Breaking: National Archives Acknowledges a Whopping 5,400 Biden Pseudonym Emails -- Faces Lawsuit for their Release

[Rawley]

Okay. Bribery.
What was the thing of value they were promising?

Access to the Vice President of the United States

 

[Marener]

Access to the Vice President of the United States

The thing of value is what is promised to the Bidens.

Joe Biden would have to return with an official act.

So you have not given us the thing of value and no official act.

What are they?

 

[progressive hunter]

Did the State Dept officials recant their testimony where they said they were the ones who wanted Shokin removed?

I havent seen proof they told the truth,, and none from the rest of the international community,,

what proof I did see was the documents proving there were at least 12 open investigations or burisma that the prosecutor was trying get more evidence on when he was fired,,

 

[progressive hunter]

The thing of value is what is promised to the Bidens.

Joe Biden would have to return with an official act.

So you have not given us the thing of value and no official act.

What are they?

the firing of the prsecutor along with joe providing transportaion and access for hunter to sign business deals,,

 

[sartre play]

So the National Archives are "in on it", right, cultist?

LOL

Is there ANY government agency that your party is not willing to tear down & call dishonest.? National Archives now!
Do you realize the damage being done in the name of party over country?

 

[Rawley]

The thing of value is what is promised to the Bidens.

$$$$$$$ We've traced over $20,000,000 so far

Joe Biden would have to return with an official act.

No he doesn't. He can fuck over his business partners and not perform and it's still illegal.

So you have not given us the thing of value and no official act.

What are they?

 

[Rawley]

Is there ANY government agency that your party is not willing to tear down & call dishonest.? National Archives now!
Do you realize the damage being done in the name of party over country?

And who said Democrats can't do irony.

 

[Marener]

No he doesn't. He can fuck over his business partners and not perform and it's still illegal.

He has to at the very least agree to perform an official act in exchange for the money. That’s required by the law.

18 USC 201 b(2)

 

[Marener]

the firing of the prsecutor along with joe providing transportaion and access for hunter to sign business deals,,

Where is the evidence that Joe agreed to fire the prosecutor in exchange for money?

 

[progressive hunter]

Where is the evidence that Joe agreed to fire the prosecutor in exchange for money?

the series of events prove it,,

 

[Nostra]

Where is the evidence that Joe agreed to fire the prosecutor in exchange for money?

Cult gonna cult.

 

[Marener]

the series of events prove it,,

How?

 

[Rawley]

He has to at the very least agree to perform an official act in exchange for the money. That’s required by the law.

18 USC 201 b(2)

$20,000,000 given to a crackhead in the throes of his addiction is a pretty good indication that there was an agreement that something would be given in return.

 

[Rawley]

Where is the evidence that Joe agreed to fire the prosecutor in exchange for money?

He fired Shokin and they got $$$$

 

[progressive hunter]

How?

its self explanatory

 

[Nostra]

He has to at the very least agree to perform an official act in exchange for the money. That’s required by the law.

18 USC 201 b(2)

China gave the Biden Crime Family money, Biden let China fly a spy balloon over out nuke sites and military installations for two weeks and did nothing.

Next?

 

[Marener]

its self explanatory

So you lied.

 

[Marener]

China gave the Biden Crime Family money, Biden let China fly a spy balloon over out nuke sites and military installations for two weeks and did nothing.

Next?

Do you think that there was an agreement between China and Biden to let the balloon fly over Montana in exchange for money?

 

[progressive hunter]

So you lied.

thats your forte not mine,,

I posted all the evidence several times,,

 

[Marener]

$20,000,000 given to a crackhead in the throes of his addiction is a pretty good indication that there was an agreement that something would be given in return.

It’s not. You need actual evidence.