excalibur
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2015
- 20,114
- 38,782
Rudy should have been indicted years ago for his false claims
Yeah, as usual for you, you hate the First Amendment.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rudy should have been indicted years ago for his false claims
I am not the dope here.I deny that "questioning" is a chargeable offense. It is hype, just like "collusion", not a chargeable offense. Don't be a dope.
Fake News.. That would be a 1st Amendment violation.
What law? Cite the specific statute.Break the law...get charged.
It sure will. The cover up is never ending because the massive fraud really took place. But anyone with a brain knows that. If they wish to be a lying hack and deny it they should explain why challenging an election is criminal in anyway shape or form.
I think you might br right. He has and is moving at a snails pace. He should have indicted the Trump gang months ago.Demweasal Garland continues to give the middle finger to the American people. He is a disgrace to the country and should be removed, not just impeached.
Yesterday, the guy who allegedly received 81 million votes, wandered off a set during an interview.
If questioning, even protesting the 2020 election is a crime, Garland is going to have to indict an awful lot of people:This is nuts! Questioning the stolen election isn't a crime. It's a 1st Amendment issue. This is prosecutorial misconduct what Smith and Garland are doing.
![]()
Just In: Dirty Jack Smith and Biden's DOJ Is Set to Indict Rudy Giuliani and Fellow Trump Attorneys for Questioning Stolen 2020 Election | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Just as more and more criminal conduct is revealed against Joe Biden and the Biden Crime Family, including likely treasonous acts, the DOJ springs into action and leaks that they are going to indict Trump’s attorneys and add more bogus charges against President Trump.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Questions do not hurt a democracy. What a dumb thing to say.You know, I am going to fall back on this one. If is JUST questioning the election he can do that, even though he knows he is lying and harming the democracy. But I bet there is more to the story.
The constant complaints of fraudulent elections, with out evidence, harms our democracy.Questions do not hurt a democracy. What a dumb thing to say.
Impeachment and disbarring bothThis is nuts! Questioning the stolen election isn't a crime. It's a 1st Amendment issue. This is prosecutorial misconduct what Smith and Garland are doing.
![]()
Just In: Dirty Jack Smith and Biden's DOJ Is Set to Indict Rudy Giuliani and Fellow Trump Attorneys for Questioning Stolen 2020 Election | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Just as more and more criminal conduct is revealed against Joe Biden and the Biden Crime Family, including likely treasonous acts, the DOJ springs into action and leaks that they are going to indict Trump’s attorneys and add more bogus charges against President Trump.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Use your sober voice.Impeachment and disbarring both
Leftists harm republicsThe constant complaints of fraudulent elections, with out evidence, harms our democracy.
This is a clear and cut case of abuse of powerUse your sober voice.
There is plenty of evidence. 3 states tried to decertify their elections. The massive percentages for Biden in late night ballot drops have never been explained. Election history also tells us any incumbent that gets more votes than his first election simply does not lose.The constant complaints of fraudulent elections, with out evidence, harms our democracy.
No. Just no. Not 1 court case, oh except where the republican observer got to stand a bit closer, Trump and cult did not win a single court case. Massive and obvious? Come on. Really?There is plenty of evidence. 3 states tried to decertify their elections. The massive percentages for Biden in late night ballot drops have never been explained. Election history also tells us any incumbent that gets more votes than his first election simply does not lose.
The fraud was massive and obvious. The censorship that followed was just an admission of guilt. Are you really as stupid as you sound?
No. Just no. Not 1 court case, oh except where the republican observer got to stand a bit closer, Trump and cult did not win a single court case. Massive and obvious? Come on. Really?
Be honest - and a good deal of Republicans.If lying was against the law, then every Democrat in Congress would be in prison.
Literally. Just copy and paste from a MAGA site and spread it around the internet as quickly as possible.The OP can only process what the fake news Gateway Pundit and Pravda tells him/her.