Doc7505
Diamond Member
- Feb 16, 2016
- 16,500
- 29,354
~~~~~~If it’s no big deal…why doctor it?
Correct. By doctoring the tape, the DoJ Special Counsel has made them biased and nullifies the statement.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
~~~~~~If it’s no big deal…why doctor it?
This is evidence tampering no matter what. It's shades of Kevin Clinesmith, remember him and what he did?
Smith once had his convictions overruled by SCOTUS. The guy is a 2nd rate investigator.
This is evidence tampering no matter what. It's shades of Kevin Clinesmith, remember him and what he did?
The digital recording was obviously edited. There is no 'tape.'I spent part of my posting day trying to convince some libtards that the words, alone, don’t matter. I argued that it requires “context!”
But I had not yet entertained even the first glimmer of a thought that the transcript might not match the audiotapes.
If that’s the case, then simply taking the words out of context pales in comparison.