Flash
Diamond Member
- Dec 8, 2014
- 71,172
- 62,059
LOLDumb shit. The party may not instigate the “apprehension of injury” but if another party is threatening you then your response is perfectly fine if that party is “apprehensive” in fact it’s designed that way as an attempt to dissuade the trespasser or aggressor.Idiot.which legal statute? i suppose now the state is wrong for getting the case dismissed?And of course, in the Legal Statute of the Law....Only in your Communist wet dreams is what they did illegal.
prove your point for one in your overall useless life.
what laws did they break. look them up and tell me specifically why they were broken. don't just scream they were, don't cite the bitch who went after them.
remove all and do your own legwork and explain to me with links which MO laws this couple broke.
bet ya $10 you can't do it.
565.056. 1. A person commits the offense of assault in the fourth degree if:(3) The person purposely places another person in apprehension of immediate physical injury;
Typical liberal snowflake bullshit that if someone feels “apprehensive” then the responsibility for that lies elsewhere
Dumbfuck, Mark McClownskey says he wasn't threatened when he pulled his weapon on the protesters. Don't you pay attention to the news??
No Moon Bat. He never said that. You are lying. The guy was on Fox last night saying he was threatened.
Pull your head out of your ass.
You think you can keep this thread going by posting lies and then doing denial when confronted?