BREAKING...Maddow: we've got Trump's tax returns!

Nothing is illegal...lol..

He wants the headlines on this , just like it worked on Jeff Sessions and his lying wire tapping tweets..

I note your non-answer, you cheap, dime store hack.

Dude, go ahead and be led like a little puppy...eating up right out of Trumps hand that is feeding you..

It would be illegal if an IRS person leaked it..

Trump is the one would told everyone that he didn't pay taxes...

If there had been anything incriminating I would be agreeing with you...but Trump is lying his ass off right now..
Targeting taxpayers
No one, outside of looney feminists, and diehard leftists take her seriously. She is a caricature of everything that is wrong with the Democrat party.

Exactly what Trump wants , to discredit her.. She has been getting some very good stories out these last few weeks on connecting the Dots to Russia...

.
Maddow is an excellent researcher. This isn't over by a long shot....anyone who things it is, is a simpleton of the Drumpfster variety.
She didn't research crap. She was given two pages that make the Trump narratives by leftists, (he is broke/doesn't pay taxes) look completely foolish.
yep, by ultimately, Trump.

YES HE DID THIS LEAK...it was all to Trump's advantage, th year of 2005, only the front two pages, and all to change the subject, to get his lemmings to go after Rachel Maddow, who is doing an incredible job investing and connecting the dots on the Russian Connection.

Simple as that...it's been done before by him and I'm certain it will be done again by him... he's controlling the media...they are not controlling him. Same with you guys, his Trumpettes...you are his good little sheep! He has you so pegged, knows exactly what you will do, once he tweets..... :p
Care4all, you have no idea how foolish you sound, do you?
Oh, I'm certain it may sound absurd... and don't blame you for thinking so! :D

But I have a lot of years of practice in trying to "read" the situation, and have a pretty good track record over the years.....I trust my feminine intuition, my gut... and the ability to observe the entire picture...in politics, there is always a reason for every action and a known reaction to the initial action.... it's a scummy scum world out there!

And since this was a DELIBERATE via courier, and timed leak of his tax return, with a specific year of 2005, where Trump had done well and actually paid taxes, with a very limited view of only the first 2 pages, giving us absolutely no information on any of his foreign nation, oligarch or bank connections, and earlier enough of a year, that he may not have even had any Russian connections yet...

YES, most certainly the ONLY ONE TO GAIN from this kind of limited leak, was Trump, himself.
 
Back in 1940s Germany you would of been gassed, CC.

When confronted with what facts are wrong this is your answer. Sad deflection attempt.
Yeah, except you were not confronting me with facts, were you, CC? Oh, that's right...you would not know a fact even if it crawled up your ass and but your prostate.

Go talk to Lew about dildos.

I asked if you didnt like facts when they are long. You stated you witnessed no facts but failed to indicated what lies were being presented as fact.

You, in turn, decided to inform me that I wouldve been gassed in Germany.

Good job pal.
 
Agreed--you'll note that Donald Trump is already stating this is a FAKE return, but it's only 2 pages of the common 1040 form, and it does not include the K-1 form that is normally attached to show investment income or loss, and a list of the income he is receiving from foriegn countries that he has heavily invested into. What Rachael Maddow released is totally WORTHLESS--and it's 12 years old.
Trump's Hotels In China Could Be A Conflict For The President-Elect
Trump sons open Dubai golf club as namesake now US president
Ethics Expert: Trump's Efforts To Address Conflicts Are 'Baby Steps'
Trump registered eight companies in Saudi Arabia during campaign: report

And this is why he has refused to release any income tax returns. It's not because of income and taxes he paid or did not pay. He is definitely in violation of Article 1 Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution--the Emolument clause.

"Never in American history has a president-elect presented more conflict of interest questions and foreign entanglements than Donald Trump. Given the vast and global scope of Trump’s business interests, many of which remain shrouded in secrecy, we cannot predict the full gamut of legal and constitutional challenges that lie ahead. But one violation, of constitutional magnitude, will run from the instant that Mr. Trump swears he will “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” While holding office, Mr. Trump will receive—by virtue of his continued interest in the Trump Organization and his stake in hundreds of other entities—a steady stream of monetary and other benefits from foreign powers and their agents."
The Emoluments Clause: Its text, meaning, and application to Donald J. Trump | Brookings Institution

Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution provides as follows: No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”

This country has elected a President that could easily be held hostage by a Foreign Country. Putting these assets in his kids names does NOT release him from responsibility of this clause, as he will still protect those assets under any circumstance, as being part of the Trump empire.

Again when Democrats take over in 2018 their first order of business will be to access recents returns (the full returns) via the Ways & Means committee. Republicans on the Ways & Means committee refused to do it recently.
Republicans (ways & means committee) refuse to release Trump's tax returns over Russia investigation

Being in violation of the Emoluments clause is reason for impeachment. I am certain that if Republicans refuse to do it, Democrats will-- when they take over in 2018.

turkey_2016-11-17_0205.png


General Flynn just recently disclosed that he is and has been a paid lobbyist for Turkey.
Mike Flynn attended intelligence briefings while a lobbyist for Turkey Sweet Baby Jesus

I call him President Trump, you can call him Emperor if you want. The Clintons are bought and paid for by foreign governments, but that didn't bother you.

Would care to pull a link out of your ass to show us how the Clinton's were bought and paid for by Foreign countries and it dam well better not be the Clinton foundation, because I'll pound you into the ground with it.
Charity Navigator - Rating for The Clinton Foundation


The New York State attorney Generals office put out a cease and desist order on the Trump foundation 3 weeks before the election, as they actually have cancelled checks in their posession that show that Trump used charitable donations to pay of unreleated legal settlements and he purchased two full size portraits of himself.--(which is now another Trump investigation.)

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/04/us/politics/trump-foundation-money.html?_r=0
'I've never encountered anything so brazen': Report details shocking new revelations about Trump Foundation

57d9f6ce5590b.image.jpg

Where's the line where you have pay to play?

Fund your daughter's wedding?

lol
 

You do realize that your sides's obsession with Trumps tax return is far more exemplified by your meme response, right?

If by side you mean "Anti-Trump" people... I want to see his latest couple year's tax returns to see where his conflicts of interests lie. It's pretty simple, and if he had to apply for a security clearance it would have been reviewed. Though he doesn't have to get a security clearance as an elected POTUS, I'd still like to see it for myself, and a great deal of the population would like to see it as well. His tax returns would also prove once and for all how big of a liar he is when it comes to how charitable he is, which could absolutely ruin him with the public. No one likes a braggart that talks about how much they give in donations only to find out they don't give shit.
We want to see your medical records to see if you are mentally fit to post on USMB.

We have a Constitutional Right to Privacy. The President filed a financial disclosure and also went through Security Vetting to get his security clearance.

Not only that, The Obama Administration had him under surveillance, ILLEGALLY, and use UK Intelligence Services tapping in to a couple of rogue agents, and FOUND NOTHING. NOTHING.

So if the CIA, NSA, Secret Service, and 17 Intelligence agencies all gave Trump clearance for his security credentials, and you have his tax returns, was wire tapping Trump Tower and had a Financial Disclosure and nothing was found, Including THE IRS btw, who would have poured over about 20 years of tax returns.....

EXACTLY WHAT THE PHUCK DO YOU NEED TO SEE IT FOR?

SO YOU CAN CREATE SOME MORE FAKE NEWS and MAKE MORE NONSENSICAL UNSUBSTANTIATED ACCUSATIONS?

I say PHUCK OFF LEFTY.

America is already sick of your shit anyways.


Presidents don't have to get a security clearance... If he had to he'd not pass simply because of his multiple bankruptcies and poor credit score. But hey...you think you know what you are talking about. :rolleyes:

You poor poor thing... you probably where headphones that have to remind you when to breath, you're that dense.

You are a moron. They have to go through a process. Every president does. They do not hand stuff to POTUS on day one.
Obama had to go through it.

Wrong again Amigo. Presidents do not go through background checks in order to be approved for a Security Clearance like a normal person would have to. You should really do some research before just spouting off at the mouth.
 
that ONE tax return only proves Trump paid the tax he wants to abolish.

[[[[[[[ SHOCKING ]]]]]]]]]


He paid 38.5 million ... 31 million was the the AMT tax.
 
Last edited:
Back in 1940s Germany you would of been gassed, CC.

When confronted with what facts are wrong this is your answer. Sad deflection attempt.
Btw, notice how CC deflected by alleging a deflection. That is called the "double deflection".

We all know that CC would have been in the oven in 1940 Central Europe.


You claimed she wasnt presenting facts. Then your defense was because you "rarely" seen her do so, which means you've seen it but you called it "rare". When asked what facts are wrong you start talking about hypotheticals of what would happen to people if they were in Germany.

I think we know why.
 
The last time his State income taxes were allegedly stolen and given to the Times I believe, via courier and just was in the reporter's mail box when they came in, in the morning, just like this leak....

NOTHING WAS DONE BY TRUMP to try to find the leaker, nothing was done by the police for the theft or the State Prosecutors...

Trump did NOT go after and try to find the leaker of the taxes, he let the whole incident go by.....WHY IS THAT? It supports my hypothesis...he selectively had them leaked himself.
 
How naive you are. I mean you did start this retarded thread without knowing how laws work for journalists.

Lew, you vain dumb ass! If someone was realizing an income from foreign capital investment and wanted to hide it do you not think that it could be done? Further, a return will not show nearly as much as his financial disclosures. Third, any K-1 distributions (go on, Lew pup, Google K-1 Form so you can learn what it is) will only identify the source. You would probably need to get their tax docs to figure out where it's revenue is derived.

Secondly, I CLEARLY state that the first amendment and public policy concerns would prevent any sort of prosecution against the dimwitted dyke). You just did not bother to look that deeply.

If you were in reach right now I would bitch slap the snot out of you for being so ignorant and insolent. You better check your tone, you fucking idiot!

View attachment 116884


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com


You started this whole fucking thread to talk about how she did something illegal!

Now you are saying shit that only makes it seem more and more likely that it was Trump himself or someone working for him that sent only the two pages on purpose.

Jesus you Trumpbots are some gullible fucking people. :lmao:
Are you fucking high or what? There are several people posting on this thread, jizz breath. Maybe we are all blurring together in your puny brain.

Go talk to Closed Caption about anal beads, jackass.


Aww are you becoming triggered snowflake? When you post nonsense you better be ready to be called out on it. Put on your big boy pants.
Uh oh... Lew has snapped.

Lewtard, whatever you are saying I totally agree with, Honey. Now go take a nap.


I snapped? I'm having a ball watching all the Trumpbots in multiple threads throw out misinformation like frisbees. Here's a small list:

#1. People still think MSNBC and Maddow broke the law.
#2. People think tax returns are "classified" information
#3. People don't understand journalists have extra specific rights of protection
#4. An idiot is arguing that Trump had to pass a background check to get a security clearance
#5. Some believe that Maddow committed espionage


That's just a couple off the top of my head from the last couple hours. It's as if Trumpbots don't care about truth.
 
Regardless of which end of the spectrum you occupy, it really is okay to lower your fists now and then and admit a screwup, or a weakness, or anything negative.

Left wing Slate does it here: Rachel Maddow Turned a Scoop on Donald Trump’s Taxes Into a Cynical, Self-Defeating Spectacle

Are there any Progressives who think this big tax revelation didn't go very well? That it may have actually helped Trump and the GOP?
.

That's why it's clear from a common sense perspective that this was engineered by Trump and his cohorts.

Once a con man, always a con man.
So, a libtard ideologue embarrasses herself on national television and somehow it is still somehow Trumps fault?

Lol, at least you have moved on from blaming Bush for everything.
 
If anyone takes the so-called president down with good solid investigation and facts, it will be Rachel Maddow. Good for her. She needs to keep digging. :clap:
Libs think Maddow is great but in reality, she is fake news.

Is it any wonder Americans are so divided?
You think this is over? :lol:

Of course not! The delusional and deranged leftist, bedwetting, pearl clutching, wingnuts will be spouting their conspiracy theories long after Trump leaves office in 2024. It's sad to watch, but entertaining at the same time.
 
Agreed--you'll note that Donald Trump is already stating this is a FAKE return, but it's only 2 pages of the common 1040 form, and it does not include the K-1 form that is normally attached to show investment income or loss, and a list of the income he is receiving from foriegn countries that he has heavily invested into. What Rachael Maddow released is totally WORTHLESS--and it's 12 years old.
Trump's Hotels In China Could Be A Conflict For The President-Elect
Trump sons open Dubai golf club as namesake now US president
Ethics Expert: Trump's Efforts To Address Conflicts Are 'Baby Steps'
Trump registered eight companies in Saudi Arabia during campaign: report

And this is why he has refused to release any income tax returns. It's not because of income and taxes he paid or did not pay. He is definitely in violation of Article 1 Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution--the Emolument clause.

"Never in American history has a president-elect presented more conflict of interest questions and foreign entanglements than Donald Trump. Given the vast and global scope of Trump’s business interests, many of which remain shrouded in secrecy, we cannot predict the full gamut of legal and constitutional challenges that lie ahead. But one violation, of constitutional magnitude, will run from the instant that Mr. Trump swears he will “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” While holding office, Mr. Trump will receive—by virtue of his continued interest in the Trump Organization and his stake in hundreds of other entities—a steady stream of monetary and other benefits from foreign powers and their agents."
The Emoluments Clause: Its text, meaning, and application to Donald J. Trump | Brookings Institution

Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution provides as follows: No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”

This country has elected a President that could easily be held hostage by a Foreign Country. Putting these assets in his kids names does NOT release him from responsibility of this clause, as he will still protect those assets under any circumstance, as being part of the Trump empire.

Again when Democrats take over in 2018 their first order of business will be to access recents returns (the full returns) via the Ways & Means committee. Republicans on the Ways & Means committee refused to do it recently.
Republicans (ways & means committee) refuse to release Trump's tax returns over Russia investigation

Being in violation of the Emoluments clause is reason for impeachment. I am certain that if Republicans refuse to do it, Democrats will-- when they take over in 2018.

turkey_2016-11-17_0205.png


General Flynn just recently disclosed that he is and has been a paid lobbyist for Turkey.
Mike Flynn attended intelligence briefings while a lobbyist for Turkey Sweet Baby Jesus

I call him President Trump, you can call him Emperor if you want. The Clintons are bought and paid for by foreign governments, but that didn't bother you.

Would care to pull a link out of your ass to show us how the Clinton's were bought and paid for by Foreign countries and it dam well better not be the Clinton foundation, because I'll pound you into the ground with it.
Charity Navigator - Rating for The Clinton Foundation


The New York State attorney Generals office put out a cease and desist order on the Trump foundation 3 weeks before the election, as they actually have cancelled checks in their posession that show that Trump used charitable donations to pay of unreleated legal settlements and he purchased two full size portraits of himself.--(which is now another Trump investigation.)

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/04/us/politics/trump-foundation-money.html?_r=0
'I've never encountered anything so brazen': Report details shocking new revelations about Trump Foundation

57d9f6ce5590b.image.jpg

Where's the line where you have pay to play?

Fund your daughter's wedding?

lol

Pull a trusted verifiable LINK out of your ass when you make a claim on this board. This is NOT the Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity show. You're on a big boy & girl political board here, and many of us have been on this political board for many years.

If you can't find a trusted verifiable link to back up your conspiracy theory then it goes into the :bsflag:
file.
 
Last edited:
I snapped? I'm having a ball watching all the Trumpbots in multiple threads throw out misinformation like frisbees. Here's a small list:

#1. People still think MSNBC and Maddow broke the law.
They sought to profit from illegally obtained documents by another. Clearly this was the reason as the documents did not damage Trump.

#2. People think tax returns are "classified" information
They are protected by federal law from all but specific government employees with court approval.

#3. People don't understand journalists have extra specific rights of protection
Really? They can torture/extort/steal and stuff then?

#4. An idiot is arguing that Trump had to pass a background check to get a security clearance
Cite the link he didn't have a background check.

#5. Some believe that Maddow committed espionage
Not sure that is the right word.

That's just a couple off the top of my head from the last couple hours. It's as if Trumpbots don't care about truth.

My replies in blue
 
Care4all, I have no twitter account....
Did I say you did???? I don't have one either??? Wll, I did set up one, one day when on one of these USMB threads, to try to read something or out of curiosity, but once on it, I had no idea what I was doing and didn't want to spend the energy and time to learn about it, so never went back...
 

Forum List

Back
Top