that said the tables were for paying customers only? If not, they weren't trespassing.

And, if Starbucks the corporation thought the manager did right, why did they fire them?

you really have to ask why they got rid of him and why he's kissing ass???!!!!???
$$$$$$$$$$

 

[harmonica]

You know, I saw this story again on the news this morning, and guess what? That shop is located in a mainly white section of town that also happens to be one of the more affluent in the city.

The other customers said that the men were being quiet and not disturbing anyone, and that there were still a few empty tables around.

Additionally, no charges were filed against the 2 men. They were arrested, held for around 8 hours, and then released.

Starbucks screwed the pooch on this one.

..no charges doesn't mean they didn't break the law
..they were legally, lawfully told to leave and they didn't --that's trespassing right there--just for starters

Were there signs posted in that store that said the tables were for paying customers only? If not, they weren't trespassing.

And, if Starbucks the corporation thought the manager did right, why did they fire them?

..if an employee feels threatened --in the SLIGHTEST way, by a black, white, green, purple person, they have every right to order you out.....
..when the cops tell you to leave, you must leave --or it's a crime
you haven't been reading about the subject--they asked to use the restrooms

On Thursday, the two men asked to use the coffee shop’s restroom. An employee refused the request because the men had not bought anything, officials said. They sat down, and they were eventually asked to leave.

Starbucks Employee Who Called Police on Black Men No Longer Works There, Company Says

they DID NOT just go into Starbucks and sit down!!!

 

[MikeK]

View attachment 188524

How do you, Melissa DePino, know there are no extenuating circumstances? Have you spent eight hours a day, five days a week, in that store?

To what do you attribute that manager, Holly's, action? "Racism?" If not, then what? Holly has been working at Starbucks for a long time, long enough to be made a manager, so she obviously knows what she's doing and has been doing things the right way.

Along comes this pair of oily-looking *******, suddenly Holly is fired for dealing with them, and a pandering, smart-ass, know-it-all like you comes along to assure us that Holly must be wrong because in spite of what Holly says you know better.

 

[harmonica]

so they were told they couldn't use the bathroom--told to leave--they didn't and they are the victims???!!!! hahahahahahahahah
just like:
Mike Brown
ASterling
KScot
FGray
ASmith
all ''victims'' that committed crimes/did not comply/etc
same old black crap
hahahahaa

 

[MikeK]

[...]

..yet another time blacks refuse to obey lawful, common sense orders and they are made out to be victims of racism ...

...hey blacks--if you keep doing stupid crap, and not listening --you will keep putting your hand in the fire over and over and over

You may rest assured they will keep behaving this way over, and over, and over -- because it's in their DNA to do so. It's who and what they are.

 

[ATL]

You know, I saw this story again on the news this morning, and guess what? That shop is located in a mainly white section of town that also happens to be one of the more affluent in the city.

The other customers said that the men were being quiet and not disturbing anyone, and that there were still a few empty tables around.

Additionally, no charges were filed against the 2 men. They were arrested, held for around 8 hours, and then released.

Starbucks screwed the pooch on this one.

..no charges doesn't mean they didn't break the law
..they were legally, lawfully told to leave and they didn't --that's trespassing right there--just for starters

Were there signs posted in that store that said the tables were for paying customers only? If not, they weren't trespassing.

And, if Starbucks the corporation thought the manager did right, why did they fire them?

..if an employee feels threatened --in the SLIGHTEST way, by a black, white, green, purple person, they have every right to order you out.....
..when the cops tell you to leave, you must leave --or it's a crime
you haven't been reading about the subject--they asked to use the restrooms

On Thursday, the two men asked to use the coffee shop’s restroom. An employee refused the request because the men had not bought anything, officials said. They sat down, and they were eventually asked to leave.

Starbucks Employee Who Called Police on Black Men No Longer Works There, Company Says

they DID NOT just go into Starbucks and sit down!!!

Must be something about Starbucks, blacks, and restrooms....Shaun King on Twitter

 

[ATL]

[...]

..yet another time blacks refuse to obey lawful, common sense orders and they are made out to be victims of racism ...

...hey blacks--if you keep doing stupid crap, and not listening --you will keep putting your hand in the fire over and over and over

You may rest assured they will keep behaving this way over, and over, and over -- because it's in their DNA to do do. It's who and what they are.

Let's see the cons here speak out about this statement....which personifies exactly why this thread is accurate...Why should blacks become republicans?

 

[harmonica]

You know, I saw this story again on the news this morning, and guess what? That shop is located in a mainly white section of town that also happens to be one of the more affluent in the city.

The other customers said that the men were being quiet and not disturbing anyone, and that there were still a few empty tables around.

Additionally, no charges were filed against the 2 men. They were arrested, held for around 8 hours, and then released.

Starbucks screwed the pooch on this one.

..no charges doesn't mean they didn't break the law
..they were legally, lawfully told to leave and they didn't --that's trespassing right there--just for starters

Were there signs posted in that store that said the tables were for paying customers only? If not, they weren't trespassing.

And, if Starbucks the corporation thought the manager did right, why did they fire them?

..if an employee feels threatened --in the SLIGHTEST way, by a black, white, green, purple person, they have every right to order you out.....
..when the cops tell you to leave, you must leave --or it's a crime
you haven't been reading about the subject--they asked to use the restrooms

On Thursday, the two men asked to use the coffee shop’s restroom. An employee refused the request because the men had not bought anything, officials said. They sat down, and they were eventually asked to leave.

Starbucks Employee Who Called Police on Black Men No Longer Works There, Company Says

they DID NOT just go into Starbucks and sit down!!!

Must be something about Starbucks, blacks, and restrooms....Shaun King on Twitter

well the first incident taints everything
just like all the fake crap about unarmed blackmen--it's all tainted now
usually, there is more to the story than a manager that is so racist he does this
does it happen, sure--but not as much as the MSM and blacks dream about

 

[harmonica]

[...]

..yet another time blacks refuse to obey lawful, common sense orders and they are made out to be victims of racism ...

...hey blacks--if you keep doing stupid crap, and not listening --you will keep putting your hand in the fire over and over and over

You may rest assured they will keep behaving this way over, and over, and over -- because it's in their DNA to do do. It's who and what they are.

Let's see the cons here speak out about this statement....which personifies exactly why this thread is accurate...Why should blacks become republicans?

hahahahh IM2 is a racist hater which he has proven over and over