Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wouldn't be too sure about that. If it becomes clear to republicans, that Clinton is likely to be the next president, they may just be able to negotiate with Obama to get a more acceptable nominee than wait for Clinton to make a nomination. You have a much more liberal court now with Scilia gone and there are some important cases going to be coming up over the next year.There is no way a replacement will be approved by the Senate in Obamas' term.
This should make the elections even more exciting.
Congress won't do anythingAnd 4-4 ties can still benefit Obama.I count two EO's overturned by the Judiciary. Immigration and recess appointments.And the chances of that are ... ?Well, I could win the lottery this week, but I won't if I never buy a ticket!
The odds of me winning the lottery next week are about the same as a lower court siding with Obama on a blatantly unconstitutional executive order. He gets smacked by the courts so often I wonder if he is a masochist. After all, he did marry a woman built like she could play linebacker for the Bears.
Good! You can count to two. Maybe next week we will try for three!
Try reading their own goddamn calendar. Stop imposing reality and instead start dealing with it.Get something right, for once Why the Senate Should Reconvene Immediately to Stop ObamaYes, they are: U.S. Senate: Calendars and Schedulesthey are not in recess
no your are incorrect
they adjourn not in recess
http://grprofessionals.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2016-Senate-Schedule.pdf
indeed they should lesson the risk of the prezbo trying it
wouldnt be the first time the prezbo has tried to call the recess
however there is a Pro Forma Sessions--Agreement in place covering the period in you are ranting about
Congress won't do anythingAnd 4-4 ties can still benefit Obama.I count two EO's overturned by the Judiciary. Immigration and recess appointments.And the chances of that are ... ?
The odds of me winning the lottery next week are about the same as a lower court siding with Obama on a blatantly unconstitutional executive order. He gets smacked by the courts so often I wonder if he is a masochist. After all, he did marry a woman built like she could play linebacker for the Bears.
Good! You can count to two. Maybe next week we will try for three!
Repblicans need SCOTUS to invalidate Obama executive orders
4-4 ties won't do it
I wouldn't be too sure about that. If it becomes clear to republicans, that Clinton is likely to be the next president, they may just be able to negotiate with Obama to get a more acceptable nominee than wait for Clinton to make a nomination. You have a much more liberal court now with Scilia gone and there are some important cases going to be coming up over the next year.There is no way a replacement will be approved by the Senate in Obamas' term.
This should make the elections even more exciting.
Republicans are playing a dangerous game
If they hold out for a Scalia type conservative, they may end up with a young liberal who will torment them for decades
Obama will be forced to nominate a moderate. Hillary will be able to trot out Liberal after Liberal until they get confirmed
They lie so easily.LOL this is very telling...Republicans booing the Facts LOL
GOP candidate Ted Cruz was called out by CBS debate moderator John Dickerson for saying, incorrectly, that no Supreme Court justices were confirmed in election years for 80 years.
Dickerson pointed out that Justice Anthony Kennedy, who was nominated by President Ronald Reagan in 1987, was confirmed in 1988, which was an election year.
“But Kennedy was confirmed in ’88,” Dickerson pointed out.
Cruz then paused and said, incorrectly, “No, Kennedy was confirmed in ’87.”
After Dickerson said he wanted to get the facts straight for the audience, the audience began booing.
Try reading their own goddamn calendar. Stop imposing reality and instead start dealing with it.Get something right, for once Why the Senate Should Reconvene Immediately to Stop ObamaYes, they are: U.S. Senate: Calendars and Schedulesthey are not in recess
no your are incorrect
they adjourn not in recess
http://grprofessionals.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2016-Senate-Schedule.pdf
indeed they should lesson the risk of the prezbo trying it
wouldnt be the first time the prezbo has tried to call the recess
however there is a Pro Forma Sessions--Agreement in place covering the period in you are ranting about
Clear evidence he was murdered.Breaking Update:
CNN Reporting No Autopsy To Be Performed On Justice Scalia
CNN Just Reported That No Autopsy Will Be Performed on Scalia
I wouldn't be too sure about that. If it becomes clear to republicans, that Clinton is likely to be the next president, they may just be able to negotiate with Obama to get a more acceptable nominee than wait for Clinton to make a nomination. You have a much more liberal court now with Scilia gone and there are some important cases going to be coming up over the next year.There is no way a replacement will be approved by the Senate in Obamas' term.
This should make the elections even more exciting.
Republicans are playing a dangerous game
If they hold out for a Scalia type conservative, they may end up with a young liberal who will torment them for decades
Obama will be forced to nominate a moderate. Hillary will be able to trot out Liberal after Liberal until they get confirmed
That's assuming lower courts rule against Obama's executive orders.Congress won't do anythingAnd 4-4 ties can still benefit Obama.I count two EO's overturned by the Judiciary. Immigration and recess appointments.The odds of me winning the lottery next week are about the same as a lower court siding with Obama on a blatantly unconstitutional executive order. He gets smacked by the courts so often I wonder if he is a masochist. After all, he did marry a woman built like she could play linebacker for the Bears.
Good! You can count to two. Maybe next week we will try for three!
Repblicans need SCOTUS to invalidate Obama executive orders
4-4 ties won't do it
The first court to hear the case is NOT the Supreme Court. Their decision will hold.
I don't care what was posted, asswipe, their own calendar says they are recessed.Try reading their own goddamn calendar. Stop imposing reality and instead start dealing with it.Get something right, for once Why the Senate Should Reconvene Immediately to Stop ObamaYes, they are: U.S. Senate: Calendars and Schedules
no your are incorrect
they adjourn not in recess
http://grprofessionals.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2016-Senate-Schedule.pdf
indeed they should lesson the risk of the prezbo trying it
wouldnt be the first time the prezbo has tried to call the recess
however there is a Pro Forma Sessions--Agreement in place covering the period in you are ranting about
dude another poster on here already posted their own wording calling it a pro forma sessions
god you are stupid
I don't care what was posted, asswipe, their own calendar says they are recessed.Try reading their own goddamn calendar. Stop imposing reality and instead start dealing with it.Get something right, for once Why the Senate Should Reconvene Immediately to Stop Obamano your are incorrect
they adjourn not in recess
http://grprofessionals.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2016-Senate-Schedule.pdf
indeed they should lesson the risk of the prezbo trying it
wouldnt be the first time the prezbo has tried to call the recess
however there is a Pro Forma Sessions--Agreement in place covering the period in you are ranting about
dude another poster on here already posted their own wording calling it a pro forma sessions
god you are stupid
I don't care what was posted, asswipe, their own calendar says they are recessed.Try reading their own goddamn calendar. Stop imposing reality and instead start dealing with it.Get something right, for once Why the Senate Should Reconvene Immediately to Stop Obamano your are incorrect
they adjourn not in recess
http://grprofessionals.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2016-Senate-Schedule.pdf
indeed they should lesson the risk of the prezbo trying it
wouldnt be the first time the prezbo has tried to call the recess
however there is a Pro Forma Sessions--Agreement in place covering the period in you are ranting about
dude another poster on here already posted their own wording calling it a pro forma sessions
god you are stupid
That's assuming lower courts rule against Obama's executive orders.Congress won't do anythingAnd 4-4 ties can still benefit Obama.I count two EO's overturned by the Judiciary. Immigration and recess appointments.
Good! You can count to two. Maybe next week we will try for three!
Repblicans need SCOTUS to invalidate Obama executive orders
4-4 ties won't do it
The first court to hear the case is NOT the Supreme Court. Their decision will hold.
You guys have been threatening that for 25 yearsI wouldn't be too sure about that. If it becomes clear to republicans, that Clinton is likely to be the next president, they may just be able to negotiate with Obama to get a more acceptable nominee than wait for Clinton to make a nomination. You have a much more liberal court now with Scilia gone and there are some important cases going to be coming up over the next year.There is no way a replacement will be approved by the Senate in Obamas' term.
This should make the elections even more exciting.
Republicans are playing a dangerous game
If they hold out for a Scalia type conservative, they may end up with a young liberal who will torment them for decades
Obama will be forced to nominate a moderate. Hillary will be able to trot out Liberal after Liberal until they get confirmed
hillary will be president of cell block c by that time
--LOL
You guys have been threatening that for 25 yearsI wouldn't be too sure about that. If it becomes clear to republicans, that Clinton is likely to be the next president, they may just be able to negotiate with Obama to get a more acceptable nominee than wait for Clinton to make a nomination. You have a much more liberal court now with Scilia gone and there are some important cases going to be coming up over the next year.There is no way a replacement will be approved by the Senate in Obamas' term.
This should make the elections even more exciting.
Republicans are playing a dangerous game
If they hold out for a Scalia type conservative, they may end up with a young liberal who will torment them for decades
Obama will be forced to nominate a moderate. Hillary will be able to trot out Liberal after Liberal until they get confirmed
hillary will be president of cell block c by that time
--LOL
Hard to convict on conspiracy theories
