Civil Disobedience

Conservatives should start having a Rosa Parks moment.

Problem is, the media will never cover it.

But if done in mass, across the board, then they have a real problem.

Spend no money. Give no charity. Stop running the trucks. Sick outs.
 
Definitely not. Replacing Biden makes things better for Trump and Americans.

Tbh, the Democrats can't put up anyone electable after the things they've done, so they're fucked.
That's it.

The only one I thought was competitive was Michelle O. They are DESPERATELY trying to make Lamaka into her, but it's not working. And it won't work
 
We can do it just but do it legally just by playing by their rules they've put in place. As President Trump urged everybody, vote early, vote by mail, use a drop box, whatever means you have to vote. Gather up legal votes from those who might not make it to the polls and mail those for them. (Break up trips to the post office though so you don't get tagged for ballot harvesting.)

Also we need to stop concentrating all our attention on Kamala's dismal record as Border Czar and go down the line to get her positions on everything out there from 'Doing away with private insurance and going to Medicare for all' to her approving unacceptable curriculum/indoctrination in schools, to her open border policies, her opposition to school choice, her raise taxes on everybody, leniency or non prosecution of criminals altogether, free college for all, student loan forgiveness, all in on the Green New Deal, etc. etc. etc.

All of that.

Also.

It's not illegal for cops to all call out sick, or any "civil service" employee. To pull our charitable giving. To go no spending for days at a time.

Leftists make all the noise but generally we are the backbone of this nation. Leftists know it and that's why threads like this scare the pants off them.
 
It isn’t the sure Trump victory it was when the scenario was Trump vs Biden

Trump is still the front runner, but the race has tightened dramatically and I think everyone’s been surprised by the energizing effect Harris has had so far. And she still has the post-convention bump to look forward to

The only reason republicans are bitching is because this isn’t turning out to be the easy race that it appeared it was gonna be.

Again that is just not true.

It's the "take your ball and go home" mentality. But I guess you love that, so good on you I guess.
 
The polling has barely begun on her. You referring to snap polls that are too early in process.

And remember that the Democratic Convention is still coming.

By the Dem convention you could all very well be in chaos AGAIN. Because Malaka won't put up great numbers vs. Trump and the flop sweat will be flowing. So now what?
 
I have zero idea what you are rambling on about.
Reading some of your other responses on this post, it looks like buyer's remorse.
That's your own fault. You had a chance to throw your support behind Nikki Haley and refused to do so.
Now you're stuck with the old man and his made-by-a-billionaire marionette. :)

I don't care about the candidates. I DO care about the fact that about half of my fellow Americans are okay when the Big Party Guys just pull their democratically nominated candidate because he's not winning.

That's why we will and must split. Your view are patently un-American, period.
 
Okay, so we have an American future where the people vote in the primaries, but the Back Room Dealers say nah, we don't like that, here's OUR candidate.

And you're fine with that. The entire nation run by parties.

okay you. But not me.
No party is obligated to have any sort of primary whatsoever. The parties are free to choose their own nomination process. It is not a legally binding or constitutional process, like the actual election is.

Everything the DNC has done is 100% within its own rules.

In living memory, there have been several brokered conventions where candidates were nominated by acclimation.
 
No party is obligated to have any sort of primary whatsoever. The parties are free to choose their own nomination process. It is not a legally binding or constitutional process, like the actual election is.

Everything the DNC has done is 100% within its own rules.

In living memory, there have been several brokered conventions where candidates were nominated by acclimation.

They're not obligated, but their people voted and they don't care. Note: many, many Republicans H-A-T-E-D Trump in 2016 but they didn't pull him out. They respected the wishes of the people.

Learn. The. Difference.
 
They're not obligated, but their people voted and they don't care. Note: many, many Republicans H-A-T-E-D Trump in 2016 but they didn't pull him out. They respected the wishes of the people.

Learn. The. Difference.
The wishes of the people ?

The democratic base has made it absolutely crystal clear that they’re glad Biden dropped out of the upcoming race.

Jesus Christ….
 
Biden withdrew because his performance in the debate made it clear he was declining mentally and physically
He was not forced out. He was the only one who could make that decision. He put the needs of the country over his personal ambitions

You are being overly dramatic….hardly meets the threshold of Civil Disobedience
Biden was FORCED out. There was nothing voluntary about it. Add to that the incessant lying by your party claiming that he was the best ever, and you people just look like the lying twits that you truly are.
 
The wishes of the people ?

The democratic base has made it absolutely crystal clear that they’re glad Biden dropped out of the upcoming race.

Jesus Christ….

How? How did they "make it clear"? polls? Op-eds? Journal entries?

Are those things part of the democratic process they pretend to love?
 
The tactic the Elite Dems pulled with Biden because he wasn't going to win is a form of civil disobedience. They had their candidate. The primary voters selected him. They pulled him because he wasn't going to win.

So, IF (and it's a big IF) Harris wins in the fall:

Conservatives, it's time to start thinking of civil disobedience of our own. The Leftists know, and we do too, that this nation doesn't run without us.
Unless she has some kind of "conversion", I don't see her beating Trump.

It just seems supremely stupid to go through all the trouble of reversing the nomination of Biden, which they forced through in the first place - and not choose someone who could actually beat Trump.

If she's backs off the woke crap, makes meaningful proposals for getting the border under control, and otherwise isn't pushing socialism, she might be able to overcome Trump's momentum. But I think they'd been much better off with one of the more moderate governors. I really think that a candidate who isn't after a lot of radical change would be appealing.

Someone who promises not to outlaw abortion AND swears off trying to socialize health care. Someone who offers a plan to streamline the process of Mexicans coming here, legally, to work AND recognizes that the southern states have been "taking one for the team" with regard to the illegal immigration. Someone who can hear the concerns of all sides and give them due respect, both rhetorically and in policy.

Ok - so I drifted into fantasy. Sue me. I'll probably stay home and tie one on for election day.
 
I don't care about the candidates. I DO care about the fact that about half of my fellow Americans are okay when the Big Party Guys just pull their democratically nominated candidate because he's not winning.

That's why we will and must split. Your view are patently un-American, period.
So why does that bother you? Why should it? The nominee decided to pull out of the race. He made the decision. Had he decided otherwise, there would have been squat people could have done about it.
But after the debate performance and the aftermath, he saw the writing on the wall. For four years I've been watching you post your rants about Biden's "dementia". And now you're upset because he did what
was best for his country....and his party? And his replacement (who has the support of enough delegates for the nomination), is turning out to be a more formidable opponent than your man and his people bargained for?

Sounds like sour milk to me. You're stuck with this old man and his milquetoast, Dan Quayle knock off. :)
There will be no split. If you don't like things..leave. You start a Go Fund Me for the plane tickets....I'll kick in.
 
Biden was FORCED out. There was nothing voluntary about it. Add to that the incessant lying by your party claiming that he was the best ever, and you people just look like the lying twits that you truly are.
If he was forced out he would have been gone the day after the debate
Biden was given a chance to evaluate a second term and decided against it

If Biden wanted to stay, he would still be in the race
Nothing Democrats could do. He had the delegates
 
Unless she has some kind of "conversion", I don't see her beating Trump.

It just seems supremely stupid to go through all the trouble of reversing the nomination of Biden, which they forced through in the first place - and not choose someone who could actually beat Trump.

If she's backs off the woke crap, makes meaningful proposals for getting the border under control, and otherwise isn't pushing socialism, she might be able to overcome Trump's momentum. But I think they'd been much better off with one of the more moderate governors. I really think that a candidate who isn't after a lot of radical change would be appealing.

Someone who promises not to outlaw abortion AND swears off trying to socialize health care. Someone who offers a plan to streamline the process of Mexicans coming here, legally, to work AND recognizes that the southern states have been "taking one for the team" with regard to the illegal immigration. Someone who can hear the concerns of all sides and give them due respect, both rhetorically and in policy.

Ok - so I drifted into fantasy. Sue me. I'll probably stay home and tie one on for election day.

This, yes.

They're trying to gaslight us into the fact that Lamaka is Michelle O, but she is clearly not. She has extreme, unpopular opinions and is wholly unlikable.
 
So why does that bother you? Why should it? The nominee decided to pull out of the race. He made the decision. Had he decided otherwise, there would have been squat people could have done about it.
But after the debate performance and the aftermath, he saw the writing on the wall. For four years I've been watching you post your rants about Biden's "dementia". And now you're upset because he did what
was best for his country....and his party? And his replacement (who has the support of enough delegates for the nomination), is turning out to be a more formidable opponent than your man and his people bargained for?

Sounds like sour milk to me. You're stuck with this old man and his milquetoast, Dan Quayle knock off. :)
There will be no split. If you don't like things..leave. You start a Go Fund Me for the plane tickets....I'll kick in.

Your party loved him until you could not longer gaslight the people well enough.

You lick their boots.

That's a YOU problem, not a ME problem
 

Forum List

Back
Top