Breaking: Justice Scalia has died

[bripat9643]

Here's one, and he's still well-liked in the Senate, Justice Biden. After all, he needs a job next year anyway.

He would be the laughing stock of the SC.

 

[eddiew]

Here's one, and he's still well-liked in the Senate, Justice Biden. After all, he needs a job next year anyway.

He would be the laughing stock of the SC.

going to take some huge laughs to take that title away from the moron thomas

 

[eagle1462010]

The Dems will suddenly be for the Constitutionalist for this selection even though they have gone against it time and time again with their pen and phone. Amnesty for illegals and Sanctuaries.............

Just another election with their standard tactics.

They will be thwarted on getting the nomination. The only question is on what they gain from tactics they will use over it. If the tables were turned they would do the same and have in the past done the exact same thing. Showing that history of their tactics could level the playing field.

EOs have always been constitutional. At least they are when a Republican is president

Not when they openly violate our laws..............Amnesty for illegals is certainly against the law..........as are other EPA laws just overturned by SCOTUS

You made SPECIFIC assertions, therefore, if you are honest and informed, you can easily provide SPECIFIC corroboration of your claims.

I challenge you to cite the SPECIFIC EO number from the Disposition Table, the SPECIFIC action taken, which SPECIFICALLY allowed amnesty and cite the SPECIFIC statute(s) that you claim was/were violated.

Oops
Supreme Court Will Rule On Obama’s Executive Order On Immigration

No Oops about it. Even your "bottom of the class" citation has it wrong, Eagle! The Oops is yours! YOU MADE SPECIFIC CLAIMS. I have relisted below, in simpler terms for you, items, which when responded to accurately, will bury your assertions. Give it another shot.

I'll bet you won't reply with anything but deflection and perhaps spiced with a little ad hominem. Here's a hint for you though and your GOP neoconservative brethren inside the echo chamber; learn the fucking difference between an Executive Order and an Executive action! The ball is in your court now so you can Man-Up to your claims or weasel out by the usual methods noted above!

1. What is the SPECIFIC EO number from the Disposition Table you claimed existed?
2. What SPECIFIC action was taken under the ALLEGED EO was taken as you claimed?
3. What portion of the ALLEGED EO SPECIFICALLY allowed amnesty as you claimed?
4. What SPECIFIC statutes were violated as you claimed?

waiting...

It's at the Supreme court over an EO.............clearly.........
Next.

 

[EriktheRed]

Wrong

Imbecile... two elections ago, Democrats gained seats in the House, gained seats in the Senate, held onto control of the Senate, and won the presidency.

Seriously, WTF is wrong with you?

Let's just let her answer the question, which I'll repeat:

Which two elections are you talking about, Sassy?

I've already stated what elections, if you can't keep pace go find a slower paced thread. But I'll help you out, when Ears took office who controlled both the House and Senate...now who controls them?

No, that really doesn't help. Which two elections are you talking about?

Stop playing your little game, it's childish.

Take note, folks....

This is what she said regarding the last two elections:

You twit, dems got shellacked in the last two...why? Try to be honest with yourself for once. Just posting "repubs suck" isn't anything. Get some substance

When questioned about exactly which two elections she's referring to, she refuses to answer. It's pretty obvious why.

Personally, I thought maybe she was just being overly hasty in her posting and would have admitted her error, but instead she accuses those pointing out her error of being "childish".

IOW, she's obviously not stupid, just a totally dishonest hack troll.

 

[EriktheRed]

The Republican Senate better deny every last Obama nominee.

Damn straight. Nothing like galvanizing Democrats to not only win the White House but to also take back the Senate. I'm getting my checkbook out for every close Senate race.

Wouldn't surprise me one bit if this stunt costs Republicans the Senate. Many people will be pissed if the Senate shirks its responsibility to advise and consent the president's nominees.

They will be far more pissed if the Senate allows Obama to install another political hack like Kagan and that Beaner, both of which have absolutely no business being on the Court.

Wake up, honey. America is fed up with Obama's partisan leftist bullshit.

"Beaner"??

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Imbecile... two elections ago, Democrats gained seats in the House, gained seats in the Senate, held onto control of the Senate, and won the presidency.

Seriously, WTF is wrong with you?

Let's just let her answer the question, which I'll repeat:

Which two elections are you talking about, Sassy?

I've already stated what elections, if you can't keep pace go find a slower paced thread. But I'll help you out, when Ears took office who controlled both the House and Senate...now who controls them?

No, that really doesn't help. Which two elections are you talking about?

Stop playing your little game, it's childish.

Take note, folks....

This is what she said regarding the last two elections:

You twit, dems got shellacked in the last two...why? Try to be honest with yourself for once. Just posting "repubs suck" isn't anything. Get some substance

When questioned about exactly which two elections she's referring to, she refuses to answer. It's pretty obvious why.

Personally, I thought maybe she was just being overly hasty in her posting and would have admitted her error, but instead she accuses those pointing out her error of being "childish".

IOW, she's obviously not stupid, just a totally dishonest hack troll.

Who controls Congress? Answer it and stop picking fly shit out of the pepper. It never works. America told you dimwits to pound sand.

 

[bripat9643]

Here's one, and he's still well-liked in the Senate, Justice Biden. After all, he needs a job next year anyway.

He would be the laughing stock of the SC.

going to take some huge laughs to take that title away from the moron thomas

Thomas is an Einstein compared to the two Obama appointed dingbats on the court.

 

[eddiew]

The Republican Senate better deny every last Obama nominee.

Damn straight. Nothing like galvanizing Democrats to not only win the White House but to also take back the Senate. I'm getting my checkbook out for every close Senate race.

Wouldn't surprise me one bit if this stunt costs Republicans the Senate. Many people will be pissed if the Senate shirks its responsibility to advise and consent the president's nominees.

They will be far more pissed if the Senate allows Obama to install another political hack like Kagan and that Beaner, both of which have absolutely no business being on the Court.

Wake up, honey. America is fed up with Obama's partisan leftist bullshit.

And since when do repubs have the right to have an edge in the SC forever?

 

[eagle1462010]

Unanimous Supreme Court Rules Against the Obama Administration’s Unconstitutional Power Grab | myHeritage

The Supreme Court unanimously struck down as unconstitutional the Obama administration’s “recess” appointments to the National Labor Relations Board, which were conducted while the Senate was formally in session.

The “decision marks the 12th time the Supreme Court unanimously ruled against the Obama administration on the issue of executive power,” Heritage Foundation legal expert Elizabeth Slattery explains.

The Constitution allows the President to make appointments during a Senate recess. President Obama’s appointments, which bypassed Senate approval, were made during a period when the Senate convened pro-forma sessions every three days. The Supreme Court held that recess appointments can only be made during breaks of “sufficient length.”

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The Republican Senate better deny every last Obama nominee.

Damn straight. Nothing like galvanizing Democrats to not only win the White House but to also take back the Senate. I'm getting my checkbook out for every close Senate race.

Wouldn't surprise me one bit if this stunt costs Republicans the Senate. Many people will be pissed if the Senate shirks its responsibility to advise and consent the president's nominees.

They will be far more pissed if the Senate allows Obama to install another political hack like Kagan and that Beaner, both of which have absolutely no business being on the Court.

Wake up, honey. America is fed up with Obama's partisan leftist bullshit.

And since when do repubs have the right to have an edge in the SC forever?

As long as they can....you don't think the dems would do the exact same thing? LMAO

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Let's just let her answer the question, which I'll repeat:

Which two elections are you talking about, Sassy?

I've already stated what elections, if you can't keep pace go find a slower paced thread. But I'll help you out, when Ears took office who controlled both the House and Senate...now who controls them?

No, that really doesn't help. Which two elections are you talking about?

Stop playing your little game, it's childish.

Take note, folks....

This is what she said regarding the last two elections:

You twit, dems got shellacked in the last two...why? Try to be honest with yourself for once. Just posting "repubs suck" isn't anything. Get some substance

When questioned about exactly which two elections she's referring to, she refuses to answer. It's pretty obvious why.

Personally, I thought maybe she was just being overly hasty in her posting and would have admitted her error, but instead she accuses those pointing out her error of being "childish".

IOW, she's obviously not stupid, just a totally dishonest hack troll.

Who controls Congress? Answer it and stop picking fly shit out of the pepper. It never works. America told you dimwits to pound sand.

What part of Throw the Bums Out have you not heard of? BTW, you're in power, which makes your side the bums...

 

[EriktheRed]

Let's just let her answer the question, which I'll repeat:

Which two elections are you talking about, Sassy?

I've already stated what elections, if you can't keep pace go find a slower paced thread. But I'll help you out, when Ears took office who controlled both the House and Senate...now who controls them?

No, that really doesn't help. Which two elections are you talking about?

Stop playing your little game, it's childish.

Take note, folks....

This is what she said regarding the last two elections:

You twit, dems got shellacked in the last two...why? Try to be honest with yourself for once. Just posting "repubs suck" isn't anything. Get some substance

When questioned about exactly which two elections she's referring to, she refuses to answer. It's pretty obvious why.

Personally, I thought maybe she was just being overly hasty in her posting and would have admitted her error, but instead she accuses those pointing out her error of being "childish".

IOW, she's obviously not stupid, just a totally dishonest hack troll.

Who controls Congress? Answer it and stop picking fly shit out of the pepper. It never works. America told you dimwits to pound sand.

Not in 2012 they didn't. And if you honestly don't count that as one of the last two elections then maybe you really are stupid. Either way, I'm not playing your little game anymore.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

And if Republicans tried that the American people would repopulate the Senate with Democrats.

Every Republican Senator and Representative up for re-election would lose.

You're as clueless as these dorks who actually believe the Republicans will stall confirming Obama's nominee for a whole year.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I've already stated what elections, if you can't keep pace go find a slower paced thread. But I'll help you out, when Ears took office who controlled both the House and Senate...now who controls them?

No, that really doesn't help. Which two elections are you talking about?

Stop playing your little game, it's childish.

Take note, folks....

This is what she said regarding the last two elections:

You twit, dems got shellacked in the last two...why? Try to be honest with yourself for once. Just posting "repubs suck" isn't anything. Get some substance

When questioned about exactly which two elections she's referring to, she refuses to answer. It's pretty obvious why.

Personally, I thought maybe she was just being overly hasty in her posting and would have admitted her error, but instead she accuses those pointing out her error of being "childish".

IOW, she's obviously not stupid, just a totally dishonest hack troll.

Who controls Congress? Answer it and stop picking fly shit out of the pepper. It never works. America told you dimwits to pound sand.

Not in 2012 they didn't. And if you honestly don't count that as one of the last two elections then maybe you really are stupid. Either way, I'm not playing your little game anymore.

Bye LOL

 

[eddiew]

The Republican Senate better deny every last Obama nominee.

Damn straight. Nothing like galvanizing Democrats to not only win the White House but to also take back the Senate. I'm getting my checkbook out for every close Senate race.

Wouldn't surprise me one bit if this stunt costs Republicans the Senate. Many people will be pissed if the Senate shirks its responsibility to advise and consent the president's nominees.

They will be far more pissed if the Senate allows Obama to install another political hack like Kagan and that Beaner, both of which have absolutely no business being on the Court.

Wake up, honey. America is fed up with Obama's partisan leftist bullshit.

And since when do repubs have the right to have an edge in the SC forever?

As long as they can....you don't think the dems would do the exact same thing? LMAO

maybe but the question is what's good for america ?,,,,can there be no compromise ahead in our lifetimes ...must hate and anger permeate{sp} our elections? will we be divided forever??

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Damn straight. Nothing like galvanizing Democrats to not only win the White House but to also take back the Senate. I'm getting my checkbook out for every close Senate race.

Wouldn't surprise me one bit if this stunt costs Republicans the Senate. Many people will be pissed if the Senate shirks its responsibility to advise and consent the president's nominees.

They will be far more pissed if the Senate allows Obama to install another political hack like Kagan and that Beaner, both of which have absolutely no business being on the Court.

Wake up, honey. America is fed up with Obama's partisan leftist bullshit.

And since when do repubs have the right to have an edge in the SC forever?

As long as they can....you don't think the dems would do the exact same thing? LMAO

maybe but the question is what's good for america ?,,,,can there be no compromise ahead in our lifetimes ...must hate and anger permeate{sp} our elections? will we be divided forever??

Ask Obungles, he and his party of fools have done more than anyone to divide this nation.

 

[eddiew]

And if Republicans tried that the American people would repopulate the Senate with Democrats.

Every Republican Senator and Representative up for re-election would lose.

You're as clueless as these dorks who actually believe the Republicans will stall confirming Obama's nominee for a whole year.

wanna bet they give it a try?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

And if Republicans tried that the American people would repopulate the Senate with Democrats.

Every Republican Senator and Representative up for re-election would lose.

You're as clueless as these dorks who actually believe the Republicans will stall confirming Obama's nominee for a whole year.

wanna bet they give it a try?

I know they'll "try." They'll put on a dog and pony show for their base for a month or two and then they'll give in. It's entirely predictable.

 

[eddiew]

Wouldn't surprise me one bit if this stunt costs Republicans the Senate. Many people will be pissed if the Senate shirks its responsibility to advise and consent the president's nominees.

They will be far more pissed if the Senate allows Obama to install another political hack like Kagan and that Beaner, both of which have absolutely no business being on the Court.

Wake up, honey. America is fed up with Obama's partisan leftist bullshit.

And since when do repubs have the right to have an edge in the SC forever?

As long as they can....you don't think the dems would do the exact same thing? LMAO

maybe but the question is what's good for america ?,,,,can there be no compromise ahead in our lifetimes ...must hate and anger permeate{sp} our elections? will we be divided forever??

Ask Obungles, he and his party of fools have done more than anyone to divide this nation.

Do you remember how your leader McConnell spoke about obama and trying to make him a 1 term president your hate for the president started early,,,,,,,was obama supposed to turn the other cheek?

 

[Faun]

he was domocrat or republican?

He and Alito were probably the two most conservative judges on the court.

who choose another superme... ?
just obama?

The president presents a nominee and the U.S Senate votes yay or nay.
most of the time the president get's his way.

Bork???? the woman that Bush nominated????????. NO, the president does not always get his way and obozo will not be allowed to put another raving liberal on the court.

Of course the president doesn't get a rubber stamp. That is not the issue here. Republicans have stupidly already shown their hand. They're not advising and consenting as the Constitution provides ... they're planning on obstructing the Constitution.