Breaking! Judge rules Trump protected by presidential immunity for claims doubting election while in office

[Blaster]

Trump has 3 different indictments and you think Biden is in the hot seat?! Haha you watch too much propaganda media that’s trying to use that as a distraction. In the real world there are real charges filed by our legal system against Trump. Law and order. The constitution… remember those things??

All are phony indictments.

 

[Slade3200]

All are phony indictments.

Well, since we’re talking about the latest one, how about you explain why. Be specific. Just saying some thing is phony means nothing.

 

[BluesLegend]

Like the law even matters to Dems. I would not be surprised if Dems brought back lynchings and burning people at the stake after their witch hunts.

 

[Cougarbear]

Trump has 3 different indictments and you think Biden is in the hot seat?! Haha you watch too much propaganda media that’s trying to use that as a distraction. In the real world there are real charges filed by our legal system against Trump. Law and order. The constitution… remember those things??

All three indictments are phony for one purpose, to interfere with the upcoming election. Again, none of these will amount to anything. But Biden’s will because it involves national security.

 

[Slade3200]

Like the law even matters to Dems. I would not be surprised if Dems brought back lynchings and burning people at the stake after their witch hunts.

What do you partisan hypocrites think you are doing to Biden right now? Seriously get a mirror.

 

[Slade3200]

All three indictments are phony for one purpose, to interfere with the upcoming election. Again, none of these will amount to anything. But Biden’s will because it involves national security.

You’re just repeating BS that Trump says. It doesn’t mean anything… there’s no evidence or proof behind that claim. There is evidence and proof behind the indictments. Actual laws and evidence that they were broken. You keep making the cheap excuse that it’s a witchhunt, and are unable to actually talk about the facts of the cases. That’s weak.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The article said he's not protected with the same protection as still being President. However, once he's out of office, he is protected for saying anything to anyone about the election because of the 1st Amendment.

And of course, this being the United States, we are all protected for saying anything to anyone about any election because of the 1st Amendment.

We're losing sight of that due to the Democrats colluding with the media to silence dissent.

 

[Kondor3]

A big win for Trump. With this ruling setting precedent, you can kiss the Georgia case by Fanni Willis goodbye. Trump did nothing wrong in that case.

Judge rules Trump protected by presidential immunity for claims doubting election while in office

Trump is not totally in the clear, as the judge ruled that statements he made after leaving the White House are not protected.

justthenews.com

A Pennsylvania STATE judge?

Tell that to Federal prosecutors who delivered a damning four-count indictment against your traitorous Phatt Orange Phukk hours after you posted this...

You are a lying sack of $hit, Tvaritch, but I gotta hand it to ya... yer damned-funny...

 

[Cougarbear]

You’re just repeating BS that Trump says. It doesn’t mean anything… there’s no evidence or proof behind that claim. There is evidence and proof behind the indictments. Actual laws and evidence that they were broken. You keep making the cheap excuse that it’s a witchhunt, and are unable to actually talk about the facts of the cases. That’s weak.

Because we’ve seen this act before. Russia witch hunt is a prime example. Nothing new. Just a bunch of nonsense communist tactics.

 

[Cougarbear]

A Pennsylvania STATE judge?

Tell that to Federal prosecutors who delivered a damning four-count indictment against your traitorous Phatt Orange Phukk hours after you posted this...

You are a lying sack of $hit, Tvaritch, but I gotta hand it to ya... yer damned-funny...

A liberal Pennsylvania Judge. See, it's called the Constitution. We all have the right to protest outcome elections. Remember all the violent protests around the country when Trump won in 2016? Lot's of accusations were thrown around that Trump stole the election from Hillary. Hillary for years did the same thing and wrote a book about it as well. The only traitors are Hillary who signed up Russia to interfere in the 2016 election with the fake dossier story and Biden who has been bribed by the Ukraine and extorted China and the Ukraine. your time is coming. Are you going to laugh when all this happens to Biden and other Democrats?

 

[Slade3200]

And of course, this being the United States, we are all protected for saying anything to anyone about any election because of the 1st Amendment.

We're losing sight of that due to the Democrats colluding with the media to silence dissent.

Yes we are protected by the 1st amendment. Even Trump. But he is being indicted for breaking actual laws. Not for legal and protected speech

 

[Slade3200]

Because we’ve seen this act before. Russia witch hunt is a prime example. Nothing new. Just a bunch of nonsense communist tactics.

Trump wasn’t indicted for his Russian lies. Manafort was indicted but not Trump. Trump was investigated by his own people. This situation is totally different and has nothing to do with Russia. You need a better reason

 

[Cougarbear]

Trump wasn’t indicted for his Russian lies. Manafort was indicted but not Trump. Trump was investigated by his own people. This situation is totally different and has nothing to do with Russia. You need a better reason

The indictments are coming from far left corrupt federal prosecutors who have history and don't like him. They also praise communist political tactics just like they are doing now. Heck, some stupid leftwing prosecutor is trumping (pun intended) up fake charges against DeSantis for sending illegals to Martha's Village even though those people sign waivers that they wanted to go. The hypocrite Democrats were fine with illegals in America when they came directly into Red States. But, when they came knocking on the doors of Democrats, they wanted them out. Same thing is happening in New York now. But, there will be an indictment because it is the communist Democrat thing to do. The public is catching on. What is it with you Democrats? Why do you love Russian tactics? Why do you hate the Constitution? Why do you love transvestites? Why do you love mutilation of children? Why do you hate the rule of law? Why do you burn down your cities and enslave your blacks to welfare? Oh, why do you do these things?

 

[Concerned American]

Like the law even matters to Dems. I would not be surprised if Dems brought back lynchings and burning people at the stake after their witch hunts.

Isn't that what they're doing to Trump---lynching?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Yes we are protected by the 1st amendment. Even Trump. But he is being indicted for breaking actual laws. Not for legal and protected speech

He is being indicted for running for president again.

The supposed "breaking of actual laws" happened two and a half years ago. It was the running for president that triggered the indictments, not breaking of actual laws.

 

[Cougarbear]

He is being indicted for running for president again.

The supposed "breaking of actual laws" happened two and a half years ago. It was the running for president that triggered the indictments, not breaking of actual laws.

I even doubt that any laws were actually broken. This is the new communist democrat party in action silencing their opponents. Hopefully there are enough democrats that are seeing this for what it really is. No laws have been broken.

 

[bodecea]

A big win for Trump. With this ruling setting precedent, you can kiss the Georgia case by Fanni Willis goodbye. Trump did nothing wrong in that case.

Judge rules Trump protected by presidential immunity for claims doubting election while in office

Trump is not totally in the clear, as the judge ruled that statements he made after leaving the White House are not protected.

justthenews.com

 

[Seymour Flops]

I even doubt that any laws were actually broken. This is the new communist democrat party in action silencing their opponents. Hopefully there are enough democrats that are seeing this for what it really is. No laws have been broken.

People who buy this are the same people who think that it's "against the law to yell 'fire' in a crowded theater."

For those of you thinking "Wut? That is against the law, LoL!" no it isn't. A law banning specific speech would be unconstitutional prior restraint. If a person yells "fire" in a theater, he could possibly be cited for disorderly conduct or some such. There would be several defenses, including that there was really a fire and the people needed to be told.

 

[Slade3200]

The indictments are coming from far left corrupt federal prosecutors who have history and don't like him. They also praise communist political tactics just like they are doing now. Heck, some stupid leftwing prosecutor is trumping (pun intended) up fake charges against DeSantis for sending illegals to Martha's Village even though those people sign waivers that they wanted to go. The hypocrite Democrats were fine with illegals in America when they came directly into Red States. But, when they came knocking on the doors of Democrats, they wanted them out. Same thing is happening in New York now. But, there will be an indictment because it is the communist Democrat thing to do. The public is catching on. What is it with you Democrats? Why do you love Russian tactics? Why do you hate the Constitution? Why do you love transvestites? Why do you love mutilation of children? Why do you hate the rule of law? Why do you burn down your cities and enslave your blacks to welfare? Oh, why do you do these things?

You say all these things without actually addressing anything specific about the charges. If somebody is charging DeSantis for the Martha stunt and he had waivers and did nothing wrong then he will be fine and it will go nowhere. That’s why we have courts. To look at evidence and debate the law.

Indictments don’t happen because of magic or one persons preference. Months and years of investigating, gathering evidence, presenting evidence to prosecutors, analyzing the law, all goes in to pressing charges. You don’t even look at that and blindly dismiss it as a political game. What’s up with that?

Are you supporting the Hunter Biden probe? Do you think Joe Biden should be impeached? Just curious….

 

[Slade3200]

He is being indicted for running for president again

Wrong, running for president is not mentioned once in any of the indictments. Get your facts straight.

Investigations don’t happen over night. While I would say they get milked and take waaaaaay too long. That’s the process