Breaking — McCloskeys charged with felony by Kim Gardner…

[iceberg]

I don't see how she can get a conviction. They may have been way overly paranoid but that isn't illegal.

So if someone down the street from you was killed in mob violence recently and now, you have mob violence at your door, you gonna risk this is a nice mob that tore down your gate?

Those marching to the mayor's house were clear they meant no one harm. As I noted though, you can legally stand outside your house with a gun.

Yes, but you can't threaten others with a gun who are not threatening you.

You can stand there and tell people to stay off your property.

Right, and they will just leave, right?

By the way, what they were doing on the private property anyways?

I saw people marching to the mayor's house to protest in front of his house.

The mayor lived Blocks away the other direction

The protesters said they took the route they chose because the city had blocked streets.

So they break into a gated community that they did not have permission to be on to take a shortcut? That makes it fine and dandy, lil faun? 200 to 300 hundred angry SJWs that have already proven that they are prone to violence, the police given stand down orders to let this collection of human garbage to rampage sans consequences. Leftard pussbags like yourself seem to believe that they should huddle in their home and hope these thugs don't start ripping shit up and knocking out windows. I also heard the trash talking these alleged "peaceful protestors" were spewing. Vulgar, threatening and intimidating. It doesn't appear to me that these commie fucks were afraid in the slightest,....apprehensive because they are cowards at heart, but they were not "fearful". I wouldn't have shed a tear if McCloskey had emptied his entire arsenal on these thugs.

Let's see your evidence any one of those protesters committed any acts of violence before guns were pulled on them...

Let's see your evidence they threatened the McCloskey's before guns were pulled on them...

Let's see your evidence they trash talked the McCloskey's before guns were pulled on them...

Let's see your evidence they're commies...

You spout a lot of bullshit made up from the whole cloth spun from inside your deranged conspiratorial empty head.

Fuckface faun, an estimated crowd of 500 angry SJW thugs break down the gate of a secured, gated community that has been zoned as much, these fucks chant loudly, some of which are armed as they are walking down my street? I wouldn't feel the need to wait and see what their intentions were before I showed them that they better keep on moving their sorry asses down the road. If it means pointing a lock and loaded AR-15 with multiple magazines at the ready as I stand on my own property to insure that they realize that their bullshit, thuggish behavior will be met with some hollow-points to those empty skulls of theirs if they step on my property? So be it. They had no right to meander, threaten or attempt to intimidate this couple on their own property. These sorry sorry pieces of commie shit that trespass, vandalize and act like they own the place had the unmitigated galll to get their panties in a wad because someone stood up to them? That is hilarious and it shows what pussy snowflakes that they are.....my only regret is that the trash-talking wimps didn't get their knee-caps shot off. I can definitely understand how your tender, snowflake like heart was breaking at the mere thought of these marxist sacks of shit being put in their place.

(snicker)

BLM IS a commie front group, dipshit.......

BTW, in the urban dictionary "faun" is a sexualized pre-adolescent boy....certainly describes your mental capabilities. Only God knows what perversions you engage in. I bet the neighborhood kids give you a wide berth or at least they should.

(snicker)

My husband, attorney at law, says it's overreach and they'll walk. They have the Second behind them and Missouri stand your ground laws.

He also said Kim Gardner must have benefited from Affirmative Action because she's obviously not aware of either state law nor Constitutional law.

LOLOL

You idiot. They don't have a stand your ground defense. Stand your ground means you don't have to retreat when you feel threatened with death or serious physical harm. Mark McCloskey brandished his firearm before he felt threatened; thereby removing a required key element to stand your ground.

It’s his property why can’t he carry is weapon?

He can, he can sit on his porch chewing on a cigar cleaning his gun

Gardner won't win this

Yes, he can do that. Regrettably for him, that's not what he was doing. What he can't do is threaten someone with his gun who has not threatened him while committed a felony or was in the commission of committing a felony.

Listen up "Faun" get your law degree and then comment, you look as fucking stupid as Gardner

The couple have every goddamn right to defend life and property under Constitutional law and Missouri law.

That's just a fact, Twinkie

Now stop looking the fool you are, Gapped Ass

It's not my problem you're too rightarded to comprehend their guns were drawn before they were threatened.

Actually the rioters were on private property having illegally entered by breaking open a gate and threatening the security guard stationed there. Their being there itself posed a clear and present threat to which the occupants had every right and duty to respond.

They didn't break the gate to get in and there was no security guard stationed there. What the fuck is wrong with you rightatds? You all get your news from the same trough?

We’re you there?

LOLOL

You don't know what video is?? Don't they have videos in Russia?

So who broke thru the gate? Santa clause? Lol

In all probability, the protesters. But that occurred after the McClownskeys unlawful use of their guns.

Holding a gun on their property while a large group of ppl pass thru a private gate, Freddy to come on their property and kill their animals and kill them ? Huh

I can always tell when one is losing an argument. Like you they simply start making things up.

What did I make up? They were trespassing they previously burnt down locations in St. Louis.. hello

They threatened no one. Two legged or four.

These commie fucks were talking trash and THEN they came back after the McCloskeys had their guns illegally confiscated...unfortunately for the commie fucks, the McCloskeys hired private security while watching these temper tantrum throwing snowflakes hurl insults from their 2nd story balcony. I would have done the same thing the McCloskeys did but I would have stood there with a smile on my face and suggest to them that they move along and be quick about it because they were trespassing on PRIVATE property and I don't give a shit if these SJW snowflakes felt that they were entitled to do so.

Awe, were they upset that people came back to make fun of them? Do you suppose their feelings were hurt?

They need to shut up and spend their money on lawyers to fight this in court. That's how it's supposed to work, right?

according to the laws, no. they're supposed to be able to defend their property.

I haven't disagreed have I?

your key assertion is that they were simply walking by. minding their own business.

but you are leaving out:
- broken gate to get onto...
- private property. this was NOT a public sidewalk it was their front yard.
- entire night had mobs on TV for the last several nights of people/groups RIOTING, not protesting
- MO's laws make what they did 100% legal, the activities in St Louis the entire week made this 100% understandable.

at this point - ANY MOTHER FUCKING ASSHOLE defending the rioters is simply placing themselves on the side of violence to get what you want as being ok.

no one gives a shit about what you're trying to sell. peaceful protesters don't do what they did. EVEN IF they made a mistake somehow in going on their property - PEACEFUL PEOPLE even when a gun is pulled on them will apologize and state their PEACEFUL intent.

since that did not happen you're choosing to use the couples defense as an excuse for the rioters activities vs. place the responsibilities on the assholes out tearing shit up.

and what i find funny (aka, fucking stupid as shit but always expected from a dumbass) is that you fail at every measure to even acknowledge there are violent rioters out there destroying whatever they feel like.

so keep on. you are just telling people you are on the Marxist side these days.

No, my point is that the argument in the past is you shut up and fight things like this out in court. Why doesn't it apply here also?

Not every American that uses the their God-given right can afford a lawyer to fight frivolous charges.. are you trying to bankrupt people you disagree with?

The couple, are both lawyers....

So because they are lawyers charge them with a crime because they disagree with you? Ok Stalin lol

That's been the argument for a long time now. Again, what is the difference now?

What the fuck are you talking about.. arresting people based off of their class has been an argument?

Yes.

my argument has always been treat people equally lol you seriously want to attack people for working hard getting a good job?
do you on crack? Lol

These people are being treated exactly as others have argued for the treatment of others. If you are wrongly arrested and charged, shut up and fight it in court.

You just said we were arguing about class and we have been for a while.. can you respond to my post or you gonna continue to deflect what is this ping-pong Lol

I did. Because what we have here is a white upper class couple, others have claimed a different standard for them.

and what we have here is a refusal for another group to accept responsibility for their actions so they must demonize those who did not approve of their actions.

again. all your side does.

 

[pknopp]

I don't see how she can get a conviction. They may have been way overly paranoid but that isn't illegal.

So if someone down the street from you was killed in mob violence recently and now, you have mob violence at your door, you gonna risk this is a nice mob that tore down your gate?

Those marching to the mayor's house were clear they meant no one harm. As I noted though, you can legally stand outside your house with a gun.

Yes, but you can't threaten others with a gun who are not threatening you.

You can stand there and tell people to stay off your property.

Right, and they will just leave, right?

By the way, what they were doing on the private property anyways?

I saw people marching to the mayor's house to protest in front of his house.

The mayor lived Blocks away the other direction

The protesters said they took the route they chose because the city had blocked streets.

So they break into a gated community that they did not have permission to be on to take a shortcut? That makes it fine and dandy, lil faun? 200 to 300 hundred angry SJWs that have already proven that they are prone to violence, the police given stand down orders to let this collection of human garbage to rampage sans consequences. Leftard pussbags like yourself seem to believe that they should huddle in their home and hope these thugs don't start ripping shit up and knocking out windows. I also heard the trash talking these alleged "peaceful protestors" were spewing. Vulgar, threatening and intimidating. It doesn't appear to me that these commie fucks were afraid in the slightest,....apprehensive because they are cowards at heart, but they were not "fearful". I wouldn't have shed a tear if McCloskey had emptied his entire arsenal on these thugs.

Let's see your evidence any one of those protesters committed any acts of violence before guns were pulled on them...

Let's see your evidence they threatened the McCloskey's before guns were pulled on them...

Let's see your evidence they trash talked the McCloskey's before guns were pulled on them...

Let's see your evidence they're commies...

You spout a lot of bullshit made up from the whole cloth spun from inside your deranged conspiratorial empty head.

Fuckface faun, an estimated crowd of 500 angry SJW thugs break down the gate of a secured, gated community that has been zoned as much, these fucks chant loudly, some of which are armed as they are walking down my street? I wouldn't feel the need to wait and see what their intentions were before I showed them that they better keep on moving their sorry asses down the road. If it means pointing a lock and loaded AR-15 with multiple magazines at the ready as I stand on my own property to insure that they realize that their bullshit, thuggish behavior will be met with some hollow-points to those empty skulls of theirs if they step on my property? So be it. They had no right to meander, threaten or attempt to intimidate this couple on their own property. These sorry sorry pieces of commie shit that trespass, vandalize and act like they own the place had the unmitigated galll to get their panties in a wad because someone stood up to them? That is hilarious and it shows what pussy snowflakes that they are.....my only regret is that the trash-talking wimps didn't get their knee-caps shot off. I can definitely understand how your tender, snowflake like heart was breaking at the mere thought of these marxist sacks of shit being put in their place.

(snicker)

BLM IS a commie front group, dipshit.......

BTW, in the urban dictionary "faun" is a sexualized pre-adolescent boy....certainly describes your mental capabilities. Only God knows what perversions you engage in. I bet the neighborhood kids give you a wide berth or at least they should.

(snicker)

My husband, attorney at law, says it's overreach and they'll walk. They have the Second behind them and Missouri stand your ground laws.

He also said Kim Gardner must have benefited from Affirmative Action because she's obviously not aware of either state law nor Constitutional law.

LOLOL

You idiot. They don't have a stand your ground defense. Stand your ground means you don't have to retreat when you feel threatened with death or serious physical harm. Mark McCloskey brandished his firearm before he felt threatened; thereby removing a required key element to stand your ground.

It’s his property why can’t he carry is weapon?

He can, he can sit on his porch chewing on a cigar cleaning his gun

Gardner won't win this

Yes, he can do that. Regrettably for him, that's not what he was doing. What he can't do is threaten someone with his gun who has not threatened him while committed a felony or was in the commission of committing a felony.

Listen up "Faun" get your law degree and then comment, you look as fucking stupid as Gardner

The couple have every goddamn right to defend life and property under Constitutional law and Missouri law.

That's just a fact, Twinkie

Now stop looking the fool you are, Gapped Ass

It's not my problem you're too rightarded to comprehend their guns were drawn before they were threatened.

Actually the rioters were on private property having illegally entered by breaking open a gate and threatening the security guard stationed there. Their being there itself posed a clear and present threat to which the occupants had every right and duty to respond.

They didn't break the gate to get in and there was no security guard stationed there. What the fuck is wrong with you rightatds? You all get your news from the same trough?

We’re you there?

LOLOL

You don't know what video is?? Don't they have videos in Russia?

So who broke thru the gate? Santa clause? Lol

In all probability, the protesters. But that occurred after the McClownskeys unlawful use of their guns.

Holding a gun on their property while a large group of ppl pass thru a private gate, Freddy to come on their property and kill their animals and kill them ? Huh

I can always tell when one is losing an argument. Like you they simply start making things up.

What did I make up? They were trespassing they previously burnt down locations in St. Louis.. hello

They threatened no one. Two legged or four.

These commie fucks were talking trash and THEN they came back after the McCloskeys had their guns illegally confiscated...unfortunately for the commie fucks, the McCloskeys hired private security while watching these temper tantrum throwing snowflakes hurl insults from their 2nd story balcony. I would have done the same thing the McCloskeys did but I would have stood there with a smile on my face and suggest to them that they move along and be quick about it because they were trespassing on PRIVATE property and I don't give a shit if these SJW snowflakes felt that they were entitled to do so.

Awe, were they upset that people came back to make fun of them? Do you suppose their feelings were hurt?

They need to shut up and spend their money on lawyers to fight this in court. That's how it's supposed to work, right?

according to the laws, no. they're supposed to be able to defend their property.

I haven't disagreed have I?

your key assertion is that they were simply walking by. minding their own business.

but you are leaving out:
- broken gate to get onto...
- private property. this was NOT a public sidewalk it was their front yard.
- entire night had mobs on TV for the last several nights of people/groups RIOTING, not protesting
- MO's laws make what they did 100% legal, the activities in St Louis the entire week made this 100% understandable.

at this point - ANY MOTHER FUCKING ASSHOLE defending the rioters is simply placing themselves on the side of violence to get what you want as being ok.

no one gives a shit about what you're trying to sell. peaceful protesters don't do what they did. EVEN IF they made a mistake somehow in going on their property - PEACEFUL PEOPLE even when a gun is pulled on them will apologize and state their PEACEFUL intent.

since that did not happen you're choosing to use the couples defense as an excuse for the rioters activities vs. place the responsibilities on the assholes out tearing shit up.

and what i find funny (aka, fucking stupid as shit but always expected from a dumbass) is that you fail at every measure to even acknowledge there are violent rioters out there destroying whatever they feel like.

so keep on. you are just telling people you are on the Marxist side these days.

No, my point is that the argument in the past is you shut up and fight things like this out in court. Why doesn't it apply here also?

Not every American that uses the their God-given right can afford a lawyer to fight frivolous charges.. are you trying to bankrupt people you disagree with?

The couple, are both lawyers....

So because they are lawyers charge them with a crime because they disagree with you? Ok Stalin lol

That's been the argument for a long time now. Again, what is the difference now?

What the fuck are you talking about.. arresting people based off of their class has been an argument?

Yes.

my argument has always been treat people equally lol you seriously want to attack people for working hard getting a good job?
do you on crack? Lol

These people are being treated exactly as others have argued for the treatment of others. If you are wrongly arrested and charged, shut up and fight it in court.

You just said we were arguing about class and we have been for a while.. can you respond to my post or you gonna continue to deflect what is this ping-pong Lol

I did. Because what we have here is a white upper class couple, others have claimed a different standard for them.

and what we have here is a refusal for another group to accept responsibility for their actions so they must demonize those who did not approve of their actions.

again. all your side does.

My side? I said they had a right to arm themselves no matter how paranoid it was. My side is on people's rights.

 

[iceberg]

I don't see how she can get a conviction. They may have been way overly paranoid but that isn't illegal.

So if someone down the street from you was killed in mob violence recently and now, you have mob violence at your door, you gonna risk this is a nice mob that tore down your gate?

Those marching to the mayor's house were clear they meant no one harm. As I noted though, you can legally stand outside your house with a gun.

Yes, but you can't threaten others with a gun who are not threatening you.

You can stand there and tell people to stay off your property.

Right, and they will just leave, right?

By the way, what they were doing on the private property anyways?

I saw people marching to the mayor's house to protest in front of his house.

The mayor lived Blocks away the other direction

The protesters said they took the route they chose because the city had blocked streets.

So they break into a gated community that they did not have permission to be on to take a shortcut? That makes it fine and dandy, lil faun? 200 to 300 hundred angry SJWs that have already proven that they are prone to violence, the police given stand down orders to let this collection of human garbage to rampage sans consequences. Leftard pussbags like yourself seem to believe that they should huddle in their home and hope these thugs don't start ripping shit up and knocking out windows. I also heard the trash talking these alleged "peaceful protestors" were spewing. Vulgar, threatening and intimidating. It doesn't appear to me that these commie fucks were afraid in the slightest,....apprehensive because they are cowards at heart, but they were not "fearful". I wouldn't have shed a tear if McCloskey had emptied his entire arsenal on these thugs.

Let's see your evidence any one of those protesters committed any acts of violence before guns were pulled on them...

Let's see your evidence they threatened the McCloskey's before guns were pulled on them...

Let's see your evidence they trash talked the McCloskey's before guns were pulled on them...

Let's see your evidence they're commies...

You spout a lot of bullshit made up from the whole cloth spun from inside your deranged conspiratorial empty head.

Fuckface faun, an estimated crowd of 500 angry SJW thugs break down the gate of a secured, gated community that has been zoned as much, these fucks chant loudly, some of which are armed as they are walking down my street? I wouldn't feel the need to wait and see what their intentions were before I showed them that they better keep on moving their sorry asses down the road. If it means pointing a lock and loaded AR-15 with multiple magazines at the ready as I stand on my own property to insure that they realize that their bullshit, thuggish behavior will be met with some hollow-points to those empty skulls of theirs if they step on my property? So be it. They had no right to meander, threaten or attempt to intimidate this couple on their own property. These sorry sorry pieces of commie shit that trespass, vandalize and act like they own the place had the unmitigated galll to get their panties in a wad because someone stood up to them? That is hilarious and it shows what pussy snowflakes that they are.....my only regret is that the trash-talking wimps didn't get their knee-caps shot off. I can definitely understand how your tender, snowflake like heart was breaking at the mere thought of these marxist sacks of shit being put in their place.

(snicker)

BLM IS a commie front group, dipshit.......

BTW, in the urban dictionary "faun" is a sexualized pre-adolescent boy....certainly describes your mental capabilities. Only God knows what perversions you engage in. I bet the neighborhood kids give you a wide berth or at least they should.

(snicker)

My husband, attorney at law, says it's overreach and they'll walk. They have the Second behind them and Missouri stand your ground laws.

He also said Kim Gardner must have benefited from Affirmative Action because she's obviously not aware of either state law nor Constitutional law.

LOLOL

You idiot. They don't have a stand your ground defense. Stand your ground means you don't have to retreat when you feel threatened with death or serious physical harm. Mark McCloskey brandished his firearm before he felt threatened; thereby removing a required key element to stand your ground.

It’s his property why can’t he carry is weapon?

He can, he can sit on his porch chewing on a cigar cleaning his gun

Gardner won't win this

Yes, he can do that. Regrettably for him, that's not what he was doing. What he can't do is threaten someone with his gun who has not threatened him while committed a felony or was in the commission of committing a felony.

Listen up "Faun" get your law degree and then comment, you look as fucking stupid as Gardner

The couple have every goddamn right to defend life and property under Constitutional law and Missouri law.

That's just a fact, Twinkie

Now stop looking the fool you are, Gapped Ass

It's not my problem you're too rightarded to comprehend their guns were drawn before they were threatened.

Actually the rioters were on private property having illegally entered by breaking open a gate and threatening the security guard stationed there. Their being there itself posed a clear and present threat to which the occupants had every right and duty to respond.

They didn't break the gate to get in and there was no security guard stationed there. What the fuck is wrong with you rightatds? You all get your news from the same trough?

We’re you there?

LOLOL

You don't know what video is?? Don't they have videos in Russia?

So who broke thru the gate? Santa clause? Lol

In all probability, the protesters. But that occurred after the McClownskeys unlawful use of their guns.

Holding a gun on their property while a large group of ppl pass thru a private gate, Freddy to come on their property and kill their animals and kill them ? Huh

I can always tell when one is losing an argument. Like you they simply start making things up.

What did I make up? They were trespassing they previously burnt down locations in St. Louis.. hello

They threatened no one. Two legged or four.

These commie fucks were talking trash and THEN they came back after the McCloskeys had their guns illegally confiscated...unfortunately for the commie fucks, the McCloskeys hired private security while watching these temper tantrum throwing snowflakes hurl insults from their 2nd story balcony. I would have done the same thing the McCloskeys did but I would have stood there with a smile on my face and suggest to them that they move along and be quick about it because they were trespassing on PRIVATE property and I don't give a shit if these SJW snowflakes felt that they were entitled to do so.

Awe, were they upset that people came back to make fun of them? Do you suppose their feelings were hurt?

They need to shut up and spend their money on lawyers to fight this in court. That's how it's supposed to work, right?

according to the laws, no. they're supposed to be able to defend their property.

I haven't disagreed have I?

your key assertion is that they were simply walking by. minding their own business.

but you are leaving out:
- broken gate to get onto...
- private property. this was NOT a public sidewalk it was their front yard.
- entire night had mobs on TV for the last several nights of people/groups RIOTING, not protesting
- MO's laws make what they did 100% legal, the activities in St Louis the entire week made this 100% understandable.

at this point - ANY MOTHER FUCKING ASSHOLE defending the rioters is simply placing themselves on the side of violence to get what you want as being ok.

no one gives a shit about what you're trying to sell. peaceful protesters don't do what they did. EVEN IF they made a mistake somehow in going on their property - PEACEFUL PEOPLE even when a gun is pulled on them will apologize and state their PEACEFUL intent.

since that did not happen you're choosing to use the couples defense as an excuse for the rioters activities vs. place the responsibilities on the assholes out tearing shit up.

and what i find funny (aka, fucking stupid as shit but always expected from a dumbass) is that you fail at every measure to even acknowledge there are violent rioters out there destroying whatever they feel like.

so keep on. you are just telling people you are on the Marxist side these days.

No, my point is that the argument in the past is you shut up and fight things like this out in court. Why doesn't it apply here also?

Not every American that uses the their God-given right can afford a lawyer to fight frivolous charges.. are you trying to bankrupt people you disagree with?

The couple, are both lawyers....

So because they are lawyers charge them with a crime because they disagree with you? Ok Stalin lol

That's been the argument for a long time now. Again, what is the difference now?

What the fuck are you talking about.. arresting people based off of their class has been an argument?

Yes.

my argument has always been treat people equally lol you seriously want to attack people for working hard getting a good job?
do you on crack? Lol

These people are being treated exactly as others have argued for the treatment of others. If you are wrongly arrested and charged, shut up and fight it in court.

You just said we were arguing about class and we have been for a while.. can you respond to my post or you gonna continue to deflect what is this ping-pong Lol

I did. Because what we have here is a white upper class couple, others have claimed a different standard for them.

and what we have here is a refusal for another group to accept responsibility for their actions so they must demonize those who did not approve of their actions.

again. all your side does.

My side? I said they had a right to arm themselves no matter how paranoid it was. My side is on people's rights.

your side is full of shit and only cares about rights when they are YOUR rights directly.

 

[Shelzin]

I'm actually surprised they even bothered to start anything. I just can't see how this goes anywhere. These two explain:

 

[daveman]

I don't see how she can get a conviction. They may have been way overly paranoid but that isn't illegal.

So if someone down the street from you was killed in mob violence recently and now, you have mob violence at your door, you gonna risk this is a nice mob that tore down your gate?

Those marching to the mayor's house were clear they meant no one harm. As I noted though, you can legally stand outside your house with a gun.

Remember, kids, threatening to kill someone and destroying their property doesn't mean you wish them harm.

Clearly.

pknopp laughed at this post.

That says a great deal about him. And none of it complimentary.

I laughed because no one was threatened. Well, the homeowners weren't.

Yes, I understand that's what you were told to believe.

Was anyone harmed? Anyone?

Why are you moving the goalposts? Do you realize, perhaps, you're supporting criminals?

 

[KissMy]

Prosecutor framed the McCloskeys

 

[B. Kidd]

The mob trespassed!
The mob vandalized!
The mob made terroristic threats!

I hope they sue the ever living crap out of the city and the state!

 

[freyasman]

I don't see how she can get a conviction. They may have been way overly paranoid but that isn't illegal.

So if someone down the street from you was killed in mob violence recently and now, you have mob violence at your door, you gonna risk this is a nice mob that tore down your gate?

Those marching to the mayor's house were clear they meant no one harm. As I noted though, you can legally stand outside your house with a gun.

Yes, but you can't threaten others with a gun who are not threatening you.

You can stand there and tell people to stay off your property.

Right, and they will just leave, right?

By the way, what they were doing on the private property anyways?

I saw people marching to the mayor's house to protest in front of his house.

The mayor lived Blocks away the other direction

The protesters said they took the route they chose because the city had blocked streets.

So they break into a gated community that they did not have permission to be on to take a shortcut? That makes it fine and dandy, lil faun? 200 to 300 hundred angry SJWs that have already proven that they are prone to violence, the police given stand down orders to let this collection of human garbage to rampage sans consequences. Leftard pussbags like yourself seem to believe that they should huddle in their home and hope these thugs don't start ripping shit up and knocking out windows. I also heard the trash talking these alleged "peaceful protestors" were spewing. Vulgar, threatening and intimidating. It doesn't appear to me that these commie fucks were afraid in the slightest,....apprehensive because they are cowards at heart, but they were not "fearful". I wouldn't have shed a tear if McCloskey had emptied his entire arsenal on these thugs.

Let's see your evidence any one of those protesters committed any acts of violence before guns were pulled on them...

Let's see your evidence they threatened the McCloskey's before guns were pulled on them...

Let's see your evidence they trash talked the McCloskey's before guns were pulled on them...

Let's see your evidence they're commies...

You spout a lot of bullshit made up from the whole cloth spun from inside your deranged conspiratorial empty head.

Fuckface faun, an estimated crowd of 500 angry SJW thugs break down the gate of a secured, gated community that has been zoned as much, these fucks chant loudly, some of which are armed as they are walking down my street? I wouldn't feel the need to wait and see what their intentions were before I showed them that they better keep on moving their sorry asses down the road. If it means pointing a lock and loaded AR-15 with multiple magazines at the ready as I stand on my own property to insure that they realize that their bullshit, thuggish behavior will be met with some hollow-points to those empty skulls of theirs if they step on my property? So be it. They had no right to meander, threaten or attempt to intimidate this couple on their own property. These sorry sorry pieces of commie shit that trespass, vandalize and act like they own the place had the unmitigated galll to get their panties in a wad because someone stood up to them? That is hilarious and it shows what pussy snowflakes that they are.....my only regret is that the trash-talking wimps didn't get their knee-caps shot off. I can definitely understand how your tender, snowflake like heart was breaking at the mere thought of these marxist sacks of shit being put in their place.

(snicker)

BLM IS a commie front group, dipshit.......

BTW, in the urban dictionary "faun" is a sexualized pre-adolescent boy....certainly describes your mental capabilities. Only God knows what perversions you engage in. I bet the neighborhood kids give you a wide berth or at least they should.

(snicker)

My husband, attorney at law, says it's overreach and they'll walk. They have the Second behind them and Missouri stand your ground laws.

He also said Kim Gardner must have benefited from Affirmative Action because she's obviously not aware of either state law nor Constitutional law.

LOLOL

You idiot. They don't have a stand your ground defense. Stand your ground means you don't have to retreat when you feel threatened with death or serious physical harm. Mark McCloskey brandished his firearm before he felt threatened; thereby removing a required key element to stand your ground.

It’s his property why can’t he carry is weapon?

He can, he can sit on his porch chewing on a cigar cleaning his gun

Gardner won't win this

Yes, he can do that. Regrettably for him, that's not what he was doing. What he can't do is threaten someone with his gun who has not threatened him while committed a felony or was in the commission of committing a felony.

Listen up "Faun" get your law degree and then comment, you look as fucking stupid as Gardner

The couple have every goddamn right to defend life and property under Constitutional law and Missouri law.

That's just a fact, Twinkie

Now stop looking the fool you are, Gapped Ass

It's not my problem you're too rightarded to comprehend their guns were drawn before they were threatened.

Actually the rioters were on private property having illegally entered by breaking open a gate and threatening the security guard stationed there. Their being there itself posed a clear and present threat to which the occupants had every right and duty to respond.

They didn't break the gate to get in and there was no security guard stationed there. What the fuck is wrong with you rightatds? You all get your news from the same trough?

We’re you there?

LOLOL

You don't know what video is?? Don't they have videos in Russia?

So who broke thru the gate? Santa clause? Lol

In all probability, the protesters. But that occurred after the McClownskeys unlawful use of their guns.

Holding a gun on their property while a large group of ppl pass thru a private gate, Freddy to come on their property and kill their animals and kill them ? Huh

I can always tell when one is losing an argument. Like you they simply start making things up.

What did I make up? They were trespassing they previously burnt down locations in St. Louis.. hello

They threatened no one. Two legged or four.

These commie fucks were talking trash and THEN they came back after the McCloskeys had their guns illegally confiscated...unfortunately for the commie fucks, the McCloskeys hired private security while watching these temper tantrum throwing snowflakes hurl insults from their 2nd story balcony. I would have done the same thing the McCloskeys did but I would have stood there with a smile on my face and suggest to them that they move along and be quick about it because they were trespassing on PRIVATE property and I don't give a shit if these SJW snowflakes felt that they were entitled to do so.

Awe, were they upset that people came back to make fun of them? Do you suppose their feelings were hurt?

They need to shut up and spend their money on lawyers to fight this in court. That's how it's supposed to work, right?

according to the laws, no. they're supposed to be able to defend their property.

I haven't disagreed have I?

your key assertion is that they were simply walking by. minding their own business.

but you are leaving out:
- broken gate to get onto...
- private property. this was NOT a public sidewalk it was their front yard.
- entire night had mobs on TV for the last several nights of people/groups RIOTING, not protesting
- MO's laws make what they did 100% legal, the activities in St Louis the entire week made this 100% understandable.

at this point - ANY MOTHER FUCKING ASSHOLE defending the rioters is simply placing themselves on the side of violence to get what you want as being ok.

no one gives a shit about what you're trying to sell. peaceful protesters don't do what they did. EVEN IF they made a mistake somehow in going on their property - PEACEFUL PEOPLE even when a gun is pulled on them will apologize and state their PEACEFUL intent.

since that did not happen you're choosing to use the couples defense as an excuse for the rioters activities vs. place the responsibilities on the assholes out tearing shit up.

and what i find funny (aka, fucking stupid as shit but always expected from a dumbass) is that you fail at every measure to even acknowledge there are violent rioters out there destroying whatever they feel like.

so keep on. you are just telling people you are on the Marxist side these days.

No, my point is that the argument in the past is you shut up and fight things like this out in court. Why doesn't it apply here also?

Not every American that uses the their God-given right can afford a lawyer to fight frivolous charges.. are you trying to bankrupt people you disagree with?

The couple, are both lawyers....

So because they are lawyers charge them with a crime because they disagree with you? Ok Stalin lol

That's been the argument for a long time now. Again, what is the difference now?

What the fuck are you talking about.. arresting people based off of their class has been an argument?

Yes.

my argument has always been treat people equally lol you seriously want to attack people for working hard getting a good job?
do you on crack? Lol

These people are being treated exactly as others have argued for the treatment of others. If you are wrongly arrested and charged, shut up and fight it in court.

You just said we were arguing about class and we have been for a while.. can you respond to my post or you gonna continue to deflect what is this ping-pong Lol

I did. Because what we have here is a white upper class couple, others have claimed a different standard for them.

I pointed out, earlier in this thread, that if it had been the Klan on the property of a black couple, not only would there not have been any charges, there wouldn't have been the slightest bit of criticism of their actions........ and everyone knows it.


That seems like a different standard to me.

 

[iceberg]

I don't see how she can get a conviction. They may have been way overly paranoid but that isn't illegal.

So if someone down the street from you was killed in mob violence recently and now, you have mob violence at your door, you gonna risk this is a nice mob that tore down your gate?

Those marching to the mayor's house were clear they meant no one harm. As I noted though, you can legally stand outside your house with a gun.

Remember, kids, threatening to kill someone and destroying their property doesn't mean you wish them harm.

Clearly.

pknopp laughed at this post.

That says a great deal about him. And none of it complimentary.

I laughed because no one was threatened. Well, the homeowners weren't.

Yes, I understand that's what you were told to believe.

Was anyone harmed? Anyone?

Why are you moving the goalposts? Do you realize, perhaps, you're supporting criminals?

Well his question of course is no.

but was anyone else harmed that day?
tons. all over TV.
close to the couple?
yes, very.

now if they had not defended themselves and they attacked the couple, pknopp and others would simply find any excuse possible to say the couple brought it on themselves.

all they know.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Only in your Communist wet dreams is what they did illegal.

And of course, in the Legal Statute of the Law....

which legal statute? i suppose now the state is wrong for getting the case dismissed?

prove your point for one in your overall useless life.

what laws did they break. look them up and tell me specifically why they were broken. don't just scream they were, don't cite the bitch who went after them.

remove all and do your own legwork and explain to me with links which MO laws this couple broke.

bet ya $10 you can't do it.

Idiot.

565.056 Assault in the fourth degree​

​

565.056. 1. A person commits the offense of assault in the fourth degree if:​

​

(3) The person purposely places another person in apprehension of immediate physical injury;​

565.056 Assault in the fourth degree

565.056. 1. A person commits the offense of assault in the fourth degree if:

(3) The person purposely places another person in apprehension of immediate physical injury;

That sounds like what that angry mob did. When was anyone of the thug "protesters" in apprehension of immediate physical injury? They certainly didn't act like it.

 

[Shelzin]

Penelope... Watch the video?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I think we should execute that prosecutor and make an example out of her.

 

[Shelzin]

I think we should execute that prosecutor and make an example out of her.

Negative. It's already handled.

 

[Oddball]

I think we should execute that prosecutor and make an example out of her.

 

[9thIDdoc]

I don't see how she can get a conviction. They may have been way overly paranoid but that isn't illegal.

So if someone down the street from you was killed in mob violence recently and now, you have mob violence at your door, you gonna risk this is a nice mob that tore down your gate?

Those marching to the mayor's house were clear they meant no one harm. As I noted though, you can legally stand outside your house with a gun.

Yes, but you can't threaten others with a gun who are not threatening you.

You can stand there and tell people to stay off your property.

Right, and they will just leave, right?

By the way, what they were doing on the private property anyways?

I saw people marching to the mayor's house to protest in front of his house.

The mayor lived Blocks away the other direction

The protesters said they took the route they chose because the city had blocked streets.

So they break into a gated community that they did not have permission to be on to take a shortcut? That makes it fine and dandy, lil faun? 200 to 300 hundred angry SJWs that have already proven that they are prone to violence, the police given stand down orders to let this collection of human garbage to rampage sans consequences. Leftard pussbags like yourself seem to believe that they should huddle in their home and hope these thugs don't start ripping shit up and knocking out windows. I also heard the trash talking these alleged "peaceful protestors" were spewing. Vulgar, threatening and intimidating. It doesn't appear to me that these commie fucks were afraid in the slightest,....apprehensive because they are cowards at heart, but they were not "fearful". I wouldn't have shed a tear if McCloskey had emptied his entire arsenal on these thugs.

Let's see your evidence any one of those protesters committed any acts of violence before guns were pulled on them...

Let's see your evidence they threatened the McCloskey's before guns were pulled on them...

Let's see your evidence they trash talked the McCloskey's before guns were pulled on them...

Let's see your evidence they're commies...

You spout a lot of bullshit made up from the whole cloth spun from inside your deranged conspiratorial empty head.

Fuckface faun, an estimated crowd of 500 angry SJW thugs break down the gate of a secured, gated community that has been zoned as much, these fucks chant loudly, some of which are armed as they are walking down my street? I wouldn't feel the need to wait and see what their intentions were before I showed them that they better keep on moving their sorry asses down the road. If it means pointing a lock and loaded AR-15 with multiple magazines at the ready as I stand on my own property to insure that they realize that their bullshit, thuggish behavior will be met with some hollow-points to those empty skulls of theirs if they step on my property? So be it. They had no right to meander, threaten or attempt to intimidate this couple on their own property. These sorry sorry pieces of commie shit that trespass, vandalize and act like they own the place had the unmitigated galll to get their panties in a wad because someone stood up to them? That is hilarious and it shows what pussy snowflakes that they are.....my only regret is that the trash-talking wimps didn't get their knee-caps shot off. I can definitely understand how your tender, snowflake like heart was breaking at the mere thought of these marxist sacks of shit being put in their place.

(snicker)

BLM IS a commie front group, dipshit.......

BTW, in the urban dictionary "faun" is a sexualized pre-adolescent boy....certainly describes your mental capabilities. Only God knows what perversions you engage in. I bet the neighborhood kids give you a wide berth or at least they should.

(snicker)

My husband, attorney at law, says it's overreach and they'll walk. They have the Second behind them and Missouri stand your ground laws.

He also said Kim Gardner must have benefited from Affirmative Action because she's obviously not aware of either state law nor Constitutional law.

LOLOL

You idiot. They don't have a stand your ground defense. Stand your ground means you don't have to retreat when you feel threatened with death or serious physical harm. Mark McCloskey brandished his firearm before he felt threatened; thereby removing a required key element to stand your ground.

It’s his property why can’t he carry is weapon?

He can, he can sit on his porch chewing on a cigar cleaning his gun

Gardner won't win this

Yes, he can do that. Regrettably for him, that's not what he was doing. What he can't do is threaten someone with his gun who has not threatened him while committed a felony or was in the commission of committing a felony.

Listen up "Faun" get your law degree and then comment, you look as fucking stupid as Gardner

The couple have every goddamn right to defend life and property under Constitutional law and Missouri law.

That's just a fact, Twinkie

Now stop looking the fool you are, Gapped Ass

It's not my problem you're too rightarded to comprehend their guns were drawn before they were threatened.

Actually the rioters were on private property having illegally entered by breaking open a gate and threatening the security guard stationed there. Their being there itself posed a clear and present threat to which the occupants had every right and duty to respond.

They didn't break the gate to get in and there was no security guard stationed there. What the fuck is wrong with you rightatds? You all get your news from the same trough?

We’re you there?

LOLOL

You don't know what video is?? Don't they have videos in Russia?

So who broke thru the gate? Santa clause? Lol

In all probability, the protesters. But that occurred after the McClownskeys unlawful use of their guns.

Holding a gun on their property while a large group of ppl pass thru a private gate, Freddy to come on their property and kill their animals and kill them ? Huh

I can always tell when one is losing an argument. Like you they simply start making things up.

What did I make up? They were trespassing they previously burnt down locations in St. Louis.. hello

They threatened no one. Two legged or four.

These commie fucks were talking trash and THEN they came back after the McCloskeys had their guns illegally confiscated...unfortunately for the commie fucks, the McCloskeys hired private security while watching these temper tantrum throwing snowflakes hurl insults from their 2nd story balcony. I would have done the same thing the McCloskeys did but I would have stood there with a smile on my face and suggest to them that they move along and be quick about it because they were trespassing on PRIVATE property and I don't give a shit if these SJW snowflakes felt that they were entitled to do so.

Awe, were they upset that people came back to make fun of them? Do you suppose their feelings were hurt?

They need to shut up and spend their money on lawyers to fight this in court. That's how it's supposed to work, right?

according to the laws, no. they're supposed to be able to defend their property.

I haven't disagreed have I?

your key assertion is that they were simply walking by. minding their own business.

but you are leaving out:
- broken gate to get onto...
- private property. this was NOT a public sidewalk it was their front yard.
- entire night had mobs on TV for the last several nights of people/groups RIOTING, not protesting
- MO's laws make what they did 100% legal, the activities in St Louis the entire week made this 100% understandable.

at this point - ANY MOTHER FUCKING ASSHOLE defending the rioters is simply placing themselves on the side of violence to get what you want as being ok.

no one gives a shit about what you're trying to sell. peaceful protesters don't do what they did. EVEN IF they made a mistake somehow in going on their property - PEACEFUL PEOPLE even when a gun is pulled on them will apologize and state their PEACEFUL intent.

since that did not happen you're choosing to use the couples defense as an excuse for the rioters activities vs. place the responsibilities on the assholes out tearing shit up.

and what i find funny (aka, fucking stupid as shit but always expected from a dumbass) is that you fail at every measure to even acknowledge there are violent rioters out there destroying whatever they feel like.

so keep on. you are just telling people you are on the Marxist side these days.

No, my point is that the argument in the past is you shut up and fight things like this out in court. Why doesn't it apply here also?

Not every American that uses the their God-given right can afford a lawyer to fight frivolous charges.. are you trying to bankrupt people you disagree with?

The couple, are both lawyers....

So because they are lawyers charge them with a crime because they disagree with you? Ok Stalin lol

That's been the argument for a long time now. Again, what is the difference now?

What the fuck are you talking about.. arresting people based off of their class has been an argument?

Yes.

my argument has always been treat people equally lol you seriously want to attack people for working hard getting a good job?
do you on crack? Lol

These people are being treated exactly as others have argued for the treatment of others. If you are wrongly arrested and charged, shut up and fight it in court.

You just said we were arguing about class and we have been for a while.. can you respond to my post or you gonna continue to deflect what is this ping-pong Lol

I did. Because what we have here is a white upper class couple, others have claimed a different standard for them.

I pointed out, earlier in this thread, that if it had been the Klan on the property of a black couple, not only would there not have been any charges, there wouldn't have been the slightest bit of criticism of their actions........ and everyone knows it.


That seems like a different standard to me.

Also a different time. These days the KKK is way more fiction than fact.

 

[pknopp]

I don't see how she can get a conviction. They may have been way overly paranoid but that isn't illegal.

So if someone down the street from you was killed in mob violence recently and now, you have mob violence at your door, you gonna risk this is a nice mob that tore down your gate?

Those marching to the mayor's house were clear they meant no one harm. As I noted though, you can legally stand outside your house with a gun.

Remember, kids, threatening to kill someone and destroying their property doesn't mean you wish them harm.

Clearly.

pknopp laughed at this post.

That says a great deal about him. And none of it complimentary.

I laughed because no one was threatened. Well, the homeowners weren't.

Yes, I understand that's what you were told to believe.

Was anyone harmed? Anyone?

Why are you moving the goalposts? Do you realize, perhaps, you're supporting criminals?

I'm not going to get all upset on trespassing when you consider what the protests are over.

 

[pknopp]

I don't see how she can get a conviction. They may have been way overly paranoid but that isn't illegal.

So if someone down the street from you was killed in mob violence recently and now, you have mob violence at your door, you gonna risk this is a nice mob that tore down your gate?

Those marching to the mayor's house were clear they meant no one harm. As I noted though, you can legally stand outside your house with a gun.

Yes, but you can't threaten others with a gun who are not threatening you.

You can stand there and tell people to stay off your property.

Right, and they will just leave, right?

By the way, what they were doing on the private property anyways?

I saw people marching to the mayor's house to protest in front of his house.

The mayor lived Blocks away the other direction

The protesters said they took the route they chose because the city had blocked streets.

So they break into a gated community that they did not have permission to be on to take a shortcut? That makes it fine and dandy, lil faun? 200 to 300 hundred angry SJWs that have already proven that they are prone to violence, the police given stand down orders to let this collection of human garbage to rampage sans consequences. Leftard pussbags like yourself seem to believe that they should huddle in their home and hope these thugs don't start ripping shit up and knocking out windows. I also heard the trash talking these alleged "peaceful protestors" were spewing. Vulgar, threatening and intimidating. It doesn't appear to me that these commie fucks were afraid in the slightest,....apprehensive because they are cowards at heart, but they were not "fearful". I wouldn't have shed a tear if McCloskey had emptied his entire arsenal on these thugs.

Let's see your evidence any one of those protesters committed any acts of violence before guns were pulled on them...

Let's see your evidence they threatened the McCloskey's before guns were pulled on them...

Let's see your evidence they trash talked the McCloskey's before guns were pulled on them...

Let's see your evidence they're commies...

You spout a lot of bullshit made up from the whole cloth spun from inside your deranged conspiratorial empty head.

Fuckface faun, an estimated crowd of 500 angry SJW thugs break down the gate of a secured, gated community that has been zoned as much, these fucks chant loudly, some of which are armed as they are walking down my street? I wouldn't feel the need to wait and see what their intentions were before I showed them that they better keep on moving their sorry asses down the road. If it means pointing a lock and loaded AR-15 with multiple magazines at the ready as I stand on my own property to insure that they realize that their bullshit, thuggish behavior will be met with some hollow-points to those empty skulls of theirs if they step on my property? So be it. They had no right to meander, threaten or attempt to intimidate this couple on their own property. These sorry sorry pieces of commie shit that trespass, vandalize and act like they own the place had the unmitigated galll to get their panties in a wad because someone stood up to them? That is hilarious and it shows what pussy snowflakes that they are.....my only regret is that the trash-talking wimps didn't get their knee-caps shot off. I can definitely understand how your tender, snowflake like heart was breaking at the mere thought of these marxist sacks of shit being put in their place.

(snicker)

BLM IS a commie front group, dipshit.......

BTW, in the urban dictionary "faun" is a sexualized pre-adolescent boy....certainly describes your mental capabilities. Only God knows what perversions you engage in. I bet the neighborhood kids give you a wide berth or at least they should.

(snicker)

My husband, attorney at law, says it's overreach and they'll walk. They have the Second behind them and Missouri stand your ground laws.

He also said Kim Gardner must have benefited from Affirmative Action because she's obviously not aware of either state law nor Constitutional law.

LOLOL

You idiot. They don't have a stand your ground defense. Stand your ground means you don't have to retreat when you feel threatened with death or serious physical harm. Mark McCloskey brandished his firearm before he felt threatened; thereby removing a required key element to stand your ground.

It’s his property why can’t he carry is weapon?

He can, he can sit on his porch chewing on a cigar cleaning his gun

Gardner won't win this

Yes, he can do that. Regrettably for him, that's not what he was doing. What he can't do is threaten someone with his gun who has not threatened him while committed a felony or was in the commission of committing a felony.

Listen up "Faun" get your law degree and then comment, you look as fucking stupid as Gardner

The couple have every goddamn right to defend life and property under Constitutional law and Missouri law.

That's just a fact, Twinkie

Now stop looking the fool you are, Gapped Ass

It's not my problem you're too rightarded to comprehend their guns were drawn before they were threatened.

Actually the rioters were on private property having illegally entered by breaking open a gate and threatening the security guard stationed there. Their being there itself posed a clear and present threat to which the occupants had every right and duty to respond.

They didn't break the gate to get in and there was no security guard stationed there. What the fuck is wrong with you rightatds? You all get your news from the same trough?

We’re you there?

LOLOL

You don't know what video is?? Don't they have videos in Russia?

So who broke thru the gate? Santa clause? Lol

In all probability, the protesters. But that occurred after the McClownskeys unlawful use of their guns.

Holding a gun on their property while a large group of ppl pass thru a private gate, Freddy to come on their property and kill their animals and kill them ? Huh

I can always tell when one is losing an argument. Like you they simply start making things up.

What did I make up? They were trespassing they previously burnt down locations in St. Louis.. hello

They threatened no one. Two legged or four.

These commie fucks were talking trash and THEN they came back after the McCloskeys had their guns illegally confiscated...unfortunately for the commie fucks, the McCloskeys hired private security while watching these temper tantrum throwing snowflakes hurl insults from their 2nd story balcony. I would have done the same thing the McCloskeys did but I would have stood there with a smile on my face and suggest to them that they move along and be quick about it because they were trespassing on PRIVATE property and I don't give a shit if these SJW snowflakes felt that they were entitled to do so.

Awe, were they upset that people came back to make fun of them? Do you suppose their feelings were hurt?

They need to shut up and spend their money on lawyers to fight this in court. That's how it's supposed to work, right?

according to the laws, no. they're supposed to be able to defend their property.

I haven't disagreed have I?

your key assertion is that they were simply walking by. minding their own business.

but you are leaving out:
- broken gate to get onto...
- private property. this was NOT a public sidewalk it was their front yard.
- entire night had mobs on TV for the last several nights of people/groups RIOTING, not protesting
- MO's laws make what they did 100% legal, the activities in St Louis the entire week made this 100% understandable.

at this point - ANY MOTHER FUCKING ASSHOLE defending the rioters is simply placing themselves on the side of violence to get what you want as being ok.

no one gives a shit about what you're trying to sell. peaceful protesters don't do what they did. EVEN IF they made a mistake somehow in going on their property - PEACEFUL PEOPLE even when a gun is pulled on them will apologize and state their PEACEFUL intent.

since that did not happen you're choosing to use the couples defense as an excuse for the rioters activities vs. place the responsibilities on the assholes out tearing shit up.

and what i find funny (aka, fucking stupid as shit but always expected from a dumbass) is that you fail at every measure to even acknowledge there are violent rioters out there destroying whatever they feel like.

so keep on. you are just telling people you are on the Marxist side these days.

No, my point is that the argument in the past is you shut up and fight things like this out in court. Why doesn't it apply here also?

Not every American that uses the their God-given right can afford a lawyer to fight frivolous charges.. are you trying to bankrupt people you disagree with?

The couple, are both lawyers....

So because they are lawyers charge them with a crime because they disagree with you? Ok Stalin lol

That's been the argument for a long time now. Again, what is the difference now?

What the fuck are you talking about.. arresting people based off of their class has been an argument?

Yes.

my argument has always been treat people equally lol you seriously want to attack people for working hard getting a good job?
do you on crack? Lol

These people are being treated exactly as others have argued for the treatment of others. If you are wrongly arrested and charged, shut up and fight it in court.

You just said we were arguing about class and we have been for a while.. can you respond to my post or you gonna continue to deflect what is this ping-pong Lol

I did. Because what we have here is a white upper class couple, others have claimed a different standard for them.

I pointed out, earlier in this thread, that if it had been the Klan on the property of a black couple, not only would there not have been any charges, there wouldn't have been the slightest bit of criticism of their actions........ and everyone knows it.


That seems like a different standard to me.

OK....and I said there might not have. So why repeat it? See, I don't support double standards.

 

[meaner gene]

565.056 Assault in the fourth degree

565.056. 1. A person commits the offense of assault in the fourth degree if:

(3) The person purposely places another person in apprehension of immediate physical injury;

That sounds like what that angry mob did. When was anyone of the thug "protesters" in apprehension of immediate physical injury? They certainly didn't act like it.

When were the protesters in apprehension of immediate physical injury?

When two crazy people pointed loaded guns at them.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I think we should execute that prosecutor and make an example out of her.

View attachment 366161

When in Rome.... (or Soviet Moscow, as we have become).

 

[Oddball]

I think we should execute that prosecutor and make an example out of her.

View attachment 366161

When in Rome.... (or Soviet Moscow, as we have become).

....or Santiago.