BREAKING...Maddow: we've got Trump's tax returns!

[Hutch Starskey]

She simply reported it. She didn't imply anything was wrong with the return.

Slate, usually a political ally of hers, strongly disagrees: Rachel Maddow Turned a Scoop on Donald Trump’s Taxes Into a Cynical, Self-Defeating Spectacle

She blew it. It would best to admit it.
.

I watched it. I don't need someone else's opinion to know what to think about it.

Okay. Run with that then.

So will the GOP, understandably.
.

Whatever, dude.

Please highlight what she reported that was misleading or otherwise incorrect.
She simply reported it.

Maddow goes on these LOOOOONNNNGGGGG monologues spitting out cynical nothingness. Last night she went on and on and on about foreign influence and whether Trump has foreign generated income on his tax return, and on and on and on.... all of which had nothing to do with the actual disclosures made in his return.

But it did not matter. The facts do not matter. She just plants that seed and keeps watering it, over and over and over hoping something grows.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Everyone who is interested in his returns is interested for that very reason.

 

[JimBowie1958]

I see them just fine.

Just like a liberal, you think I am responsible for your personal failures.

Taint so, bro.

If YOUR links don't back up what YOU say, how is that my fault?

Sorry dude, 2 + 2 will never = 5.

The links do bqack up my claims, you simply have a linking fail in addition to a reading comprehension fail.

The root problem is obvious; you dont want to expose your mind to any contrary points of view, and I cannot help you with that.

 

[Flash]

The fuming far right and alt right regressives are having a hissy fit ^^^ because the reporter and Maddow forced Trump to release his returns.

More returns to come.

We're laughing at Madcow...and you left loons.

Once again you look foolish

Trump schlonged that Maddow asshole and the Libtard Moon Bats are not even smart enough to know it.

 

[percysunshine]

.
Amazing...

Pajama boy

 

[saveliberty]

Care4all, I have no twitter account....

 

[jc456]

so as it turns out

leftard butthurt rages on

--LOL

f you lefties

--LOL

Maybe page 3 and 4 will be found in the mailbox tomorrow...

and you think what, Trump and russia were scheming for a 2016 presidential bash back then? o,,,,m....g.... wow dude.

 

[easyt65]

CNN's Sally Kohn Tweets:

This return, in isolation, is nothingburger BUT serious kudos to @maddow for hyping story to refocus attention on unanswered questions!
— Sally Kohn (@sallykohn) March 15, 2017

One 'Twitterverse' Inhabitant responded / said it best:

“Sure, everything Rachel Maddow hyped up turned out to be nonsense. BUT SHE RAISED AWARENESS” @sallykohn sums up leftism
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ @maddow pic.twitter.com/Yy07ShNH4w
— Harry Khachatrian (@Harry1T6) March 15, 2017

 

[saveliberty]

Agreed--you'll note that Donald Trump is already stating this is a FAKE return, but it's only 2 pages of the common 1040 form, and it does not include the K-1 form that is normally attached to show investment income or loss, and a list of the income he is receiving from foriegn countries that he has heavily invested into. What Rachael Maddow released is totally WORTHLESS--and it's 12 years old.
Trump's Hotels In China Could Be A Conflict For The President-Elect
Trump sons open Dubai golf club as namesake now US president
Ethics Expert: Trump's Efforts To Address Conflicts Are 'Baby Steps'
Trump registered eight companies in Saudi Arabia during campaign: report

And this is why he has refused to release any income tax returns. It's not because of income and taxes he paid or did not pay. He is definitely in violation of Article 1 Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution--the Emolument clause.

"Never in American history has a president-elect presented more conflict of interest questions and foreign entanglements than Donald Trump. Given the vast and global scope of Trump’s business interests, many of which remain shrouded in secrecy, we cannot predict the full gamut of legal and constitutional challenges that lie ahead. But one violation, of constitutional magnitude, will run from the instant that Mr. Trump swears he will “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” While holding office, Mr. Trump will receive—by virtue of his continued interest in the Trump Organization and his stake in hundreds of other entities—a steady stream of monetary and other benefits from foreign powers and their agents."
The Emoluments Clause: Its text, meaning, and application to Donald J. Trump | Brookings Institution

Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution provides as follows: “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”

This country has elected a President that could easily be held hostage by a Foreign Country. Putting these assets in his kids names does NOT release him from responsibility of this clause, as he will still protect those assets under any circumstance, as being part of the Trump empire.

Again when Democrats take over in 2018 their first order of business will be to access recents returns (the full returns) via the Ways & Means committee. Republicans on the Ways & Means committee refused to do it recently.
Republicans (ways & means committee) refuse to release Trump's tax returns over Russia investigation

Being in violation of the Emoluments clause is reason for impeachment. I am certain that if Republicans refuse to do it, Democrats will-- when they take over in 2018.

General Flynn just recently disclosed that he is and has been a paid lobbyist for Turkey.
Mike Flynn attended intelligence briefings while a lobbyist for Turkey Sweet Baby Jesus

I call him President Trump, you can call him Emperor if you want. The Clintons are bought and paid for by foreign governments, but that didn't bother you.

 

[Rob37]

They still have to follow basic rules, and if the law explicitly protects private citizen's tax returns, (as Trump was back in 2005) any shield they are claiming isn't exactly made of adamantium.

You do realize that your sides's obsession with Trumps tax return is far more exemplified by your meme response, right?

If by side you mean "Anti-Trump" people... I want to see his latest couple year's tax returns to see where his conflicts of interests lie. It's pretty simple, and if he had to apply for a security clearance it would have been reviewed. Though he doesn't have to get a security clearance as an elected POTUS, I'd still like to see it for myself, and a great deal of the population would like to see it as well. His tax returns would also prove once and for all how big of a liar he is when it comes to how charitable he is, which could absolutely ruin him with the public. No one likes a braggart that talks about how much they give in donations only to find out they don't give shit.

You don't need to see anybody's tax returns, motherfucker. You would not understand them anyway. It is not like there is going to be a 1099 from Russia attached to it, dumbass!

How naive you are. I mean you did start this retarded thread without knowing how laws work for journalists.

Lew, you vain dumb ass! If someone was realizing an income from foreign capital investment and wanted to hide it do you not think that it could be done? Further, a return will not show nearly as much as his financial disclosures. Third, any K-1 distributions (go on, Lew pup, Google K-1 Form so you can learn what it is) will only identify the source. You would probably need to get their tax docs to figure out where it's revenue is derived.

Secondly, I CLEARLY state that the first amendment and public policy concerns would prevent any sort of prosecution against the dimwitted dyke). You just did not bother to look that deeply.

If you were in reach right now I would bitch slap the snot out of you for being so ignorant and insolent. You better check your tone, you fucking idiot!

Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[TheDude]

Starkey says:

The stumbling and bumbling redneck conservative defenders of Trump You're just an intolerant hateful fuck Starkey. I defend Trump and I'm not a redneck.

who they now realize is the most divisive president in our history Realize what? Your hysterics is not our reality. Your use of divisive is code for you have nothing more than a tear in your bunghole.

are butt hurt This is just projection. It's your club that remains butt hurt, and the pain intensifies because they lack the balls to admit to their foolish behavior.

that Maddow forced Trump to release one year's returns. SO HILARIOUS. Madcow couldn't force anything but fragile liberals into a deeper frenzy. Course they're easy prey.

More sure to follow. The first was so damaging too. I can't wait to see your prediction come true.

 

[MrShangles]

Regardless of which end of the spectrum you occupy, it really is okay to lower your fists now and then and admit a screwup, or a weakness, or anything negative.

Left wing Slate does it here: Rachel Maddow Turned a Scoop on Donald Trump’s Taxes Into a Cynical, Self-Defeating Spectacle

Are there any Progressives who think this big tax revelation didn't go very well? That it may have actually helped Trump and the GOP?
.

That's why it's clear from a common sense perspective that this was engineered by Trump and his cohorts.

Once a con man, always a con man.

Really, all we hear left say , see his taxes. Well you seen one and now Trump is a con man for showing. Y'all make my head hurt, from banging it on the wall


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Rob37]

Slate, usually a political ally of hers, strongly disagrees: Rachel Maddow Turned a Scoop on Donald Trump’s Taxes Into a Cynical, Self-Defeating Spectacle

She blew it. It would best to admit it.
.

I watched it. I don't need someone else's opinion to know what to think about it.

Okay. Run with that then.

So will the GOP, understandably.
.

Whatever, dude.

Please highlight what she reported that was misleading or otherwise incorrect.
She simply reported it.

Maddow goes on these LOOOOONNNNGGGGG monologues spitting out cynical nothingness. Last night she went on and on and on about foreign influence and whether Trump has foreign generated income on his tax return, and on and on and on.... all of which had nothing to do with the actual disclosures made in his return.

But it did not matter. The facts do not matter. She just plants that seed and keeps watering it, over and over and over hoping something grows.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

So you don't like facts when they are long? Smh...I can see how that is a valid argument.

You are assuming the dyke is spitting out facts. I have rarely witnessed her doing that.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[saveliberty]

Lew, you vain dumb ass! If someone was realizing an income from foreign capital investment and wanted to hide it do you not think that it could be done? Further, a return will not show nearly as much as his financial disclosures. Third, any K-1 distributions (go on, Lew pup, Google K-1 Form so you can learn what it is) will only identify the source. You would probably need to get their tax docs to figure out where it's revenue is derived.

Secondly, I CLEARLY state that the first amendment and public policy concerns would prevent any sort of prosecution against the dimwitted dyke). You just did not bother to look that deeply.

If you were in reach right now I would bitch slap the snot out of you for being so ignorant and insolent. You better check your tone, you fucking idiot!

View attachment 116884


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Agreed a 1120 would be more helpful

 

[Fang]

If anyone takes the so-called president down with good solid investigation and facts, it will be Rachel Maddow. Good for her. She needs to keep digging.

Hillary and liberals claimed Trump didn't pay taxes. Turns out he paid 25%. Obama paid 18% in recent years. WHOOPS!! President Trump should thank Rachael Maddow. LOL

 

[Rob37]

Slate, usually a political ally of hers, strongly disagrees: Rachel Maddow Turned a Scoop on Donald Trump’s Taxes Into a Cynical, Self-Defeating Spectacle

She blew it. It would best to admit it.
.

I watched it. I don't need someone else's opinion to know what to think about it.

Okay. Run with that then.

So will the GOP, understandably.
.

Whatever, dude.

Please highlight what she reported that was misleading or otherwise incorrect.
She simply reported it.

Maddow goes on these LOOOOONNNNGGGGG monologues spitting out cynical nothingness. Last night she went on and on and on about foreign influence and whether Trump has foreign generated income on his tax return, and on and on and on.... all of which had nothing to do with the actual disclosures made in his return.

But it did not matter. The facts do not matter. She just plants that seed and keeps watering it, over and over and over hoping something grows.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Everyone who is interested in his returns is interested for that very reason.

It is pure speculation. Why don't you pull his genealogy too to see if he descended from pagans? You stupid, sick fuck head!


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[ClosedCaption]

I watched it. I don't need someone else's opinion to know what to think about it.

Okay. Run with that then.

So will the GOP, understandably.
.

Whatever, dude.

Please highlight what she reported that was misleading or otherwise incorrect.
She simply reported it.

Maddow goes on these LOOOOONNNNGGGGG monologues spitting out cynical nothingness. Last night she went on and on and on about foreign influence and whether Trump has foreign generated income on his tax return, and on and on and on.... all of which had nothing to do with the actual disclosures made in his return.

But it did not matter. The facts do not matter. She just plants that seed and keeps watering it, over and over and over hoping something grows.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

So you don't like facts when they are long? Smh...I can see how that is a valid argument.

You are assuming the dyke is spitting out facts. I have rarely witnessed her doing that.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Well if we were discussing what you witnessed you'd have a point. But we are discussing if what she is saying are facts. Not if you've ever witnessed it. There are libraries filled with things you haven't witnessed.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

This ranks right up there with Geraldo's Al Capone's Hidden Vault show.

 

[HaShev]

The healthcare bill is in turmoil, Trumps lie about Obama "wire tapping" is getting exposed... is this glorious looking headline that Trump paid 38 million in taxes the new shiney object?

Thoughts?

Liberals like describing opponents in terms like chaos and turmoil and you regurgitate them as if they are true, means they brainwashed you and cpntrol how you view things like puppets on a string (which they admitted already).
Fact is all bills go through these processes of first draft, arguing over the bill, everyone politicizing their 2 cents for 15 minutes of fame(see Rand Pauls manipulation of media time to understand this).
Eventually cpmpromises get made and it helps create a bill that more people are comfortable with or have no choice, because the alternative is keeping the failed former plan.
By calling the bill in turmoil is to blame Obama for leaving us the mess to clean up, a concept that should not have been implimented in the first place-BRILLIANT!
If you claim Trump is lying about being wire tapped before investigations reveal what you are not privy to know is then a lie by you as how would you know? Also he has reasons to believe this so how is it a lie withput admitting the Dems lied about everything they suspected but were false charges?
Lying to coverup lies and displacing blame for your failures is exactly why your party lost the elections. The party's activists rioting in Isis gear, attacking flags and old men, just helps the next election keep you guys out.

Funny how different we each see the situation. To me that healthcare plan is God aweful and the GOO party is rightfully divided on it. Yeah it's a lot of business as usual, Washington style, but it's definitely turmoil, that's the joke our congress has become... and anybody with two eyes and brain know Trump was talking out of his ass with that tweet and his ego won't let him admit he was wrong. It was an obvious distraction attempt to turn heads from the Sessions recusal. If he had evidence he would call a press conference and throw it in his critics faces. He would do that so fast. But he has nothing, he is searching and spinning and throwing more shiney objects around to distract in hope that the media will move on. Very transperant.

You have to consider to view it this way:
ANYONE complaining about any policy, better have a better solution to put forth because it's easy to tear down everything, but you damn better have something better to replace what you tear down.
Both parties still govern, if Dems left the mess because they pushed it through without this debate process to shape
it better, they better be offring solutions and helping to solve not make things worse.
I find it irritating that people even Republicans saying they will own this bill, when in reality the Bill should never have existed and is still the result of the failed original source and still is both parties responsibility to shape it by suggesting viable improvements.

I agree with part of your statement. Both party's do have a responsibility to work together. But you have to recognize the irony after 8 years of Republican obstruction. Many on the Left are enjoying giving the GOP a taste of there own medicine. I hope they can be better than that at some point and act like grown ups that have a tremendous responsibility to serve the people. I'm not holding my breath though.

But in all fairness they from the get go was left out (locked out) of working a more palatable health care bill and were right all along about that plan. Some of the other obstructions had justification also and no more objective then usual in disagreement even amongst their own party.
Let's face it, when your proposals are arrogantly non partisan and swing to far one way the result is extremes the other direction for balance. Life's pendulum swings back and forth left- right trying to find our balance center.
Too far one way causes the extreme back the other way to balance out and center us.
The Left went to far left resulted in seeing far right popularity to balance that progressive far leftist ideology & it's difficult results.

 

[Rob37]

CNN's Sally Kohn Tweets:

This return, in isolation, is nothingburger BUT serious kudos to @maddow for hyping story to refocus attention on unanswered questions!
— Sally Kohn (@sallykohn) March 15, 2017

One 'Twitterverse' Inhabitant responded / said it best:

“Sure, everything Rachel Maddow hyped up turned out to be nonsense. BUT SHE RAISED AWARENESS” @sallykohn sums up leftism
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ @maddow pic.twitter.com/Yy07ShNH4w
— Harry Khachatrian (@Harry1T6) March 15, 2017


View attachment 116882

Sally Kohn.... another fucking militant dyke. How many times has she and Maddow strapped on together?


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Fang]

Maddow unwittingly disproved Hillary Clinton’s 2016 claim that Trump might have paid no taxes. Trump’s $38 million tax hit was more tax than 672 households earned in the entire 2016. Drudge summed up the math: “TRUMP PAID HIGHER TAX RATE [25%] THAN MSNBC COMCAST [24%]... MUCH HIGHER THAN OBAMA [19%]... AND BERNIE [13%]!”
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...te-socialist-bernie-sanders-paid-13-tax-rate/
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH EPIC FAIL!!!!!

Tax returns 'scoop': Anti-Trump queen Maddow goes from coronation to catastrophe

EPIC FAIL